TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying 2GodBeTheGlory's 10 most recent comments.

• Gay Gym Teacher Continues Fight After Being Fired by Catholic School Over Revelations of Her Same-Sex Relationship

  May 14, 2013 at 4:11pm

  In reply to Moliminous.

  @HarryPotter

  Might want to look up the definition of a word before you use it. Any religious school/church can use their MORALS in the way they see fit in defining what is right or wrong. You talk about a “loving relationship”, but she hid it and quite probable lied about it (omission is just as much a lie), and thus the problem that a MORAL religious church / school would not WANT such a person in their ranks (i.e. a person that is obviously against the teachings of said church / school, it’s children, and it’s parents, and a liar).

  So obviously your definition of “moral” is different of merriam-webster.

• Sex Offenders Can Carry Guns in Iowa — and Here’s How Authorities Are Responding

  May 6, 2013 at 1:35pm

  In reply to 2GodBeTheGlory.

  @LOCKED

  Know what you mean about back pain. Just had a CT on my two weeks ago at the VA. Not sure what the results are (haven’t show up yet in the “myvet” web site). This was the third test, hopefully they will find something soon so I can get some relief. Back pain is real debilitating, so I hope you feel better soon.

  God bless you.

• Sex Offenders Can Carry Guns in Iowa — and Here’s How Authorities Are Responding

  May 6, 2013 at 11:59am

  In reply to 2GodBeTheGlory.

  @EVERYONE

  Sorry, my spelling and grammar is atrocious today. I sit here at the bed side to my 14 month old daughter after heart surgery, did not sleep well, but I know that is no excuse. Sorry again all.

• Sex Offenders Can Carry Guns in Iowa — and Here’s How Authorities Are Responding

  May 6, 2013 at 11:49am

  In reply to 2GodBeTheGlory.

  @LOCKED

  Just re-read my original post and realized how easy it was for someone to not tie in the “before” and “after” in dealing with the marriage. I by no means meant to imply that they where married before they charge. To be concise, I meant to say. Had sex, got pregnancy, convicted as sex offender, got married to each other.

  I’m sorry for the confusion and the banter.

• Sex Offenders Can Carry Guns in Iowa — and Here’s How Authorities Are Responding

  May 6, 2013 at 11:40am

  In reply to 2GodBeTheGlory.

  @LOCKED

  Because they where not married before they had sex, got pregnant, then got married. Look at the history of this country, happened time and time again. I was merely pointing out that today, those couples are married to each other, where as when the pregnancy occurred, they where not.

  The father could, and sometimes, did press charges, no matter if consensual. I do not plan on bringing up peoples names that I know that did this, or search the NET for the references that you want because you do not believe me.

• Sex Offenders Can Carry Guns in Iowa — and Here’s How Authorities Are Responding

  May 6, 2013 at 9:50am

  In reply to 2GodBeTheGlory.

  @Locked

  Instead of attacking my point (to which I’m sure you would not agree to my source), why don’t you explain you’re point. That would be the mature thing to do.

• Has the NRA Had A Positive Influence on America?

  May 6, 2013 at 9:24am

  Of course. The amount of trainings that they perform to lawful owners is great. Who else performs gun safety classes more than the NRA? I wish they were not needed to “secure our rights”, however, as the attacks started from the courts, I can see why they need to be in the capacity they are in.

• Sex Offenders Can Carry Guns in Iowa — and Here’s How Authorities Are Responding

  May 6, 2013 at 8:57am

  Another Billy special.

  Anyway, as many “sex offenders” are 18 year old with 16 year old that they are married with, yes, they should have a weapon. In fact, show me in the constitution where a person cannot have a gun if they served in club fed? It is my belief that if a person paid for their mistakes in infringement on others, then as a free person, they should receive their rights back. This is like saying “well, we just don’t think you could ever be a good person again, so you don’t have any rights”. Where did this become constitutional or even fair. Is everyone saying that a person who makes a mistake cannot learn and become a good person? Or they can’t so they have no legal rights to defend themselves? Where is this right? If that is the argument, then you would have to say that EVERY person who fought in the revolutionary war is an ex-con and should not have a had a weapon, much less started the most powerful nation on the planet.

• U.S. Consumer Spending up in March

  April 29, 2013 at 12:38pm

  .2% is not “UP”. It is still contracting because they did not factor population growth.

• Florida Megapastor Lampoons ‘White Man, GOP Conservative’ Mark Sanford in Sermon About Morality

  April 22, 2013 at 11:12am

  In reply to termyt.

  The only problem that I see with our current system is that people must want to be elected. I’m of the mindset that office should be like jury selection. In this fashion, people may not like being selected, however, I would trust the average person that does not seek authority than those that do not. The normal day to day people would become more involved with our government and thus be better because of it.
  If a jury can hold a persons life in their hands, why cannot they then have direct input/control of the same? I would further suggest having a term limit of 2 years for each office.

  Can anyone see this option as causing more harm than our current system?