User Profile: 1FreeVoice

1FreeVoice

Member Since: December 28, 2012

CommentsDisplaying 1FreeVoice's 10 most recent comments.

  • I don’t think the people in the video are representative of England, because I have doubts that they are English in a real sense. The man was born in England but speaks of his country, obviously referring to somewhere else. That part of London may be no more a part of England than a foreign embassy. People came to England and did not assimilate, they brought their country/countries with them. They recognize their own culture and law.

    England has one (or more) hostile foreign countries within their borders. What are they going to do? (What could we do if it was here?) Multiculturalism isn’t working. They are facing the consequences of taking the cheap and easy way of dealing with their immigrants. There is no easy way out, they tried that and it led here. What now?

    We have our own immigration issues. (We also have people who want to take a “cheap and easy” way of dealing with those problems.) What can we do to prevent things from getting that bad here? We have experimented with multiculturalism here. How dangerous is multiculturalism, really? Hostile micro-countries within our borders- with US citizenship- could it happen here?

    Could strategies to handle such threats be turned against our own citizens when they petition our government for redress of grievances?

  • That part of London was no more a part of England than a foreign embassy. It seems to have been colonized by people who did not assimilate, but brought their nation with them. The murderer speaks of his country… and is not referring to England, though he was born there. He steps politely out of the way of the woman… She ignores the dead man, and goes around his killer totally unconcerned. It’s as if the dead man isn’t one of her people (so, no big deal), and the bloody handed murderer is seen as no threat to her.

    I think that England has one (or more) hostile foreign countries within their own borders.

    Think about it. How’s multiculturalism working out there? Do you know anyone who still thinks we should give the vote to non citizens here in the US, or expedite the citizenship process? Cultural assimilation isn’t that important really, is it? This should be a wake up call, but too many are still sound asleep.

  • reply to JERRYWALTERS :

    If you hate MSNBC, and think the BLAZE is even worse… what on earth are you doing logged on here ? If you think everyone here is nuts, why are you wasting time posting comments here?

    If you want to comment, could you post something thoughtful… perhaps containing facts to back up your opinions?

  • There are no radical Muslim extremists: they are Orthodox Muslim Activists.

    Think about that.

  • Did anyone else notice the reaction of the woman who walked past him? A man with bloody hands, holding a couple of knives, body on the ground… What do you make of her expression, her body language, how she treated him? W T F…

  • I was watching Real News on the Blaze when Oklahoma came up the other night. My husband told me about a story he had heard that really disturbed him. The emergency shelter at the elementary school was in the basement. The tornado hit the school dead center and destroyed it. The teachers and kids were trapped below… and the water mains broke.

    Imagine that you were responsible for the safety of your students, kids you had known and cared about for some time. You took them to shelter, and then had to see and hear them drown to death before your eyes while you could not save them. The knowledge that you were about to die yourself would be trivial. It is a description of hell on earth.

    It turns out that the early reports were not entirely accurate, but :
    http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/children_drowned_officials_basement_3rJIZQk4MtoIhZTQjqZrBJ.

    One of the panelists on Real News went on about the importance of lost photographs and sentimental trivia. People died, children died. Those families will never be the same. It is the PEOPLE who can never be replaced. She might not have known that story, but she knew that people died. Even if she was just going off talking points someone handed her, she could have done better- and should have.

  • Remember the uprisings in Africa? On a signal, multitudes of people took up arms and slaughtered unsuspecting neighbors… They attempted to erase another tribe that they had been sharing the country with for generations. What are the odds that “radical” islamists are stockpiling weapons in secret locations… waiting for the moment when they can rise up and wipe out the natives? The British are largely unarmed, and would be overwhelmed by force and numbers. The muslims who only want to be left alone and live their lives will be given a choice – join the winning side or die.

    The shifting demographics point to the invited invaders having a potential advantage. The future is decided by the people who show up… and relative birth rates are significant.

    What is the probability that scenario?

    By the way… How do you think that we are doing tracking down those 15,000 missing “students” who legally entered the US, and then dropped off the radar without signing up for any classes?

    At least we are neither outnumbered, nor disarmed.

  • I am sorry that the girls didn’t think that their relationship was important enough to think much about. They should have waited a bit, and there would have been no problem. Someone worth your time is worth waiting for. The laws of human nature apply to all relationships. Someone who can’t or won’t wait for sex is too self-centered to be a good partner in a healthy relationship. It could have been a warning sign right there that trouble was on the horizon.

    I understand the feelings of those involved, but the law has long been in place and well known. They can’t honestly claim to be blindsided- they just didn’t think the law applied to THEM. That is the real problem. She can’t insist that gays should have equal treatment under the law… except when it comes to obeying the law.

    Statutory rape is still a crime. Being of the same sex as the younger partner is not a licence for entering a relationship with someone under the age of consent. If we are going to have an age limit on consensual sex (whether it is set at 6 or 16), it must be respected by everyone. To claim that it shouldn’t apply to these girls because they are both female is to argue that a particular group can ignore the law… The point of the rule of law is that it applies to everyone.

  • I am sorry that the girls didn’t think that their relationship was important enough to think much about. They should have waited a bit, and there would have been no problem. Someone worth your time is worth waiting for. The laws of human nature apply to all relationships. Someone who can’t or won’t wait for sex is too self-centered to be a good partner in a healthy relationship. It could have been a warning sign right there that trouble was on the horizon. I understand the feelings of those involved, but the law has long been in place and well known. They can’t honestly claim to be blindsided- they just didn’t think the law applied to THEM. That is the real problem.

    Statutory rape is still a crime. Being of the same sex as the younger partner is not a licence for entering a relationship with someone under the age of consent. If we are going to have an age limit on consensual sex (whether it is set at 6 or 16), it must be respected by everyone. To claim that it shouldn’t apply to these girls because they are both female is to argue that a particular group can ignore the law… The point of the rule of law is that it applies to everyone. People who claim to want to be treated equally can’t demand special privileges.

  • re: stop the hate, free Kate

    I am sorry that the girls didn’t think that their relationship was important enough to think much about. They should have waited a bit, and there would have been no problem. Someone worth your time is worth waiting for. The laws of human nature apply to all relationships. Someone who can’t or won’t wait is too self-centered to be a good partner in a healthy relationship. It could have been a warning sign right there that trouble was on the horizon.

    Statutory rape is still a crime. Being of the same sex as the younger partner is not a licence for entering a relationship with someone under the age of consent. If we are going to have an age limit on consensual sex (whether it is set at 6 or 16), it must be respected by everyone. To claim that it shouldn’t apply to these girls because they are both female is to argue that a particular group can ignore the law… The point of the rule of law is that it applies to everyone.

    I understand the feelings of those involved, but a precedent must be set. The law has been in place and well known. They can’t honestly claim to be blindsided- they just didn’t think the law applied to THEM. That is the real problem.