Technology

World’s Thinnest OLED TV for Its Size Receives Strong Accolades From Tech Crowd

On Tuesday at the 2012 Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics showed off a 55-inch TV. So, what’s so special about that? Well, it’s only 4 millimeters thick — one-sixth of an inch — making it the largest of the thinnest TVs in the world, according to Samsung.

Samsung Debuts the Largest, Worlds Thinnest OLED TV at CES

Width of Samsung's "Super" OLED TV. (Photo: Engadget)

The TV uses organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), not the usual plasma or liquid crystals. Watch The Associated Press coverage of the unveiling:

A tech update for TV screens has been a long time coming and here is what some of the expert sites are saying about it:

  • Digital Trends described the TV as “pretty impressive” at least from 75 feet away.
  • David Katzmaier for CNE T said that it will outperform any other OLED TV on the market, which is an 11-inch one by Sony. At the Time of Sony’s 2007 introduction of the less-than-a-foot TV, Katzmaier described it as “delivered the deepest black levels I’ve seen to this day” but noted there were other color accuracy issues. He states he would need more face time with the Samsung version to confirm those same issues do not exist.
  • Trusted Reviews also said the glimpse of the TV was brief, but from what they saw, it “immediately impressed.”
  • Engadget states it is “pretty darn amazing to behold.”

Watch more of Engadget’s review from the show:

OLED technology is used in high-end smartphones, but it has been very difficult to make larger screens with consistent results. In 2007, Sony Corp. started selling an 11-inch OLED TV for about $2,500, but it never followed it up with a bigger model. Since then, LG and Samsung have shown prototype OLED TVs at the annual CES show, but hadn’t revealed any marketing plans until this week.

While Samsung and LG didn’t state a price for the TV that will be available sometime this year, expect the sets to cost more than $5,000 each. It’ll take at least a few years for prices to come down enough for most people.

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Comments (70)

  • CleanUpAisle2013
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:22am

    Now that you see how thin they are … enjoy watching this:

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-17852_3-57354456-71/the-smartest-flat-screen-thief-ever/?tag=mncol;1n

    Report Post » CleanUpAisle2013  
    • Kaoscontrol
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 7:08pm

      Fun commercial.
      At $5000, the OLED TV seems like it’s just a way overpriced, 55 inch iPad.

      Report Post » Kaoscontrol  
    • IMPEACHBHO
      Posted on January 13, 2012 at 5:12pm

      Yep, and it won’t fit in your Volt that costs 250,000 apiece to build. Now we know what they mean by “green”

      Report Post » IMPEACHBHO  
  • RightThinking1
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:54am

    We still use an early 90′s 27″ Sony Trinitron. The thing won’t die. I feel mixed emotions about it. The picture quality still amazes me, and it is not as though I don‘t browse the banks of flatpanel TV’s at Best Buys from time-to-time. When (if) it finally does quit working, then it will take two strong guys to haul the thing out of here.

    Report Post »  
    • wraith67
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 12:08pm

      I feel your pain. I have a big Toshiba HD tv I got in 2001, still going strong, great picture…but weighs probably close to 200lbs…wondering what I’m going to do with it when it eventually goes down…

      Report Post » wraith67  
    • llotus
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 2:03pm

      Rightthinkin1……….bite the bullet and get one. I`ve had mine since 1997……at least 500 lbs. Put it in the spare B.R. I love it. That Sony wont die. Lotus.

      Report Post »  
    • Dan_o
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 4:38pm

      Yeah, if they could make a CRT with the same resolution that didn’t way as much as a car, it would by far have the best picture quality.

      Darn physics.

      Report Post » Dan_o  
  • carbonyes
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:40am

    Blaze, someone needs to redo their math. One inch equals 2.54 centimeters or 254 millimeters. One sixth of that is 42.33 millimeters. Therefore, if the TV is one sixth of an inch thick, then it is 42 millimeters thick, not 4 millimeters. Simple math!

    Report Post »  
    • dbkid6
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:54am

      The math is correct. There are 10 millimeters to a centimeter, not 100. 42 millimeters would be 1.65 inches.

      Report Post » dbkid6  
    • ghostrider99
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:57am

      1/6 of an inch does equal 4.23mm. 1/6=0.166 x 25.4 = 4.23. Simple math. 42mm equals 1 inch and 15/24′s

      Report Post »  
    • aTrueAMERICAN27
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:00am

      1″ = 2.54cm = 25.4mm

      Report Post »  
    • SShink
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:38am

      How far is your foot into your mouth?
      Learn to use Google conversion.

      Report Post »  
    • chips1
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 1:20pm

      So now we outsourced our measurements? If it isn’t in inches, I won’t buy it. Buy American. OOPS! I forgot. We don’t make products anymore. My bad!!!!

      Report Post »  
    • theaveng
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 2:04pm

      It’s always the “correctors” who end-up looking like the dumbasses.

      See this video of Jennifer Garner telling Conan O’brien that “snuck” is not a word. That’s you Carboneyes

      http://youtu.be/q51ld-scMI8

      .

      Report Post »  
  • SenorStrange
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:33am

    TV tech is moving too fast. I’m still using a DLP.

    Report Post »  
    • ImMadAsHell
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 1:03pm

      I agree, TV Tech moving too fast to keep up. Im still using my Zenith black & white. My remote is a bulb on a 10′ tube that changes channels when I squeeze the bulb. hahahahahahahahahahah Thats Y IMMADASHELL

      Report Post »  
  • wewantchillywilly
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:58am

    good i can break it over my leg when the vikings throw another pick-6.

    Report Post »  
  • CPT_GCF
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:33am

    Too bad OLED has a MUCH shorter lifespan than LCD or Plasma.

    Report Post »  
  • Cemetery
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:01am

    These are old. =[

    Report Post » Cemetery  
    • 4xeverything
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:30am

      Agism is not OK.

      Report Post » 4xeverything  
    • RRFlyer
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:34am

      WHy do you say that? They have never been on the market before

      Report Post »  
    • jerseyman44
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 10:52am

      Mainly for RRFLYER, OLED tech is hardly new, I have some samples here I’ve been playing with for a few years already. The only thing new here is the size. The colors fade at different rates, blue being the fastest. Blue loses half it’s intensity in about 500 hours. That’s not a lot at all considering the cost of replacing the screen.

      Report Post »  
  • Rayblue
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 8:31am

    I miss the black and white slow pan, back and forth across the round dials. Barometric pressure, temperature, time, wind speed and such. And all three channels were free. Soft glow behind the TV from the tubes. And the question whether you would receive the transmission at all.
    And if you didn’t, there were other more mindful things to do. Like reading a book. Playing a board game. Talking on the phone with a party line. Watching the stars slowly move across the black void.
    Having the neighbors over for dominos, hearts. Ever play a game called “Exquisite Corpse” or “Consequences” ?

    Report Post » Rayblue  
    • Christian Kalgaard
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 8:47am

      idiot you can still have those things

      Report Post » Christian Kalgaard  
    • stormerwasright
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 8:52am

      Thanks for the memories….how about watching the little white dot until it faded away after we turned the set off? Caught by it many times too…parents would go out for the night and tell us to turn off the tv and be in bed by a certain time. We’d stay up and watch the tv until we saw the headlights in the driveway. We’d hurry up and turn off the set and run to the bedroom to act like we were asleep….only to be caught by the lingering dot sitting in the middle of the screen.

      Report Post » stormerwasright  
    • Curtman41
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:34am

      @Rayblue Don’t forget outdoor plumbing, bias ply tires, the horse drawn carriage, lead paint, rotary phones, Polio, kerosene lamps, typhoid, dirt floors, silent movies, the dickey, the abacus, the milk man, sweat shops, no refrigerators or air conditioning, scarlet fever and horse drawn plows. You really need to get out of the nursing home more often..

      Report Post »  
    • RRFlyer
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:35am

      I sure don’t miss that.

      Report Post »  
    • G-WHIZ
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 11:06am

      About 20yrs-ago, I bought an old Fisher stereo-receiver, and because of the price($5.00), I was able to almost-compleatly reconstrruct the audio-section with ultra-hi-end parts and engineering-type circuits. The “hot”tubes now are running 75%cooler, and the sound is so good that the speaker-cones “dissappear” and the sound is “just there” without the usual paper/plastic sound-added which most hifi/stereos have unless you pay over $2000.00/channel…total cost including hand-matched tubes, was about $700.00 and my time to do the work. If the “old” tech hadnot been passed-up and the items had not become “cheep”, I would not have “Disney”sound in my livingroom for these many years. I can produce this sound with many different HiFi/stereo speaker-sets, because my amplifier stages have improved “control” over the many quirks that cones produce themselves. I am an old DeVry-engineer, without $15,000 to spend on equipment. So, I simply re-constructed my own ultra-fi with an old-fi as a starting point…only about 36watts/channel, but the SOUND!! OOOH-YaaH!

      Report Post »  
  • SpankDaMonkey
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 8:28am

    .
    What if I want a Chubby TV?…….This is stright up RACIST…………..

    Report Post » SpankDaMonkey  
    • GeneTracy
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 8:34am

      Good one!

      Report Post » GeneTracy  
    • sndrman
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 9:22am

      is moosechelle behind this? did she or b. HUSSAIN o. tell the tv manufacturers? to make thin tvs?did moosecheelle cut down on the sweet tubes or transiters?just wondering

      Report Post »  
  • GeneTracy
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 8:03am

    What’s that old saying?”You can never be too thin.”Apparently this applies to our TVs now.Is there a metaphor here?Just kidding,this technology is pretty cool.

    Report Post » GeneTracy  
  • txn4justice
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 8:01am

    The geeks are rejoicing everywhere! Sound the trumpets!

    Report Post »  
  • SamIamTwo
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 7:46am

    Just when you think you have the latest tech, they come out with new stuff. Every time electronics get cheap, they always come out with something new to keep you addicted to the tech world.

    As for me, I’ll keep what I have and be satisfied. At some point the madness of going to the next level will pop.

    But it is, for some, those consumers that are occupiers that are addicted to the new tech crap…they fight capitalism and buy the stuff they fight against. Weird and messed up people. Pretty sure they never took the higher level SOC classes. LOL and IMHO

    But then again for the US, the commie recognized that they can take over the US and keep capitalism in place…They simply use it to herd the undereducated cattle. mooo

    Report Post » SamIamTwo  
    • chips1
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 1:27pm

      My VCR still blinks 12:00 and it’s just as bright as the day I bought it.

      Report Post »  
  • NewLife56
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 7:20am

    Now if they would just produce decent shows again

    Report Post » NewLife56  
    • TomFerrari
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 7:50am

      EXACTLY !

      Without some decent content, it is all for naught.
      At least we can use Roku to GBTV !

      Report Post » TomFerrari  
    • lvfreemontst
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 7:53am

      amen to thast brother!

      Report Post »  
  • Your Name Here
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 6:18am

    Has anyone noticed that as televisions get better the things to watch on them get worse?
    There are so few shows that are worth watching that it is hard to justify buying a new TV.

    Report Post » Your Name Here  
    • NIPPOHIPS
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 7:03am

      Yes, they’re only good for computer monitors and the occasional movie.

      Report Post »  
    • Righteous Outlaw
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 7:26am

      Amen, Hollywood is an epic failure lately unless their ulterior motives were to attempt mind slavery then they on to something.

      Report Post »  
  • MsCamelot
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 5:57am

    WOW!!! This is so totally cool. I have been waiting to be able to get just a regular flat screen TV. I am still using the same old dinosaur 27″ TV I bought in 1997, with no hook-ups for games, vcr’s or dvd players. It has a great picture for a tv of this kind.. so I will use it til it dies I guess. It would be great to have one of those OLED flat screens.. but 5K… really? As cool as this new product is… I can think of a lot better things to spend 5K on. I will say that Samsung is a great company too, they have good products.

    Report Post » MsCamelot  
    • 4xeverything
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 6:54am

      If you can hold out for about three-five years, the new OLED will have flooded the market and not only will they cost about a quarter of the price, but you will also be able to choose from Samsung, Sony, Panasonic, Magnavox, etc. Patience is not only a virtue, but a huge money saver. Besides, by that time Consumer Reports will have the skinny on the skinny.

      Report Post » 4xeverything  
  • 4xeverything
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 5:19am

    How do you hang it on the wall? With Scotch tape? Is Scotch tape really from Scotland?

    Report Post » 4xeverything  
  • grannyrecipe
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 5:18am

    Well, the only thing left to do in television technology is to make a hologram type of one. I do miss the rabbit ears though. Me and my brother used to have sword fights with them.

    Report Post » grannyrecipe  
    • 4xeverything
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 5:22am

      Our rabbit ears are now embedded in various Halloween costumes.

      Report Post » 4xeverything  
    • Gonzo
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 7:27am

      Do you really miss them? Take a look at a football game in HD and then standard def. You‘ll feel like you’re losing youe eyesight! Not to mention audio recievers. You can buy 7.2 or 9.2 AVRs for under $500 that blow away the top of the line stuff from the ‘70’s that cost far more at the time. I know there are still plenty of vacuum tube afficianados that will argue that though.

      Report Post » Gonzo  
  • Societal Misfit
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 4:34am

    Well it’s about time! LOL Actually it looks pretty cool. Would love to have one, to bad it will be a while before I, and many others could afford it given the state of the current economy.

    Report Post » Societal Misfit  
    • chips1
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 1:32pm

      If you can’t afford one, just hang around the mall and follow the flash mobs. Holder has your back!

      Report Post »  
  • Mickeyd
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 2:58am

    Congratulations, Samsung & LG! We love corporate innovation! Obama does not appreciate this kind of thing; he’s too busy excoriating business almost all the time. Can’t wait to have a better president. But the rest of us appreciate the constant imrovement that business is trying to bring to us the consumers. Bravo!

    Report Post »  
  • GeddyWanaBe
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 2:27am

    This is real Star Wars / Star Trek kind of stuff. Some of the expected extrem applications are transparent computer work stations like you saw in Minority Report. OLED can wrap around uneven surfaces like a column in a mall. Some have even said that you can apply it to paper with like an inkjet printer. Or it could be spray painted on a car so a reflective image can make the care disappear. These are just some of the extreme applications I’ve read about. The technology is still very much in its infancy. Very cool though.

    Report Post »  
  • Runesinger
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 1:43am

    Finally! They are manufacturing OLED TV’s! Not only is the screen super-thin, the material is super energy-efficient – about 1/4 the power of the LED TV’s. Very, very cool!

    Report Post » Runesinger  
  • TyrannyNoMore
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 1:31am

    Pretty cool technology ! You could put Velcro strips on the back of one of these and put it up anywhere in a snap. I remember unpacking my 58″ Samsung plasma several years ago. That damned thing was heavy, when trying to mount it on the wall.

    Report Post » TyrannyNoMore  
  • Baddoggy
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 1:27am

    Send one out with each welfare check. It will keep the criminals off the streets for a while…

    Report Post » Baddoggy  
  • Witness1974
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 1:15am

    All I can say is ever since I learned that HD means Hideous Detail, I have lost my enthusiasm for advances in television.

    Report Post »  
  • TXPilot
    Posted on January 11, 2012 at 12:52am

    I bet our beloved Fuhrer will look even better, when viewed on such a tv…..might even make his lies look and sound more believable.

    Report Post » TXPilot  
    • Got2bRoni
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 1:00am

      Lol. They found a “old French note in the dvd player”

      Report Post » Got2bRoni  
    • TXPilot
      Posted on January 11, 2012 at 1:35am

      @GOT2BRONI…..lol….I’m sure all the really old people out there got your reference……wait?…..that might mean I too am getting old……cr@p!!!

      Report Post » TXPilot  

Sign In To Post Comments! Sign In