1. Fox has give Trump more coverage than all the other candidates combined.
2. Trump has done nothing that shows he wants to represent me and he does not. He is a fataly flawed candidate.
3. Cruz has never represented the WDC elite and is the true anti establishment candidate.
4. Trump is the other side of the establishment coin, the corrupt business man that was buy the corrupt politicians that most people are upset about and Trump will bring his corrupt practices with him in the unlike event he is elected president.
5. Trump is in it for Trump just as he has been in everything else he does.
6. Trump is a pathological liar. He lies about everything.
No such thing as a principled conservative who fails to go vote republican in the gen. That would amount to a democrat mole. And that is true at any time. More so this time, considering the alternative to a republican in office in 2017. It's only the fate of the nation at stake.
March 24, 2016 at 1:11pm
Your candidate has a minority of Republican votes so a Trump win will be a denial of We the People.
March 24, 2016 at 1:07pm
The Fox poll was a statistical tie. Trump may or may not be in the lead.
The poll confrmed a majority of the voters wan a candidate other thanTrump for benefit of those claiming the will of the people s being ignored.
Lastly the poll shows that Trump loses the General election to Hillary while Cruz and Kasich beat her.
If polls match your agenda, they must be true. Glad politicians and the MSM have never lied to you before.
 March 19, 2016 at 10:06am
Why punish the only person in the contest that has actually opposed the forces in the Republican Party that you dislike with reason. Cruz has not sought the establishment’s help, the establishment in their desperation are starting to jump on The Cruz bandwagon. Secondly the difference between Cruz and the Demorats is stark. Crus is a true principled Constitutional conservative. He is not a phony Constitutional scholar like Obama he has al credentials like 8 cases won in the SCOUS.
If either Hillary or Trump win, the system becomes more corrupt, the SCOUS goes full extreme left wing and we lose many of our rights.
This is why I am angry. Sans the egotistical, authoritarian Trump with his ignorance of critical issues like the Constitution and left wing history, Cruz would have been the most likely winner of the primary and the general election. Have you ever heard Cruz’s position on immigration? Its a delight in the explanation of how the rule of law and the laws in place properly implemented solves the problem of illegal aliens. It is pure sanity and requires no changes to law just a law lover to implement.
I wish you would reconsider your vote because a Trump nomination will seriously damage the Republic by the election of Clinton and leave the establishment in charge of the party. Our children and grandchildren will never have the country I grew up in and the uniqueness of the American Revolution will die .
 March 17, 2016 at 8:03am
Rubio was not an anchor baby his parents entered the country by the front door legally before the Cuban Special Status was passed, He was born to parents that were legal resident’s of the USA and therefor not an anchor baby. You let your hate overcome your lack of due diligence.
March 16, 2016 at 9:16am
Megan Kelly is to Trump
As Koch Bros are to left wing Demorats
Both have to have some one to demonize to clover their lack of an intelligent rational argument supporting their side. Right out Rules for Radical which tells you a lot about the authoritarian tendencies of Trump. Bluster and crude, uncouth language is not the sign or a strong leader but does suit a two bit wantabe dictator well.
 March 12, 2016 at 10:08am
Ted you have my vote but this was not wise. What happens when they do the same thing to you? Did you incite it or because they are intolerant’ anti free speech? I expect better from you and you know better.
Cruz does not encourage his supporters to show up looking for a rumble. If this happens at one of his rallies, which I doubt, it will be handled by security.
Trump should be ashamed of himself, but he doesn't have the sense.
March 12, 2016 at 9:59am
There is no such thing, Fascism are a variation of Socialism. The fascist in history would have agreed with Hillary and Bernie, not any one on the right. This is what dumb downed left wing educations produces. Fascism is an economics theory of governance in the collectivist/socialist camp.
 March 12, 2016 at 9:52am
There more than a doubt were professional community organizers paid by Soros etc. but it was a very leftist college campus where nearly 300 professors were leading the opposition. Pretty much a socialist /communists mob with little need to stir it’s intolerance up.
 March 12, 2016 at 9:46am
The NAZI socialist Brownshirts are alive and living in the United States. These traitorous extreme left wingers want to insure that the thought is a pure and unadulterated “race” of thought and that all inferior thought should be wiped out to maintain the pureness of their race of thought. I am surprised they did not burn down the convention center and blame it in Trump, that would fit the NAZI socialist mode of operation and their bigotry.
Just like Islamist they cannot tolerate any ideas that challenge their totalitarian approach because their Marxist belief system is inferior and loses when an informed population is able to contrast their approaches. We have not seen such complete disregard for free speech and individual right since the 1960s Marxist inspired anti war thuggery. These are not protesters, protesters don’t disrupt other people’s right to assemble and their right to hear someone speak. Marxists and NAZI Brownshirts assert totalitarian brute force to eliminate all thought that they have decided opposes their pure race of thought.
The 1960 radicals, such as Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn of the Weathermen, wanted violent over thow of the USA and installation of a Communist government in the USA. Seems to me like we have the same danger again with what were are seeing develop in Chicago.
Trump is not a good candidate for President IMHO, but he is far less dangerous to the Republic than the NAZI Brownshirts present at Chicago and prevalent on the vast majority of college campuses
 February 25, 2016 at 1:29pm
Being rich does not make you a good prospect for president any more than being rich makes you a good prospect for being a priest. What makes a good candidate is a man of sound mind, a settled world view and adherence to the founding principles and the Constitution. Trump has none of these qualities and after 55 years of voting for the nominee, I will not vote for Trump period. He will be worse that Obama in deciding he is above the Constitution and the law. If I am going to get screwed it might as well be by a Democrat rather than a Democrat claiming to be a Republican.
At least with Hillary, you know what your getting ahead of time. With "The Donald" its anybody's guess, depending on the moment.
 August 31, 2015 at 2:20pm
You are so confused but I will limit my comment to the fact that your screen name shows mass confusion and ignorance. Socialism and Libertinism are mutually exclusive concepts as all forms of collectivism must be confiscating liberty and individual rights to consolidate power in the government’s hands. Libertarians would be ideologically opposed to giving that power to the government.
I can assure you, the confusion is yours. While certainly some forms of socialism involves the state removing property rights from individuals, liberal socialism is not such an ideology. Liberal/Libertarian Socialism is the ideolog of empowering individuals economically...it takes the concepts of democracy and applies them to the economic sphere. It fixes some of the prominent property rights issues that has arisen because of the deficiencies of the capitalist system.
And just how is anyone empowered by handouts from the government? That just makes people slaves to the government. Doesn't sound very "Libertarian" to me.
What handouts from the government? I don't recall saying anything about that...
Your own post at 2:31pm. You spoke of empowering people economically. How can that be done when there’s not enough work for Americans, let alone letting illegals flood in just to get whatever bennies (food stamps, medical care, etc.) that most people work for? Sooner or later, with that mentality, the government will run out of other people’s money to give away to those they let in in the first place. Where’s the empowerment then? You just never thought ahead to that argument. You can't SPEND your way into prosperity! It's already been tried elsewhere and failed elsewhere. Why do you liberals expect different results when you try the same things over and over?
 August 26, 2015 at 8:48am
That is the typical media question, just like the aborition-rape question. You go to the most emotional position and hamer on that so any reasonable discussion is lost. In this case the answer is of course the illegals will be deported. They can chose to take their child with them or leave the child with legal relatives. But the illegal parents will be deported. After all that is what anchor babies are all about rewarding unlawful behavior and Dems are all for that.
 August 25, 2015 at 9:48am
• Anchor baby is not a description of the baby but the function of the baby. The anchor refers to the vast numbers of people related to the baby that jump to the head of the line for legal residence and citizen ship because the anchor secures special privileges to otherwise unworthy persons. Everyone in the immediate family: parents, siblings grandparents aunts, uncles and cousins and for that reason it is a discriminatory policy and rewards unlawful behavior. The reason the left despises the term is because it exposes the duplicity of immigration policy. It also exposes the Dem plan to let the country slide to third world status to secure power.
 August 23, 2015 at 11:18am
Will Trump end the sugar tariffs that make sugar cost 134% more that it does world wide. Since sugar is the leading ingredient in Oreo’s products it is easy to see why they left for Mexico. Easy to say that he will not eat them but a lot harder to look at the reasons behind the decision. They had to move out of Illinois because of taxes, Workman’s comp and general anti business government, 11 other companies did so the same month. Oreos decided to eliminate the other major government cost of business by moving to Mexico rather than Alabama, Mississippi or Texas.
Unlike oil, where there are differences between grades, sugar is pretty much sugar. But there are two futures prices. Sugar #11 (the global price), and sugar #16, the US price thanks to tariffs.
The divide that led Luther to leave the Catholic Denomination was over salvation and the fact of scriptures stating salvation was by faith alone. Along with other maybe less substantial parts.
Eph 2:8-10 8 For by grace you have been saved through faith; and [h]that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; 9 not as a result of works, so that no one may boast. 10 For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them.
You are saved by grace and the mechanism is faith
The faith is the gift of God we do not have it of our self
If we could generate the faith ourselves we could boast of or good works
His purpose in this is to create servants that would do good work as a result of salvation
See Roman 4; 1 – 6
In James when he speaks of works he is speaking to believers not undegenerated man.
 August 22, 2015 at 11:14am
When Paul addressed The Church at —, he was not addressing the building or all those assembled. He was addressing the believers of the only trues church, that of The Church of Jesus Christ which is not a building, a congregation, or a denomination.