@JROOK – And that’s why this “gendercide” arguement is so tripe when spouted by supposed “pro-choice” people – anything ending in “cide” (a suffix) means kill/murder. (Homicide, patricide, suicide…) You have to fully embrace “cide” to embrace abortion and thus cannot argue it’s wrong to have a “faulty” reason. Why is gender an invalid reason and birth control not? If you are pro-choice, there’s no difference. They argue you should still have the choice. Which is why abortion should be called infanticide and treated accordingly – to prevent genocide, gendercide, and eugenics.
May 29, 2012 at 5:48pm
Posted on May 29, 2012 at 4:18pm
I still believe Planned Parenthood is population control for whites,as they steer white females towards abortion and minority girls to the welfare lines to support their offspring.”
YOU ARE SO WRONG. Number 1 user of abortion: minorities. Number 1 killer of black babies: abortion. Interesting you would ever think it’s a white thing… racism must be rotting your brain.
May 29, 2012 at 5:45pm
The problem, though, is that they must first admit that they are human if they are assigning gender… and if they are human – GIRLS or boys – the abortion must be murder. If you are arguing that embryos aren’t alive/human, then gender selection should be legal. You can’t say GENDERCIDE unless you admit they are human and alive – otherwise you aren’t “killing” anything – which means that PP can’t argue that gendercide is horrible without arguing that abortion is also, and neither can lawmakers. Or can they? Didn’t we have these same discussions when it became permissible to charge a criminal with a double homicide if a woman is pregnant – but cannot charge a woman with murder if she kills her baby en utero. SMH
"The problem, though, is that they must first admit that they are human if they are assigning gender… and if they are human – GIRLS or boys – the abortion must be murder."
Excellent Amber! Planned Parenthood was created by an insane eugenist who only wanted a 'superior' race surviving on this planet. Margaret Sanger was a beast equalling Adolf Hitler in extermination of human beings!
Wrong. Sex of a baby could be determined within as little as 15 weeks. With blood tests being developed in the hopes of being able to determine within 6 weeks. Therefore, using your logic, the baby is "human" at 15 weeks. In that case, why be pregnant for 9 months when you can have it over with after 15 weeks? The reason is because the fetus is not human and would not survive very long outside the womb. So no, it's not human.
July 6, 2011 at 6:43pm
I am amazed by the lack of a.) respect, b.) decency and c.) intellegence these comments to a news story provoked. Rather than discourse, we get insults (from lewd/crude to thinly veiled). How can you think you are any better than anyone with this as standard for judgement? Just something to think about.
I watched this and was amazed that the Blaze insinuated both ladies were brawling. That’s not what happened – MP Ahmadzai let her passions go to her head and then attacked (childishly) another politician. Did the other pick something up? Of course! Someone was attacking her. But this fifteen seconds of flared tempers is NOT a brawl. It was a scuffle at best. To the editors, you cannot say you are trying for radical journalism — returning to the truth, to the roots of journalism — when you’re sensationalizing a simple four line story.