User Profile: 2GodBeTheGlory

2GodBeTheGlory

Member Since: September 02, 2010

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

123 To page: Go
  • April 17, 2014 at 11:22pm

    @right-wing-waco

    Yes

    Means that the person firing the weapon was already a criminal BEFORE firing it (too young to have said firearm, felon in possession, ect.)

    Sorry, did not write that the way I should have.

    This does not include suicide.

  • April 17, 2014 at 10:54pm

    @jarhead

    I do understand your point and have performed the same research, albeit a different conclusion. You see, the terms and conditions for the original “payment” was under the explicit understanding that the money would be used for the betterment for the land that was to be used for grazing. As the money was NOT used for this purpose and no “government authority” could be held responsible for the misuse of funds, he went to the state/local so that he could pay them (and therefore hold responsible) for the grazing rights. You should also know that Bundy payed out of his own pocket for items to place on the land in question to enhance it for the said purpose (which was then destroyed by BLM), that was the original agreed upon use of the grazing money.

    No matter how you slice this pie, it was all about getting Bundy out of business, for he could not pay the “grazing fee” and pay for the same items that BLM was supposed to use the money for to begin with.

    As an example, you pay a toll for a road that is never maintenance, snow never removed, lines not painted, and pot holes as large as a semi. When you fight the “government authority” over the toll for the road – they never do anything. Then they take the toll money and buy all the cars and make them take public transportation. You go out and pay out of your own pocket to maintain the road, but stop paying tolls, then they come to take your car and destroy the road.

  • April 17, 2014 at 10:23pm

    Here are some REAL, verifiable facts that the anti 2nd amendment people do not want you to know:

    2012

    # of U.S. citizens: 325M
    # of citizen owned firearms: 325M+
    # of NEW, citizen purchased firearms (domestic made) per year since 2008: 5M+
    # of deaths by criminal use of a firearm: 80%
    % of new firearms purchased per year to death by criminal firearm discharge: < .002% (does not include the purchase of imported firearms)

    Responses (1) +
  • April 17, 2014 at 8:52pm

    Your CNN article is a fraud with many, many mistakes.

    Might want to actually read the entire opinion and fact check them (i.e., no left leaning killings have been linked to any liberal). Also, using the source “southern poverty law center” – i.e. nothing but a liberal organization. Read all their released statements.

  • April 17, 2014 at 6:50pm

    @VWR

    As per the courts, yes, you are correct. Now, lets take it further to the supreme court and think about what it means, legally, shall we:

    As per SCOTUS (supreme court of the u.s.), the government can purchase ANY land at ANY time, without any “real” justification, only that the deal would be based on “fair market value”. Now, the U.S. treasury mints all coin which is LAWFUL to pay all debts. Further, the treasure, with FEDS assistance, can “borrow” all necessary “money” to purchase ALL land inside the U.S., at anytime. Once ALL land is “FEDERAL” land (legally of course as per the court rulings that you provided and the SCOTUS rulings from 2005) and thus can be “regulated” to include removing ALL bill of rights from any and all citizens. LEGALLY

    There is a difference between what is legal and what is right.

    If I error in my reading of the courts, please provide actual page number from ruling that would restrict the government from doing this and forgive me.

  • April 17, 2014 at 8:26am

    @SquirrelNYC,

    You talk as if everyone is angry, however, I find that is not the case. You repeatedly even claimed that I’m angry, however, your lack of understanding only clouds your judgment. Further, you have apparently followed Glenn into a position of wanting to follow your rulers into the incinerator. You misunderstand that those that take action in defense are not angry (although some may be) but assertive. There is a big difference between the two that neither you nor Glenn understand. One can be assertive in stating “no more, you may NOT continue to rape, murder, kill indiscriminately, crushing taxes, endless regulation, destruction of inalienable rights” ect.. It is your right not to “believe it is time”, however, at what point do you or Glenn believe it is time? If you think that no time is right, then do you also believe that the founders where wrong in asserting their inalienable rights to stop tyranny?

  • April 16, 2014 at 6:54pm

    @SquirrelNYC,

    You have shown yourself to be a person that attempts to take the Holy Bible and twist it to fit your own ideals. Good luck with that, however, I will follow God, not you nor Glenn, for neither of you understand HIS word.

  • April 16, 2014 at 1:58am

    @Kimmiemffl

    Read your bible, not just what someone tells you.

  • April 16, 2014 at 1:14am

    “correction” not “correct”

    Oh, and I don’t believe Glenn is correct nor following the will of the father for he has disgraced the founders of this country for taking a stand against “The Government” of their day. Glenn does not speak as a righteous man, nor as a godly man, but a person that destroys and belittles the righteousness of a people that do not want to “fight”, however, are willing and able to come to the defense of another who is unable. Coming to the aid of another, willing to lay down their life for another is no greater thing that one can do.

  • April 16, 2014 at 1:08am

    You are correct, further pray for those that would spitefully use you. One point of correct; One MUST repent to obtain forgiveness. No repenting, no forgiveness. Christ talked much about that, and thus the reason for treating the person that would not repent as a heathen. You might want to find out what that meant.

    Responses (2) +
  • April 16, 2014 at 1:03am

    Amen

  • April 16, 2014 at 12:22am

    @SquirrelNYC,

    You attempt to take the “high road” without knowledge is telling of your stance and ignorance of both the government and Glenn.

    You might want to find out what righteous anger is before attempting to point to a splinter in my eye.

  • April 15, 2014 at 11:46pm

    Sure, who cares about a 1st amendment zone. We don’t need anything like amendments. MLK and Gandhi where not gods and are not always right. Next time you have a swat team come into your house under a “wrong address” or “wrong information” and kill your children and NOTHING happens, go ahead and embrace your god of government. Embrace your god of government when they come for you and place you in camps. Embrace your god of government when they rape, murder, destroy, take, and regulate your prayer.

    Your complacency has blinded you into thinking that this government will not be like communist Russia, or China, or Nazi Germany. It has become worse (in some aspects), you just will not see it.

    Responses (6) +
  • April 15, 2014 at 11:32pm

    Glenn Beck,

    You where once a person that I would have called friend, and even brother, now I find that I can do neither. You have insulted my faith, the founders, and the inalienable rights of man. I will not conclude anything other than this; You are not a patriot, a righteous man, nor an honorable man, nor my friend nor my brother.

    Cling to your god of MLK and Mahatma Gandhi. Jesus did not come to bring peace into this world, Glen, maybe you should actually READ what Christ said and DID. Now, I respect both MLK and Gandhi, however, their way is not always correct, as you claim.

    Now, before you fly off the handle like you have been doing recently, I do not promote ANY kind of violence, however, if force is used against the innocent and no other way is available, and God leads, protect with all necessary force.

    Finally, It’s easy to grow old, but it’s difficult to grow up.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 15, 2014 at 11:18pm

    cont.

    What evidence do I have? Glad you asked; shootings by government on citizens with greater than 99% “reasonable” rate, shooting of innocent citizens by LEO with NO arrest, > 60% tax, 1St amendment zone, attack by courts on amendments (first of which is the 2nd), selective enforcement of laws, laws written for some with exclusions of others, 73K PAGE tax code, duress contract to exist, disallow of informing jury of nullification by courts, providing money and arms to enemy, allowing enemy on soil (see Mexican border – drug wars), theft, party system, Fed, judges and LEO not accountable for not following or knowing the law, not allowing children to sell lemonade, not allowing a church to give out food to the needy, etc.. Some of thees are minor, some are major, however, I am attempting to educate you in the pleothora of wrongs committed by this government AGAINST it’s citizens. The same government that you would have me give up and allow the rape of my children.

    Now, what does this have to do with the Bible? Glad you asked – Those that seek righteousness for righteousness sake and those that would protect the innocent, the helpless, the infirm, the weak, and the indigent. Should one live by the sword, no, however, that does not mean that you should not protect those that are helpless or those that are wronged by an entity that is evil and only intent on committing evil acts (think of the person that would kill indiscriminately)

  • April 15, 2014 at 11:07pm

    Glenn Beck,

    I have listen to your words, and read them, now hear mine – YOU NEED TO PRAY and READ the Holy Bible, not just listen to the interpretation of others. You claim that 15% of those in Nevada are without honor, and that maybe true (quite probable), however, to associate the “occupy movement” to the people there in Nevada is absolutely disgraceful.

    Furthermore, it did not escape me that you are not harping on the “1st amendment zone”.

    Here is a history lesson for you, Glenn, for the likes of Washington, Adams, Franklin, Hamilton, Jay, Madison, Jefferson, Allen, Clark, Gates, Henry, Jones, Knox, Lee, Pickens, and many more, started this country for considerably less reasons than what we, as mere citizens, must endure today. Least your forget the reasons of an armed revolt, you should read the Deceleration of Independence, replacing “he, him, or king” with “Fed, Federal government, Federal Courts, NSA, LEO, Congress, Senate, President” and the plethora of agencies both state and federal.

    cont.

    Responses (2) +
  • April 14, 2014 at 10:00pm

    @Capt,

    I’m calling for tyranny to stop. Are you stating that no part of this government is tyrannical? Are you stating that this government does not allow murder, attempted murder, infringement upon the constitution and AGAINST the people? Are you stating this government does not force it’s citizens into contracts just because they exist?

  • April 14, 2014 at 5:06pm

    @CaptianSuperior,

    Food for thought. As per the SCOTUS ruling Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005) the state / federal government can “purchase” all land without restriction and then “regulate” such land. Meaning that by the same way the courts regulated away the 2nd amendment, the government can “regulate” ALL rights away. How I came to such a horrify conclusion? Simple:

    1. U.S. Treasury mints all coin.
    2. The “coin” is legal tender for ALL debts.
    3. Government can “purchase” any and all land without restriction at “fair market value”
    4. As the “debt” from such purchase cannot be legally challenged, all property will become the state / federal government “property”
    5. All federal / state land can be “regulated” at the whim of any “agency”, all “rights” can be regulated away (see courts restrictions of 2nd amendment under “regulation” not law). Also see airport screening and court screening by “regulation”
    6. Due to the continued courts allowance of eminent domain to government, the court MUST allow this happen.

  • April 9, 2014 at 12:36pm

    @zapparules,

    As marriage was first use by God, then the church, it is you that must be burden to prove that the “state” has prior legal binding authority to the right, and the duty to override the church. Note: I have thousands of years worth of evidence to back my claim, and even in this country, at the start of the last century the Holy Bible was used to denote marriage, birth, and death.

  • April 9, 2014 at 12:27pm

    It is unfortunate that people will choose a life of crime. Man has not changed since Adam, always choosing sin as a path without care of the consequences. Some will not receive their consequences today, tomorrow, or even in this life, and then there are those like in this case are given fast-track path to their consequences. I do feel and pray for the family that had to go through this ordeal, the family of this criminal, and the neighbors in this area.

    The gun did not kill this man, it was a family that was in fear of their life in their own home that was forced to defend themselves from a person that forced his way into their home.

    On a lighter note, the family did have good gun control.

    Responses (2) +
123 To page: Go