Now contrast this Anti gun mayor with this Pro gun citizen debate on the same channel and ask yourself who has the stronger argument and far better control of their emotions. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uo9BbB6rBx0
Oh my! Gun toting mass hysteria. Actually, a great vid. It shows very clearly the lefts use of fear mongering, red herrings, changing the conversation or point every time they lose it. They can never debate a single point. You say guns, they want to pull in grenade launchers and nukes. The founders (who they hate) never meant nuclear weapons. I've heard this idiocy for 40 years. I ask them, do citizens have nukes? Are we asking for them? Will the military ever give them to us if we asked? THEN WHY ARE YOU TALKING ABOU THEM?! I'm talking about guns.
I just watched that video and the guy Keith owned that segment. lol great video thanks for posting it!
April 1, 2014 at 5:12am
You state that Benghazi is a non scandal and have the arrogance to lecture others about seeing what they want to see? LOL.
The south is red now explain to me exactly how that somehow means REP are now the KKK? I didn’t realize they had such strong numbers. Just because you put FACT at the end of your comments doesn’t make them so. correlation does not equal causation. You seem to be implying that because the south is now red that makes the REP the party of the KKK. I’d say there were members from both sides. You say Harry Reid is a racist, well he is a democrat. I’m willing to say there are racists on both sides.
March 31, 2014 at 10:03pm
Though I would say you didn’t go off topic, you do seem to be trying to provoke and inflame, which is the definition of an internet troll.
Mike Haynes, the NFL’s Vice President of Player and Employee Development. “For the most part, we’re talking about African-American players. They want to be around people their own age and meet cute girls. Unfortunately, the opportunity for gang affiliation and people in gangs being in the same establishment is higher than you would like for our guys.
So would this guy also be a racist? Are you automatically racist if you bring up race in any context? Is it racist when NFL players tweet about the NFL being like modern day slavery? Desean Jackson and Aaron Hernandez came to mind right away.
I have usually found that when you have to resort to playing the race card you have already lost in the arena of ideas. I’m sure you attack Harry Reid for talking about Obama’s “light-skinned” and “with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.” comment with the same determination.
Robert Byrd of West Virginia was a member of the KKK. I’m pretty sure he was still a democrat when he died. I’d say you are engaging in some revisionist history here.
directly from the MNDNR. They fly over and attempt to count the moose and due to the increased snow fall it makes it easier to see the moose to count. I kid you not. I’m thinking this process has a rather large margin for error. if the moose are not in the 52 randomly selected areas they can’t get counted.
October 17, 2013 at 3:15am
Is this some kind of new tactic to tell people to look up facts and then follow it up with misinformation? “George Bush racked up 10 Trillion in debt” What kind of Barney Frank math are you using? ND when Bush came into office was $5.73T and when he left it was $10.63. Does this mean Obama racked up all $17+T? “Spending is in fact currently ‘under control’
the long term debt is in fact manageable” Just because you use the word fact doesn’t make it so. Under control by what standard? Manageable? You provide no empirical data to support these statements. You could make the statement that deficits don’t matter as long as your growth exceeds the deficit, but you can’t have the anemic growth that we have had since 08 and have these deficits.
September 4, 2013 at 4:45pm
Wow, just keep your head in the sand and let the world pass you by. You have to do some serious mental gymnastics to come to the conclusion that Benghazi is just a “phony scandal”. But hey at this point what difference does it make right?
September 4, 2013 at 12:47pm
moderaterepublican said “Actually under the War Powers Resolution of 1973 the President can commit American forces to attack another group or nation, although he has to give Congress 48 hours notice and his actions are limited to 60 days. Look it up.”
I responded directly to moderaterepublican. So where in the constitution does it say that if a president states or feels that he is too restricted by something he can just disregard it and do as he feels is ok? A president doing what he wants to and not with in the powers granted by our constitution sounds an awful lot like a dictator not a president.
September 4, 2013 at 2:48am
As for your Rand Paul can’t get elected, I would say this: Nether of us knows for certain, but we do know that Bob Dole, John McCain and Mitt Romney didn’t. All moderate republicans go figure.
September 4, 2013 at 1:43am
Please tell me where in the “War Powers Act” it gives the president the ability to attack any country or nation as he wants?
(c) Presidential executive power as Commander-in-Chief; limitation
The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to
(1) a declaration of war,
(2) specific statutory authorization, or
(3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.
No Declaration of war as been give that I’m aware of. No statutory authorization of military action has been given, and if I’m not mistaken No national emergency has been created by an attack on the US, its territories, possessons, or its armed forces. I looked it up so now what?
September 3, 2013 at 9:57pm
When did firing missiles into another country not equate to war??? Where does it say boots have to be on the ground before it can be considered war? Can anyone point me to a document that clears this up?
Well we starved Iraqis and made them live in unsanitary conditions for a decade - and nobody called that war. We are currently doing the similar thing in Iran.
Republicans, during GW Bush, said that he did not need a declaration of war to invade and overthrow a country of 30 million people.
I see this as a 'full circle' kind of thing - similar dance, same song
Well they weren't mannually dropped by planes as they were back on Dec 7, 1941. (Well Dec 6 according to a former history teacher). Since missiles are remote, it's not an act of war.
June 14, 2012 at 11:40pm
This guy makes me sick. He always seems to think he is the most cooperative AG in the history of the world. He has “Superior Knowledge” on this stuff yet if you listen to him explain when he knew about FnF or if he has talked to any of the top brass in the Exec branch about this he seems like he has no knowledge at all. His answers on the issue to this point would be laughable if we weren’t talking about a government program that cost the life of border patrol agent and countless others.
June 14, 2012 at 11:52am
What about the Deputy Attorney General Ogden on March 09 clearly showed that the Obama admin and AG Holder all knew about Gun Runner/F n F. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PNhYk9NuNc What about the letter sent to congress in Feb 2011 that the DoJ had to request be retracted because it was completely inaccurate. What about the emails between ATF agents that talked about how they could use this to push for more gun regs. What about the fact that 6 months after Terry was killed the AG had still not talked to Pres Obama, Sec of State Clinton, DHS Napolitano, the Mexican President or AG about Fast n Furious.
June 6, 2012 at 8:56pm
I completely agree. Watergate isn’t even in the same realm as a handful of things going on during this administration, ie Solyndra, Fast n Furious, and now this.
June 6, 2012 at 9:15am
There is no way the unions spent less than $4 mil on this thing. Not possible. I would like to see how they are getting this number.
June 6, 2012 at 12:03am
That was my first thought. Where is he getting his numbers? 34 mil to 4 mil???? Delusional thoughts from fantasy island I guess.
May 24, 2012 at 12:44pm
Laughable, I can hear it now in Nov when Obama is ousted they will hammer on the electorate being too stupid to understand how great BO was.
The numbers don't bear that out, Alucard. Despite what people like Bill Maher have suggested, for at least the last three presidential elections, the majority of "uneducated" (high school deg. or less) voters have always voted for the Democrat. For example, 54%-Kerry, 46%-Bush. In that election, Bush cleaned up on the "some college/college graduate" votes, winning in double digits, while Kerry won the smaller "post-graduate" vote, but only by 6 points. In this case, if the "uneducated" didn't vote, not only would Bush still have won, he would have won by a larger margin.
May 22, 2012 at 12:43pm
I completely agree, everytime I’ve talked to someone who hates Rush and thinks that he is a racist or sexist they have never actually listened to a full segment of his show. I’m glad he isn’t always held down by PC like most people these days it seems.
May 8, 2012 at 1:28pm
@JZS Sorry, but you have that wrong. Romney can’t get elected without the Tea Party vote. To follow your logic you would have to completely erase the 2010 elections from existence. I’ll give you that a presidential election has a greater turnout overall, but if Romney tries to remove himself from the Tea vote he will be another McCain.
May 7, 2012 at 11:13pm
Sheeple my friend, most American’s on both sides are Sheeple and gobble up whatever they are told.
May 2, 2012 at 11:21pm
I’d like to say I’m shocked by this, but for our kids coming up and especially at an OWS event I’m not.