User Profile: 2GodBeTheGlory


Member Since: September 02, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [2] October 8, 2015 at 5:46pm

    Re: “American society to function properly!” – In that statement alone, your argument fails, for the country does not function in society “properly”.

  • [18] October 8, 2015 at 1:04pm

    Somethings up. If something seems to go to be true, then it is.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] October 8, 2015 at 12:57pm

    That cost increase is to cover those that are without insurance due to laws mandated by congress/presidents. This increase also includes to the cost to cover those that are in this country illegally, obtaining medical services that they are unable/unwilling to pay.

  • October 8, 2015 at 11:20am

    Simple solution. Don’t FLY! Why would anyone allow themselves to be “processed” and searched by government employees who cannot “save you” and are proven incompetent and unable to prevent another 911?

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] October 7, 2015 at 7:32pm

    I agree with most of what you said.

    Re: “pass judgment on laws” – We, as a jury member can rule a law illegal by acquitting a citizen who clearly infringed upon the law. When enough juries have done so, the law becomes unlawful.

  • [12] October 7, 2015 at 1:06pm

    The cost of health care is easy to understand when you go back in time. Here is how we went from a system where in the 70′s if you had “health insurance” you paid nothing for care, to today where you still pay for everything with health insurance:

    - 1970′s media blitz that revealed the pregnant women without insurance rejected by some hospitals
    - In response, new law created forcing hospitals to accept ANY pregnant women regardless of medical insurance
    - In response, hospital cost increased to cover for these provided medical services
    - 1980′s media blitz that revealed that some people with gunshot wounds where rejected by some hospitals, then the victim died in hospital parking lots.
    - In response, new laws created forcing hospitals to provide emergency care to victims regardless of health insurance status
    - In response, hospital cost increased to cover for these provided medical services
    - Since NAFTA, the Mexican government has distributed pamphlets that describe how to enter into the U.S. and obtain services for free, including health care
    - In response, hospital cost increased to cover for these provided medical services

    Thank you, to the media for destroying an industry and created this mess that costs over 1/4 of the entire U.S. GDP. Thank you politicians for creating stupid laws that destroy liberty. Thank you to the Glenn Beck’s out there that refuse to show how this disaster happened.

  • [6] October 7, 2015 at 11:20am

    My account may be removed from The Blaze (mutual). See the below response that I made to the moderator of The Blaze:

    Wait, wait, wait…. Are you stating that a person who is raping another and is shot because of their actions in defense of a victim, is me advocating violence? If that be the case, then destroy my account and remove ALL my post from The Blaze, for I no longer want to be associated with a type of organization that believes my comments advocated violence.

  • [65] October 7, 2015 at 9:56am

    From one of the founders that would not back down:

    “The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able may have a gun.”

    “Three millions of people, armed in the holy cause of liberty, and in such a country as that which we possess, are invincible by any force which our enemy can send against us. Beside, sir, we shall not fight our battles alone. There is a just God who presides over the destinies of Nations, and who will raise up friends to fight our battles for us.”

    “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who comes near that precious jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. When you give up that force, you are ruined.”

    “Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands?”

    “It is when a people forget God that tyrants forge their chains.

    - Patrick Henry

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] October 6, 2015 at 8:41am

    Utilizing the number of non-justified, non-felon deaths by use of a firearm using 86M citizens in possession of 345M firearms, the actual number is .00000407%.

    Utilizing the number of 86M citizens with a top end of 12K deaths via firearms would give percentage of .000139535%. Therefore 99.99986%.

    At least 10M new firearms purchased by citizens ever year (based upon domestic firearm manufacture #’s and the estimated imports). So, since the number of firearms are ever increasing at an unprecedented rate, we are actually seeing a decrease in deaths by use of a firearm.

  • October 5, 2015 at 10:15pm

    point of clarification; not a u-haul but a Ryder Truck (same one used in the first twin towers bombing)

  • [2] October 5, 2015 at 9:49pm

    Re: “Because someone brought a gun into a gun free zone…again, if there is no gun, there’s no bang-bang”

    Re: “Yes…they have.

    Your comment however seems to indicate you do not think so…why is that?”

    Both of these comments appear to contradict each other. Either “gun free zones” are proven to “work” by protecting people from “gun violence” or they don’t. Which is it?

  • [3] October 5, 2015 at 9:46pm

    So, only women can/should carry guns, but not the sick, infirm, or weak? Got it. Only the strong and women should survive.

  • [1] October 5, 2015 at 9:44pm

    same here!

  • [4] October 5, 2015 at 9:41pm

    Re: “being so frightened that they feel the need for a weapon at their side” – I’m not frightened, I don’t need to feel frightened because I’m carrying a gun.

    Answer this simple question: Who (specifically) responsible and accountable for your safety?

  • [9] October 5, 2015 at 9:35pm

    Re: “in my experience, those who feel the need to carry a gun are “unmanly”” – So, my daughter carries a firearm to have a chance against much larger rapist is a bad idea to you? Got it.

    Responses (2) +
  • October 5, 2015 at 9:21pm

    No, for laws are not to prevent crime, but to hold those accountable for their infringement of another’s rights.

    Don’t feel bad, most people don’t understand what laws where supposed to do. If laws prevented murder, then it should have stopped thousands of years ago.

  • [10] October 5, 2015 at 9:18pm

    So, by your line of thinking, creating a “gun free zone” has helped by saving people from “gun violence”?

    Responses (12) +
  • [7] October 5, 2015 at 2:54pm

    As long as the exhaust pressure is great enough to overcome water pressure, the exhaust can still be under water (think boat exhaust). All that’s required to keep the engine running is fuel & air – keep the RPMs up and all will be good. However, you put water in the intake – your done.

    I’ve taken cars through high water quite frequently. Don’t try it with anything other than a stick (ride the clutch to keep RPMs up) and you know the road area pre-flood so you know how high the water is as you want to ensure that your intake doesn’t go under.

  • [2] October 5, 2015 at 2:26pm

    What’s the difference between a scammer and the IRS?

  • [1] October 4, 2015 at 5:26pm

    I have a count of 345M+ in citizens hand with a increase of 10M+ new annually.

    Come for the guns and it will be a new version of April 1775.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love