User Profile: A Conservatarian

A Conservatarian

Member Since: September 13, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • February 7, 2012 at 10:12pm

    There are over 20+ trillion worth of government funds that if they were cashed in today could wipe out the federal deficit. Again stop the regular response mechanism and read the CAFR’s They are all online. I will take the ridicule as I understand the misunderstandings many of you have, I had them too.

    You say it’s all bankrupt? The CAFR’s say you are all wrong. If the CAFRs didn’t exist and I had no proof? I wouldn’t be posting this. Don’t believe me? Again, read the CAFR’s. The fund portfolios are laid out for everyone to see. My hope is that at least 1 or 2 of you will actually investigate. The rest of the balance will ignore and ridicule. I expect this and am not upset with any of you, in all honesty. All the best!

    Take care, I’m done with this website. My shackles are removed completely.

    A Conservatarian.

  • February 7, 2012 at 10:01pm

    Ok I’ll ruin part of the videos even more for some of you. The SS fund is invested in Mutual Funds, Stocks, Real Estate and more. While it may have IOU’s? You can’t invest in mutual funds and stocks and more with IOU’s unless it is federal reserve notes.

    Don’t take my word for it, the portfolio of the SS Fund, for every fund hell the CalPERS fund, any state fund, county, municiple, look up there CAFR and you will see diversity in stocks, mutual funds, real estate, gold clubs, etc. etc. etc. These are not IOU’s and we cannot touch the money as taxpayers. Stop with the quick quip answers and study the CAFRs and the VIDEOS.

  • February 7, 2012 at 9:57pm

    No gentleman, you don’t understand. That’s not correct. The assets may be in “paper” IOU’s… but it is in federal reserve note IOUs. The last year they had 80.1 Billion in profits that went nowhere but back into the fund. The money is invested in corporations all over the world. Stop saying what you think you know, I used to say the same things. Watch the videos PLEASE! If you refuse and want to stay stubborn that’s fine. Just don’t think you know everything the government does about accounting tricks because you’re being spoon fed BS.

  • February 7, 2012 at 9:46pm

    Btw, if you’ve ever felt like you were getting ripped off, knew something was happening, the money was going somewhere… it was being hidden from you and you just couldn’t find out who.. or how “They” were doing it?

    This will explain it for you 100%; if I could bet on your understanding this situation and being happy that you understand the biggest racket of all time, I would put all the money I have on the fact that you will understand this!

  • February 7, 2012 at 9:35pm

    If you want to know more about CAFR – which stands for Comprehensive Annual Financial Report then study these videos (below). As an example, the federal reserve has a CAFR that shows the disposition of all its funds that is independently audited; Ron Paul is asking for an independent audit to the fed reserve… when the CAFR already has one and he knows because the house of reps and the senate each receive a copy of this report yearly. It’s political suicide to mention them, for good reason.

    The vids are long. But, I liken the situation to this: If say 20 people out of 1000 can comprehend the federal reserve racket… then only 1/2 of a person of that 20 will understand this scheme. It’s monumental, beautiful and shocking. We put Italy, Nazi Germany.. everyone to shame who ever tried out fascism and completely failed compared to the spectacular success of the government FUND.

    This is 9 some odd hours of video, so yes it’s long. The path to understanding this fraud of accounting tricks is massively extensive, so to learn it all in 9 hours? Is nothing short of amazing. If you liked The Money Masters, you’ll love this.

    The Corporation Nation part 1 –
    The Corporation Nation part 2 –
    The Corporation Nation part 3 –

  • February 7, 2012 at 9:27pm

    The two month extension of payroll taxes could easily be paid by the profit the pension fund of the social security made just this year. We are lied to and told Social Security is bankrupt. Most people do not understand that there exists A SOCIAL SECURITY FUND. Just like pension funds, police officer funds… a the municipal, county, state.. in this case Federal level.

    Look up “Social Security CAFR” on google: It states – Total Assets for the social security fund in 2010 is 2.635 TRILLION DOLLARS minus 95 Billion in liabilities (payments to beneficiaries on the year etc.) for a net 2.500 TRILLION DOLLARS. That’s not a joke.

    We are told Social Security is underfunded and it’s broke. We are told mere accounting tricks of looking at a 1-3 year investment outlook, versus a 5-10-15 year outlook. The last 2 years sucked, of course the 1-3 year outlook sucks. But, the longer term outlook? Well lets take a look at the last 5 years of the fund!!!

    Google “CAFR Federal Government” and you will see under NOTE 26 – SOCIAL INSURANCE::: Net Value of the Social Insurance Fund :::
    2006 — $1.859 TRILLION
    2007 — $2.048 TRILLION
    2008 — $2.238 TRILLION
    2009 — $2.419 TRILLION
    2010 — $2.540 TRILLION

    Does it look like it’s going broke? We could pay off the deficit alone with the Social Security Fund.

    Continued …

    Responses (9) +
  • February 7, 2012 at 8:19am

    I know Traficant was a crook, but… he also gave an amazing speech that… I’m not sure quite what to think about but… falls right in line with your line of thought Ashes….

  • February 7, 2012 at 6:32am

    Ashes that video friggin kills me

  • February 7, 2012 at 5:35am

    JJCoolay… everyone but Paul said they supported the Patriot Act, NDAA and supported modified versions of SOPA and PIPA….

    And you’re asking why we support only Paul? If you don’t have the eyes to see or the ears to hear, you won’t understand why we don’t want to support anyone that wants to violate our liberties any further, no matter what D or R is behind their name. If Paul said he supported NDAA and the Patriot Act, I would drop him in a heart beat and all of you non Ron Paul supporters would have your normal election of finding the lesser of all evil candidates.

  • February 7, 2012 at 4:38am

    If Ahmadinejad hated Israel and all Jews, then Ahmadinajad hates even anti-Zionist Jews. This is logic. It is sound. Again, if he hates Israel and all jews and wants them all dead, he hates even the anti-Zionists.

    Please explain these pictures on this forum then:

    I’m not anti Israel, I’d like to see them knock out their enemies hard. But, I also would like people to see the truth. Like when the leader of the Mossad says if Iran gets a nuke, they are not a threat to Israel…. like when Netanyahu says Israel does not need our help or our money, they have their own money and their own protection. I believe what these people say, just like I believe what Ahmedinejad says – that he wants the Israeli regime pushed into the Mediterranean. If he wants the regime and the zionists gone and pushed into the sea as it were, then it makes sense that he would meet with anti-zionist Jewry.

    If we are to believe our government spoon fed BS, then we believe Ahmedinejad wants all jews dead— that Israel must have our help and needs our defense— that the leader of the Mossad does not know what he is talking about.

    Is Ahmedinejad a bad leader? Is he oppressive of his people? A Murderer? Yup. I don’t like him. But, I still will listen carefully and keep my eyes open.

  • February 5, 2012 at 1:20am

    This is a joke, the counting isn’t even completed NOR REPORTED. Yet here we have The Blaze… blazing the same trail the big media is… why am I not surprised.

    Anyone that’s a Paul supporter.. or even not a Paul supporter… check the link:

    Responses (1) +
  • February 5, 2012 at 1:18am

    This is a joke, the counting isn’t even completed NOR REPORTED. Yet here we have The Blaze… blazing the same trail the big media is… why am I not surprised.

    Anyone that’s a Paul supporter.. or even not a Paul supporter… check the link:

  • February 4, 2012 at 4:47am

    RE: God’s existence, the existence of the big bang, etc and more. Please see below what I posted :)

  • February 4, 2012 at 4:21am

    Watching Shooter…

    Love this quote:

    “You don’t get it, there is no head to cut off, it is a conglomerate. If one of them betrays the principles of the accrual of money and power… the others betray him… what it is.. is human WEAKNESS. You can’t kill that, with a gun.”

    Doesn’t matter who the president is people. Understand this quote and you may move past the current Either/Or dichotomy of crap you find yourself currently mired within.

  • February 4, 2012 at 3:57am

    I’ve spoken up on this topic more and more, when I should wait for people to find this info on their own. Here is how communication works, when we say a word or words, the words either have concrete definitive meaning or they don’t. Words such as Tree, Dog, Mathematics, Logic, Experience, Nothing, Everything, Thing – all hold valid concepts. Tree – you think of limbs, trunk, roots, etc – all experiences available of tree flood the mind. Ditto dog… Mathematics is a little more difficult, as say a dog or tree, but it is still very real, definable, postulate-able, proof-able. Math is the expansion of the unit. Logic is even more difficult as that concept describes the activity you undertake in identifying the existents about and around the sensory perceptions feeding information for definition and concept. Logic is the art by which we identify existence/existent things. A thing – even more obscure as even the imagination – is real THING (made up of chemicals in the mind), we can imagine any – THING we want. A Unicorn, is not real yet is an imaginary thing of built of available experience.

    God on the other hand has what experience cannot provide – and do not tell me of history of man, tell me of actual god, not a man’s or woman’s tale. Give me concrete definition of what God is, well we can’t call God a thing and we can’t call God ANY-thing. Accepting God is not a thing means any definable word cannot apply to God nor concept: GOD. All words are things. (cont)

  • February 4, 2012 at 2:38am

    Copatriots… I thought the comment disappeared, looked around now and find you’re correct, there’s your quote. It happened to me earlier tonight on another article, 3 comments deleted on after another, yes really.

    Anyhow, why speak of Ron’s honorable intent and say “I just realized, MOD, that your version of atheism is equivalent to a Ron Paul supporter”

    Please do explain that cluser**** of a comment considering your latest revalation. And I am not a theist or an atheist simple because I said exactly what I did. It’s not scary to realize the word God has no concept or definition, it’s only scary to realize you’ve been using it for decades as if it did have concept or definition. I did the same thing too for a couple decades, then I started understanding logic lots better.

    Don’t be scared, you’ll never see me say it’s foolish to believe in God or God exists or doesn’t. I can’t say any of that, not without bull-crapping myself massively. I mean everything I said up there :) If you have the positions you do, Dr. Paul should be at the top of your list and I’m curious why he’s not given some of your very logical thoughts so far.

  • February 4, 2012 at 2:31am

    You, like, missed the ‘like’ between really and is in the quote.

  • February 4, 2012 at 2:29am

    Mmmm at his age I’m of the thought that he can’t be trying to bust out his vocal chords like he could when he was 30.

    He’s on American Idol though, so, he served up his own plate of ass to eat :)

  • February 4, 2012 at 1:56am

    Owen?! Jackson the most liberal? He shut down the reserve, that =’s one conservative ass democrat.

    If that’s what it takes to take down the fed, then yes please I’ll take another classical liberal like him.

    Alright, nuff from me, I really like this article.

  • February 4, 2012 at 1:47am

    Alright, I’ll buy that, looked again and I do agree with you.

123 To page: Go