User Profile: 83plus

83plus

Member Since: September 20, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • June 26, 2016 at 11:26am

    misty

    Okay, but the second to last paragraph is still something I’d like to know.

  • [1] June 25, 2016 at 11:02pm

    bukowski

    Perhaps you should read the argument I’ve put forth regarding the no fly no buy thing; there’s one in particular I dropped on ultrasecularlib. Otherwise look at Makingout’s comment who understood what I meant.

    What’s yours regarding “Gun control pls” that’s assuming you want more gun control though.

  • [3] June 25, 2016 at 3:24pm

    miss

    Reagan was an actor and former democrat, on October 27, 1964 he made an excellent case against liberalism with his speech A Time for Choosing. It’s available on youtube and I suggest you watch it. An interesting thing about it is if you change the statistical numbers, some names and key-words a good bit of it would as applicable today as it was then.

    When Reagan ran in 1980 he had at least 16 years of pro-conservative values. Now what exactly does trump have?

    BTW, just because trump’s a businessman doesn’t mean he’s the best man for the job. Herbert Hoover was also businessman, he was elected in 1928, now how did things turn out for the country in 1929?

    Tell me where was trump to support Cruz and Lee when they fought to defund o-care? How about when Cruz and Jeff Sessions (who’s endorsed trump) teamed up to bring down the gang of 8 with Cruz’s amendments? Where was trump when Cruz loudly called mcConnell a liar in senate chambers regarding the highway bill?

    I know trump wasn’t in either house of congress but where was he expressing his support of those who tried to fight the progressive bills? Or to express his opposition to of the bills themselves?

  • [5] June 25, 2016 at 1:52pm

    Really? I’m hearing democrats calling for no fly no buy in regards to firearms but it wouldn’t have stopped the Fort Hood, San Bernardino or Orlando attacks because those terrorists weren’t on the the magic lists when they obtained their weapons.

    Yet two members of congress ended up on the no-fly list by mistake. So tell me what good is “no fly no buy” when the lists has these kind of problems? To be effective wouldn’t it be critical to fix the problems before hand or immediately afterward?

    However, all I’m hearing so far is “no fly no buy” and little to nothing on how the lists are broken we (congress) needs to fix it. Also what’s to prevent politicians from abusing the no fly no buy if or when it goes into effect?

    How about some actual planning and thinking regarding no fly no buy instead of some near haphazard bill they’ll likely never read before passing it?

  • [4] June 25, 2016 at 1:17pm

    More regs, more laws and 1000 plus page bills no one in congress bothers to read before passing them.

    Government spending is going great, not too low and the national just gets bigger with no one doing anything about it as it should be.

    Sarcasm: Awesome.

  • [3] June 25, 2016 at 12:58pm

    I voted for Romney in ’12.

    Yet I’ve heard said we aren’t needed voting wise and I see trump working to get sanders voters. So which is it REALLY, do you/trump need our votes yes or no?

    Unify? On what, conservatism? Okay, what’s is trump’s background/record/past in that regard? How is he a conservative and what are his conservative principles? What case has he made for conservatism? How about the Constitution?

    Hillary will be president otherwise? The same would be true if it were McCain, Cruz, Kaisch or Romney instead of trump.

    Responses (5) +
  • June 25, 2016 at 12:20pm

    Adding to that is the notion that the list system is flawed and the democrats don’t want to fix it even after two of their own ended up on the no-fly, one of whom was part of the sit-in too.

  • June 25, 2016 at 12:14pm

    Clinton for Leavenworth 2017!

  • [15] June 25, 2016 at 12:08pm

    Maybe we need more laws; those law breaking ratbags wouldn’t dare to break new laws even though they break the current ones right?

    Responses (4) +
  • June 25, 2016 at 11:49am

    #DemsNeverSat to get Ted Kennedy and John Lewis of the no-fly list or to improve the list system to avoid future mistakes.

    They don’t care.

  • [8] June 23, 2016 at 2:37pm

    Ironically Lewis was on the no-fly by mistake like Ted Kennedy was and I think he had a difficult time getting off it.

    Looks like he doesn’t have that concern for the general public.

  • [1] June 23, 2016 at 8:18am

    What’s broken is the lists and whole anti-terrorist system.

    The San Bernardino, Orlando and Fort Hood terrorists weren’t on any of the lists when they attacked. Meanwhile Ted Kennedy a US senator was on the no-fly at one point.

  • June 21, 2016 at 10:44pm

    “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment.

    Now if the intention was to not have civilian gun ownership then why exactly does it say/have “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” in there?

    As for “well regulated militia” I suggest you look up what militia means. Now if you’re saying that “well regulated militia” refers to the regulation of civilian gun ownership then are you’re saying ALL civilian gun owners are a militia? Either way I’d like to know what you’re equating/referring militia to.

  • June 21, 2016 at 12:13am

    What happens if trump wins and proves to not be conservative or worse go like ellmers did?

  • [14] June 20, 2016 at 1:38pm

    It’s like the Fort Hood terrorist attack being called workplace violence.

  • June 20, 2016 at 11:41am

    If congress wants to be useful they ought to look into how the intelligence sector and the watch list failed to stop the shooter.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] June 19, 2016 at 3:56pm

    You lefties are crazy if you think all that needs to be done is to have stricter gun laws and all the bad guys will follow them. Gun control isn’t 100% no matter how strict, recent history has proven that.

    Even if shooting murders lessen I expect the other methods knife stabbing in particular will increase as some will resort to those other means.

  • [8] June 19, 2016 at 3:24pm

    For a side that’s so concerned about the right being intolerant of LGBT you folks don’t seem to mind the intolerance of muslims. Muslims don’t like LGBT either and your side in the US government wants to bring muslim refugees from Syria with little or no regard to possibility that terrorists who kill LGBT in the ME may or will use that as a way to enter the US.

    There’s no system that exist to prevent such infiltration. We have watch/no-fly list except the Orlando, San Bernardino and Fort Hood attackers WEREN’T on it. Yet somehow Ted Kennedy a senator in the US government was on it, so how do you expect the list to be any use when it has those problems?

    Also if he used bombs and had no guns the gun control debate would’ve stayed quiet.

    The Orland shooter went through federal background checks and PASSED them. The guns the San Bernardino attackers had I believe were illegal under California state law and the pipe bombs they had were illegal under federal laws.

    The tsarnaev brothers used bombs to attack the Boston Marathon. The fruit of kaboom had a bomb in his undies, only thing that stop him was a malfunction when he tried to detonate it. timothy mcviegh used a moving van and a product used frequently by normal people, fertilizer.

  • [5] June 19, 2016 at 12:13pm

    Really, then why do us cry babies ask questions and raise topics about trump you trump fans don’t to discuss?

  • [1] June 18, 2016 at 11:01pm

    Or trump could go like ellmer’s did.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love