User Profile: ASE


Member Since: June 08, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [1] June 30, 2015 at 5:40am

    I have the perfect execution method – painless, fast, merciful, albeit somewhat messy; a .45 round to the back of the head. Even better if you can carry it off without their even suspecting it is about to happen; then they don’t even have time for worry. The libs probably won’t go for it though since it is not ‘clean’. The lib goal is not for it to be humane, though, they are seeking to just do away with them completely – moral relativism and all that (until a crime happens to them, that is).

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] June 30, 2015 at 5:31am

    BS!! This is nothing more than a corrupt organization protecting one of their likewise corrupt former members.

  • June 30, 2015 at 5:22am

    I’m surprised they didn’t find out about this guy and run him off campus; dems can’t afford to have the truth be told about their scam of claiming to be for ‘the little guy’. Can’t have the real story out there.

  • [31] June 30, 2015 at 5:12am

    The chinese business mindset is that if you do business with them, you are supposed to suspect that they will skimp, cut corners, or otherwise engage in deceptive / harmful / criminal activity to shave costs & maximize profit, and if you don’t suspect them and don’t catch them at it – YOU ARE AT FAULT for not catching them, and forcing them to do it correctly or as agreed upon. Their lack or ethics is never to blame (in their way of thinking), it is your lack of diligence or too-trusting attitude. The best business practice to adopt when it involves china is to NEVER DO BUSINESS WITH CHINA.

  • [12] June 29, 2015 at 10:37am

    Donate to a charity agreed to by both parties…

    Yeah, I know how that goes. The only ones the union will like are lefty causes, so you have to agree to one of the ones they decide, so you really have no choice as long as it leans left. I’d say that the union should give it back to her if they don’t reach any sort of agreement within say 18 months time. They are holding out expecting her to just cave. Why should the union have any say in it when it is clear that they are biased. Screw them!

  • [3] June 26, 2015 at 1:08am

    So when a corrupt SCOTUS decides that a law really doesn’t mean what it appears to be written to mean, when ‘bobo-the-lawless’ attempts to get a 3rd, 4th, etc. term does his ‘owned’ SCOTUS interpret the term limitation to only have been intended to apply for those with serious debilitating maladies like FDR, and couldn’t possibly have been intended to apply to such great ‘statesmen’ as bobo?

    Think it can’t happen?

    Responses (1) +
  • June 26, 2015 at 1:01am

    Maybe he IS an idiot, but when you write ‘your’ when you mean ‘you’re’ who looks like an idiot, then?

  • [2] June 26, 2015 at 12:43am

    Here’s a thought…

    If America is finished, as Glenn stated, then any laws established by that former nation are now void, and any protections provided by those laws are likewise void. Do those in power fully understand their precarious position?

  • [1] June 26, 2015 at 12:39am

    Well, Glenn, you’ve always said, “violence is never the answer.” I ask you now, if we decide to reset by peaceably leaving current locations, and peaceably move to somewhere with principals more in line with conservative ideals, and the corrupt U.S. refuses to allow this; attempts to take our property, our possessions, anything of value, even our very freedom – violently if necessary, will you allow yourself and your family to be taken and all that you possess, or will you react the way that Abraham did when his brother Lot was taken, and with armed men restored him and his possessions, afterwhich he was blessed by God’s priest Melchizedek near Salem. What say you, Glenn?

  • [21] June 24, 2015 at 11:40pm

    Notice that the cowardly beyotch attacked when the woman had her head turned away. Also, I’ve seen attacks where the odds were heavily slanted toward the attacker, and still they attack when the victim is unsuspecting.

    I’m a human being, not a machine. I have a temper, and I have limitations to what I can tolerate. I am sure I am not alone in this. Is it wrong of someone to view this and just want to ‘take-out’ all of this trash? Not because of their race, but because they are dispicable low-lifes that should not be walking around freely in society. Does this happen because ‘bobo-the-lawless’ is causing this sort of a national mind-set, or because the ‘just-us’ dept. has pretty much declared ‘person’s of color’ as a protected group? Things like this happen, and then people wonder why that nut-job shot up those innocent people in that church.

  • [3] June 24, 2015 at 11:26pm

    Can’t debate facts? Silence your opposition. Why do you think they want ‘net neutrality’ for radio, but strangely not for TV (Fox alone against ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, HLN, PBS, etc)? They want to silence ANY voice of opposition regardless of how many are on their side spouting a mantra that a clear majority of the public has shown it is tired of hearing based on the viewership/listenership favoring the non-lefty-brainwashed stations.

  • June 18, 2015 at 9:31pm

    Glenn, go where you are called to go, and may He who is calling you keep you safe.

  • [1] June 18, 2015 at 9:13pm

    Is it any wonder why people like that white guy shoot up black churches? (personally, I think the guy should get the death penalty – but I DO understand the growing anger among whites for nothing being done in the ‘just-us’ dept while ‘whitey’ is being victimized and the MSM refuses to report on it, or reports in in a clearly biased fashion) There already IS a race war going on, the networks just refuse to tell the truth. If you are white, (and not a felon or nutjob) arm yourself. Don’t go into areas where you may be a target, but if trouble comes looking for you, defend yourself; the cops and the feds won’t come to your aid in time – you need to take responsibility for your own safety.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] June 18, 2015 at 9:13pm

    Is that a round-a-bout way of bobo saying that the countries where Christians are slaughtered are not ‘advanced countries’?

  • June 18, 2015 at 12:04am

    Archuleta said, “The whole of government is responsible…” What a d@mn lie!! Talk about attempting to shift blame!! She should have been verbally slapped as soon as she said this lie.

  • June 18, 2015 at 12:00am

    In my state, cyclists are to be single file not riding abreast of each other. This way they don’t seem to be playing ‘rolling-roadblock’. It seems to not be enforced much, though. I can understand aggravation they cause, but I still wouldn’t run them down.

  • [2] June 17, 2015 at 11:38pm

    Oh, I SO want to wipe these vile swine off the face of the Earth!

  • [3] June 17, 2015 at 10:56pm

    And so does this fallacious argument nullify the 2nd Amd? I’ll answer that for you – NO IT DOES NOT!! So you anti-gun nuts can just go away and STFU!!

  • [2] June 17, 2015 at 10:51pm

    Ohhhhh, I wish he would have confronted me about that. I would have told him that his definition of ‘murder’ and mine must differ quite drastically. His would be that killing of anyone (who is a fellow mooselim) fighting a war is considered ‘murder’, but murdering anyone that makes a drawing he doesn’t like, or murdering little children that happen to be Christian is somehow justifiable. I would have then said that HIS thinking was evil and deluded and therefore HIS opinion did not matter. (and the sooner people that think like that are wiped off the face of the Earth, the better)

  • [10] June 17, 2015 at 9:39pm

    No that’s my favorite form of ‘gun control’

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love