User Profile: 1froglegs

1froglegs

Member Since: November 21, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [8] July 1, 2015 at 5:41pm

    TG360- I am more than willing to go out of my way to ensure I do not give my money to anyone who does not want it. You should be able to pick and choose your customers the same way a customer can pick and choose who they do business with. The free market will handle it from there.

  • [15] July 1, 2015 at 3:32pm

    I should be able to deny service to ANY PERSON for ANY REASON. If the public does not like my stance, they can shop somewhere else. The free market will decide whether or not the community opposes or supports it.

  • [7] June 29, 2015 at 3:25pm

    Why is marriage a civil right? Marriage is a religious commitment ceremony that has somehow devolved into a government licensed contract. Gays are not being denied the right to be in a relationship. People are opposed to them co-opting a word that to them is rooted in their religious heritage. The marriage debate was never about gay marriage, it has always been an attempt to legitimize their lifestyle through a government seal of approval.

  • [45] June 27, 2015 at 7:51pm

    What we need is a secession of the states!!!!

  • June 24, 2015 at 2:26pm

    It is a bigger leap of faith to say we are alone in the universe than to say that there are other life forms out there.

  • [1] June 24, 2015 at 12:27pm

    It is easy to dismiss these types of things, but it has long been the policy of the US government to deny the existence of alien life if they were ever to find it. That is not to say that they have found something, but the policy to deny it is a long held policy.

    Clearly alien life exists somewhere out there. The universe is far too large for us to be the only things living in it.

    Responses (2) +
  • [27] June 20, 2015 at 6:25pm

    The Boy Scouts did not allow openly gay scout members, that does not mean people like this guy did not slip through the cracks.

    Being gay is the result of a mental dysfunction related to sexual attraction. It is not unreasonable to say that we cannot determine how far that dysfunction goes. If a person wants to have sex with animals, will you allow them to babysit your kids because “My daughter isn’t a dog, so he won’t have sex with her”?

    It is better to err on the side of caution and only knowingly allow people with normal sexual attractions to hold a supervisory role over young children. Once a kid is violated like that they generally are messed up for their whole life. Why risk it?

  • [19] June 17, 2015 at 9:16pm

    Even if the shot to the face disfigured him, his cellmate will still love him…really, really love him.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] June 5, 2015 at 7:26pm

    A private business can put any restrictions they want on their employees as long as the restrictions do not violate the law. Not allowing an employee to advertise the extent of their employment is in no way a violation of any law. You either work under the conditions of employment as laid out by your employer, or you find a new job.

  • [34] June 5, 2015 at 5:36pm

    Your Constitutional rights are between you and your government, not you and your employer. If you do not like the restrictions your employer place on you as a condition of your employment, then you need to find a new job.

    Responses (1) +
  • [15] April 29, 2015 at 6:57pm

    I was just wondering how much time you save every day by not reading the article and then commenting based on what you interpret the headline to mean. I have a busy schedule and was hoping to find some ways to save time, and jumping to conclusions like you do seems as good a way as any.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] March 12, 2015 at 7:20pm

    @grannyjojo I am the one who is using common sense. She broke the law. Justice is blind, and poverty should not be allowed to be used as an excuse for theft. If it is not a big deal, she could have asked first. In the end a private citzen was left paying the bill to charge her phone, and that is not fair.

  • [1] March 12, 2015 at 7:15pm

    @TheGrtDcptn If one day I am in a situation where I am starving and decide to steal food, I will not feign indignation when I am arrested for it. Your personal needs do not trump the requirement that somebody else will have to pay for it. That is why healthcare is not a right, because you are not entitled to anything that someone else has to involuntarily provide for you.

  • [2] March 12, 2015 at 5:53pm

    Anyone who feels the police overreated is free to set up a charging station outisde of their home.

  • [-2] March 12, 2015 at 5:22pm

    Theft is theft. Either you support the rule of law or you do not. This was not a victimless crime, because somebody is left paying the cost of her electricity usage. At some point something has to be done to prevent the homeless people from taking advantage of others. It does not matter if the cost of the item is only a few pennies. What matters is that she took something that did not belong to her without any intention of paying for it. If you let it happen today it will happen again tomorrow, and eventually your outlets become the charging station for every drug addict on Skid Row.

  • [-5] March 12, 2015 at 4:17pm

    She will just have to use some of the money she uses to buy drugs to pay her fine. A little less crack for her tomorrow should cover the cost of the fine.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] March 12, 2015 at 4:16pm

    Then you should offer to pay the cost of the electricity for her. Today its a cell phone, tomorrow she’ll want to plug in a space heater. Where does it stop? She stole electricity and got caught. Justice is served.

    Responses (2) +
  • [18] March 12, 2015 at 4:14pm

    How are they scumbags? Why should a private person, who has no association with this “homeless” woman, be forced to pay for her to charge her phone. Electricity is not free.

    Responses (14) +
  • [2] February 7, 2015 at 4:40pm

    I hope she died as they attempted to capture her. I would not want any woman to spend a day in captivity being held by these barbarians.

    The kind of people who burn someone alive are not prone to spontaneous acts of mercy.

  • [9] February 7, 2015 at 4:23pm

    For her sake, her parents should hope that she died quickly while they were “capturing” her. These people treat their own wives like animals, I can only imagine how they treat a white America woman.

    They will never see her alive again, and they should pray that her suffereing ended as quickly as it started.

    Responses (5) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love