Thats funny. Everyone with a clearance understands a common standard, which is to not put classified information on an unclassified system. In reality it is a pretty basic standard. Don’t do it. She obviously can’t follow simple standards.
 April 14, 2016 at 2:49pm
So dumb. Sure, the cops will come out and check it out. Once they realize the guys are not carrying a gun, they should leave. Not breaking a law…………nothing to see. He even came out and said you are not breaking a law. So dumb.
Good point about Trump's kids. It's not like this is their first election. They most likely are registered Democrats and can't vote in the Republican primary.
Hannity can support whoever he wants, but don't come on the radio and tv and tell us how conservative you are. You can't be a conservative and support someone like Trump! And don't lecture the rest of us when we refuse to vote for Trump if he ends op being the Republican nominee. Most of us live our values and morals and won't violate them even for a fraud with an R after his name on the ballot.
[-3] April 12, 2016 at 8:59am
“The people” actually don’t have much say. Yes, we go to the voting booth and select who we prefer. Most states lock the delegates in proportionally on the results of said vote. However, it is the delegates that actually nominate our candidate, not the people.
While the delegates might be “locked” into voting how they were told to on the 1st ballot, and in some state they are “locked” on the second ballot if there is one as well………….there really is nothing keeping them from jumping ship all together and voting for whom ever they want on the 1st ballot honestly. They will not be fined. They will not be charged with a crime. They will not be sued. The only thing that can really happen if the state leadership wants is that they be barred from being a future delegate.
So, while Trump may have over 700 “pledged” or “locked” delegates, there is a very good chance that maybe 100 or even more may be “NeverTrump” supporters. What if they all just forewent their duties to vote for Trump on the 1st ballot, and voted for Kasic or Cruz instead? Trump couldn’t do a dang thing.
We only have the illusion that we are casting a ballot that actually counts for something. We are only stating our preference.
I’d much rather not have delegates. It would be much easier to do everything just off a simple majority vote. Everyone votes on convention day. It will take multiple votes, but the first to 50.01% wins. All “the peoples” votes. No delegates.
 April 12, 2016 at 8:36am
I agree with what others have said. If Donald is saying that he will surround himself with the greatest minds during his potential presidency, why is he not doing that now? Did he not have a single person on his payroll that knew about how the CO delegate selection would go down? He obviously didn’t care much about CO, and instead focused his attention to ensuring that as many liberals as possible would vote for him in NY to get above the 50% threshold to win all the delegates.
Why don’t more people talk about all those liberal votes going to Donald? If you were banned from registering to vote on election day, and were only allowed to vote how you registered……………he would not be where he is today. He would have tanked long ago. Liberals are excited for him to run against Hillary. They know Hillary will crush him. They will make him look like the worst sexist man in America. He has openly bragged about having relations with married women, and how many women he has had relations with, etc. All those comments aimed at Megan Kelly and others. He is toast.
He isn’t a real conservative. Plain and simple. He is only saying what people want to hear to further himself. How much money did he give to Hillary’s 2008 presidential run? Other liberals?
Stop whining when you loose a contest. A contest that the rules were agreed upon back in August.
The American people don’t elect the nominee. Delegates do. How the system was set up. Deal with it.
NY is a closed primary and you must be registered as a Republican prior to March 25th. So your saying all those Bernie and Hillary voters are going to change their Democratic affiliation for the primary and general just to vote for Trump? Whatever you say……. Guarantee you he will take Hillary to the woodshed!
 April 8, 2016 at 8:05am
I would have fought back against Bill’s “What are you selling us” question. I would have said, “I’m not selling anything”, “I am putting forth policies that can help you”, etc. Trump sells.
And yes, even the majority of Faux News supports Trump. They are afraid to go after him. They are afraid that if they do, they will be shut out of coverage, etc. Poor journalism. Lack of morals.
 April 1, 2016 at 7:40am
I just send this in to Hannity via his website………….
I am a relatively long time listener to your show. Whenever I am in my car from 9am to 6pm, I have either you, Beck, or Rush on the radio, depending on what time it is.
Saying that, I have to take issue with your public stance of not endorsing a candidate this primary election cycle. You say you are not endorsing Trump. You say you are not endorsing Cruz. Nor are you endorsing Kasic. That is all good and stuff, but your actions tell a different story.
I don’t have a twitter account, but you can obviously go on and view tweets. So, I just took a look at yours after reading a headline on the Blaze that stated you have been unable to book Cruz for an hour long special for the last 10 days.
You say you are not endorsing anyone, yet, all the original tweets, tweeted out by your twitter account for the last several days included something about Trump in them. That is just from what I can see anyway. Maybe because I don’t have a twitter account there are. I don’t know.
You also say that you have been unable to get Cruz or a Cruz surrogate to call in to the radio show very much. But you say that you can almost always book a Trump surrogate.
Maybe it is because Cruz, and maybe even a lot of your listeners know that you are in the bag for Trump. Why would someone want to come on your show, when they know at least behind the scenes that you are a Trump supporter?
Cruz was invited on Savage, and failed to provide the coursety of a reply.
After complaining about no media coverage to Anderson Cooper, it was revealed that Cruz had turned down multiple CNN invites.
Now Cruz turns down Hannity.
Face it, if Cruz can’t control the interview, and be rehearsed, he declines to go.
Dear Sean Hannity,
Don't let your heart be troubled, but I see through you. You are transparent, and the people see no backbone. You have become a puppet.
God Bless You and your family.
Schmiggsy, a short time listener.
Hannity has given and/or offered air time to all of the candidates. Kashich, Paul, Carson, Christie, Fiorina, Bush, et.al, have all been on his radio or tv show. Heck, he even invited Sanders to come on. Maybe he is in the tank for Trump, but it's not Hannity's fault that the other candidates won't go on his show. Like him or not, Trump is a businessman. He is funding his own campaign. As a businessman can you blame him for wanting his puss on tv every day? Can you blame him for taking advantage of the FREE air time he gets. He doesn't have to spend 100s of millions on advertising or for exposure because he already get its for nothing! The media are the ones that give him the camera or the mic. While Cruz and Kasich are hemorrhaging money, Trump is building up a the war chest he needs to face Clinton. The worst thing that can happen for a guy like Trump is to ignore him. By ignoring him, he might just go away. At the very least he might stop living rent free in everyone's head. But Trump being in this election is a ratings bonanza for the media (doesn't matter if its right or left). They're salivating waiting to hear what he says next and Trump is happy to give them all of the fodder they can handle. I would support either Cruz or Trump in the general election because they both have strong points amid many weak points that each of them possess. If I were in the Cruz' inner circle, I'd tell him to get on every media outlet possible. Just my $.02.
Simply stated, Trump is a New Yorker (like Sean) and Trump's NOT a LAWYER. Hannity's had his fill of shyster lawyers (e.g., Ted Cruz) and wants an honest open candidate; Sean doesn't want to be soiled by Lyin' Ted.
Simply stated, Cruz is ducking Hannity because Hannity calls him out on his lies. And the truth is you Cruzbots love your guy and want his lies to stand. It won’t happen on Hannity.
When your guy is being attacked by liberals, government employees, politicians of both parties, the media, GOP establishment, GOP donors, strategists and lobbyists, multi-national corporations, billionaire CEOs, world leaders, special interest groups, and yes – even the elite D.C. conservative establishment like National Review then maybe he would be more relevant.
Anyone who holds any kind of power appears willing to do anything to attack Trump, the ONLY TRUE OUTSIDER PROVEN BY WHO ALL IS ATTACKING HIM. Cruz doesn’t see any attacks because no one sees him as a threat and because he is a part of the corrupt system.
Trump is the only one that will end their gravy train and upset their apple cart. They are all scared to death and willing to do anything to stop him which means he’s best for our country.
 July 22, 2014 at 4:46am
An NCO is not an officer.
I was one, I would know.
A sergeant major is the highest NCO rank, but there are technically 3 types depending on what your duty position is and if you are in charge of anyone. Sergeant Major. Command Sergeant Major. And finally, Sergeant Major of the Army.
 July 22, 2014 at 4:40am
It is 3 years per stripe. The other side has a stripe representing each 6 months spent deployed overseas.
Do a bit of research first.
But yes. This guy is a POS.
September 17, 2013 at 2:31pm
Ummmmmmmmmm. It would help if the Blaze could review thier articles prior to publishing them.
It is not an AR-15. That would be either a Ruger Mini-14 or a Mini-30.
So, either the Blaze has it wrong, or the Congressman is a moron. But in the original tweet, he doesnt say anything about it being an AR-15, so I am left to assume it is a mistake on the Blaze’s part.
I guess we can leave it to artist's block.
In the end the congressman is a moron.
July 31, 2013 at 2:25pm
Dude got what he had comming to him. Why dont you just park closer to the curb? Would still have left him plenty of room to mitigate any door dings. People always thinking they are above everyone else by taking up two spots or parking where they shouldnt. Someone is going to get you. It woudl have been better if he wasnt in the corner spot and two cars came up on either side of him. It would have been awesome to see him have to go through the trunk to get in the drivers seat.
July 26, 2013 at 12:04pm
Why do we allow illegals in this country again? Just curious. Just boggles my mind.
And then, the Republicans are going to probably end up giving amnesty to these people?
Seriously? Is that what the conservative party had come down too?
Then there is the story of the 13 year old girl that was rapped by multiple illegals that hasnt even been brought up, or at least to national attention.
This country is going to implode one day. Utter stupidity.
SECURE THE DANG BORDER. PERIOD. END OF STORY.
Then go around and round up all the illegals and ship them back over the border with a smile.
Maybe we hook the border up with some land mines and the military with its full might.
How can we ever expect our country to be “safe” and “secure” when we just let anyone and everyone across the border?
82nd, I assume you spent some time in NC. Last night I was researching the illegal alien gang rapes and there were a shocking number in NC.
* To the wimps in Congress: they get to dream and we are stuck with the nightmares? This disgusting "dreamer" was 19 by reports and illegal.
July 22, 2013 at 3:46pm
He would actually be charged for such an action as he was not old enough to legally own or possess such a weapon. But if he WERE old enough to legally own/possess a handgun and were confronted by a person or persons or even animal, and felt his life was in danger (death or serious injury) he would be able to use deadly force with said handgun. But, seeing he couldnt even buy a shotgun from Walmart, because you have to be 18………………………..he would not be legally allowed to carry a weapon on his person. It would be different if he were at his dad’s house, his dad had a gun, and someone broke in. He could then use his dad’s firearm to ensure the safety of him and his brother.
July 22, 2013 at 3:24pm
In any case, he co-sponsored a bill that helped to strengthen the castle doctrine. While not Stand Your Ground, which is a “traveling” protection, the castle doctrine is protection at your domicile.
Just another issue that he was for before he was against.
I wish people would just stick to thier beliefs. If you are for something continue being for it. If you are against something, dont backtrack or back-peddle on it.
And for the love of everything, stop making everything about race. Stop trying to stoke the fire Mr Prez. Seriously. Are you not busy enough spying on everyone, now you got to incite some more riots and protests? Maybe take another hack at gun control?
As soon as a poll hits 51-52 % him and Hillary are suddenly in favor of it. Don't believe me look up the polls that said the American public was 51 -52% in FAVOR of same sex marriages. Then look up when those two had a " change of heart " as to their beliefs. A poll could say the best thing to prevent Global Warming , oh yeah " Climate Change " would be to kill anyone who drives a 1980 or older carbon belching beast vehicle. They'd be for Klingon them if the polls were for it. Their conscience is poll numbers. That's all
May 14, 2013 at 12:13pm
Bird shot is for wusses.
Assuming it was a shoty, he needs at least 00 Buck!
The girl in the passenger seat needs to be charged as well. I am sure she could have called Crime Stoppers and been given a few bucks for turning in her boyfriend. Might not be much, but you get something out of it and you stop a crime. But, she turned a blind eye and should be held accountable as well.
My grandfather uses rock salt with a potato slug in his over-under, he had an intruder that got lit up and later wrote him a letter of apology... He framed the letter and hung it on the front porch.
Dollars to Donuts.......... BOTH the girl and the guy are tweekers lookin' for the easy score....... No doubt METH is the culprit here.....
May 14, 2013 at 9:47am
So, did the officer just ask him casually to see his weapon………and then decided to drop the mag and count each and every round?
“Hey, thats a nice piece of hardware, can I check her out?”
Or was it more like……….”Sir, I am going to have to inventory every round in your magazine to ensure that you only have 7″?
Ok………also……………so it says anything over 7 rounds in your “MAGAZINE” and you are in violation. What if you have 7 in the mag and 1 in the chamber? 8 rounds, but there are only 7 in the magazine. Sounds legit to me.
Easy solution . Leave NY b4 they put you in the Camps.
May 13, 2013 at 10:15am
I think the original version was chambered for .380ACP. I could be wrong, but I think that is what I saw.
.380′s are tiny pistols with very little metal (the wife has a Ruger LCP). And considering that they make AR-15 upper recievers from polymer……………..I dont see anything that would cause it to blow up if they designed the gun with enough plastic.
May 13, 2013 at 10:07am
The real test would be attempting it again with the metal “nail” firing pin and a round (can be a spent shell case or blank for safety) in the chamber.
Otherwise, right now it is just a watergun. Basically a supersoaker. Or just a child’s toy.
This story so far is a non starter. It “proves” nothing, aside that a metal detector wont detect plastic. Duh. But the firing pin and the spent shell or blank would likely trigger some reaction to the detector depending on the setting it is on.
May 10, 2013 at 2:24pm
I don’t think it would work RANGER1965. Can you imagine 100-300 paratroopers on a mass, night time, tactical jump from 800ft trying to steer their chutes?
The T-10s and now T-11 chute is pretty “dumby proof”. Sure, its less forgiving and an abrupt stop at the end of the ride………..But doing a free fall with a “cool” chute at 800ft with all that gear, I dont think it would end that well. Lol.
I couldn’t even imagine if they were called in to do a real combat jump at about 500ft. By the time they jumped, cleared the aircraft and pulled the ripcord………splat.
May 10, 2013 at 1:30pm
**** happens. Thankfully that never happend to me.
We were always instructed that if your reserve opens and starts snaking to the door, you and everyone in front of you needs to beat feet out, because if those in front dont, they will just become cushioning for the guy that is being dragged out.
The bad thing, is that not only is his reserve now open, but once he “exited” the aircraft, his main opens as well. You would think two parachutes would mean a better landing……….but it would be a bit dificult to “control” your decent with both deployed.
Thankfully he made it through without any injuries. I have seen a bunch of people get messed up on jumps. My last jump in Division was my last for a reason. It was my 4th brain injury. I almost remember nothing from that night, aside from what I was told by my fellow paratroopers.
All in all, I miss those days. Every time I get on a plane now, I look out the window waiting for the plane to reach 800-1500ft, and being disapointed when I realize that it isnt a C-130 or C-17, and I am now longer on jump status.
It's those damned hard landings. Little crappy round chutes. The entire philosophy behind it is utterly jacked! I realize that an Airborne assault needs to be at a low altitude because everyone's a target, but if 10% of your forces have injuries from the jump, and 2-5% are not really combat effective, and all of that loss without a single round being fired? Utter BS!
So teach Airborne troops to use the larger Para Sails. They'll require a little more training, but it'll give each individual a WHOLE LOT! more control, and they'll only be in the air a few more seconds at most, but the landings won't be those leg shattering body slams anymore.
I don't think it would work RANGER1965. Can you imagine 100-300 paratroopers on a mass, night time, tactical jump from 800ft trying to steer their chutes?
The T-10s and now T-11 chute is pretty "dumby proof". Sure, its less forgiving and an abrupt stop at the end of the ride...........But doing a free fall with a "cool" chute at 800ft with all that gear, I dont think it would end that well. Lol.
I couldn't even imagine if they were called in to do a real combat jump at about 500ft. By the time they jumped, cleared the aircraft and pulled the ripcord.........splat.
Hell just set up the Para Sails so they can deploy with a static line. And if that doesn't work just make the chutes a little bigger so there is less pain and injury on the DZ.
I've use the T-10C and the MC1-1B, but WTH is a T-11?