User Profile: 12AngryWoMen


Member Since: December 13, 2012


  • [6] June 5, 2014 at 8:46am

    True. Nullification of unconstitutional acts was clearly laid out as the remedy to federal overreach by both Madison and Jefferson.

  • [2] June 3, 2014 at 11:32pm

    I am pretty sure he was issuing a passive-aggressive surrender. He won’t come out and say that he surrenders, just implies by actions and a comment about the “end of wars.”

  • [2] June 3, 2014 at 11:27pm

    I met her once at an FRC Forum in DC. So sweet and sincere. She has a good, peaceful vibe all the time it seems.

  • April 22, 2014 at 12:06pm

    He was a pensioner- retired old guy. He got “clipped” pretty hard. I’m pretty sure that is his shoe flying past the camera and he is looking for it after he gets up. Possible dementia. Be kinder.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 17, 2014 at 7:43pm

    Funny, I got the complete opposite from this. I thought it was meant to remove any mental conditioning of “You’re suppressed” that the feminist talking heads may have brainwashed into our women. The point is, our COUNTRY and its LAWS do not support suppression of women. Individuals here in the US have every opportunity to make of themselves what they wish, and everyone will have their own obstacles. Gender laws will not be one of them.

  • April 17, 2014 at 7:37pm

    Preach on, sister! Nothing and nobody hold me back but myself. This idea that tearing down someone else can lift you up is not just found with feminists- its everywhere- race baiting, income disparity, popularity contests, religion, etc. Take responsibility for who you are and make it happen, don’t sit around blaming others for what you don’t have.

    In reply to the contribution Ladies, We're Not Suppressed

  • March 18, 2014 at 4:25pm

    I’m pretty sure the sign was intended to “tick off” gun owners. He has every right to disenfranchise an entire segment of his customer base.

    Responses (2) +
  • March 16, 2014 at 9:35pm

    Coincidentally, I just received an LP of “Miami Vice” last night. Such sweet, sweet, neon pink.

  • March 16, 2014 at 9:08pm

    I’m with outlaw. Why in the world do we think that this bunch of oath-breakers would even notice new amendments? Who is going to enforce these new standards? We would actually have to have a Justice Department interested in justice, and politicians who care more about the Constitution that their own careers.
    The real solution is nullification, the remedy put in place by the founders from the beginning. If a federal law or regulation is unconstitutional, states do not have to recognize it. Sure, they may not get the bribe money from Uncle Sam, but freedom and prosperity are far more lucrative.

  • March 16, 2014 at 1:20pm


  • March 15, 2014 at 4:17pm

    Kawaii desu yo!

    Responses (2) +
  • March 15, 2014 at 3:54pm

    What state? They often forget to include this info when relaying stories from local news channels.

    Responses (1) +
  • March 15, 2014 at 3:37pm

    True. The only political movement that has had any degree of success at turning back tyranny is the nullification movement. Of course, it gets little to no press or funding, since there is not a lot of money to be made in the freedom industry. Please check out the Tenth Amendment Center. Every person on this site should be supporting it- pure constitution- nothing more or less.

  • March 15, 2014 at 3:31pm

    Zapparules makes an excellent point. The push for big government in schools from both the right and left. For different reasons, but end result is the same- they both want more money for public schools. The right for actual education, which they naively believe can still happen in public schools (many driven by the unconscious guilt that they might actually be sending their children to kiddie prison so they can have more time for work or play). The left wants the money for more indoctrination and benefits for unions.
    The hard, bitter truth for both sides is that as long as public schools are funded by taxpayer dollars, all taxpayers (and by default their political reps) get a direct say in its operations. If the stakeholders (students and parents) want to have exclusive decision-making, they need to be the exclusive funders. Stop rationalizing legal plunder on the entire community to subsidize the education of kids that are not their responsibility.
    Please see Sheldon Richman’s “Separation of School and State” for the full story.

  • March 15, 2014 at 12:49pm

    Wow. His permission makes all the difference.

    Responses (15) +
  • March 15, 2014 at 12:46pm

    That is where I’m at. No conspiracy- just a natural pattern that reflects things around corners from our view.

  • March 13, 2014 at 6:27pm

    It would not need to be perfect. What were the odds for 9/11?

  • March 13, 2014 at 6:21pm

    All answers have been previously posted. Nevertheless, you assumption about the depressurization is partly correct- the pressure in the cockpit is not a big deal- both the pilot and/or accomplices could have gear for that. The terrible part is that the passengers would not go to sleep, they would be instantly killed at that altitude.

  • March 13, 2014 at 6:18pm

    One life, maybe. But getting ransoms for groups or for every individual is a lot of work and risk. Plus, their collective worth is not enough to buy an aircraft that can be disguised and then used as an EMP.

  • March 13, 2014 at 6:10pm

    I don’t think anyone is suggesting that it was “snuck” past anyone. More like it was welcomed by someone.