Don’t count it, this is abc, the minion state media of the liberals.
 February 2, 2016 at 8:54pm
Different language? Might have to try that sometime.
February 1, 2016 at 3:02pm
What KIND of deals would Trump plan on cutting? I also find it curious that he’s willing to cut deals with the commies but can’t seem to work with someone like Cruz who’s a republican. Well since Cruz is nasty and worse than hillary that could explain why, at least for Cruz. How about about the other republicans?
“No, all you have to do is familiarize yourself with the story of Donald Trump’s success. Here is his consistent record:” Sure, it gives a degree predictability to any candidate, we all know what sanders and hillary will likely do if either win. But depending on a candidate’s true intentions as president that record and the candidate’s sales pitches might mean nothing.
So what if trump turns for the worse? We’ll have a big problem, that’s my concern and the concern of many others. If trump’s elected and is as good as Regan, I’m proven wrong, fantastic. I think Regan was a democrat years before running for president, he turned out alright and had what I think is the biggest win of the electoral votes.
As someone who likes and supports Cruz I will give Trump a chance should he win the primary running for the GOP and if my concerns are proven wrong, awesome.
February 1, 2016 at 11:43am
ALL Article II says is that an eligible candidate must a natural born citizen. Now where exactly does it stipulate that to be natural born you have to be born to two US citizens and/or you have be born within US borders?
January 31, 2016 at 7:51pm
trump certainly is, according to him Cruz is worse than hillary and nasty. Now, do you agree, yes or no?
 January 31, 2016 at 7:46pm
“I’ll give you this in exchange for this.” That is a common MO of deal making and negotiations otherwise it sounds more like ‘give me this’ does it not? So I ask again, what does trump plan on giving them?
BTW, Trump offered a vp consideration to Cruz; aren’t you afraid Trump might get ‘establishment’ contamination if it’s a trump/cruz ticket?
Perhaps we should let the democrats get one or both houses of back then, Trump might have better luck with them than the incompetent establishment. We could even make it veto proof, either way the ‘jujitsu master’ shouldn’t have ANY trouble with them should he? Maybe nasty Cruz can be replaced with hillary, she is better than Cruz right?
“incompetent, inept lawyer-politicians capitulating on all deals with democrats” Most republicans were and are. However, some of you trump supporters seem to think ALL the republicans in congress are that way.
“does not mean Trump is going to follow suit” Perhaps, but we won’t know for sure unless he becomes president will we? Don’t give me any ‘because he said so’ nonsense because than can mean absolutely nothing; case in point, obama.
In other words you have to pass it to find what’s in it although in this case it’s you have to vote him into office to find what he’ll do. Yes, I know started it, except elections give that standard an applicable definition.
[-4] January 31, 2016 at 1:18am
Now exactly how many of those at the rallies any and all actually go to the voting stations?
[-3] January 31, 2016 at 1:11am
And Trump wants to make deals with SCHUMER, PELOSI and REID, what does trump plan on giving them?
Go ahead mention Cruz and what he might owe the establishment republicans. Surely the communist democrats we’ve had for eight years are better than the establishment republicans. Besides trump wouldn’t want to deal or work with someone who’s ‘nasty’ and ‘worse than hillary’ would he?
What’s a another trillion dollars in debt is to obama? N O T H I N G.
Absolutely nothing, he doesn’t care.
 January 30, 2016 at 4:45pm
He could say we should have free tuition for students at community colleges. As someone who went through 2 years of community college I can you right now there would be a COST ISSUE with that. My tuition was just over $1,000 dollars per semester, I’m sure that some course are higher. Now figure 1,000+ times four for the four semesters and times how many students attend community college throughout the country.
Someone like you however WON’T care, to you and people like obama cost, spending and funding are NEVER a problem. You all just think oh we can pay for that and never consider how the government can ACTUALLY AFFORD it much less pay/fund it.
So “he will ask Congress for billions of dollars to help students learn computer science”, BILLIONS OF DOLLARS! Now how EXACTLY can the government afford this, how EXACTLY will it be funded and/or payed for? Just deeper into debt, THAT’S your answer and NONE of you libs care, after all there’s is no spending problem right?
 January 28, 2016 at 11:40am
Cruz could’ve been only five and you’d still bring it up today. You’re going liberal with the tactics here, using every sting of something ‘bad-sounding’ in hopes it knock Cruz out of the running.
Yes we all say crazy stuff as teens and younger, however you don’t seem to think this was just a harmless teen jibe. Something like that isn’t much of a measure either, but please explain how it means Cruz will be the bad president you already think he’ll be.
No charges, indictments and criminal case regarding the illegal donations? 1 to 2 years and a chance for a liberal DOJ to bring a charge against someone the libs despise yet there’s nothing? Crazy. No news articles talking about it?
No word from Trump on it; if is illegal surely he’d take it up and run with it? So far trump seems silent about it, why?
 January 27, 2016 at 5:58pm
First paragraph: ANYONE running can say that, the question is will they follow through if they win? Hmm, “you have to pass it to find what’s in it” might have actual meaning for a change; wrong wording but that’s kinda the principle voting in a new person.
So if Trump wins he darn better be what you trumpbots claim to be.
 January 27, 2016 at 5:33pm
So where’s the charges, indictments and criminal case regarding the illegal donations?
How about news articles, it was reported somewhere yes?
I have posted the link twice and I have seen many other people post the links. But when people like you refuse to read the links that is your problem not mine. Go to open secrets and put in some work. Why do you need to be spoon fed all your information? That is what I call low info.
Ah http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/pacgot.php?cmte=C00536540&cycle=2014 but that's it? Just a claim and link?
No charges, indictments and criminal case regarding the illegal donations? 1 to 2 years and a chance for a liberal DOJ to bring a charge against someone the libs despise yet there's nothing? Crazy. No news articles talking about it?
No word from Trump on it; if is illegal surely he'd take it up and run with it? So far trump seems silent about it, why?