Since it affects Cruz supporters, he won't be ok with it.
If it affected Trump supporters only, he'd be praising the decision and calling the maker of the decision a "vicious defender of liberty."
Probably. As the article states, the party chair has indicated that any supporter who disrupts the proceedings will become unwelcomed, told to leave, and removed by law enforcement if they refuse.
It's like calling the cops to get your drunk neighbor out of your barbeque when he starts acting the idiot.
 April 19, 2016 at 5:26pm
There are 750 BILLION reasons why Saudi Arabia will remain anonymous as a sponsor of terror. And that becomes 4 TRILLION reasons if they can convince their OPEC partners of their innocence….now do we see that 19 Trillion in debt is a threat to our national security….of course not…/sarc
 April 13, 2016 at 8:37pm
The real question I have is how do we fix this long term? Ultimately someone will be nominated, and whether they win or lose, this will be behind us, but I believe the animosity will continue. I have been posting here for years, and I see what used to be a group of like minded people now tearing each other apart.
Just remember: We are all victims of the choices we make.
Fact: There are 639 children attending this school.
Fact: There is a designated “Pick Up” lane for those retrieving or dropping off their children.
Fact: Due to the amount of children, waiting in the designated lane will be time consuming.
Fact: The reason this policy was implemented was because parents were parking their cars and entering the school to retrieve or drop off their children instead of waiting in the designated lane. This led to many parents and children crossing through the pick up lane and bus lanes causing bigger delays as well as risking the well being of the children.
Fact: You cannot walk you children to school. You must drive them, and drop them off via the designated lane, or take the school bus.
This is not a liberal conspiracy theory, it is in the name of safety for all parties involved. 639 is a lot of kids to get in and out of a building with moving traffic right outside the front door.
Did my homework Glenn…now a little more research by your team would have prevented some of the ridiculous responses posted here.
Agent P, what about the father, Frank Young, who walks his children to school? He received a warning for escorting his children home. Why shouldn't a parent be allowed to walk their children to school? It is great exercise and a good time to talk with your children.
I agree the children need to be kept safe and not allowed to dart in between buses and cars. Surely there must be other solutions besides banning the parents from school property.
Fact, I would pull my kids from the facist school.
Fact, I would bring criminal complaint against the school district for child endangerment.
Fact, I would file a civil suit against the school district.
Fact, I would file a civil suit against each and every person in this school's administration.
Fact, I would file a civil suit against every individual in the administration of that school district.
Fact, I would file criminal complaint for false imprisionment.
Fact, I would file criminal complaint for kidnapping.
Sometimes I used to walk to/from school when I was in second grade. School was almost a mile away and I had to cross a highway to get there. My mom escorted me a few times until she was sure I knew how to cross the highway safely then it was up to me. I can only imagine the public outcry from the liberals of today if some kid wanted to do that now.
You cannot WALK TO SCHOOL???? I walked to school (over a mile each way) since I was 8 years old (and my dad was a teacher at the school too). Did you even consider the absurdity of your "FACT" when you wrote it or are you just a liberal who has lost all sense of logic?
I'm agreeing with thankfulmom. What part of your explanation should exclude parents from walking their child too and from school. Why is it a fact that "you cannot walk you (sic) children to school?" No joke. My child would not attend such a school. According to your explanation I'd think there would be more attention paid to vehicle traffic control and less attention to parent control. How does walking your child to and from school contribute to the waiting time in the designated lane?
At any rate, the biggest problem I see is the unwillingness of the principal to consider alternatives. More minds on the problem is always better in these situations.
How many kids hurt or killed in the old ways of doing business... NONE... Still trying to wrap my head around a school district telling parents and kids you cannot walk to school... it is frickin crazy... Agent pee get your head out of your rectum...
Agent P---did you do your homework at this school?.......Not all parents drive to the school!....you need to learn at another school this one has failed you.Your facts are very misleading therefor FALSE. Nice try though.
okay, what about someone that does not have a car?
Agent P, It appears you are one of those parents that are in a race to get through dismissal and the school zone speed limits. The kind of parent that others find unpleasant. I understand the purpose of school zones are to accommodate children walking to and from school, much like the red stop sign protruding from a stopped school bus is to accommodate children crossing the street. What does your "homework" lead you to the purpose of a designated school zone, to accommodate cars or children?
Reference – “Fact: You cannot walk you children to school. You must drive them, and drop them off via the designated lane, or take the school bus.”
FACT. The school and the school principle has zero authority off of school property.
FACT. Off school property and walking on private/public walk ways and side walks. That is and belongs to the tax payers and the public. Not the school or principle.
FACT. The school system, plus the government recommends walking and exercise for adults and children. Especially when the weather is nice. So, are you saying the education system and the government lied again?
FACT. Buy parents and adults walking students home. They are more responsible parents because they are also associating and mixing with the community. Hence a stronger bond helps keep a neighborhood and the children safer. And their is more eyes out for the bad people. Unless your go is to have people not evolved in their children welfare. Or that of their neighbor/community.
FACT. The majority of auto accidents happen close to home.
FACT. More vehicles create more congestion. And pollutes and uses more fuel. Especially when it is not needed. Also, the more vehicles, the more chance for a child/student to picked up by the wrong person. Or jumping in the wrong vehicle.
FACT. Some people only have one vehicle. And the primary vehicle is used for the person at work. Or else where. There is no reason to have another vehicle.-to many facts to list.
 March 4, 2016 at 3:26pm
OK. Listened to the actual clip, since Drudge took it down in like 15 minutes, and Beck was going after Stu with a knife, not Trump. As one who has listed to the show for many years until recently, I know that he talking to Stu, as he has in the past many times. Should have listened first. This one is on me….
 March 4, 2016 at 1:39pm
“If I was close enough and had a knife, the stabbing just wouldn’t stop.” – Glenn Beck
Mr. Beck has officially jumped the shark…..by all, I’m done here. Peace out!
I heard that too. Didn't appreciate it and I'm no big fan of trump.
Then again, it's really no different than bragging that you could murder someone and still have your supporters. It works for the clintons though.
Me to, I don't even read the articles just come down to the comments and laugh at the Cruz die hard trying to bring Trump down.
He should have held his tongue. He was stating how the other candidates were able to tolerate Trumps rhetoric and if he were in their position and had a knife he would have lost it. It was not a specific threat and it was comment about his own frustration.
I thought Glenn knew how to handle a gun . . .
OK. Listened to the actual clip, since Drudge took it down in like 15 minutes, and Beck was going after Stu with a knife, not Trump. As one who has listed to the show for many years until recently, I know that he talking to Stu, as he has in the past many times. Should have listened first. This one is on me....
Well OK then Mr. Trumpeteer ...
Hey trip, did trump donate that charity money to the veterans?
@SLAPTHELEFT Don't ask the tough questions, unless you want to get yelled at for being a loser that attack Trump.
 March 4, 2016 at 12:39pm
Sounds like a smart move…why give Beck and Fox the soundbites….I am sure there would be a blaze article dedicated to each boo he would receive….
Yeah, why say things that can be proven as lies and flip flops?
Yup. Great move. Don't go on record in front of CPAC to lay out your plans. That way when he abandons all of them, he can't be held to account.
What is little donnie afraid of? After all he told everyone "I have the best words"
 March 3, 2016 at 10:05pm
100+ trillion in unfunded liabilities and your talking about a rounding error…
 March 2, 2016 at 5:56pm
Question: Are there not laws prohibiting a public official from accepting “Promotional items” while serving? Additionally, does that sale now represent a financial gain?
While I am sure she now has bigger problems financially, it still comes back to the corruption in government.
 March 2, 2016 at 8:17am
let me live that fantasy…
 February 29, 2016 at 8:59pm
And in other news…there is a breaking story on how Donald Trump paid David Duke a yuuuuge sum of money to convince the black Secret Service agent to choke a Time reporter, all while conspiring with the mob to arrange for fake anti Trump Mexicans to show up as protesters in KKK outfits even though they are black…does that about sum up the last 24 hours, or did I miss something?
Glenn's Quixote and Trump's the windmill.
Pat and Stu are Sancho
and Cruz is Dulcinea
That's Donald J. Quixote to a lot of us, Agent P.
Absolutely. Get informed dumbass.
Your article is wrong. Glenn Beck has specifically been saying that his copy of Don Quixote was not just one of 3 copies that belonged to George Washington, Glenn Beck has been saying that is copy is THE copy that George Washington purchased on the day that he signed the Declaration of Independence. There are lots of video of Beck stating just that... over and over again. Mount Vernon, the actual owners of that specific book said that Glenn Beck is wrong, because they have it in their collection, and it's always been there. Beck's copy wasn't even published until 9 years after the signing... some expert he is. Further more, since people at Mt. Vernon are the preeminent experts on all things George Washington, Glenn Becks new claim that it's one of 3 copies (after he got caught in his lie) can't be verified until they examine the book. So right now, Glenn has nothing.