User Profile: Apologist JD

Apologist JD

Member Since: December 07, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [150] May 27, 2016 at 5:24pm

    This reinforces my general reluctance to hire anyone with Ivy League education. My question is at what point the larger labor market will realize what a bunch of whiny brats come out of these schools and follow my lead? At some point, these schools’ radical left worldviews and their unwillingness to stand up to the children (meant insultingly) will spell their end.

    Responses (12) +
  • [7] May 24, 2016 at 1:54pm

    She said McDonald “needs to comprehensively address the VA’s systemic problems — and that means reducing wait times, improving care and increasing patient satisfaction.”
    The way to address the VA’s systemic problems is to privatize it and get government out of healthcare altogether. Government involvement is the penultimate systemic problem.

    Responses (1) +
  • [17] May 23, 2016 at 2:03pm

    Exactly. The only difference is that she says what she thinks, where most on the left still recognize a need to filter.

  • [12] May 19, 2016 at 5:48pm

    Seems like a poor choice of words by Mr. Perez. Instead of unconscionable, he probably meant “economically literate” or “competent” or “not as stupid as liberals.” There, fixed it for him!

  • [10] May 19, 2016 at 5:35pm

    You have to respect the guy who voiced support for post-birth abortions for being intellectually honest and consistent, even if wholly and completely evil.

    Responses (2) +
  • [8] May 19, 2016 at 5:29pm

    Title is wrong, I’m not surprised at all. This shows the liberals have a lot of work to do if they want this minority to become their slaves alongside other unnamed ones that have forgone sanity in favor of victimhood.

  • [16] May 18, 2016 at 1:51pm

    Just don’t go to NYC. Problem solved. Also, seems like there’s a quaint thing called the First Amendment that would preclude the government prescribing words in any situation, let alone this one.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] May 17, 2016 at 5:38pm

    Doesn’t giving interviews to the press on the subject constitute a waiver of privilege?

  • [19] May 17, 2016 at 2:24pm

    What a fool. Every tragedy he cites occurred in a gun free zone and there is no crime at NRA conventions. Loved the post about Chicago in the article!

  • [5] May 13, 2016 at 3:00pm

    This is such a farce anyway. It’s plain to see that once you decide that making men use a men’s room and women use the ladies’ room is discriminatory, the transgender issue goes away. See, the Supremes decided that separate is inherently unequal, so this form of segregation is doomed to go away and men won’t need to pretend to be women to go into the ladies room. Brave new world, here we come!

    Responses (1) +
  • [74] May 13, 2016 at 2:54pm

    Abolish the Department of Indoctrination (Education). Problem solved. You’re welcome. Should send a strong message to the control freaks everywhere that there is a limit to how much crap people will take from you before they cut you off completely.

    Responses (2) +
  • [9] May 11, 2016 at 5:38pm

    While I’m inclined to agree that there’s probably something he’s hiding (like no charitable contributions at all or contributions to leftist orgs), the irony that Romney is playing on Donald the same BS card Harry Reid played on him is overwhelming!

    Responses (1) +
  • [13] May 11, 2016 at 3:48pm

    I keep trying to explain to her supporters that if Bill chooses other women over Hillary, those who plan to vote for her should too!

  • [62] May 6, 2016 at 2:03pm

    Raise your hand if this article told you anything you didn’t already know. Nobody? Ya, me neither.

    Responses (2) +
  • [208] May 5, 2016 at 12:49pm

    Can we merge the Constitution and Libertarian parties? Seems like a good starting point…

    Responses (14) +
  • [8] May 4, 2016 at 4:44pm

    Isn’t their admission that they know nothing about how any of this works something of a repudiation of the theory of evolution too? It doesn’t disprove it necessarily, but I find the logic very strained when we claim to know the origin of something we haven’t even begun to understand!

    Responses (1) +
  • [23] May 4, 2016 at 1:42pm

    If it makes you feel a little better, I’m 34 and I get it. I’m so staunchly conservative and believe enough in the Constitution that I refused to vote for McCain and Romney because they aren’t actual conservatives and don’t understand the Constitution. I understand your grief, however, because I’m the first to acknowledge that I’m in a small minority in my generation.

  • [47] May 3, 2016 at 12:39pm

    By their logic, no constitutionally guaranteed right is safe. No fraud ever occurs without communication, so let’s curtail speech rights without due process! This could get interesting!

  • [50] May 2, 2016 at 5:10pm

    So the real question is how everyone involved identifies, right? Hilarious that she just experienced the biggest reason not to allow people to pick their restroom and then sits and defends it. What a tool!

  • [40] May 2, 2016 at 12:53pm

    This is way too innovative. There has to be a violation of the CBA or Title IX or something to stop this dangerously effective innovation! Come on NEA, ACLU, NAACP, etc.!

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love