Liberty University

User Profile: Apologist JD

Apologist JD

Member Since: December 07, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [11] October 22, 2014 at 2:41pm

    I’d be thrilled if their video was real. It would mean that law enforcement and others have finally gotten past their PC constipation, and have adopted effective methods for law enforcement and security.

  • [8] October 22, 2014 at 2:05pm

    It must be pure propaganda, since we know that Muslims are peaceful and Canada doesn’t have constitutionally guaranteed right to bear arms. Their gun control measures would have stopped anything like this from happening in real life. Back to your cartoons everyone!

  • [36] October 20, 2014 at 1:37pm

    Dan’s had a little too much union Kool-Aid. Whenever I talk to teachers, I point out that their unions are the ones standing in the way of them getting paid more. See, none of them think they are the poor performer, so you can point out that in a free market, they could make more and their poor-performing peers could be fired or make less, instead of pay being a seniority system.
    It would have been outside the scope of the letter to which Matt was responding, but I would have liked for him to have discussed the problem with governmental control of curriculum also, which is the strongest argument against public schooling in my opinion.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] October 17, 2014 at 2:19pm

    Read the post to which I was responding. It wasn’t talking about the grand jury, it specifically said the jury in a jury trial, so we’re talking about the rules of evidence. I would mock you for making a fool of yourself while attempting to demonstrate intellectual superiority, but you never claimed to have basic reading comprehension or logic skills, so I guess it wouldn’t be fair.

  • [7] October 17, 2014 at 2:14pm

    @ redkelly
    “Unless of course you will try and justify killing someone every time you draw your weapon.”
    Frankly, if you can’t justify killing someone and you aren’t prepared to do so, you have no business drawing your weapon. Not that you have to salivate at the thought of killing, but if there’s no justification for the kill, there’s no reason to draw at all. And if you’re not ready to kill when justified, having a weapon at all is a bad idea. Introducing a firearm into a situation when you’re not committed to its ultimate purpose is just asking for added danger (physically and legally) without any of the associated benefit.

  • [7] October 16, 2014 at 7:54pm

    You’re right, if the defense attorney objects, as he should. And I have a law degree with honors from a top 25 law school, so well done!

  • [2] October 16, 2014 at 7:48pm

    The funny thing is I’m betting the Obama administration actually helped train the Chinese official in the art of denial, because the whole “You can’t prove anything” attitude and demanding compromise and working together and trust sounds exactly how Democrats handle these situations.

  • [9] October 16, 2014 at 7:44pm

    Two words: Public Execution

  • [2] October 16, 2014 at 2:20pm

    I love that he says he’s not heroic because he was just doing his job. In this economy, with all the government freebies, and the protections in place to prevent the firing of the lazy, it’s heroic in my book that he has a job to do, that he’s qualified to do it, and that he actually puts in real work on the clock!

  • [2] October 15, 2014 at 3:35pm

    Exactly Cav, guns work better. Ohio, the point is that this illustrates the need for CC, shame they had to do it the hard way.

  • [1] October 15, 2014 at 1:58pm

    Those aren’t principles in the Constitution, they come from the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, etc. You might be able to claim that they somehow derive from the Equal Protection and Due Process clauses, but that’s a stretch since the Constitution limits what governments may do, not what private employers may do.

  • [7] October 15, 2014 at 12:46pm

    The stock market is a scam anyway. There is no connection between stock prices and the actual value of the company whose stock you own. According to EMH, the only way to win is to cheat. If you’re not cheating, guess what you’re doing!

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] October 15, 2014 at 12:41pm

    At what point do we begin disregarding the results of elections where basic security measures are lacking?

  • October 14, 2014 at 4:58pm

    Exactly. I believe it when I see it.

  • [14] October 14, 2014 at 4:55pm

    How sad is the state of our country when news that fraud with government cards is estimated at 50% of the transactions!

  • [2] October 14, 2014 at 4:54pm

    While I agree that there is rampant abuse and waste in the DoD, unlike other federal agencies, it seems to be the only one that produces anything of value to society!

  • [4] October 14, 2014 at 1:30pm

    What I can’t figure out is after the kid is down there, what’s with these pansies standing up above throwing stuff while the jaguars eat their kid? I’m not trying to sound like a tough guy, and I’m also quite aware that I might lose the fight, but I’d be right in there with my kid fighting some jaguars, if only to buy my kid more time. I don’t care if they’re endangered either.

  • [322] October 10, 2014 at 1:49pm

    I am an adoptive parent also, and I agree completely with you. This makes me sick to my stomach in a literal sense. I’m glad she recognizes that she’s not ready to be a parent, but I’m not sure how she skipped past adoption and thought her only course of action was to kill what she acknowledges is a life, and which she purports to love. This is the difference between Jesus’ love and Satan’s counterfeit, the first leads to tremendous self-sacrifice, the latter leads to selfish acts of convenience.

    Responses (4) +
  • [6] October 10, 2014 at 1:42pm

    I love it. They can’t figure out why nobody trusts them, yet in the same presentation explain how we want to brutalize people more than we want to show that we’re innocuous, and we’ll use the information you give us to figure out how much of your money we can take and give to someone else (or, in the democrat neighborhoods, they’re afraid to enter their actual income or anything else because it might disrupt the fraud they’ve perpetrated to get EBT, disability, etc.).

  • [46] October 10, 2014 at 1:36pm

    “Police say Myers was shot Wednesday after he opened fire on a white, off-duty officer, but Myers’ parents say he was unarmed. Some activists and lawmakers say Myers was targeted because he was black and are asking the Justice Department – which has opened a civil rights investigation into the death of Brown, who was unarmed – to investigate his shooting.”
    So mommy and daddy think it’s ok to shoot at people as long as you ditch the weapon at some point? And my memo to the Justice Department: he wasn’t targeted because of his race, he was targeted because he shot at people.

123 To page: Go