I didn’t trust ABC news enough when they asked for interviews about guns, but their story ended up being about as fair-minded as NY liberals can be on the subject (and I really mean that in a mostly positive way). No regrets on declining the interview though.
 July 1, 2015 at 2:14pm
Come on, he’d give them some meaningless red lines they could cross in the process, don’t short change his record like that!
 July 1, 2015 at 1:50pm
Just another reason not to be on Facebook, as if there weren’t enough reasons already.
Amen to that JD! I haven't been on FB in more than 3 years and have no intentions of going back
 June 29, 2015 at 6:08pm
The difference is that one of these rights is a fundamental human right, protected by the Constitution. The other is fabricated. And while we’re talking about false intentions, is anyone who favors abortion really concerned about anyone’s health or safety or anything else? It’s about convenience and profit, depending on which advocate you’re talking to.
 June 29, 2015 at 6:05pm
I question your libertarian credentials based on this post. What does legalization of murder have to do with freedom? Even the most staunch libertarians believe that government has a legitimate role in punishing one person who harms another person. Your position is more accurately anarchist, depending on your definition of a “person,” which question is not answered by libertarian thought.
 June 29, 2015 at 6:01pm
I love it: “Justice Stephen Breyer wrote that four justices probably would want to review the constitutionality of the regulations.”
How do you review the constitutionality of rules that implicate nothing found in the Constitution? It’s like trying to measure the GDP of hyperbole, all complete non-sequiturs.
 June 29, 2015 at 4:06pm
I think this administration is trying to help us precisely how much credibility you lose each time you create a bright red line and then do nothing as it’s repeatedly crossed. It’s all a social science experiment.
 June 29, 2015 at 3:31pm
Avoid large gatherings, stay armed!
 June 29, 2015 at 3:20pm
I agree with him that people ought to stick with their principles and fight for their religious freedom and conscience rights, but we all know that the courts will force real, God-given, constitutionally-guaranteed rights to yield to court-fabricated rights.
Even if you’re in favor of Obamacare and subsidizing the destruction of society (gay marriage), you should be terrified of what SCOTUS did last week, because we no longer have any semblance of rule of law, we are ruled by men. And when rule of law is gone, the poor, the sickly, and the gays tend to be the first groups exterminated.
 June 24, 2015 at 2:41pm
Does anyone take him seriously? You almost have to assume he’s doing it for some strategic reason (to help or hurt other candidates), not because he thinks he’ll actually win. Then again, collectively speaking we elected then reelected Obama, no feat of stupidity is beyond us.
 June 23, 2015 at 3:33pm
Liberals pretend they don’t understand our dogged defense of the 2nd Amendment, but they know this is what lies between them and their goal of enforcing their beliefs on the rest of us, and they hate it.
I'm glad we have the 2nd Amendment.
It has kept stalin, lenin, mao, and hitler types from seizing power.
I wonder when they will just try to just outlaw the Constitution and have a damn big fight on their hands.
IMO that is just what jade helm is.
 June 19, 2015 at 9:29pm
What a dolt. The horror that would have occurred is that he would have got one or two victims before he was taken out. He’s right, however, that there wouldn’t have been 3 survivors, there would have been 9 or more.
APOLOGIST, and to twist the anti-gun "logic" even more, if only one or two parishioners would have been shot before the shooter was taken out by law abiding gun carriers in that church then this incident would not be classified as a mass shooting because only one or two people were killed. And then the anti-gun crowd would add it to their "statistic" that guns do not stop mass shootings. It is beyond madness.
 June 19, 2015 at 1:08pm
I’ll help you out with decoding leftist speech:
overtones, dog whistles, micro aggression, inflaming rhetoric, etc. all mean there isn’t any real aggression or discrimination or racism, but we’re going to pretend like there is, because otherwise we’ll have to face the fact that our failing is because our entire ideology is wrong, and not someone else’s fault.
 June 18, 2015 at 6:52pm
I’m starting a petition in my city to try to get him to move here and work for our police force. That’s absolutely bad @$$
June 18, 2015 at 6:50pm
Only three of my four kids were born yet, but I suppose this study suggests that either 3 or 4 of them, along with my wife, are myths? We’re all fine and well because I helped someone be part of the 259 that year.
 June 18, 2015 at 6:41pm
You can’t blame him for trying to remove the only thing that would keep him from declaring himself the supreme leader. This is to be expected. America has insulted itself by reelecting him.
He wouldn’t have made it out of the parking lot alive if that were my car with my kids inside. Glad the family’s ok!
 June 15, 2015 at 1:16pm
I happen to like it warm. Does this mean I can sue if driving my SUV fails to bring the desired result?
 June 15, 2015 at 1:05pm
This is Iraq II. We’re setting up the same sets of inspections we did for the WMDs Saddam had. The only difference is that Saddam at least acted like he would comply until after the agreements were signed. These guys are telling us right now that they won’t. Cruise missiles tend to help soften their negotiating strategy.