User Profile: AboveMyPayGrade

AboveMyPayGrade

Member Since: July 12, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [1] July 28, 2014 at 12:33pm

    Smokey_Bojangles, regarding my 12:30 response to WhoIsJohnGlt’s 12:11pm post and my 12:24pm response to this post of cosette:

    do you think I have fundamentally hit the nail on the head in my observations in these posts, or that I’m way off base?

  • [4] July 28, 2014 at 12:30pm

    Most likely what we’re seeing here in the black and Latino communities is a GENERATIONAL divide.

    It is the OLDER generations in these communities, all but certainly, that are the most fastidious church attenders, and the members of these generations are going to tend to be the most stable and responsible members of these communities and thus the most likely to vote Republican or at the very least not vote Democrat.

    Most likely, the YOUNGER generations of these communities are pretty well UNCHURCHED and overwhelmingly represented in the more irresponsible and unstable segment of these communities.

    The plain and simple fact is, these days, YOUNG blacks and Latinos are fairly secularized – and as a result, overwhelmingly drawn to a Democrat Party that has no more place for God than THEY do.

    Responses (1) +
  • [7] July 28, 2014 at 12:24pm

    Which means that this black Christian woman tacitly admitted to you that her supposed Christian faith is much more an APPENDAGE to her life rather than the CORE of it.

    Most black churches these days are nothing more than branch offices of the Democrat Party.

  • July 28, 2014 at 11:55am

    Sentence got cut off, it meant to read:

    “If the civilian federal workforce will be the bully boys for this, then WHY didn’t those bully boys engage those at the Bundy ranch and in Murietta, CA?”

    If Obama TRIES to impose a national state of martial law, I think he will VERY quickly realize that he’s bitten off a LOT more than he can chew – and once he makes this horrifying discovery, I think that at that point, you can number the remaining life of the Obama presidency, if not Obama’s OWN life, in mere days if not in mere hours.

  • July 28, 2014 at 11:52am

    @barber2

    You replied in part to iamnotu’s 10:31am response to your 10:19am post with “iamno: I don’t trust the Obama radical Lefties who seem to be toying with congress to impeach him – probably because they know they have played the race card for 6 years insuring a race war if anyone tries to impeach Obama . They also have Martial Law at their disposal…….And they will use Obama executive power / legal means to ‘ fundamentally transform ‘ any civil disorder that they encounter.”

    If Obama tries to actually PLAY the martial law card, I think he will quickly discover to his absolute horror that it looked a LOT easier on PAPER than it will be to actually implement IN PRACTICE.

    On an American Thinker article the other day talking about the possibility of impeaching Obama, one poster pretty well put MY feelings on this matter in a nutshell when he posted in response to someone else who also floated the martial law meme:

    “”Large cities are to the nation as large sores are to the body.”

    - Thomas Jefferson

    Declaring martial law and enforcing it in the hinterlands are two different things.”

    AGAIN, I must ask: Obama can DECLARE a national state of martial law, but SOMEONE is still going to have to IMPOSE and ENFORCE, and just WHERE do you think Obama will be able to get the willing bodies to DO it?

    If the civilian federal workforce will be the bully boys for this, then WHY didn’t those bully boys engage those at the Bundy ranch and in Mur

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] July 26, 2014 at 10:39am

    Twoshoes68, the situation at the Bundy ranch in Nevada earlier this year spoke VOLUMES to me about Obama.

    When scores of armed citizens came streaming into Nevada to stand in support of Cliven Bundy and in open DEFIANCE of the forces of the feds, as I stated in another post on this thread, given the fact that the federal government has supposedly acquired hundreds of millions of rounds of hollowpoint ammo in the last few years, why didn’t Obama simply order the forces of the feds, including BLM personnel, at the Bundy ranch to break out a few of those rounds and send those citizens fleeing?

    For that matter, why didn’t he order the personnel of DHS, confronted with a mass of citizens who blocked their buses from unloading their contingent of child illegals in Murietta, CA recently, to do the same thing? The fact that he didn’t ALSO spoke volumes to me.

    And what BOTH incidents spoke volumes to me about is that Obama really DOES fear us.

    I ALSO suspect that Obama GREATLY fears our military, as well as loathing and distrusting them, and while he MAY have packed the Pentagon with boot-licking generals who would obey any order he may give them no matter how flagrantly illegal, I think he knows only too well that such blind obedience to him is in very short supply among the men at the “boots on the ground” level were he to attempt a totalitarian putsch.

    And Obama knows about the absolute EXPLOSION in gun and ammo purchases since he become president.

  • July 26, 2014 at 9:59am

    Indagila, I fully agree with you on the points you raised in your 9:37am, and there are two things I’ve oft-stated on this site about this.

    One, that civilian federal government employees do NOT live with their families in super-secret government compounds where the only people they ever see and associate with are OTHER civilian federal government employees and THEIR families, they live in ordinary neighborhoods among us where their neighbors know who they are and what they do for a living.

    Let Obama try to turn the civilian federal workforce into jackboots and unleash them against the American people, and THEIR homes and families would become targets – and they KNOW it. In point of fact, under such a circumstance, I think that very quickly, civilian fed employees would have no choice but to have to send their families far away for their own safety, and thus in the process greatly reduce their OWN quality of life.

    The other point is, except for those civilian federal employees with prior military or civilian law-enforcement experience, and I believe that at most very few such employees would go along with this, those in our military are trained to operate in an environment where people are shooting back at and trying to kill THEM: civilian fed employees AREN’T. Once the latter start facing return fire from an enraged American citizenry, and they WOULD, I think it would utterly fry all their circuits and quickly cause them to head for the hills.

  • [2] July 26, 2014 at 9:50am

    GeoChk, to be sure, there ARE many millions of apathetic Americans who won’t wake up until they’ve been marched into the bathhouses believing that it’s merely for “delousing”, as they will have been told by the government that they naively trusted, and only then discover that instead of water coming out of the shower nozzles, it’s Zyklon-B instead. But the vast majority of these Americans are the UNARMED segment of our population.

    That having been said, there are TENS OF MILLIONS of armed Americans who WILL fight to the death if need be being marched into those gas chambers. Just look at the absolute EXPLOSION in gun and ammo sales since Obama’s presidency started – and the vast majority of those guns and ammo HAVEN’T been purchased by people simply to become the next generation of duck and deer hunters.

    Which means that those who attempt to march them into those gas chambers can expect to take a LOT of casualties in the process. And I believe that the moment that those forces DID start taking casualties, at least the vast majority of them would quickly cease being involved in such an effort, because they would decide that it is NOT worth their LIVES.

  • [5] July 26, 2014 at 9:39am

    Oh, and one more thing:

    if Obama tried to make himself president-for-life by force of arms, I believe that such an attempt would IMMEDIATELY trigger a mass secession response, as I believe that a whole bunch of states, starting I fully expect with Texas, would immediately announce that they are no longer a part of that entity which is legally named the United States of America, and would start arresting and/or expelling federal agents from their states and closing down federal installations. And given what I’ve stated above about our military, I believe our military, with very few exceptions, would not obey orders from Obama to crush such a secession movement, indeed, I think there’s a good chance many of them would JOIN it.

    But frankly, if things got to THAT point, I think that by then you could number the remainder of the Obama presidency in mere DAYS if not HOURS, and if Obama isn’t already dead by then, I think he’d realize that the jig is up for him and would be looking for the first opportunity to flee the country for parts unknown in the Third World.

    Although where he could go NOW for sanctuary if he was forced to flee this country one jump ahead of a rope is a good question. He’s burned his bridges even to the Islamic world by now, so somewhere like Saudi Arabia is not an option for him in exile. In point of fact, I think there’s only ONE place he could flee to: North Korea. And THERE, he WON’T live the good life he’s accustomed to.

  • [12] July 26, 2014 at 9:25am

    Trigus, you replied in part at 9:04am to ArmedAndReallyPissed’s 8:17am post with: “Obama needs an Army loyal to him, and needs it fast. This planned Invasion of Illegals. 2016 is approaching fast and he needs his army in Place and Trained so he can Stay in Power. I still have no clue why most of you think Obama will wake up and follow the Constitution, and Federal Law and give up his Throne.”

    If what you’re implying is that Obama will try to arm these illegals to use them as an army to put and keep him in totalitarian control of this country after 1/20/2017, all I can say is, good luck to him on THAT.

    If Obama attempted such a course, I firmly believe that enough of our military, which is already infuriated at their Commander-in-Chief, would NOT stand down in the face of such a move but WOULD rise up to fight it, and enough of their officers would also. Once the top brass in the Pentagon realized that they’ve lost control of their own men, they’d have one of two choices: join that revolution, or flee the country.

    And the vast majority of these illegals flooding our country are utterly untrained in weapons use, and such a move would GALVANIZE the tens of millions of armed citizens in this country, so any illegal-alien army Obama tried to arm would be facing a SLAUGHTER, and frankly, I think that once the bullets started flying, the vast majority of Obama’s “army” would quickly throw down their guns and FLEE for south of the border – and safety.

    Responses (3) +
  • [3] July 26, 2014 at 9:11am

    And THAT’S when state governors need to stand up and tell Obama in no uncertain terms, no, they will NOT be allowed to vote in our states, and just TRY to MAKE us allow them to vote.

    And at THAT point, force Obama to either have to back down or to have to escalate. And if Obama chooses to escalate with force and violence: well, then, Civil War II is ON.

    But frankly, I doubt Obama WOULD escalate that way. If he was so eager for an opportunity to engage in a bullet contest with the American people, as so many people you see posting on conservative sites all over the Internet including THIS one seem to believe, it seems to ME that he’s HAD just such opportunities this year, at Cliven Bundy’s ranch in Nevada when scores of armed citizens flocked there to stand in solidarity with Bundy and in open DEFIANCE of the forces of the feds, and more recently in Murietta, CA, when many citizens blocked those DHS buses from unloading their contingents of child illegals.

    Supposedly, the federal government has acquired hundreds of millions of rounds of hollowpoint ammo the last few years: why didn’t Obama order the forces of the feds at the Bundy ranch and in Murietta to break out a few of those rounds to disperse these citizens?

    I believe it’s because Obama is FEARFUL of inciting a full-blown revolution. HE has a LOT to lose by doing so, because such a revolution could very conceivably drive him out of the White House and into a VERY bleak future thereafter.

    Responses (4) +
  • [18] July 26, 2014 at 9:04am

    “Democrats don’t give a darn about the future of their own kids.”

    Liberals ABORT their kids (well, at least white and black liberals, Hispanic liberals, not so much).

    Liberals don’t have their OWN kids, through the public school system, they simply try to expropriate CONSERVATIVES’ kids for their side by brainwashing them in the K12 system with communist indoctrination.

    WHY is Obama trying to import so many people from south of our border? Because the non-Hispanic liberals in this country AREN’T reproducing and thus this threatens the future of the Democrat Party, so if your OWN base is shrinking, then you import a NEW base.

    Of course, white Democrats, being the “useful idiots” that they are, actually believe that even if the majority of their base is Hispanic, that these Hispanics will continue to obligingly vote for white or black Democrats to represent them in political office.

    Of course, we know the truth is, once Hispanics have the numbers, if you’re a Democrat political aspirant whose last name DOESN’T end in a “z” or “s” or “a”, you can pretty much forget about holding elective office.

    Once Hispanics are the Democrats’ single most important constituency, think THEY’D ever vote for a BLACK person ever again for president?

    The plain and simple fact is, blacks are rapidly being totally marginalized in the Democrat Party, and once the Democrats don’t need their votes anymore, they’ll throw blacks over the side.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] July 26, 2014 at 8:28am

    And of course, who was it in our OWN country who assassinated our own Robert F. Kennedy?

    It was – drumroll, please – a PALESTINIAN!

  • [3] July 26, 2014 at 8:26am

    jds7171, you replied at 12:02am to DEFCON4′s 10:15pm response to MericanHero’s 10:01pm post with: “I don’t know how true this is, but I have heard that the arabs don’t view the Palestinians in high esteem. To them the Palestinian people are just above jews and infidels (us).”

    What you’ve heard about this is TOTALLY true.

    The Palestinians have made themselves unwelcome pretty much EVERYWHERE they’ve gone, even in the ARAB world.

    Some 300,000 of them were living in Kuwait when Saddam Hussein invaded that country and touched off the first Gulf War, and they backed Saddam. Once our forces kicked Saddam’s army out of Kuwait, that country promptly EXPELLED all those Palestinians.

    I knew an American who actually fought in the Israeli army and was part of their invasion of Lebanon in 1982. This person told me that as Israeli forces moved through southern Lebanon, the ****** Muslims living there were actually CHEERING the Israelis – because they thought that the Israelis were now going to expel from that country the Palestinians who had settled there. What does THAT tell you?

    The Black September terrorist group that pulled off the Munich Olympic massacre took its name from the fact that in September 1970 King Hussein of Jordan sent his army after the Palestinians in his country who were making themselves a huge problem for him, killing thousands of them, and thus making that month a “black September” for Palestinians in Jordan.

    I could go on and on.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 26, 2014 at 8:08am

    Snowleopard, you posted in part at 5:13pm:

    “The reason this is being hyped in the media by the White House is out of genuine fear of something going forward in the courts. The elections are nearing, and matters are getting out of control with Obama and the left: they see the handwriting on the wall, and know only one of two choices remains…

    Total victory or a grab for final power in an overthrow of the government by Obama.”

    if Obama makes that grab for final power to overthrow the government, please tell me where the army he will need to put and keep him in totalitarian control of this country will come from.

    From our own military? I doubt it very much. Even if I accept the so-called conventional wisdom that Obama has filled the Pentagon with boot-licking generals who will carry out ANY orders he gives them no matter HOW flagrantly illegal, after the Taliban-Bergdahl swap, I doubt the same attitude is present among the vast majority of the grunts, so it won’t do Obama any good to have such generals if those generals have almost no troops who will obey such orders.I think the same will be true of at least the vast majority of those in the National Guard and civilian LEOs.

    The civilian federal workforce? For all the armament they’ve acquired as of late, these people are NOT trained warriors, and when they start facing bullets from an enraged American citizenry, and they WOULD, I think at least the vast majority will quickly head for the hills.

  • [3] July 26, 2014 at 7:55am

    I can hardly agree more with Concerned Green Beret when he posted in part at 8:13pm in response to Cavallo’s 5:08pm post as to what the Republicans should do in response to Obama with:

    “4. Republican Governors need to get together and flat out state his immigration policies are illegal and none of them will be honored in their states. Any fed trying to enforce Obama ‘s lawlessness in their state will be arrested.

    5. The Governors need to declare states of emergency in their states and call up the National Guard to enforce the state borders. The governors should cite as part of the emergency is the President’s deliberate subversion of the constitution and the law.”

    And with Rexd63′s 8:33pm response to Concerned Green Beret when he stated: “If I was the gov of Texas I would have an all military force of veterans and concerned Americans and physically shut down the border and tell oboma and crew to pound sand.”

    Because I’ve been saying for MONTHS on this site that where the REAL line of resistance to Obama needs to come from is the STATES. State governors backed by their legislators and law-enforcement personnel need to take action on their own to combat Obama’s flagrantly illegal actions and DARE Obama to in response either have to back down or to have to escalate. And if Obama was prepared to escalate with force and violence: he HAD such opportunities at the Bundy ranch in Nevada and in Murietta, CA earlier this year – and DECLINED to do so.

  • [1] July 25, 2014 at 11:30am

    OOPS!

    Sorry about the double post, all.

  • [1] July 25, 2014 at 11:29am

    @Revolution2.0cometh, The_Woofster, and UpstateNY_Proud

    Regarding Obama’s attempts to fly Central American children directly into the United States:

    what needs to happen is what happened in a movie HBO made back in the late 1990′s entitled The Second Civil War, a couple snippets of which I recently saw embedded on an Internet article, which was the first that I had heard of this movie.

    In the movie, planeloads of refugee children were being flown in from abroad, in the movie’s version from Pakistan, which had just engaged in a nuclear exchange with India and as a result was now left with millions of orphaned children, and the president of the United States was either actively facilitating this influx or simply passively standing by while it happened (the snippets of the movie I saw didn’t indicate which).

    Finally, the governor of the state of Idaho had enough and called a press conference at which he announced that he had called out the state’s law-enforcement personnel to seal the state’s borders, and thus no one hence could get into the state of Idaho without approval first.

    Something like this needs to happen if Obama actually goes ahead with this mad scheme: some state governor(s) with cojones needs to stand up, call out his state’s law-enforcement personnel AND any private citizens willing to join them, and keep these kids from entering their states, by force of arms if need be – and force Obama to have to either back down or to escalate.

  • [1] July 25, 2014 at 11:29am

    @Revolution2.0cometh, The_Woofster, and UpstateNY_Proud

    Regarding Obama’s attempts to fly Central American children directly into the United States:

    what needs to happen is what happened in a movie HBO made back in the late 1990′s entitled The Second Civil War, a couple snippets of which I recently saw embedded on an Internet article, which was the first that I had heard of this movie.

    In the movie, planeloads of refugee children were being flown in from abroad, in the movie’s version from Pakistan, which had just engaged in a nuclear exchange with India and as a result was now left with millions of orphaned children, and the president of the United States was either actively facilitating this influx or simply passively standing by while it happened (the snippets of the movie I saw didn’t indicate which).

    Finally, the governor of the state of Idaho had enough and called a press conference at which he announced that he had called out the state’s law-enforcement personnel to seal the state’s borders, and thus no one hence could get into the state of Idaho without approval first.

    Something like this needs to happen if Obama actually goes ahead with this mad scheme: some state governor(s) with cojones needs to stand up, call out his state’s law-enforcement personnel AND any private citizens willing to join them, and keep these kids from entering their states, by force of arms if need be – and force Obama to have to either back down or to escalate.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] July 25, 2014 at 11:19am

    The one saving grace for Israel about CNN’s utterly anti-Israel “news” broadcasting bias is that CNN’s ratings are low enough that the only people still watching CNN for “news” are the total Kool-Aid drinkers who are likely unreachable anyway to the truth.

    If CNN’s ratings were still solid, it would not have been forced to abandon its all-news format in prime time in favor of other programming, as it did some time ago.

123 To page: Go