User Profile: AboveMyPayGrade

AboveMyPayGrade

Member Since: July 12, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [2] March 19, 2015 at 4:22pm

    @ progressiveslayer

    I’d bet on the Jews, because many of them are ALREADY American Caucasians, and in addition, THEY didn’t need the benefit of affirmative action to get where THEY are, they actually have REAL smarts, and thus they represent EVERYTHING that Obama WANTS to be but knows in his heart of hearts he CAN’T be and thus it drives him to rage: accomplished people able to stand quite well and make their way in the world on their own two feet.

    In addition, in his upbringing in the Muslim world, he SURELY must have been exposed to a LOT of anti-Jewish sentiment.

  • [2] March 19, 2015 at 3:36pm

    In other words, what Josh Earnest was saying is:

    “How DARE Netanyahu actually campaign in a way that he should actually try to WIN!”

    But why doesn’t Obama just petition the U.N. to launch a full investigation of this latest Israeli election on some bogus grounds?

  • [4] March 19, 2015 at 3:33pm

    @ barber2

    If you’re suggesting in your 3:23pm post what I THINK you’re suggesting:

    well, the other day, on the following Blaze thread:

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/03/17/exit-polls-show-extremely-tight-contest-for-israeli-prime-minister-netanyahu/

    when junkman1031 responded to a post of mine in part with: “Obama sets Sharpton loose with Soros funding to start race riots across the US that make the 70′s look like a picnic. He then can declare Marshall Law, postpone elections, and institute his NDAA and NDRP. He can then shut down communication, travel, and have curfews.”
    :
    Max Power 1 replied to junkman1031 with: “@ junkman, the day obola does any one of those things will be his last day in office. If you ever see him declare martial law, you will also see untold numbers of heavily armed Americans throw their war bags into their vehicles & head to DC. Trust me, he knows this, martial law isn’t on his to do list.”

    I think Max Power 1 hit the nail right on the head.

    So if you’re suggesting that Obama will ATTEMPT a huge population purge in THIS country:

    he just may wind up being able to reduce the population of this country a LITTLE, by maybe a few hundred thousand or even possibly a few MILLION, but as I’ve oft-indicated on this site about this, I think there’s a VERY good chance that he won’t live long enough to see the final result of his handiwork – or be having to watch it on CNN International in deep hiding in the Third World.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] March 19, 2015 at 1:10pm

    Even the Democrats have learned by now that unless you represent one of the most hard-core-communist districts in the country, espousing gun control is a sure-fire means to commit political hari-kari.

    Both Colorado and New York enacted strict new gun control laws in 2013 – and in the mid-terms last year, the Democrats lost control of the state senate in BOTH states.

    This is why Democrats now want Obama to do gun control through the BACK DOOR, by executive order, because they KNOW trying to do it through the FRONT DOOR in the manner you’ve suggested will mean that many Democrats will need to find another way to make a living besides holding elective office.

    Of course, the problem by now is, there are so many guns in this country in private hands (a development Obama HIMSELF has GREATLY accentuated) that there’s NO WAY for Obama and his fellow Dems to get those guns OUT of people’s hands short of outright confiscation – and as I’ve oft-stated on this site on this, good luck to Obama in being able to get the necessary bully boys who are willing to march into the hailstorm of lead which the forces of Fedzilla will SURELY face on THAT day in the process of trying to grab those guns which will come from the guns of America’s law-abiding gun owners whose motto will be “MOLON LABE!” when it comes to that and who will fight to the death for their gun rights, since they KNOW that to be disarmed puts them only a short step to facing their OWN “Final Solution”.

  • March 19, 2015 at 12:33pm

    Seems a BUNCH of us posting on this article had the same idea, as this is the train of thought I posted at 11:54am and that several others, like demsrtraitors at 12:17pm and krusader23 at 12:21pm, have posted as well.

  • March 19, 2015 at 12:27pm

    You raised a thought in my mind that’s so DELICIOUS to contemplate that I better stop thinking about it!

    What IF the word HAD gotten out soon enough to the criminal underground after this place opened its doors that there was this gun shop with genuine merchandise but whose personnel would NOT shoot back at anyone who attempted to rob them because they were actually anti-gun people?

    And then a gang of armed bad guys, such as gang members, HAD gone in, shot the store personnel dead (so as not to leave any witnesses, you know), and then cleaned out the place of everything they could lay their hands on?

    Just a few LESS “useful idiots” in the world!

    Actually, better yet, let’s suppose for this scenario that one of the store personnel SURVIVED the massacre – so that he could finger whoever the higher-ups were who authorized this operation and got the necessary permits and merchandise to allow the place to open. I’d ENJOY watching those higher-ups trying to defend such an operation that got some hapless “useful idiots” killed on the network news shows – and then enjoy watching them get sued up the wazoo by the survivors of those killed.

  • [4] March 19, 2015 at 11:54am

    Maybe one of their would-be customers should have said to the guy behind the counter:

    “All right, then, I have assurance that if I need to shoot a REAL bad guy with it, IT WORKS! RING IT UP!”

    But woodyee raises EXCELLENT points in his 11:51am post: where DID this fake gun shop get the merchandise and the necessary permits to be able to open?

  • [10] March 19, 2015 at 11:18am

    Geez, these ungrateful blacks and Latinos!

    Here their liberal white betters are trying to “HELP” them – AND THEY REFUSE TO COOPERATE!

    Here’s an idea: given how it’s simply an open secret that EBT cardholders expend a lot of the funds on their cards on “unhealthy” foods, why don’t the feds simply set up food distribution centers where it stocks only “healthy” foods – and make the system such so that the ONLY place that can accept EBT cards are these federal food distribution centers?

    I know what a lot of you would immediately riposte with: if THIS kind of system was ever created, EBT cardholders would simply sell their EBT cards on the black market, as many ALREADY do, and then simply report it as lost to get a replacement.

    And here’s my solution to THAT problem: if in a given month an EBT cardholder’s expenditures of the monies put on his EBT card is NOT being made in these government food distribution centers, then the federal government sends the cardholder an announcement before the next recharge of funds on the card threatening to reduce the amount of funds put on the card unless the cardholder starts spending the funds on the card at these distribution centers, and if by the next month’s recharge of funds nothing has changed, then at the NEXT recharge, the amount put on the card is sharply reduced and continues to be until the cardholder acquiesces.

    Of course, THIS will NEVER happen: liberals would scream bloody murder that this is “racist”.

    Responses (4) +
  • [1] March 19, 2015 at 10:32am

    @ progressiveslayer

    You replied at 10:02am to justangry’s 9:40am post with: “An agent of the state popping off a few rounds would create the outcome the state desired.”

    Unless the “state” you’re referring to is the FEDERAL government, I doubt very much the “state” as in the state government of MICHIGAN is looking to create a “false flag” incident to give the state government a justification for impinging upon Michiganders’ 2nd Amendment rights, given the fact that the governor of Michigan, Rick Snyder, is a Republican and that the Republicans control BOTH chambers of the Michigan state legislature.

    Let the Republicans in the state government of Michigan just TRY to go after their state’s residents’ 2nd Amendment rights, and the Republican Party can count on being just as doomed to becoming as permanent a minority party in the state government of Michigan as it’s become in the state government of California.

    And of course, many of us have oft-discussed on this site what would happen if the FEDERAL government tried to use or gin up some false-flag situation like what you suggested as a pretext for dropping the hammer in a draconian way on our 2nd Amendment rights, so I don’t need to go into all THAT again here.

  • [14] March 18, 2015 at 5:56pm

    @ JRook

    You don’t need to worry, hardly ANY of us conservatives who post here believe that Obama was the guy on the grassy knoll.

    NOT because he would have been all of 2 years old at the time, but for THIS reason:

    even if it had happened when Obama was chronologically an adult, I think the vast majority of we conservatives who post on this site are VERY skeptical that Obama – like the VAST majority of hard-core liberals – could actually HANDLE a firearm WITHOUT inflicting self-injury!

  • [2] March 18, 2015 at 5:48pm

    Possibly a SUCCESSOR to Obama may be crowned Emperor – but NOT Obama. After the results of last year’s mid-terms, if Obama tries going HERE, he can COUNT on Civil War II – which his presidency will NOT survive.

    Responses (1) +
  • March 18, 2015 at 5:44pm

    Nothing surprising about this tactic.

    After getting their heads handed to them in the last two mid-term elections, the race card by now is the ONLY thing the progs have left.

    I repeatedly posted on this site last year to expect to see the race card get played with ever-increasing intensity as we got closer to the mid-terms – because by now the race card is ALL the progs have left as far as being able to defend this president.

    They can’t defend his POLICIES, they can’t defend the RESULTS of his policies, and they can’t defend his PHILOSOPHY, so when you have no answers on the SUBSTANCE, all you can do is throw mud against the wall hoping something sticks.

  • [3] March 18, 2015 at 5:39pm

    Of course, you realize that if Obama succeeds in doing what you FEAR he’ll do – find some way to make himself president-for-life – he will NEVER be tried for treason.

    The other day, on the following Blaze thread:

    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/03/17/exit-polls-show-extremely-tight-contest-for-israeli-prime-minister-netanyahu/

    when junkman1031 responded to a post of mine in part with: “Obama sets Sharpton loose with Soros funding to start race riots across the US that make the 70′s look like a picnic. He then can declare Marshall Law, postpone elections, and institute his NDAA and NDRP. He can then shut down communication, travel, and have curfews.”:

    Max Power 1 replied to junkman1031 with: “@ junkman, the day obola does any one of those things will be his last day in office. If you ever see him declare martial law, you will also see untold numbers of heavily armed Americans throw their war bags into their vehicles & head to DC. Trust me, he knows this, martial law isn’t on his to do list.”

    I think Max Power 1 hit the nail right on the head, in fact, I’ll go even farther than Max Power 1 and venture to say that not only will the day Obama attempts any of these things be his last day in office (or pretty darn close to it), but there’s a very good chance that it will ALSO be his last day IN THE LAND OF THE LIVING (or pretty darn close to it). If the AMERICAN PEOPLE don’t see to that, I think there’s a VERY good chance his own HANDLERS will.

  • [12] March 18, 2015 at 5:31pm

    GIven that he IGNORES the Constitution, I’m surprised that Obama DIDN’T say, “Wouldn’t it be fun if I amended the Constitution to put limits on campaign contributions WITH AN EXECUTIVE ORDER?!”

    Since WHEN is Obama concerned with amending the Constitution by LEGAL means?

    Responses (1) +
  • [8] March 18, 2015 at 12:00pm

    That would be like Red Sox fans congratulating the Yankees on winning the World Series – or vice versa.

  • [34] March 18, 2015 at 11:57am

    Larry Miller had NOTHING to apologize for.

    I fully agree with him, if the Muslims coming to Canada want to live in a nation that is conformed to their Islamic beliefs, then these Muslims need to find ANOTHER country where that nation’s society is what they want to live in.

    Even the mayor of Rotterdam, Netherlands – a Muslim HIMSELF – recently publicly stated to his FELLOW Muslims living in Holland that if they have a problem with the freedoms of a Western democracy like Holland, then they should pack their bags and leave.

  • [12] March 18, 2015 at 11:49am

    From now on, in any future meetings between Obama and Netanyahu (if there even ARE any future meetings between the two), whenever Obama gets angry when he makes certain demands on Netanyahu which Bibi blows off out of hand, Netanyahu ought to quote back to Obama two words that Obama HIMSELF likes to use on the Republicans on Capitol Hill: “I WON!”

    With the election results in Israel yesterday, in the last four months, Obama has now been repudiated in national elections in TWO countries: ours and Israel.

    It must absolutely GALL him that for all the effort he and the left made to bring about Netanyahu’s defeat yesterday, it all turned into ashes in his mouth.

    And since Netanyahu has already said that Israel will cede no more land for “peace” while HE’S prime minister, it means that Obama has little left at his disposal to bring pressure on Bibi.

  • March 18, 2015 at 9:58am

    @ Mikeil305

    Well, maybe SGT Rock just isn’t quite the diplomat that YOU are.

  • March 18, 2015 at 9:55am

    @ Sargeking

    I think that for a lot of people, it was Obama’s talking during the 2008 campaign about establishing a “Civilian National Security Force” that caused them to start seriously thinking that if this guy got into the White House, he had no plans to ever leave it except in his coffin.

    But as I stated on another website the day after the 2010 mid-terms, I think that THOSE mid-term results effectively interred any thought of a CNSF, because with the House of Representatives now in control of the Republicans and thus the government’s purse strings as well, and more importantly with the investigative power of the House committees now in Republican hands, Obama would neither be able to get funding for such an organization and more importantly, couldn’t be assured anymore of the thing he would need MOST to be able to create such an outfit: secrecy.

    And of course, I’ve OFT-opined on THIS site since 11/4/2014 that with the mid-term results, the martial law ship sailed on Obama on that day, if it can even be argued that it was ever at the dock to begin with.

    And of course, by now you’ve seen enough from me on this site on this subject to know what I believe about Obama’s chances of successfully elevating himself from president to fuhrer, so I don’t think I need to re-hash all THAT here.

  • [4] March 18, 2015 at 9:43am

    I’d like to see these anti-capitalist types try something like this in TEXAS.

    Because THEN the good folks there could play a game of “cowboys and radicals”.

    ESPECIALLY now that Governor Abbott is about to sign into law there that new bill allowing open carry in Texas.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love