Liberty University

User Profile: 2AFirearmsDealerDotCom


Member Since: July 20, 2012


  • [1] October 17, 2014 at 9:22am

    “Think about it, the bad guy brought a knife to a gun fight; a wounding shot did all that had to be done.”

    Until the next time when the thug brings a gun and ambushes his next victim(s) so as not to get shot himself again…

  • [23] October 13, 2014 at 12:10pm

    “The lawyer did note that Hands on Originals has both employed and served gays and lesbians, but that when it comes to the messages present on products, Adamson draws a line.”

    So, it appears he has served anybody and everybody, as long as the message itself is within his ideals of appropriate imagery.

    Does this mean I can sue him and force him to print tshirts depicting child rape, or mass murder, or bestiality?

    1) It is HIS private business, not the governments. He should have the right to do with it as he pleases. If the masses don’t agree with it, then don’t shop there.

    2) Why should anybody be forced to do something that violates their first amendment rights?

    3) What happened to freedom in this country? Doesn’t anybody care anymore?

    4) Can we force the gay activist groups to promote anti-gay sentiments if they have businesses with which we could do so?

    Responses (2) +
  • August 21, 2014 at 1:42pm

    Wrong. Rounds of ammunition are either sub-sonic (below the speed of sound), or super-sonic (above the speed of sound). With some exceptions, most handgun ammunition is sub-sonic, and most rifle ammunition is supersonic.

    Since the speed of sound (which actually varies a little based on some variables such as air temperature) is approximately 1,125 ft/s, it depends on whether the cartridge used has a muzzle velocity above or below that to determine if the cartridge is supersonic or subsonic.

    In practicality, does it really matter? Most people would not be able to hear/see the difference as the sound of the shot will be within fractions of a second of the shot itself regardless.

  • [1] August 13, 2014 at 11:46am

    Thats nice, but they never read the constitution anyway. Further, in order to truly understand the constitution, and not try and “interpret” it to fit your wants, they really need to be reading the Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers that explain the constitution.

  • [1] August 13, 2014 at 9:15am

    “fleeing from El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras.”

    Don’t they mean… INVADING from El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras.

  • July 31, 2014 at 7:16am

    1) Is this one of the same schools that the UN admitted to finding Hamas rockets within?

    2) If not, isn’t it likely that there were Hamas weapons within?

    3) There are all kinds of reports and condemnations about Israel attacking civilian targets, but few to no reports of those “civilian” targets housing Hamas and weapons, nor any reports of Hamas performing some of those attacks attributed to Israel (which has had evidence presented in some of the attacks).

    4) White House, how about you condemn Hamas for continuing to lob rockets and attack civilians in Israel?

  • July 24, 2014 at 11:48am

    Monk, wait… that is impossible (seeing turtles crossing roads in florida….)

    I mean, after spending all that tax payer money to build a turtle tunnel? You must be lying.

  • [13] July 18, 2014 at 11:38am

    How about government officials get off social media and do their jobs rather than sending out tweets? Twits.

  • [2] July 18, 2014 at 9:34am

    Yes, legally you can purchase it in another state and have it transferred in your own state, unless the state itself has its own laws preventing it. Like you said, it is just like an internet sale.

    Unfortunately, the SCOTUS refuses to practice constitutional law, especially regarding the second amendment, as any and all gun laws are an infringement and against our constitutional rights.

    verb (used with object), in·fringed, in·fring·ing.
    1. to commit a breach or infraction of; violate or transgress: to infringe a copyright; to infringe a rule.
    verb (used without object), in·fringed, in·fring·ing.
    2. to encroach or trespass (usually followed by on or upon ): Don’t infringe on his privacy.

    ANY gun law “encroaches” upon our right to keep and bear arms.

  • July 17, 2014 at 12:32pm

    While I believe this is wrong and shows the declining morals of our society and potential issues and dangers for the girls and the way they were/are raised, I just have to say one thing…

    Its a turtle…

  • [1] July 17, 2014 at 12:25pm

    Earnest replied. “The issue that we’re seeing right now is not individuals attempting to evade detection by Border Patrol, what we’re seeing right now are people coming to the border and turning themselves over to Border Patrol.”

    This should explain EVERYTHING to the American people. It means… illegal aliens are no longer afraid of being caught in our country. They are turning themselves in because they know this administration will give them a pass, bus them to some community where they will be given schooling, money, food, housing, and let them stay until amnesty is given.

  • June 9, 2014 at 1:52pm

    So correct me if I’m wrong… This is all about limiting the production of CO2, right? The same stuff that feeds plantlife? The same stuff that plantlife thrives on in levels between 600-800 ppm? And we are already limited to under 350ppm?

    So, unless I’m mistaken, we are already limiting the food of plantlife to half their desired levels, in essence killing them or making them grow smaller, wherein they cannot produce as much oxygen for us to breathe.

    Therefore, not only are the EPA and environmentalists killing or at least preventing plantlife from thriving on this planet, they are also keeping people from breathing clean, oxygen rich air and minimizing how much oxygen can be produced by said plantlife?

    Thanks EPA. Personally, I’d like my family to be able to breathe!

  • [1] June 6, 2014 at 1:44pm

    What about banning people from obtaining and using knives and cars too? This guy killed half the people with a knife and wounded many more with his car.

    We need to stop the assault on inanimate objects. They are not the problem.

  • [1] June 4, 2014 at 11:21am

    Not really. America has the lions share of funding the UN and IMF. Once our financial disaster is no longer postponed by the FEDs Quantitative Easing, there will be nobody left to bail us out because nobody will have money to do it.

  • [4] June 4, 2014 at 11:17am

    It is so nice for Michigan to give Detroit so much “extra” money (throwing it down the toilet as the D has already proven that corruption and incompetence has overrun the city and they can’t manage their money anyway), all while preparing to push an increased gas tax from 19.5 cents to 44 cents per gallon because we need more money to fix roads…

  • June 3, 2014 at 9:37am

    Republicans, or more specifically conservatives, are completely losing the battle by fighting the wrong fight.

    The issue should NEVER be “we need to raise the minimum wage because people can’t afford to live on their meager pay”…

    The TRUE issue is WHY CANT people live on their meager pay? Why is everything so darn expensive now? Why is gas still $4? Why is food up 36% since a few years ago? Why does everything cost so much more now than it did 5-10 years ago if inflation is 0%???

    With government regulation and control, costs of businesses have increased greatly. With increasing minimum wage, costs go up. Do the people really think businesses are going to eat all these additional costs? Of course not. They must make a profit in order to stay open and hire people.

    A very simple way to drop the costs on almost everything we buy is to get gas back down to under $2 a gallon.

    Also, get rid of the overbearing regulations and laws that are stifling businesses and not allowing people to thrive. Get government out of the way and let the true free market work its magic.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-5] June 2, 2014 at 12:40pm

    I am a born and raised Christian. I do appreciate and approve of everything he said, but do not agree with him using a public location and event to do so. I am also a conservative and constitutionalist. I believe he has the constitutional right to say whatever he wishes as long as it does not interfere with anothers constitutional rights. But he should keep his thoughts and prayers about God separate from his official capacity in a public school.

    Therein lays the problem. For all those praising him, consider for the moment how you would feel if instead of God, he was preaching and praising Allah and radical islam/muslim. I most certainly would NOT want some school principal preaching Allah and radical islam to MY kids.

    The moment of silence is fantastic, so those with beliefs, whatever those beliefs may be, can say a little prayer, or not. In a Christian or Catholic school, by all means include god in anything. If in a Muslim school, include Allah. In cases such as these, there is a reasonable expectation that God or Allah will be included in the curriculum.

    However, in a non-religious specific public school, allow all or none. And I would prefer none to allowing the potential of religious hate or values other than I wish to teach my children to be preached.

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] May 29, 2014 at 9:11am

    Bottom line, a knife and a car were also used to commit these horrible atrocities…

    Why aren’t the lefties calling to ban knives and cars as well, considering they each cost more lives in a week than guns do in a year.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 17, 2014 at 2:03pm

    How about this? Very few children get obese from one meal a day during school.

    Child obesity starts at the home. And I have every darn right to feed my kids what I want (My kids are actually extremely healthy and thin.)

    Child obesity is NOT going to be stopped or controlled by the lunches they serve at school. Just more government control in our lives.

  • April 16, 2014 at 9:25am

    Who said this guy is a kid?