X-Ray Art? Here’s How the Stunning Photos Are Made
- Posted on January 17, 2012 at 12:25pm by
Liz Klimas
- Print »
- Email »
Have you ever heard about, or seen, X-ray photography? If not, prepared to be amazed.
Nick Veasey’s X-ray images make intense detail look effortless, almost having the perfection associated with computer generation. But would you believe that some of these X-ray shots can take months to create and are actually a compilation of X-ray images that are then Photoshopped into one?
CNET explains that Veasey, a British photographer who creates these images for a hefty sum occasionally for advertising purposes, first has to choose the right size machine. For images like the bus, Veasey used the same type of cargo-scanning X-ray machine found at border crossings. But CNET reports that using this machine only produced a “crude outline” — nothing near the level of detail you see in the finished product.
Watch this clip by BBC last year about Veasey’s work:
CNET goes on to explain that to add more detail in his images — especially the large ones — he X-rays different parts of the object and then Photoshops them all together:
This not only lets him capture objects as gigantic as a Boeing 777 (which, of course, dwarfs a mere bus), it also lets him create richly detailed and layered images that would be impossible to produce with a single X-ray.
CNET also notes that Veasey is unable to use human subjects in his artwork due to the length of the radiation exposure. According to CNET, medical X-ray machines have radiation that lasts for a split second, while Veasey needs several minutes. So, what are those skeletons? It’s more like skeleton — singular. Veasey uses a skeleton named Frida that was left over from student radiologists, according to CNET:
It’s Frida who appears again and again in the bus. She sits; she stands. She reads the paper; she drives the vehicle.
In terms of time, CNET reports that the Boeing 777, for example, was composed of 500 images and took about three months to complete. CNET reports that Veasey’s clients have included Adobe, Hewlett-Packard, Mecedes-Benz and United Airlines.
Veasey doesn’t just take images of man and machines. He also has many images of plant and animal life as well as everyday objects:
Veasey has also been featured by the Discovery Channel and other major media groups for his more than 4,000 works of art. Here’s the Discovery Channel clip:
See more of Veasey’s projects here.

























Submitting your tip... please wait!
supressorgrid
Posted on January 19, 2012 at 7:44amCan we now X-Ray Obama’s head to see what the Chinese wrote on the inside of his eyelids?
Report Post »Wakeup Maggie
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 10:56amOMG=Obama Must Go
Report Post »e7705
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:42amOK!!! Mea culpa!!! Mea culpa!!! Yes, I’ll go back and read the whole article! Wow, that sure did bring out the nastiness of people.
Report Post »grannyrecipe
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 6:40amFrida has been exposed to huge amounts of radiation but that’s okay by her, she’s just glowing with pride.
Report Post »TelepromoterNChief
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 1:05amTime and time again, I would order those X-ray glasses sold in comic books and not once was I able too see the things advertised.
Report Post »Cat
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 11:35pmSee there son?
Report Post »Being an x-ray artist does pay better than being a pubescent gynecologist …
lylejk
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 6:56pmVery cool stuff. Retouching is one of my more serious hobbies so I have more of an appreciation of what’s involved than others here. Thanks for sharing this story with us Liz. :)
Report Post »Robert-CA
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 5:30pmArt ? or invasion ????????
Report Post »pmjr-jones
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 10:58pmsubconscious, next headline is birthday: so you’ll think it could be worse?!
Report Post »Ghandi was a Republican
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 2:33pmThis is what separates us from the great Apes?
Report Post »bobodu
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:54amApes vote Democrat?
Report Post »soldtonorm
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 2:04pmIf you look really close, he proves it’s all ball bearings now.
Report Post »e7705
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 1:52pmDoes this man have the right to expose people to radium? How do we know that we have not also been exposed xrays taken by some yahoo photographer?
Report Post »mastice
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 3:18pmPlease read the whole article – it clearly points out he uses a skeleton named Frida. It’s a single skeleton in each picture photographed several times in different positions.
Report Post »RRFlyer
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 1:06amI am sure glad E7705 is doing his duty as PC police. How could we get along without your type?
Report Post »BeckFan1964
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 8:36amTry reading the article before embarrassing yourself.
Report Post »Starkadder
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 12:24pmRadium is a radioactive element and is not found in X-rays. X-rays are a created when a beam of electrons energizes the nuclei in a heavy metal target reflector. X-rays are actually photons and not radiation in the classical nuclear power definition of radiation. An X-ray machine contains no radioactive matierial.
Report Post »Dismayed Veteran
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 1:41pmYou better not have lead in your pencil.
Report Post »dthomps6
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 2:32pmThere has never been lead in pencils. Lead is a measure of darkness in graphite. See? Learning is fun.
Report Post »Reload
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 3:01pm@DTHOMPS6
I bet you got the ever loving schit kicked out of you quite a bit when you were school didn’t you?
Condescending Dihk.
Report Post »dthomps6
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 5:24pmAwesome
Report Post »Rayblue
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 8:59pm@dthomp…left a link waaay back.
Report Post »Starkadder
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 12:25pmActually I think the lead was in the paint.
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 1:28pmHow much radiation do the subjects of these x-rays wind up being exposed to?
Report Post »Jim
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 1:46pmRead the article before posting questions that make you seem like a blonde.
Report Post »let us prey
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 1:54pmSnow
Report Post »A split second is all they are exposed for. Cool stuff.
Homeschoolmama
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 3:43pmJim, don’t insult blondes like that.
Report Post »ha99yhack3r
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 4:37pmAs I understand it ( My wife is a R RT) Kv and time of exposer differ with mass and density. Engine block at 250 Kv might need a time of 8 minutes.
Report Post »thegreatcarnac
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 1:19pmIs someone standing on the bus with a lampshade on his head??
Report Post »booger71
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 1:24pmLooks to me like body armor.
Report Post »ThePostman
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 1:35pmIt‘s a newspaper he’s reading.
Report Post »bobodu
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 9:57amThat is a Ron Paul supporter and what you see is tin foil.
Report Post »Harry Assenback
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 1:09pmCan he make and X-Ray Gun???? Kapowie!!!!!!!!!
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 1:07pmWow, X-ray! What will they think of next… a flying machine?
Report Post »Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 12:56pmIf he is so good, have him X-Ray a fart.
Report Post »Gonzo
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 2:06pmActually, I think that’s possible with a few of mine.
Report Post »READRIGHTHERE
Posted on January 18, 2012 at 3:57amThis conversation has taken a left turn.
Report Post »rtlane28
Posted on January 17, 2012 at 12:34pmA slinky
Report Post »