User Profile: Joey Joe Joe

Member Since: October 09, 2010

CommentsDisplaying Joey Joe Joe's 10 most recent comments.

  • I remember a different Christie that would’ve used his answer to highlight the fact that 18,500+ people unnecessarily lost their jobs because of union leaders. Those days seem long gone now I guess.

  • I defies all logic that Romney got less votes than McCain…

    1) There are virtually no McCain voters that moved to Obama.
    2) There are massive amounts of independent voters that wanted Obama out because they were betrayed last election.
    3) Massive amounts of the Obama base weren’t as motivated to come out. (as evident in his rallies compared to 2008)

    All this doesn’t add up. I’m not saying Romney would have be a clear winner, but it does not make any sense how the turnout for the election referred to as “the most important election of our lifetime” pulled in less votes for Romney than McCain had four years ago.

    I’m praying the election in Allen West’s district will unearth any fraud that might have occurred systematically across the country. If fraud occurred anywhere, it would be in Florida and n the district that liberals fear most.

  • The 26 people who took time out of their miserable little lives to “dislike” that video on youtube should be eternally frozen in carbonite.

  • I wonder how twitter is going to make any money now that obama won’t be buying anymore sponsored trends.

  • Good point 22Automatic. Hannity probably accounted a vast majority of the negatives, which is totally understandable given he has an opinion show. Also, the study is extraordinarily subjective considering they are measuring “tone”. They should have limited their study to only the hard news shows.

  • Where’s CNN? This study compares a fringe MSNBC outlet with FOX, the largest cable news network (like it or not). The omission of CNN implies that FOX is just as far extreme right as MSDNC is extreme left, which anyone knows is not true. What is CNN then, fair and balanced? I think not.

  • JEDIKNIGHT – no need for the high and almighty tone. If you knew anything about the known Facebook API exploit back in 2011, then maybe you would’ve re-phrased your last response a little differently. When someone exploits the Facebook API for purposes of gaining user data that was not explicitly shared by individuals upon installing the app it is considered a hack, pure and simple. You are right though – there are legitimate (yet rogue) apps that accomplish the same type of data collection by using the API legitimately from unsuspecting users. Getting 1.1M users this way though is highly unlikely.

  • Sorry, but this is one of the most naive statements I’ve ever read. There are plenty of services readily available that marketers use that can append a physical address to a known email address using 3rd-party databases aggregated from multiple sources. (This is one way large companies know who to target when sending out mail catalogs, etc.)

    It’s NOT a good thing when your personal email address and real name are exposed online in front of thousands of hackers and identify thieves. When people add location to their tweets or post about their upcoming vacation on facebook, it only adds to this vulnerability.

    The hacker that is selling the list for $5 isn’t the main issue though. He’s just exposing something every black hat and cyber thief knew about several years ago. Facebook security is absolutely atrocious, and there is a lot of incompetence in that organization that is driven by the whole company mentality (‘more..more..more..faster..faster..faster). That site is a disaster waiting to happen, and it is only going to get worse when they start pushing mobile.

  • How much more proof is needed before liberalism becomes a confirmed mental disorder?

  • 2 Peter 2:1-3