Your Guide to Science’s Wild Ig Nobel Awards: Findings That ‘Cannot or Should Not Be Reproduced’
- Posted on October 2, 2011 at 11:56pm by
Liz Klimas
- Print »
- Email »
Science isn’t all serious business. To honor these findings that “that cannot, or should not, be reproduced”, the Annals of Improbable Research runs the Ig Nobel awards each year since 1991.
Here are the winners from this year’s 21st 1st annual Ig Nobel Prize awards.
1) Physiology: Further evidence — from research of Red-Footed Tortoises – suggests yawns are not contagious. First of all, yes, tortoises yawn. Watch the video below. But one tortoise’s yawn does not induce another to yawn. According to an article in The Guardian when the research was announced earlier this year, because tortoises are not known to mimic each other, they are “the idea subjects for examining this question.” The Blaze recently reported the controversy of contagious yawning and its theorized purposes.
2) Chemistry: Here’s a spicy wake up call. Japanese researchers were recognized for figuring out the ideal density of airborne wasabi that could be used to wake up people in case of emergency, like a fire. A device that would sound — er, spray — the alarm is patent pending and is guaranteed to not burn your eyes. This is the fifth year in a row that Japanese researchers have won an Ig Nobel prize.
3) Medicine: Gotta go? Maybe you should hold it just a little longer. Evidence from collaborative research out of the Netherlands, Belgium, the United States and Australia found that controlling your bladder could make you better at controlling yourself when it comes to life decisions. Psychological Science reported that the researchers gave participants five cups of water and waited 40 minutes, at which time participants were asked a series of questions that could result in an immediate reward or a larger, delayed reward. Those with full bladders were willing to wait. Perhaps because at the time they would rather run to the restroom?
4) Psychology: Frustrated? Give a good huh. That is, sigh. Why do we do this when exasperated, angry, content? There are many different tones to sighing even. Karl Halvor Teigen of the University of Oslo, Norway, was honored for looking into just why we express ourselves in a sigh. In three studies on the topic, Teigen found that “sighs are often unintentional expressions of an activity, plan or desire that has to be discarded, creating a pause before it can be replaced by a novel initiative.” Teigen played on the Ig Nobels’ own catchphrase to describe his feelings. “Ig Nobel prizes are assumed to make people laugh and then think — and I would add: then sigh.”
5) Biology: Although “tequila may make her clothes fall off”, according to country singer Joe Nichol’s song, beer is what does it for this beetle. The reflections on round bumps of some beer bottles confuse this Australian beetle into thinking it’s a female.
6) Physics: Watch the following videos. Are you dizzy?
Well, according to two researchers, hammer throwers don’t get dizzy while discus throwers do. Odd considering they both spin. Video analysis found that hammer throwers have more “visual bearings” than discus throwers and the fact that discus throwers leave the ground and the motion of their head is what causes reported motion sickness.
7) Mathematics: Several scientists were recognized for “teaching the world to be careful when making mathematical assumptions and calculations. They are as follows “Dorothy Martin of the USA (who predicted the world would end in 1954), Pat Robertson of the USA (who predicted the world would end in 1982), Elizabeth Clare Prophet of the USA (who predicted the world would end in 1990), Lee Jang Rim of KOREA (who predicted the world would end in 1992), Credonia Mwerinde of UGANDA (who predicted the world would end in 1999) and Harold Camping of the USA (who predicted the world would end on September 6, 1994 and later predicted that the world will end on October 21, 2011).”
8) Peace: Luxury cars + armored tank = problem solved. Citizens of Vilnius, Lithuania, can thank their mayor.
Read The Blaze article or watch it here:
9) Public Safety: John Senders from the University of Toronto conducted experiments on distracted driving. Sometimes science doesn’t have to be complex. Senders created a helmet with a visor that flaps over the eyes whilst driving to see the affect of distracted driving on a major highway.
Watch him conduct the experiment himself:
You can watch the full Ig Nobel ceremony here.
Also, if you’re interested, the “ig” comes from the word “ignoble,” which according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary means characterized by baseness, lowness, or meanness.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.






















Submitting your tip... please wait!
RightThinking1
Posted on October 4, 2011 at 8:29pmActually, that guy driving with the visor reminded me of Obama. Actually, I don’t think Obama drives, except perhaps the 10 feet he drove the Volt. He’s more of a bicycle/public transportation guy.
Report Post »Obama>Jesus
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 8:04pmI love science.
Report Post »mzk1
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 12:03pmI used to be on their mailing list, but unfortunately left-wing politics has affected them also.
I liked the original Journal of Irreproducible results, from which they splintered, which had some balance (and was hilarious). It actually originated here in Israel from some sheets that an Ameircan Israeli scientist handed around (way before email outside of DOD). My late uncle was on the list.
Report Post »Junter
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 11:09amBrilliant! An award celebrating lack of brilliance.
Report Post »BenInNY
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 10:48amOk. The turtle made me yawn.
Report Post »Oraclevoiceofreason
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 10:39amI would like to crush cars with a tank
Report Post »Harold B
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 9:23amThis story isn’t worthy of the electrons used to display it in screen
Report Post »MidWestMom
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 9:06amPlease tell me the government didn’t waste money funding this “research”
Report Post »Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 9:19amI don’t need to say anything at all; though the one where the gentleman in the armored vehicle crushing cars looks like he was having fun.
Report Post »Consentiondum
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 6:43pmYeah… surely scientific research has done nothing to make your life better.
Report Post »GoingBeck
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 8:49amPolitically correct science brings into question the veracity of the entire body of knowledge. If the rules of basic math can be bent, then we have a crisis of confidence in the whole spectrum of scientific discipline. Nothing is real, not even existentialism.
Report Post »GoingBeck
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 8:42amObama deserves the Nobel Prize in Economics. He singlehandedly proved once and for all, without a doubt, that Keyensian economic theory does not work.
Report Post »starman70
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 7:40amHow many of these “Studies” were funded by taxpayers?
Report Post »hojo
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 7:21amThe most IgNobel award goes to Barry Obummer’s Peace Prize.
Report Post »SageInWaiting
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 7:07amAlGore didn’t even gen an honorable mention?
Report Post »WakeUp
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 6:45amAt least this science can be taken more seriously than global warming
Report Post »Consentiondum
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 6:59pmYea, obviously global warming is a mass conspiracy perpetrated by the vast majority of the world’s scientist for the sole purpose of hindering businesses and corporations. It just makes sense.
Report Post »WVBeagleMom
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 6:33amAre scientists finding way too much time (or grant money) on the hands?
Report Post »Katydidnt
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 6:14amYawning being contagious didn’t work with my autistic son. I once tried yawning and yawning to encourage him to go to sleep. Didn’t work, I on the other hand was exhausted. He didn’t yawn once.
Report Post »Arc
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 2:59amDam……..and I even read that article thinking it would be of some social import……..ahhhhhh a treasure trove of useless information, unless you happen to be a disillusioned academic looking to impress someone at the next cocktail party.
Report Post »tharpdevenport
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 2:36amNow, if only bras were like that helmet device and occassionally flipped up.
Report Post »biohazard23
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 4:39amBe careful what you wish for. Somethings you just can’t unsee…..
Report Post »Ryntintin
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 1:44amThank God for Scientists. (thats a Darwin joke but seriously, Thanks God)
Report Post »Heitah
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 1:42amlol at yawning turtles winning
Report Post »whatthecrazy
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 1:41amWhy am i still awake?
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 1:08amI actually thought that the hammer throw vs. discus research was interesting and worthwhile.
Report Post »JimCDew
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 6:26amThat kind of thinking leads to research grants to see if the sun will rise tomorrow.
Report Post »Jack of Hearts
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 11:08amWith a name like yours, you would. How far can you chuck a stein anyway? This is a whole new area for them to research.
Report Post »Chuck Stein
Posted on October 3, 2011 at 4:50pm@ jack
Report Post »Good one. ;D