That would be the Bernie Sanders School of Socialist Mathematics and is the type needed to make those programs appear to work
 January 11, 2016 at 1:21pm
Pull your head out of the sand and pay attention david. HR 4269 would do just what you say isn’t being done all with the support of 112 demonrats. Go take your self deluded, ignorant propaganda elsewhere. Oh and I know you are also not aware of the statute that became effective in CA as of 1 Jan either. And the list goes on and on like the SAFE act. david go troll somewhere the people are uninformed like a leftist forum.
 December 9, 2015 at 12:16pm
I wonder what they are doing with all that metadata, since admittedly they aren’t using it to keep jihadists out of the county?
 November 23, 2015 at 10:36am
So you’re Okay with the suspension of Constitutional rights without due process?
 July 26, 2015 at 11:51pm
As we are seeing these days, the rule of law is thrown out the window and we are led by the dictatorial whims of the executive……Obamaism
There I fixed it for you.
April 7, 2014 at 6:02am
“right of the people”
September 22, 2013 at 3:28pm
They are too busy recording our phone calls and readin our emails
August 19, 2013 at 5:26pm
Just another step in the enfeeblement of people. Their ultimate goal is total dependency. Once you have to rely on the government for even basic self protection the war is lost. They will be able to decide who lives and dies much easier that way.
With all do respect (and I love your word), attempts to undermine lawfully armed self-defense are not enfeeblement. They are enslavement and imprisonment. Looking at our own US history what groups of people have been disarmed?
2. Native American Indians
3. Defeated enemies on the battlefield
4. convicted violent felons
Attempts to disarm law-abiding Americans should be compared to those groups above. The lawfully armed having the right to stand their ground against potential immediate use of lethal force removed means our government thinks we are:
2. sub-human (as natives and slaves were treated)
3. the enemy on the battlefield
It can be interpreted no other way. Our Constitution designed the federal government to be subservient to the sovereignty of the individual, not the totalitarian dictator over same.
Stand your ground with the US Constitution and let your elected representatives know ENOUGH of their weakness in refusal to uphold our Constitution. Demand accountability and action of those who subvert the US Constitution after swearing to her allegiance and defense.
Just do it!
July 10, 2013 at 10:15am
Yeah, they are going to use this to keep us all in line. Getting assualted in your own neighborhood is going to become the norm because you won’t be able to defend yourself by any means. They have been pushing towards this agenda for along time. The more dangerous they can make society the more the sheeple will cry for the govenment to help them and the more willingly they will give up their and my rights. It all equals more government control of our daily lives.
July 7, 2013 at 4:22pm
Did CNN actually report that the crowd for “Man in the Moon” was 800 people. I read that in another post but I can not find it. Can somone post a link?
I would be surprised if CNN reported the event at all.
Glenn mentioned that Media Matters was there.
Sound;s like more than I saw.
It was sitting room only.
Media Matters was there? That reminds me of a verse...
"And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not." --John 1:5
July 5, 2013 at 10:27am
Those that do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
June 26, 2013 at 9:25pm
Jellyfish have more spine than Boehner. Wait, on second thought it is an insult to jellyfish to even make the comparison.
June 25, 2013 at 11:08pm
These mental midgets certainly represent their low information constituents well, don’t they
June 23, 2013 at 2:11pm
The only double standard here is a professor using his position and the first amendment to require a stundent to violate his own first amendment rights and then getting upset about it. You or whomever else can stomp on or burn whatever you like in effigy and I will support that, but you can not require me to do so, that violates my rights. Glenn is very consistent on this point. You just do not understand how rights work.
June 7, 2013 at 11:22pm
Now we see what happens when emotions take the place of rational, reasoned debate. I hope everyone will think about this whenever one of their hot button issues come up for legislative action.
Exactly. Emotions will get you and everyone else in trouble more times than not.
Indeed. Like Immigration/amnesty. Which is a wholly emotional argument without a single reasonable argument for why it should be done. So we shouldn't do it.
June 1, 2013 at 3:09pm
There is no Progressive “double” standard , just their standard
June 1, 2013 at 3:07pm
There is no right not to be offended!!!
May 16, 2013 at 1:10pm
If he had has donation of athiest books rejected by the officials he might have a case, but I am sorry there is no right to not “be offended” in the Constitution. No one forced him to read or even touch the Bible in his room.
May 14, 2013 at 6:15pm
Tell them to come live with me in south Texas we will change their last name to Garcia and they can get Amnesty along with all the other illegals. Oh wait, they speak English too well and he has marketable skills. I guess we will have to scratch that idea.