User Profile: 2Amendment

2Amendment

Member Since: September 07, 2011

Comments

123
  • [1] July 18, 2014 at 10:21am

    I will close by quoting another commenter’s thoughts on the subject which is at the heart of matters as far as Christians are concerned. Government does pass laws restricting the free exercise of religion.

    “Richalu
    - Jul. 18, 2014 at 9:43am .

    While at the same time they applaud the LGBT community in their efforts to get the Federal government to force Christians to bake cakes for them, to force Christians to take their wedding photos, to force Christian pastors to marry them in … a church…

    On the one hand they demand the separation of church and state, yet on the other they demand total unification of the same.”

  • July 18, 2014 at 10:10am

    How are your freedoms limited? I probably haved live longer and seen much more of the change that has happened as and adult than the fast majority that post. In the sixties the leftist doctrine because the hallmark of higher education except in science and engineering schools. It produced a host of extreme radials most of which ended up in universities and a few in politics. The ideology was very radical and Marxist which by definition is anti Christian in particular and anti religion in general. Obama is a second generation product of this ideology.

    Marxism has been very explicit about how to gain control of the US and one of their top goals was and is destruction of Christianity. The left today has adopted the radical ideology mainstream and jointed the war on Christianity. That gave us the newly discovered constitutional right to murder babies. You don’t have to be a Christian to object to that, you just have to think clearly.

    Many old line protestant denominations pushing ecumenicalism have more in common with Marx than they do with the Bible. Ecumenicalism that requires you to accept ideology and practice that is proscribed in Scripture clearly is heresy and should be treated as such.

  • [1] July 18, 2014 at 9:44am

    Your comment fails to recognize that you classify dogma as the only reason people would oppose destructive practices and life styles. You also fail to recognize that what you call trying to force their belief on you is actually a reaction to the attack the left, people like you, as organized against Christians.

    I was repulsed by homosexuality long before I became a Christian, casual sex is destructive, look at the unwed birth rate which is a life sentence of poverty of the child. Hard to see why one should want to support life styles that insure a low quality of life. The attacks on the family are not just anti Christian, you also take swipes at Islam also as well as other religions as well as thousands of years of practice and traditions. Those traditions were not just religiously prescribed but empirically found to work best.

    Your anti religious bigotry is clearly displayed and based on inability to critically think.

  • [6] July 18, 2014 at 9:28am

    You have that right in the first amendment and you can embrace that, your problem is you don’t want to just practice your right, you want to shut down the rights of those that disagree with you.

  • [2] July 18, 2014 at 9:21am

    The left is always quoting the wall of separation of church and state, a phrase not in the Constitution but never recognize the full content of the First Amendment religious clause -”Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;,,,,,,”

    Just as in not understanding the Second Amendment “shall not be infringed” they have complete disregard for the prohibition of government interfering with the free exercise of religion.

    The fact is the extreme left as represented by those controlling the Democrat party don’t like and want to do away with the Constitution.

  • [11] July 17, 2014 at 9:05am

    “I don’t believe that any company has the right to deny access to appropriate medical care, same as the reason why I don’t believe that they have the right to deny me access to the washroom,” she said. “No company has the right to dictate what is decided between me and my doctor.”

    There is the clear false statement behind the left’s attack on Hobby Lobby and the basis for the Left’s false flag war on women.

    Access in the left’s terminology does not really mean access. Access is availability to get the service. The left uses it to mean the right to force someone else to pay for your services. Any woman can go to her doctor, get a prescription and walk in to any drug sore or pharmacy and obtain birth control. Period!

    The comment about an employer getting between her doctor and her is patently false and the evidence of a public school education critical thinking ability.

    Responses (2) +
  • [74] July 17, 2014 at 12:15am

    Issa can only discover and reveal corruption. The committee then must refer a criminal complain to Eric, “selective enforcement” Holder. This is why Lois Lerner has not been indicted and we have no special prosecutor for IRS, VA, and a host of other scandals.

    Congress has not power to indict or prosecute criminals.

    Responses (2) +
  • June 9, 2014 at 8:44am

    I think his lawyer blew it in making the defense about free speech and not the “free exercise of religion” cause of the First Amendment because precedent is very strong in that area.

    Responses (2) +
  • April 29, 2014 at 3:57pm

    As stated post salvation has many steps including temporal and permanent sanctification, adoption, perseverance and glorification. This is clearly seen in Romans:

    “28 And we know that [k]God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose. 29 For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among many brethren; 30 and these whom He predestined, He also called; and these whom He called, He also justified; and these whom He justified, He also glorified.” Rms 8:28-30

    No where in the limits of that process is works even mentioned because the verses are discussing the acts of God not man. calling, justification and glorification are all Devine acts with out human input or consent.

  • April 29, 2014 at 3:50pm

    Your quote comes from James and is reasonably accurate. but the passage has absolutely nothing to do with salvation.

    “21 But now apart [k]from the Law the righteousness of God has been manifested, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, 22 even the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all those [l]who believe; for there is no distinction; 23 for all [m]have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus; 25 whom God displayed publicly as a [n]propitiation [o]in His blood through faith. .

    27 Where then is boasting? It is excluded. By what kind of law? Of works? No, but by a law of faith. 28 [r]For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works [s]of the Law. 29 Or is God the God of Jews only? Is He not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, 30 since indeed God who will justify the [t]circumcised [u]by faith and the [v]uncircumcised through faith is one. RMS 3: 21ff NASB

    Justification come by grace through the blood Christ with out which there is no salvation. Justification is necessary and sufficient condition for salvation. This verse is in the context of defining the efficacy of the Law (works) which clearly does not bring justification.

    Sanctification is another matter and is post justification and as James states Christian works in the saved man is evidence of becoming sanctified. Post justification is a process:

  • April 29, 2014 at 10:03am

    Here is the source: “For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of works, so that no one may boast.” Ephesians 2:7-9 NASB

    It clearly states salvation is through faith and that you have no part in it at all. If it required you assent or put forth effort then you have works to your credit.

  • April 28, 2014 at 3:31pm

    Funny she does not quote Scripture on abortion, homosexuality, lying and cheating and coveting position and power. She is like many Christians, Pelosi comes to mind, that are cultural Christians that thing because they were born in a Christian country and attended a church they are true believers. So sad what happens on Judgment Day when the Lamb’s Book of Life is opened.

  • April 28, 2014 at 3:21pm

    Like many “social justice” adherents, Clinton quotes Scripture reasonably accurately but then makes the leap of applying those words to empowering government as the source of charity fulfillment and care for widows, orphans, and others.

    I have searched Scripture for years and have yet to see that government was in Christ’s or any disciple’s mind when discussing Christian charity and obligations.

    The Good Samaritan, used by Christ to demonstrate the concept of caring and being a good neighbor, did not call a government official to dispense care but did it himself. That is social justice Christian style, Clinton’s is collectivism’s finest imitation.

  • April 2, 2014 at 10:22am

    This public school teacher is so ignorant that she misses the symbolism. These are not Christian symbols, they are pagan, demonic representations. The star is a pentagram, a five point star inscribed in a circle and 666 is the symbol of the Beast, representing satan, from the Bible. A very evil and demonic message.

  • February 17, 2014 at 10:43am

    You got the correct charge right, second degree murder, but the rest of your “facts” are opinion which don’t correlate with reality. Neither of those cases involve SYG.

  • February 17, 2014 at 10:38am

    You misinterpret SYG. First it only matters if you have a legitimate self defense case. SYG means that there is no obligation to remove yourself or flee buy can not use deadly force with out meeting he legal requirements of self defense.

    Again Zimmerman could not flee at the point of using his weapon all the SYG nonsense was just that nonsense. The only question was did Zimmerman have a valid self defense situation? As far as who started the confrontation the time line presented in court show Martin had plenty of time to have walked home to safety and did not.

    I personally think this guy is guilty of second degree murder and should not be carrying.

  • January 29, 2014 at 11:44pm

    I believe it was General Honore’ who was in charge of the government’s Rita ( 3 week post Katrina) preparations responding to a reporter that asked a question of the General who had just said- you are essentially fighting the last storm, don’t get stuck on stupid.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qv5m4hTMuWU

  • November 30, 2013 at 9:39am

    If you are wondering which way our society is heading there are three explanations::

    First, you have been paying no attention to what is happening in the country
    Two, you lack critical thinking skills
    Three, you belong to the moocher class.

    This is an explanation of the Moocher Class by a 32 year old moocher.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRRwZDSmTVI

  • November 11, 2013 at 11:44pm

    I lived in Annapolis for over thirty years and escaped t0 a red state in 2003. Back a few years ago the Dems took Anne Arundel County, that voted Republican and placed it in four congressional districts dominated by leftists Democrat areas there by eliminating a safe Rep seat in Congress. Annapolis was placed in a district with some parts of Prince Georges country but the majority of the district voters, 75% as I recall were in Anne Arundel Country. When Reps won the majority of the seats in County for the State legislature delegation, and would have elected a Rep as delegation head, the Dems changed to procedure and allowed Prince County legislatures to vote in the Anne Arundel delegation caucus and retain control.

    Talk about voter suppression, this is how Democrats make sure your vote does not count.

    Responses (1) +
  • November 5, 2013 at 11:25pm

    You obviously did not watch Sibilsilly try and answer the question, when you were insurance commissioner and Governor, why did you allow these so called substandard policies to be sold in your state.

    Obama is famous for miss representing facts, one might call it lies, and calling the polices cheap and substandard is just one more example. The real issue is that the left thinks they know what I need better than I do, and your comments are prima facie evidence that the left is seriously ignorant.

123