User Profile: 83plus

83plus

Member Since: September 20, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [1] April 28, 2016 at 4:19pm

    Would you mind this much if they all endorsed trump?

  • [2] April 28, 2016 at 4:16pm

    “some people are just thick”

    Sometimes yes, did it ever occur to you that Cruz might’ve been referring to the liberal BS going on there? Governor Cuomo’s “they’re not welcome here” statement or some of the things Bloomberg did as mayor.

    Perhaps that’s not from thickness but either way it’s been explained and it’s clear you’ve chosen to reject it.

  • [3] April 28, 2016 at 12:29pm

    I believe the libs are still trying to learn how to learn.

  • April 28, 2016 at 12:07pm

    If the world gets another hitler when do you think the US should take action to him?

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] April 28, 2016 at 12:02pm

    Has it ever occurred to you that a predator could disguise himself by cross-dressing and use the tg claim as an excuse to try get off hook if found out?

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] April 28, 2016 at 9:29am

    bear

    You see right through the media rats.

  • [1] April 27, 2016 at 12:57pm

    Noisy pest needs to stop whining and start talking about the issues, the REAL issues.

    Like the ones Reagan lays out in http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qXBswFfh6AY

    Interesting thing about that speech of Reagan’s is if you changed the statistical numbers, some key words and names to mach modern times/events/figures much of it would be as applicable today as it was 51 years ago.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] April 27, 2016 at 12:22pm

    Monk

    I’d go for that, on the other hand Lee probably could do a fair bit of good in the senate as majority leader. The only problem would be getting him to majority leader, that’s a massive hurdle considering the amount opposition there’d be to it.

  • [1] April 27, 2016 at 12:05pm

    userfreeman

    So ends justify the means for you then. What if a future president/candidate were seize the power to impose taxes and direct control of government spending selling the idea that it’s to ensure the tax system is fair and that the country would be better off budget wise?

    How far would you let trump run on ‘his way’, exactly what and how much would you be willing to compromise on in order to have satisfactory financial bacon and sovereignty? At what point will you say enough?

    I suggest you take extreme caution with “ends justify the means” because the means might just be something you won’t agree with, a line you won’t want to be crossed and/or a comprise you won’t want to make.

  • April 27, 2016 at 11:25am

    conservative2

    And will likely face hillary, what if she squashes him debate wise?

    How about digging something up that’s ‘bad’ like a Goldman sachs thing? The left will try and will most likely use it. That turd is getting closer to the fan, have fun when it hits.

  • [1] April 27, 2016 at 11:09am

    common-sense

    So is there a reason to debate hillary?

    dt

    “apparently Trump never needed to debate Cruz one on one.” Except he wanted to at one point and now he doesn’t.

  • [1] April 27, 2016 at 2:19am

    1971

    Okay, a large number of conservatives voters couldn’t vote in NY because they weren’t registered as republican. I’d say “oh well, that’s the rules” but that doesn’t work anymore; perhaps I should complain about it being unfair.

    What do you think?

  • [12] April 27, 2016 at 1:33am

    ted

    “Trump didn’t debate Cruz because he could only lose as a presumptive nominee.” Why lose like that when you can lose as the real nominee after getting neutered by hillary in a debate? If that does happen then what, well I guess we have a big problem named hillary.

    “Maybe if Cruz was on more equal footing when it came to the vote count, states won, and delegates he would have” Better double check hillary’s primary wins thoroughly to see if she worthy of debating.

    “But Trump isn’t going to debate Cruz just because he’s desperate; There has to be something in it for him” What about hillary? Is she desperate and wanting to make a deal just to have a debate?

    BTW trump knows that he has to get 270 or better in ELECTORAL votes to actually win the general election right? We don’t want him misunderstanding that just getting a majority in popular votes isn’t how it works now do we.

  • [34] April 26, 2016 at 11:28pm

    Trump won’t debate Cruz in a one-on-one, he wouldn’t go CPAC where he could’ve made his case to voters.

    He can’t/won’t make his case for the to establishment and naysayers, the hard sell voters, to side with him. However, you expect him to against hillary and and the libs, the impossible sell. Well have fun with that.

    Especially if trump can’t hack it against hillary in debates.

    Responses (16) +
  • [1] April 26, 2016 at 11:01pm

    And you expect all five to vote red in the general?

  • [1] April 26, 2016 at 10:28pm

    rayvet

    Things must be fair enough in EVERY state trump’s won so far though.

  • [7] April 26, 2016 at 10:14pm

    And you expect states like NY to go republican in the general election. The democrat side had a bigger voter turnout than the GOP did.

  • [8] April 26, 2016 at 10:07pm

    How EXACTLY is trump a conservative?

  • [9] April 26, 2016 at 10:05pm

    ratio

    There’s some good red states to go through. Montana stayed red in the last two presidential elections.

  • [14] April 26, 2016 at 10:00pm

    How EXACTLY is trump a conservative? Details please, go ahead your/his/a case.

    You know, trump could’ve done that at something like CPAC, he wasn’t interested.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love