User Profile: Amarath01


Member Since: December 20, 2011


  • [2] June 5, 2015 at 1:42am

    yet people debate it all the time, how honest are you?

  • [-2] June 5, 2015 at 1:07am

    Its not clear if present at all

  • [3] June 5, 2015 at 12:59am

    “God gives His clarity & blessing of sex, in only ONE union. That of marriage of a man & woman…& only AFTER that marriage.”
    Actually god doesn’t want to you marry, Jesus wants you to be as he is.
    However, god allows for this if the urges of your heart are too great.

    1 Corinthians 7 :
    “8 Now to the unmarried[a] and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do. 9 But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.

    10 To the married I give this command (not I, but the Lord): A wife must not separate from her husband. 11 But if she does, she must remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband. And a husband must not divorce his wife.”

  • [-3] June 5, 2015 at 12:34am

    “So if being gay is a sin and thus gays should not be married, why is it that every sexual sin for straight people still allow them to wed?”
    Because this isn’t about god’s will its about people’s pride and personal righteousness.

    “I believe in the bible it states that adultery (rush, newt, clinton, sandford, edwards etc.) divorce (newt, mccain, spitzer, edwards, etc.) are sins in the same vein as homosexuality?”
    Adultery is a sin, you may not divorce so its a sin. Homosexuality… not so clear. Romans 1 26-7 the clearest example. But this was a result or idolatry which included female homosexual acts/sex which then lead men to also preform such homosexual acts.
    It may well condemn homosexuality, but it was actually stated as a punishment from god in these verses. Its most likely referencing temple prostitution and priests of Cybele (men dressing /acting as women). Early Christianity also interpreted these passages this way.

    In short, it read: those who ignored god and were adulterers (idolaters) where punished with the ill natural passion of dishonor of homosexuality temple prostitution .
    Paul wrote that and again in 1 chor. 6 8-9 about this using the words ἀρσενοκοῖται and μαλακοὶ . The one is a compound word from the Septuagint referring to temple prostitution, and the other one was about harlot or sluts).
    μαλακοὶ demands women not put makeup on their face and decorate their hair (like a slut to entice men), yet there little talk about this.

  • [-1] June 4, 2015 at 11:54pm

    You do please provide such evidence.

  • [-6] June 4, 2015 at 11:53pm

    “Until the last hundred years or so, marriage has always, 100% of the time, in every culture that has ever existed, been for the EXPRESS PURPOSE of producing a family. ”
    This is correct and allows for multiple wives, concubines, etc.
    But i believe you would oppose such things, why because this is about your righteousness not god’s.
    But you are correct that is the secular purpose of marriage.

  • [5] June 4, 2015 at 11:51pm

    Marriage is already not traditional marriage, the definition has already been changed. If you get married legally that isn’t marriage under god. Legal marriage is three way marriage with you, your spouse and the government. It supposed to be you, your spouse, and god.
    We can see this from divorce rates what Christians’ marriages truly are. Most churches don’t even care today, and people have the audacity to complain about gays getting married because of the standards or meaning that that institution, when that institution no longer has that meaning or value to many of the people complaining.
    Christians should be more concerned with holding themselves and follows in Christ accountable, before worrying about others possible misdeeds.
    Something about a splinter and a plank in the eye.

  • [-7] June 4, 2015 at 11:45pm

    “If you just default to the position that ALL sex outside of traditional marriage is a sin, you can’t be accused of homophobia or anything like that. ”
    I have read the bible a few times and in more than one language. Your claim isn’t well supported by the bible. But you are right because you want to be so that makes you right. Your perspective isn’t about the bible or god, its about you. I can say this without a doubt because logical people who examine the people can at most can claim there is some evidence but its not clear nor without question that sex outside of marriage is allowed.
    There are very clear things claimed in the bible that Christians don’t follow at all then are hardly clear issues that Christians swear by. And this is because its not about god states should be but what you think should be. I think this maybe a sin or at lest doesn’t strengthen one’s relationship to god.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] May 15, 2015 at 5:59pm

    He has anatomy that is innately harassing…

  • [20] May 15, 2015 at 5:57pm

    This wasn’t about him being black. She pulled the harassment card real early. She was counting on the he is a he and i am a she, so he loses.

    This encounter was brought to you by Feminism, where the oppression Olympics is a profession.

  • [6] May 13, 2015 at 10:00am

    You could link a study, heck this author could have… but they cannot instead they link Bull and claim see it could be a victory but scare mongering.
    There are real issues out there.
    >50% of babies are born out of wedlock.
    >50% of men under 34 have never married.
    These trends and more will continue as they have in japan.
    Porn and games aren’t the cause they are the pressure valve, they are the diversion from reality. If not youngsters would have probably already rightfully killed all old peoples’ SS and the welfare state. Or at least a wave of violence for that goal would have erupted. But i don’t see old people calling for that… no all i see is a bunch of old people blaming young people for not being better tools for their happiness.
    Who really are the the feckless degenerates?

    Responses (3) +
  • [2] December 20, 2014 at 5:52am

    I hate black culture, try that one out see how well it goes.

  • December 20, 2014 at 5:49am

    What sad is rarely does anyone even know what to lust after means. Of course that passage means wife and not women (the word itself is used as wife and women), which is the logical translation but why worry about that. How do you know it means wife simple, ”

    27 “Ἠκούσατε ὅτι ἐρρέθη Οὐ μοιχεύσεις”

    Furthermore the word for women is:
    The word used is “guné” “γυναῖκα”
    Which means wife or women, but as we will see the issue is adultery, which indicates marriage (ps polygamy is still practiced at this time).

    It super clear when you don’t split the writing in half. “27 You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’ 28 But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart”.

    And oh snap all you bible thumps aren’t even following the bible making up your own rules and changing what the bible actually states. Hmm can i get an AMEN. Literally, can we put AMEN here?

  • [2] December 20, 2014 at 5:21am

    20-21% do in 10 years

    But you are correct that is a far cry from 82% divorce rate for 10 years of women with 16-20 pre-martial partners.

  • [2] December 20, 2014 at 4:29am

    I say go to porn, why are you even married i mean just take a few of her pictures and go live alone ina small apt. for cheap. **** you still have her pictures and well if those are good enough for you in marriage they should be out of marriage too.
    I am being snarky here i would lay down the line, listen i want to have sex with my wife if thats too much too ask then who am i suppose to have sex with? Ask her that? If not you then who? If she blows that off she don’t give a **** about you sorry mate. I mean it sounds like you already made this kid of apparent and she didn’t give a rats ass. Let her know its not acceptable to you.

  • [1] December 20, 2014 at 4:20am

    Sure thats what did it… Not.

  • [-1] December 20, 2014 at 4:19am

    @ runwithscissors
    “The corn syrup in pop gives you diabetes and makes you fat.”
    Does provide a link.. ps you cannot because you’re talking out of your ass.

  • December 20, 2014 at 4:14am

    Matt’s a natural beta so it seems natural to act like a serf of his women folk.

  • [1] December 20, 2014 at 4:05am

    @ tisiluca2000
    Thank you,
    For being honest and saying what Matt wouldn’t.
    The issue is clear as day; women aren’t hold their end of the relationship up and the entire society tells them they don’t have to then it shames men to stay in those relationship anyways.

  • [-1] December 20, 2014 at 3:59am

    I doubt that account. 100% calling ********. I am not calling you a lair, I am sure that that is her account of the story. It might even be his, but he was just then tailoring his side of the story to protect her.
    Sorry but i don’t believe it, sure i think that has and does occur but i also think its super rare.

Restoring Love