User Profile: 101stIraqVet


Member Since: May 14, 2012

CommentsDisplaying 20 of 101stIraqVet's most recent comments.

  • March 5, 2014 at 4:59pm

    Too bad it wasn’t Gloria Allred in Mieses place. She’s the one who needs an awakening.

    Responses (7) +
  • March 3, 2014 at 1:00am

    2009-2017, 8 Years a Slave.

    Responses (3) +
  • March 3, 2014 at 12:57am

    It must be a miserable life to have the need to be offended at every little thing.

    Or just maybe they aren’t offended, they just like the attention of pretending to be offended.

  • October 21, 2013 at 8:22am

    “if this law isn’t directly concerning you…”

    If you pay taxes, this law concerns you. Even more when they don’t get the numbers they wanted to sign up. Taxes will be raised to pay for this pipe dream many, many times in the future. If you can’t see this, there is no help for you.

  • October 16, 2013 at 9:41am

    Buying health insurance at an affordable rate???

    For my family, under Obamacare, the lowest tier (catastrophic) plan would be $589, and the highest plan (gold) would be $1,327.

    Really ****ing affordable.

  • October 16, 2013 at 9:13am

    Oh cry me a ****in’ river.

    It’s never your guy’s fault is it, because you all have a monopoly on being ****in’ perfect, don’t you?

  • October 7, 2013 at 5:02pm

    It’s not okay to take away your food stamps, but it is okay for you to take away MY hard earned cash to pay for your food stamps. Am I right?

  • October 3, 2013 at 4:30pm

    Sell your soul for 39 dollars a month? Have some ******* dignity, man.

    Responses (1) +
  • October 1, 2013 at 5:06am


    The voice of the people voted twice for universal health care? I never saw that on the ballot. Actually I remember it was unpopular, but the clowns went against the voice of the people and voted for it anyway. What world do you live in?

  • September 18, 2013 at 3:09pm

    DOSE: Your anti-gun translation of “Assault Rifle” is just that, the anti-gun version. Who’s the ******** now?

    The translation assault rifle gradually became the common term for similar firearms sharing the same technical definition as the StG 44. In a strict definition, a firearm must have at least the following characteristics to be considered an assault rifle:
    It must be an individual weapon with provision to fire from the shoulder (i.e. a buttstock);
    It must be capable of selective fire;
    It must have an intermediate-power cartridge: more power than a pistol but less than a standard rifle or battle rifle;
    Its ammunition must be supplied from a detachable magazine rather than a feed-belt.
    And it should at least have a firing range of 300 metres (980 feet)

  • September 18, 2013 at 2:14pm

    VAMAN: Assault Rifle… Really?

  • July 7, 2013 at 5:30am

    Oh please, S-T-F-U already.

    The only reason I can come up with for your off the wall rant, is that you must be married to this woman.

  • July 6, 2013 at 4:02pm

    Why the **** are people on board taking pictures and posting comments when they could be helping others. Save that crap until everyone is safe and evacuated.

    Responses (3) +
  • July 5, 2013 at 10:48am

    That’s funny, a while back, Trayvon’s Dad listened to the tape and said it wasn’t his son screaming.

    Responses (1) +
  • June 30, 2013 at 2:23pm

    Deport him over Mexico, at 30,000 ft., without a parachute.

    Responses (1) +
  • June 21, 2013 at 10:24am

    We should apply that to voting too, don’t you think?

  • June 21, 2013 at 10:22am


    Is Obama still president?

  • June 21, 2013 at 9:54am

    I would like politicians to take a class on how government works and how to be a good representative to the people that hired him/her.

    Here in Indiana, we have it as close to right as you can get, no training needed and lifetime licenses. Blood hasn’t run the streets red yet.

    Responses (2) +
  • June 20, 2013 at 9:56am

    Welcome home Brother, glad you made it out of that cluster****.

    Responses (1) +
  • June 20, 2013 at 9:37am

    “Ladies and gentlemen you will not get one more Latino vote next year than you got last year.”

    … and to top it off, the Republicans will lose more base voters than they will gain with the legislation if they cave on immigration.