Here’s the easiest vetting process for Syrian refugees and/or anyone entering this country from the middle east. You usher everyone into a giant convention center. Then, at some point later in the day, you show a fake video on the big screen of the United States being attacked by Islamists all across the country (get some actors and plug in some CGI special effects). Then you announce that Islamists are attacking and trying to take over the country. Suddenly, all of the terrorist posing as refugees will jump up with knives and scream “Allahu Akbar!!!” You shoot them in the head. Then you take that group out and bring in the next group for vetting.
Very effective. Very cost efficient
 November 19, 2015 at 12:55am
Hey Everyone – Vote At The Link Below For “Time Magazine Person of the Year 2015″ – DO NOT let the disgraceful CEO of planned parenthood or Bernie Sanders get it! Trump, Cruz, Carson and many others are on the list to vote for (only get one vote apparently). Just a heads up
I did my duty and voted for Cruzy!
At the top with 14.4% is Bernie Sanders LOL
 November 18, 2015 at 1:27pm
There is going to be a lot of chaos over the next 12 months. Even more than there is right now. Out of the chaos though Liberty will rise again and all this gender/blm crap will be washed away like a sandcastle by a large wave and we’ll get back to restoring our nation again.
 November 17, 2015 at 12:46pm
Must watch: The best speech an Israeli diplomat ever held” George Deek in Oslo (George is an Arab Christian Israeli – Powerful!) https://youtu.be/8m6ux-IeNo4
One of the best documentaries ever made about Israel’s entire history and all that they have had to endure over the centuries right up to today. Called “Israel Indivisible” https://youtu.be/3zCmNWd_yRs
 November 12, 2015 at 6:54pm
You missed the point of my post entirely Ratiocinative.
 November 12, 2015 at 6:51pm
Thanks for the suggestions. I know about #1 well but the other two I am definitely going to explore now. In fact, below are links to your suggestions for everyone. Thank you again
You have to look ahead at their ultimate goal. They are eliminating Christianity from all public spaces while at the same time setting goals to eliminate private property. Do you see how this ends? It all came from Karl Marx’s “Communist Manifesto” – goal number one. Once the state owns all property then you won’t even be able to put up Christian displays or have a Bible in your home because Marxists want to eliminate private property. Always look ahead.
Ten Planks Of Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto
1. Abolition of private property in land and application of all rents of land to public purpose.
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the state.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal obligation of all to work. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
10. Free education for all children in government schools.
Step by step, the progressives continue on their ideological road to madness and more...
22: Agree. The Far left stamp is indelibly marked on our so0-called Progressive Left and the International Lefties who droned Marxist-mentored Barack Obama into the Democrat party. This is no coincidence. This is a well orchestrated - tho hidden - Plan - just like all of the old communist comrade Five Year Plans of the past !
22Automatic, very good post. Further good reading:
1)Lookup the 45 goals of communism. Pay special attention to #17.
2)Go to youtube and watch "The Wave". (School experiment.)
3)On youtube, watch the movie "The childrens story. (in 3 parts)
Also good reading: The Naked Communist, By: Cleon Skousen
Right, and in respect to #10., if you send your kids to a public school, you are NOT a conservative.
There is no "Separation of Church and State" in 1A. Only that the federal government cannot establish a national religion. Of course, why do I even post this anymore. Liberals already have their version of the constitution called "case law."
I want to see if selling a small plot of land to a private historical society for such displays (with deed restrictions) would work. I don't think it has been tried yet.
This is neither progressive nor atheist, it is constitutional. It's so simple, I don't understand why everyone fights it so. Display all you want on private property, just leave it off of government property… So incredibly simple and constitutional
You have two options here:
(1) Government allows no displays of religion on public property
(2) Government allows all displays equally
This isn't difficult. Just let them have their dumb solstice banner (and yeah probably a satan statue), and you can have your nativity. Or if those offend you, move the nativity down the block to a church. So. Very. Simple.
So because you are afraid of some government shift (away from democracy), you believe that following our constitution should be overlooked in favor of Christianity?
There is no specific tie in that makes Maxism = Atheism or vice versa. They are two totally different things. Just because one can exist with the other (in a hypothetical) does not mean one leads to the other. In the end, it is merely a straw man argument.
When someone leaps from a constitutional argument over whether it is appropriate to promote a singular religious viewpoint on public land to a communistic conspiracy theory, I wonder if their tinfoil hat is on too tight.
 October 31, 2015 at 3:20pm
 October 28, 2015 at 4:13pm
You’ve just completely explained the issue in just over 100 characters that so-called “journalists” & “experts” have been unable (and unwilling) to figure out for years. It really is that simple
[-1] October 16, 2015 at 4:39pm
You are 100% correct
[-17] October 15, 2015 at 3:52pm
lol – I post scientists discussing soft tissue on 60 Minutes and your retort is some no-name blogger doing a voice over on YouTube?
[-20] October 15, 2015 at 3:31pm
Oh, and whatever you do Blinknight DO NOT down vote “iceblast’s” lead comment which currently has 9 up-votes because I want all of my links to remain on the front page of the comment section so everyone can see/hear the truth.
[-19] October 15, 2015 at 3:24pm
Blinknight is so insecure whenever the “evolution” theory is in trouble that he brings all of his boys from Media Matters over here by the hundreds to down-vote everyone and up-vote all of his comments because he knows “evolution” is on its deathbed. Now, go ahead, call all of your Drongo Horses at Media Matters & Rational Wiki to down vote me. Pathetic & weak. Not to mention, you spent all day yesterday and today in panic mode making sure all of your comments were up-voted. Get a life
Here’s a famous Creationist is answering questions on evolution, the Bible, Dinosaurs, and more daily for people around the world on YouTube. He’s converted over 150 atheists just the past month alone. He’ll answer your questions live if you still have any after watching the other videos I posted
Kent Hovind is one of the most debunked idiots on all of Youtube. Videos explaining how completely wrong he is about basically everything have been around for years.
You are correct. Those who claim he has been debunked simply begin by asserting that their view is true. They beg the question, and then use their assumptions to simply make the claim that hovind was wrong. I have yet to see any solid refutation based on science, for the vast majority of what mr hovind presents
Hovind has been shown to be wrong on so many levels, makes me wonder how he can call himself a Christian.
conserve- could you give two examples to support your assertion? I know of a couple things where I would disagree with Mr Hovind. But it would be good to hear what you think
Sure, pick two subjects with his statements. Please be specific.
Conserve- You made the assertion. You support it. you take the time to do the search
Very correct. In doing some research, I found somebody has done quite a job already..
What you think?
COnserve- Have you read what you posted? What I think is that you should respond to the original request. I do note that Mr hovind posited some things that I would not use as evidence for creation or a young earth. But the premsie stands. You pick a couple things which you believe refute creation and a young earth.
ok. Radiometric dating.
And my fave paleomagnetism. At the Atlantic ridge, the plates are moving outward around 2 cm per year. And the rock shows the Earth's poles has flipped multiple times. And today we see mag north is wandering as well. The neat part is there is a copy showing the same thing on the other side of the ridge.
Dating ancient ages is base on assumptions about the ancient past that cannot be shown by science. The first question asked about a sample is " what layer was it found in" then, assumptions about the strata are used as the base. The rocks are dated by the find, and the find is dated by the rocks. Dates that fit are kept, those that don't are discarded. No on can know what the original conditions were, or what happened in the ensuing years
Your second does nothing to prove the age. The ages are assumed, not proven by the observations. All that can be seen, is what can be seen. history cannot be observed in the chart or the plates.
"These geological principles are not assumptions either. Each of them is a testable hypothesis about the relationships between rock units and their characteristics. They are applied by geologists in the same sense that a "null hypothesis" is in statistics -- not necessarily correct, just testable. In the last 200 or more years of their application, they are often valid, but geologists do not assume they are. They are the "initial working hypotheses" to be tested further by data.
Using these principles, it is possible to construct an interpretation of the sequence of events for any geological situation, even on other planets (e.g., a crater impact can cut into an older, pre-existing surface, or craters may overlap, revealing their relative ages). The simplest situation for a geologist is a "layer cake" succession of sedimentary or extrusive igneous rock units arranged in nearly horizontal layers. In such a situation, the "principle of superposition" is easily applied, and the strata towards the bottom are older, those towards the top are younger."
you just posted a link that contained nothing but assupmtions about what is observed. They could not be anything else
Uh, what assumptions where none are made? You need to explain what is the assumption in light of what I posted above? Please take a quote and say what is assumed. Or did you not read it and you wish to make false statements (not a good thing in the Light of God).
[-20] October 15, 2015 at 2:15am
Dinosaur bones are actually not billions of years old. Recently even 60 minutes had scientists admitting they’ve discovered soft tissue and blood cells in dinosaur fossils that couldn’t exist past a few thousand years. Many creationists take the position, and rightfully so, that dinosaurs died out during Noah’s Flood. What’s the evidence for that? See below.
Now go look up the rest of the dinosaur story and you will find out what the creationists neglected to tell you.
lol - I post scientists discussing soft tissue on 60 Minutes and your retort is some no-name blogger doing a voice over on YouTube?
Also, when Neil Armstrong stepped on the moon, they were expecting much more accumulation of dust, so it's actually a young moon compared to "scientists" of today.
Moon dust was not an issue before landing.. I knew this 20 years ago.
 October 3, 2015 at 1:21am
All of the information/links I’ve posted so far sum up everything well but to your points:
1) Generally speaking Atheists believe in evolution (though some are now swinging over to “Ancient Aliens” because they see the writing on the wall for “Darwinism” and wish to find any alternative to God — i.e. consequences for actions)
2) Though 98% of mass murderers, school shooters, genocide, serial killers, totalitarians, terrorists (less Islam) are atheist/agnostic not every single one in history has been what you’d say “left-wing” though. All have been anti-Christian and/or anti-American though in my lifetime.
3) “Sometimes mass murders are crazy too:” I cannot argue with that. And though I cannot interview every one of them my wager is that they believe they evolved from slime OR were “seeded” here by aliens.
4) McVeigh & Breivik (not Christians) both fit my criteria as well. Always fall into one or multiple of these categories: 1) Atheist/Humanist 2) Anti-American 3) Anti-Christian 5) Progressive/Marxist 6) or combination of above
“I agree with your post, but as far as warning signs for potential mass murderers, I think believers in evolution are pretty low on the list.” I would have to disagree here. I would place believing we “evolved from bacteria” & “no life after death” is at the top (Dahmer said it perfectly)
Wow John. I have not heard those points made anywhere else. Please send them in to news tips and/or copy the info to news editors on Twitter. Great important information
 October 2, 2015 at 10:58pm
Thank you my brother. Below are a ton of Kent Hovind debates/seminars all in one place worth sharing with others. He never copyrighted his videos and now they’re all over every video platform & in 40+ countries (I think over 88 million views in total added up). Not bad for a guy who, until 2015, didn’t know what YouTube was!
Hovind just challenged Neil Tyson, Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, Bill Nye, and 10 other top atheists/evolutionists to debate ALL AT THE SAME TIME. That’s how confident he is. I think he’s now 100-0 in debates against Darwinists.
 October 2, 2015 at 10:42pm
You’re having a hard time tonight Hooey
 October 2, 2015 at 9:46pm
Hoosier bought a bright red love seat 5 years ago; half of it is still brand new
20 Shocking Things That Have Happened In the Kent Hovind IRS Targeting & Persecution Case Since 2004 (Lois Lerner’s first target) https://youtu.be/Xxqnrhr9qqM