User Profile: ASE


Member Since: June 08, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [2] May 22, 2016 at 3:25pm

    Looked to me that if anyone made contact with james it was his fellow team mate.

  • [4] May 15, 2016 at 5:04am

    Actions speak louder than words. What actions? Virtually one sided pol donations says all you need to know. zucks words mean nothing in the face of this. The selection process they use for their news results in totally one-sided news stories. If the stories are selected when they show up on 5 or more (or was it 10?) networks, but the networks, except fox, constantly do not report on stories unfavorable to lefty personalities, or lefty causes; their stories will never make the cut. Zuck knows this, and his sham argument attempting to show they are trying to be evenhanded just falls completely flat.

    Responses (1) +
  • May 13, 2016 at 9:50am

    You can’t see that he is a mooselim?!? Especially with all the evidence?!? You seem like the type to believe the career criminal when he claims he’s innocent; you believe ‘bobo’ when he claims to be Christian.

    I feel bad for you, I really do… (and some downright disgust, too)

  • [5] May 13, 2016 at 8:58am

    It’s time for some pushback: ‘bobo-the-lawless’ needs to be asked under which statute is he authorized to make his ‘decree’. He can’t just fall back on, “Well, I’m the president, and I say to do it.” That doesn’t cut it. He is not a ‘king’ that just spouts ‘law’ by his every word and whim. He needs to site the law that he is acting under that gives him the authority to direct what he is saying. If he can’t, then his words carry no weight, and his arguments have no merit.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] May 12, 2016 at 7:27am

    One lib tactic employed often is to use extreme examples when supporting their world view, or when tearing down others. For example: “Is intolerance necessarily a bad thing?” one NYT commenter responded Monday. “As a liberal, I’m intolerant of many things such as human trafficking, racism, sexism, homophobia and anti-feminism. So I too, confess to being intolerant and am not ashamed of it.” I’m sure that the conservatives would have a very similar list, and also not be ashamed of it; but the implication of merely using this list, is that it causes one to believe, to some degree, that the conservatives ARE tolerant of those things. This could not be FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH. But, to a lefty lib, the truth is not necessarily something they are fond of – only THEIR VERSION of the truth. Explain to them that truth is truth, not a variant of it, and you are being an intolerant clod for not accepting their version of the ‘truth’. They just don’t see that if you color it, hide part of it, cause it to be subjective – it CAN NOT BE THE TRUTH!!! (but that is simply close-minded cave-man thinking to a lib; no black and white, just various shades of gray in their world)

    The libs’ reaction to his article serves to illustrate their intolerance for opposing views. Anything that doesn’t show the left as smarter, more aware, more inclusive, more sensitive, having higher morals, etc. is NOT welcomed. The truth doesn’t matter, only things that support their ‘lofty’ image of themselves.

  • [1] May 12, 2016 at 7:26am

    “I don’t understand this thing called ‘liberal arrogance’. Is it arrogant to want to address issues with fact, critical thinking, an empirical viewpoint, one that privileges data and acquisition of real world experience over faith? Liberal arrogance, seems to me, to be just a pejorative for living in the real world, and refusing to apologize for it.”
    The problem is that liberals rarely, if ever, use fact, critical thinking in their arguments, and their ‘empirical thinking’ is usually with blinders on, or tinted glasses so they only see what they want to see, esp. if their ‘view’ won’t hold up under logically-based reasoning and scrutiny. Also, their arrogance permits them, in their own jaded view of things, to ignore facts that disagree with their viewpoint by dismissing the logic and facts of those that they feel are beaneath them, like conservatives.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] May 12, 2016 at 7:11am

    Mills’ response: Well, that all depends on what you mean by ‘know’. Since hilda-beast prefers the ‘company’ of women, we gets together sometimes to just ‘chew-the-fat’ so to speak.

  • [1] May 12, 2016 at 7:05am

    The left does this with impunity. Leave ‘the nuge’ alone.

  • May 12, 2016 at 7:01am

    So… they deny censorship, but only donate one way. Hmmm. Seems the guy is a liar – but in the lefty liar mantra “The ends justify the means.” (even if the means are unjust)

  • [7] May 12, 2016 at 6:33am

    “According to the FBI, they couldn’t disclose whether or not they are wiretapping the devices, because it threatens the techniques they use.”

    You mean it would disclose that they are breaking the law, and breaking the 4th Amd to illegally listen on people that have done NOTHING to merit such scrutiny? Is that the ‘technique’ they refer to?

  • [14] May 8, 2016 at 11:45am

    I hope this issue is close to being ‘locked up’.

  • [11] May 7, 2016 at 1:32am

    He is a ‘jack’ mooselim. He has to do non-mooselim things to fool the infidels, therefore he is given a pass.

  • [1] May 6, 2016 at 5:27am

    I’m sure they will be using information from the FBI database which the judiciary is being pressured to make exempt from disclosure to the public. They can have false information in there to base these decisions on, but you can’t see the info they have on you to even make a determination if it is even accurate.


  • [-1] May 5, 2016 at 10:29am

    that powder comes from t-rump-kissing too much. that is the powder from t-rump’s ‘nether’ region, but to fools like x-x it is manna from heaven, or at least from their god. enjoy it in the nether regions, x-x.

  • May 5, 2016 at 10:25am

    He’s down on his knees providing ‘lip’ service and t-rump-kissing his hero. Even has the t-rump kneepads I’ll wager.

  • May 5, 2016 at 10:24am

    You believe all the t-rump lies? Not surprised.

  • [-1] May 5, 2016 at 10:22am

    T-rump-kiss much?

    Have fun down there.

  • May 5, 2016 at 10:22am

    Maybe he meant “I do troll that way”.

  • May 5, 2016 at 10:21am

    It wasn’t merely Hannity, it was soooo many others, too, kissing the t-rump.. You seem to forget that inconvenient truth. But, hey, it is obvious any t-rump-kisser cares nothing about truth anyway.

  • [-1] May 5, 2016 at 10:19am

    You must believe in a different god, then. Go worship t-rump like so many here apparently do. He tells many lies, and we know who the father of lies is.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love