TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying 2AFirearmsDealerDotCom's 10 most recent comments.

• This Man Is Now Claiming to Be the Real Hero in the Cleveland Kidnapping Case

  May 8, 2013 at 2:00pm

  Sorry, in my opinion, “heros” do not look for attention, or the need to be recognized, especially as “the first” to help.

• Guns and Crime: What the Statistics Really Say and How They’re Interpreted in the Debate

  May 7, 2013 at 9:10am

  I’m so tired of these gun debates. Look… just buy guns. Lots of them.

• Senate Reaches Bipartisan Deal on Background Checks for Guns

  April 10, 2013 at 12:00pm

  In reply to freedomisasfreedomdoes.

  You are assuming they either do not know, or do not understand the constitution and peoples rights.

  I suggest that they know EXACTLY what they are doing, and are following the blueprint by the progressives to turn this once free nation to a socialist/communist/dictatorship under the guise of “protecting the people” or “social justice”. It is that simple.

• Senate Reaches Bipartisan Deal on Background Checks for Guns

  April 10, 2013 at 11:54am

  In reply to termyt.

  BG Checks are not an additional tax. There is no charge for the check nor does the government receive money for the check (outside of the FFL license fee for license holders).

  When my company sells a firearm, we do not charge a background check fee (though, there are some states that do assess background check fees, this has nothing to do with federal law).

  We do, however, charge a nominal transfer fee, if somebody buys a firearm from another location and uses us as the transfer dealer. But this is not for the background check. This is for our time and effort in providing the transfer service, filling out the paperwork, etc.

• The Epic Gun Control Testimony You’ve Been Waiting For: ‘The Constitution Did Not Guarantee Public Safety, It Guaranteed Liberty’

  March 21, 2013 at 1:58pm

  In reply to moderateliberal.

  @Welldoneson

  Don’t feed the trolls…

• The Epic Gun Control Testimony You’ve Been Waiting For: ‘The Constitution Did Not Guarantee Public Safety, It Guaranteed Liberty’

  March 21, 2013 at 1:56pm

  @Marine25
  “Are you suggesting conservatives make the argument that the judiciary cannot establish the constitutionality of ANY limitations on the 2nd? No restriction on nuclear weapons? Citizens with rocket launchers? Anti-personnel mines? Serin gas? Fully automatic weapons? … Precedent says the arms guaranteed to citizens can be limited in the cause of a civil society and national security. Suggesting the 2nd is unlimited is historically inaccurate and politically unwise.”

  Quit with the BS straw man arguments. First of all, you should learn your history, maybe even read the Constitution and Federalist and Anti-Federalist papers. In addition, the Constitution should be viewed with Constitutional Law, not Case Law with “precedents”. Turning the law system into a Case Law system was the biggest and worse movement in out country by the progressives. Also, no “Precedent” has yet or should ever be set that can or would violate the Constitution. Those that are, I would argue, unconstitutional and our current Supreme Court doesn’t have the guts to knock them down, because of progressives)

  Nobody is suggesting weapons of mass destruction should fall into the hands of the average citizen. That is also, I suggest, outside of the perview of “Arms”, as they are not hand held “firearms”.

  If you knew what you were talking about, fully automatic firearms ARE available to citizens (but it is a LOT more regulated).

  Bottom line, show me ANY evidence that laws stop cr

• Has Gun Ownership in American Homes Really Decreased This Dramatically?

  March 11, 2013 at 11:37am

  As a firearms dealer, we can tell you without a shadow of doubt that we have had many NEW first time gun owners buying firearms.

  While we don’t ask nor keep records, it is very interesting how many people volunteer the information that they are a first time purchaser.

  We do, of course, always recommend taking safety training, gun classes, regular target practice, etc.

  Household gun ownership may have declined over the past 4 decades, but it surely is on the rise now, based upon the number of new owners we are seeing.

• Have Any More Gun Makers Stopped Selling To Anti-Gun States? (Hint: Yeah, Lots More)

  February 22, 2013 at 11:46am

  In reply to dbadave.

  http://2afirearmsdealer.com/magpul-pmag-223rem-30rnd-blk.html

  $10.13 and flat rate shipping.

  Unfortunately, we can’t get anymore at the moment, but we are working on it. Demand is much higher than supply, and is projected to be so for at least 6-9 months.

• Have Any More Gun Makers Stopped Selling To Anti-Gun States? (Hint: Yeah, Lots More)

  February 22, 2013 at 11:41am

  We have ALWAYS refused sales to governments, agencies, employees, etc in locations that restrict sales to the law abiding citizens. Our belief has always been we will only sell items to anybody when it is legal to do so for the average law abiding citizen.

• Campus Rape Victim Says Gun-Free Zones Empower Criminals, Defends Concealed Carry

  February 21, 2013 at 2:36pm

  Unfortunately, the libs are winning the debate, because they are making the debate about what we the people would NEED in order to defend ourselves. “you don’t NEED a 30rd magazine to defend yourself… a 10 round mag will allow it”.

  The problem is, the debate should NOT be about what we the people NEED. It should be about what the government has a right to legislate.

  For example, the federal government is given specific enumerated powers that it has power over. Gun control is not one of them. In addition, the founders put in our constitution the bill of rights, which includes the 2nd amendment, for the specific purpose of preventing the government from trying to usurp control over guns if they decided to ignore the fact that the power was not granted in the constitution.

  We need to change the conversation from “Where is the line for what kind of weapons you need to defend yourselves with” … to … “Why is the federal government involved in making laws about gun control when they not only have no authority to do so because it is not listed in the powers granted to it by the constitution, but is also specifically denied authority by the 2nd amendment”

  Conservatives in this country need to stop trying to play the libs games, and start pressing the real issues.

  Does the federal government have the AUTHORITY under the constitution to legislate issue X under the constitution? No? Then too bad. Get off it.