User Profile: A. NonyMoose

A. NonyMoose

Member Since: August 12, 2011

Comments

  • [29] June 24, 2014 at 11:30pm

    ModRepub – the hundreds of thousands of impoverished -US Citizen- inner city kids living in rat infested hellholes who haven’t had a meal today may disagree with the amount of attention being lavished on people who’s first act in America is to break the law. I wonder if they’ll grow up thinking that as a political football, they’ve been punted in favor of illegals, for the sake of votes.

  • [2] May 30, 2014 at 2:34pm

    If it wasn’t for the mainstream press backing Obama’s (almost) every play, Carney, or anyone would have been torn to shreds every press briefing, and the headlines and ledes would have wrecked the admin.

    But nooooo….

  • May 1, 2014 at 11:40am

    Oh, you’ve cut him deep there… I’ll bet he’ll cry all the way to the bank. Then, after depositing more money than six generations of your family and mine has ever seen, he’ll get on his plane and fly away. Just sobbing. It’s sad, really.

  • April 24, 2014 at 2:59pm

    Wait.. sounds like Bundy was echoing at least parts of what many others have said – along the lines of “too many blacks (among other races/groups) are still on the plantation, it’s just the democrat party who owns it now”.

    Heck, Glenn even approved this basic concept on his own site: http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/06/18/democrat-senator-abandons-big-government-plantation-to-join-the-gop/ when Elbert Guillory decided to switch parties. And Mr. Guillory is black.

    And, Bundy was saying ” I wonder if ” not “They shall be” regarding slavery from what I read.

    I think Glenn overreacted on this.

  • February 27, 2014 at 2:05pm

    Emperor Palpatine had a sister?

  • July 28, 2013 at 10:07am

    When a politician talks about something being a “career ender” that politician should be thrown out of office. You’re supposed to do the right thing, period, whether you get re-elected or not. You’re not in a career, you’re discharging a duty.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 9, 2013 at 9:28am

    Sad to see it happen, but looks justified. The Officer actually could have shot earlier, but held off until the last second, it appears. Most importantly, the person getting arrested didn’t necessarily have to run his mouth and interfere. He caused this.

    Responses (5) +
  • July 3, 2013 at 12:02pm

    Right! Why not simply have her immediate supervisor order her to testify truthfully. If she refuses, fire her for cause. She hasn’t incriminated herself, but what employer in their right mind would want to keep an employee who’s hiding evidence of such a huge organizational problem? Out she goes, for cause.

  • July 1, 2013 at 12:50pm

    Hey Johnny – Glenn’s said he doesn’t really care who loves who. His beef ( iirc ) is with the slow, constant changing of traditions/definitions for the purposes of deconstructing a reasonably well-functioning civilization because some wish to rebuild it, and their plan allows for far less individual liberty.

    He mentions the Fabian Society as reference for this – for instance:

    “The Fabian Society, which favoured gradual change rather than revolutionary change, was named – at the suggestion of Frank Podmore – in honour of the Roman general Fabius Maximus (nicknamed “Cunctator”, meaning “the Delayer”). His Fabian strategy advocated tactics of harassment and attrition rather than head-on battles against the Carthaginian army under the renowned general Hannibal. – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabian_Society

    So, Glenn’s essentially pointing out this drip of changing the culture and traditions has an end game that we ( all of us, Left, Right, Center, Straight, Gay, etc ) aren’t going to like.

  • April 5, 2013 at 11:25pm

    On this current path, we are.

    Responses (1) +
  • March 26, 2013 at 11:17am

    I’m in support. First, I don’t trust the motives of the people moving this legislation. Second, they haven’t enforced the existing law, so I think existing law should be vigorously enforced first, then examine the situation.

  • March 22, 2013 at 1:05pm

    I think Rand’s actually right on this. Sure, they came here illegally, but they wouldn’t be here if folks weren’t hiring them. And since the Feds (under the authority of BOTH parties) have not vigorously enforced immigration law, here we are.

    Sure, let’s deport any lawbreakers, etc. But seriously, do so many of you truly believe families who have been here more than 10 years, at our invitation via job offers and lax enforcement, should be broken up and/or sent home? I rather doubt it, regardless of the rhetoric lobbed in from behind the cover of an anonymous user account.

    If you’re truly going to be an absolutist and say “send them ALL back”, well, don’t we dislike Zero Tolerance policies in general? Like when kids gnaw a poptart into the shape of a gun and get suspended?

    I think Rand’s on the right track. Secure the border first, then address those who remain. We can sort the wheat from the chaff this way, and perhaps even approach the birthright citizenship issue with some credibility. I’d rather see logic -and- compassion applied here, rather than another “Zero Tolerance” approach arbitrarily applied after decades of “wink and a nod” immigration enforcement. Regardless of whose political party it benefits.

  • February 23, 2013 at 6:11pm

    “You keep pointing that camera at my rear and snickering, this orange is going in yours.”

  • February 2, 2013 at 11:02am

    Odd, though. They have no problem with using religion in their commercials…. “Say a prayer for peace”, is how their song ends.

    So, I don’t understand why they suddenly get religion-averse when the religion they base their appeal on asks for a nod in return for a donation.

  • February 1, 2013 at 10:58am

    Double amen. The Anthem is not about you, the singer. I actually started listening to the posted version, but it was going on for too long. I have other things to do besides watching a decent singer try too hard.

  • January 22, 2013 at 10:29am

    Sounds like he overreacted. But I would like to know….

    If that person had turned to face you, and in a reasonable tone of voice said:

    “I can see your son doesn’t understand, but many people, myself included, don’t like to be touched unexpectedly. Could you please stop him from doing that again?”

    Is that a valid request in your opinion?

  • January 9, 2013 at 2:19pm

    If this isn’t a hoax:
    If you can’t afford the tip, you can’t afford to dine out. If you wish to protest, write your CongressCritter. But don’t deliberately deprive another of fairly earned wages because you want to make a political point.

    Responses (2) +
  • January 5, 2013 at 2:47pm

    Probably thought it was a drive through window. He wanted two all people patties, special tossed, crunchy knees, leaves and twigs on a sesame seed bun.

    Yep, I bet you sang along with that if you’re over 40.

    Responses (2) +
  • January 5, 2013 at 2:22pm

    The trombone solo was the best part of the story. That was good work!

  • December 31, 2012 at 3:40pm

    Imaginary dialogue with some of these Actors/Actresses when they’re speaking freely:
    Me: “Why do you have armed security at the studio gates, and at film shoots?”
    Them: “Because some crazy could walk up and start shoo…..”
    Me: “Exactly…”
    Them: “But you’re a nobody…”
    Me: “Tell that to my kids.”

    Responses (1) +