Don’t forget Terminus-Est…not too long ago the left launched a “save Katie” campaign to help Kaitlyn Hunt the 18 year old lesbian who was repeatedly molesting a 14 year old girl. She even defied court orders to stay away from the 14 year old and assisted the girl to run away from her parents. For the left that was an expression of love between two very special teenagers…so long as it’s a lefty protected class like homosexuals expressing that kind of “love” then the progs are fine with statutory rape and child molestation.
Don't forget that fat little movie star Lena someone that admitted to molesting her little sister.
Katie and Lena Dunham did claim to a moral compass. They didn't campaign against homosexuals saying they would "molest your children". The actions are forgivable but the hypocrisy is not.
False equivalency there. Kaitlyn and the 14 year old engaged in their activities mutually. Josh preformed his acts in secret.
Kaitlyn was also charged and jailed for two counts of misdemeanor battery, misdemeanor contributing to the dependency of a child and two counts of felony interference with child custody. Because of the law in Florida she could not be charged with any sexual crimes.
 May 22, 2015 at 3:46pm
well I know someone who not too long ago was defending an 18 year old lesbian continually molesting a 14 year old girl. That 18 year old lesbian was Kaitlyn Hunt and that someone was you Verycreepyviolet.
An 18 year old dating a 14 year old is a lot different then a 14 year old sneaking into his sisters' rooms and fondling them. I doubt any of his little sisters were willing participants.
 May 22, 2015 at 11:39am
If that’s the case MagoosWay then will you be keeping an eye on lesbian Kaitlyn Hunt who you were defending so passionately when she was 18 and molesting a 14 year old?
 May 22, 2015 at 11:36am
actually blank….your buddy here MagoosWay..a prog to the core… was energetically defending 18 year old lesbian Kaitlyn Hunt in her molesting of a 14 year old girl.
How does it go again? Oh yes…”you lie”.
[-1] May 22, 2015 at 11:27am
You Magoo, were one of the menagere of prog trolls here that were energetically defending 18 year old lesbian Kaitlyn Hunt in her molesting of a 14 year old girl.
You didn’t think the 14 year old needed protecting then. Does your opinion on statutory rape and child molestation soften when it’s a homosexual 18 year old raping a minor? You’ll recall classy Katie was taking the 14 year old into the school restrooms to fondle her?
[-2] May 22, 2015 at 10:58am
While I’m heartened to see you’ve changed your opinions on statutory rape and child molestation MagoosWay I think it’s important for the reader of your post here to know that this attitude of yours is a new position for you. When the story about 18 year old lesbian Kaitlyn Hunt molesting a 14 year old girl broke you were one of the prog trolls defending dear Katie’s actions. You’ll recall Katie went to the extent of aiding the 14 year old in running away from her parents?
You didn’t see Kate’s actions on a 14 year old as an “apolitical tragedy” then..I’m glad you’ve since seen the light on child predation.
 May 22, 2015 at 10:53am
That’s funny VeryCreepyViolet but I recall when you were posting under a different name you defended 18 year old lesbian Kaitlyn Hunt who at the time was molesting a 14 year old and went to the extent of aiding the 14 year old in running away from her family to be with her.
I’m pleased to see you’ve changed your mind on child molestation and statutory rape but you should also recall that your beloved homosexuals that yous used to defend so vehemently used to have NAMBLA march with them in pride parades and included NAMBLA in a U.N. delegation on LGBT affairs.
 May 21, 2015 at 5:58pm
actually seeing his reaffirms my Christian faith and I’ll tell you why. These adherences by ultra-orthodox Jews are carry overs from Rabbinic laws going back to the time of Jesus. Now of course Judaism like Christianity has gone through a reformation but this kind of thing is a throwback to older jewish practices concerning women. Included in these practices was the idea that a woman’s testimony carried no value in Jewish law. But then who was the first person to attest to the risen Christ? It was Magdalene when she went to the sepulchre to attend the body of Jesus. So acknowledging this…one must ask why would jews of the time (and make no mistake the followers of Jesus at that point were still very much Jews) use a woman’s testimony to the most significant event in their lives if a woman’s testimony is worthless in their society? Answer- Because it’s the truth of how the events transpired and the truth wasn’t manipulated by the gospels’ authors to make it “acceptable” to anyone at the time..it was just reported as it happened.
Her name was Mary. She, being from the city of Magdala, was a Magdalene.
"actually seeing his reaffirms my Christian faith and I’ll tell you why. These adherences by ultra-orthodox Jews are carry overs from Rabbinic laws going back to the time of Jesus. Now of course Judaism like Christianity has gone through a reformation but this kind of thing is a throwback to older jewish practices concerning women."
It's not a 'throwback' it's part of the laws G-d gave Moses.
"Included in these practices was the idea that a woman’s testimony carried no value in Jewish law.":
Not that it carried 'no value' but having value is not the same as automatically being 'reliable'
Perhaps back then many women were known to give unreliable testimony or were more prone then men to get wrapped up in their emotions and report based on that rather then an actual assessment of the actual events.
The testimony of a professional gambler was/is also not accepted.
"But then who was the first person to attest to the risen Christ? It was Magdalene when she went to the sepulchre to attend the body of Jesus. So acknowledging this…"
That is your belief, but you believing it, is not proof that it actually happened.
"one must ask why would jews of the time (and make no mistake the followers of Jesus at that point were still very much Jews)"
Many of the early followers of Jesus, were not Jews.
And those who were, were not following the laws that G-d had given Moses like this one about women testifying which was the law since more then a 1000 years before Jesus even existed..
" use a woman’s testimony to the most significant event in their lives if a woman’s testimony is worthless in their society?"
As I said not accepted in court does not mean 'worthless'.
A husband was supposed to listen to what his wife had to say, so your pretense that Judaism supposedly 'put down' women is false.
" Answer- Because it’s the truth of how the events transpired and the truth wasn’t manipulated by the gospels’ authors to make it “acceptable” to anyone at the time..it was just reported as it happened."
That's your belief, but you can't prove it's true.
Jesus if you accept the N.T. claims, violated G-d command against idolatry by claiming to be G-d in the flesh when G-d had told Moses "No man can see my face and live".
What do you ignoramuses care what Haredi do on their own websites?
 May 21, 2015 at 5:25pm
I agree with you Zorro in the sense that we don’t want to look like our perpetually offended and hyper-litigious militant atheist friends. But I think we also needn’t back down from activitst liberal teachers. The precedent is well established in the education system that christians are being silenced and forced into the shadows by our militant atheist teacher and student friends there. If the child has been unfairly silenced by the teacher then that teacher (and his fellow militant atheists in the education system) need to know that we can play their game and win at it as well.
 May 21, 2015 at 5:19pm
Going by the precedent our liberal friends in education have set Chuck I’d say it’s a safe bet that if the child had quoted the Q’oran the teacher would have gushed with platitudes about “diversity” and other prog canards. But since it was a christian sentiment then our liberal teacher not surprisingly thought that excising any reference to the christian faith is the best option. The less it’s seen and acknowledged the faster it will die off is the prog strategy I believe.
 May 21, 2015 at 2:32pm
Let me add blank…Obama’s former “Czar of Safe Schools” Kevin Jennings formed GLSEN. A pro-homosexual organization for the purpose of bringing the homosexual agenda to school children. GLSEN recently wanted schoolage children taught common homosexual sex practices like f#sting. Tell me blank…would you want your child to know how to “safely” insert their fist and forearm into a sex partner’s orifice? Jennings of course distanced himself from his own group when that was brought up to him. My…how convenient. But his past actions tell a different story. While he was a school official a boy he believed was underage (the boy has since insisted he was of the age of consent but nonetheless..Jennings IS on record stating that he believed the boy was not of legal age) approached him and told him he was going to a local pick up area for homosexuals to obtain sex from adult males. It was a bus stop if memory serves. What did Jennings do? He asked if the boy was wearing condoms and he went on to say that he and the boy would from then on pass each other at school and wink at each other (or some such acknowledgement) to reinforce their secret together.
Let me ask you blank…as a parent would you like to know if your school age child is going to bus stops to obtain sex from adult males? The answer is yes by the way.
 May 21, 2015 at 2:22pm
Oh and in case you forgot blank…NAMBLA is an acronym…”North American MAN BOY Love Association”.
Yes, and you're a moron who gets information from hate groups, trying to lecture me about what I know about an organization that supports pedophiles.
Once again, homosexuals and pedophiles are not the same thing.
"Once again, homosexuals and pedophiles are not the same thing."
When they are men going after young boys, they are exactlky the same thing.
Blink, I think we need to introduce this group to the concept of a Venn Diagram.
Speaking specifically to the male gender, here, though there's no reason this can't apply to women, too. There are two groups: Homosexuals, and Pedophiles. In some cases, the two circles overlap, and a person can be both a homosexual and a pedophiles. This does not apply to all members of both groups, however. There are still homosexuals who do not have any interest in underage males, and there are pedophiles who go after young girls. Therefore, homosexuals and pedophiles are not the same thing.
Furthermore, a dictionary search of homosexual will not reveal pedophile as a synonym.
 May 21, 2015 at 2:16pm
Actually blank….NAMBLA used to march in “Pride” parades. NAMBLA was also part of an LGBT delegation to the United Nations. It’s a well known fact that pederasty is common and rife among homosexuals despite your best efforts to scrub and hide it from the record.
Furthermore…male homosexuals make up less than two percent of the population…yet male on male child sex assaults show that homosexual pedophiles make up a disproportionately high percentage of these types of assaults. Some of course in the following numbers may have wives and girlfriends but they seem to like sex with boys nonetheless. That’s the “B” part of LGBT in case you forgot blank.
A study on pedophilia in the Psychiatric Journal of the University of Ottawa reported: “According to the literature, findings of a two-to-one ratio of heterosexual to homosexual pedophiles have been documented.”
The Journal of Sex Research reports a study that included “199 offenders against female children and 96 offenders against male children. . . . This would indicate a proportional prevalence of 32 percent of homosexual offenders against children.”
Gay newspaper Washington Blade: “[S]ome gay men still maintain that an adult who has same-sex relations with someone under the legal age of consent is on some level doing the kid a favor by helping to bring him or her ‘out.’ It’s not pedophilia, this thinking goes–pedophilia refers only to little kids.”
Perhaps you think like these men blankboy?
Now for some actual facts.
95%+ pedophiles are men. I guess that makes men the problem then?
For every male pedophile that preys on boys, there are seven who prey on girls.
Using the above facts, and following your insane logic, the real problem would be... straight men. Except I don't see you applying this logic to straight men now do I? Now why could that be?
Because you're an idiot cherry picking and obfuscating facts?
Oh and you're getting information from.. The Family Research Council? A known anti-homosexual group. Bravo! You know just which hate group to go to in order to find out the things you want to hear!
Oh here's some actual research.
Sorry, but your horse manure from the hate group has been debunked for years and years now.
Just as an FYI, the FRC as recently as 2010 was busted using a bogus study about this very subject, basically one fundamentalist religious organization took misrepresented info from another fundamentalist religious organization, and didn't even represent THAT correctly.
But wait, let me guess, your recognized hate group of fundamentalists that has been caught lying and misrepresenting data, is "right" and the link I provided is from people with an agenda?
"95%+ pedophiles are men. I guess that makes men the problem then?"
NAMBLA is an exclusively gay group BY DEFINITION (National MAN BOY (which means gay, and also means pedophiles, that is exclusively what the group is about) Love, Association.
Yet no one goes after them with 1/10 the gusto they go after legitimate groups like the Boy scouts.
That’s not their agenda. Their agenda is to attack and erode traditional values and institutions. A “gay” scout organization isn’t going to serve that purpose. Additionally…they’ve tried hard for years now to appear “normal” (this is why NAMBLA no longer marches in “pride” parades)….how do you think a bunch of adult homosexual males cavorting with homosexual adolescent males as part of an alternative scout organization is going to look? It’ll back to their bathhouses, dungeons and gloryholes of yesteryear and will harm their narrative.
 May 21, 2015 at 1:33pm
If memory serves..Boy Scouts Canada adopted Gates’ policies and subsquently saw their membership numbers evaporate. The Gaystapo doesn’t care either way…either an institution with a nominal christian complexion capitulates to the homosexual agenda and is irreparably harmed for it, or homosexual adult males now can have a smorgasbord of adolescent males to isolate themselves with. It’s a win/win for them.
#16 Communist Goal: Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
#26 Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
WEAKEN BASIC AMERICAN INSTITUTIONS.....How about attacking the Boy Scouts of America?????? We had better realize what we are up against and figure it out now!
Well presented DIAMOND.
You and Blackdiamondskier are both spot on. This is just another front in the underground Cold War that has been going on since the 50's when the counter culture revolution began. The left is telling us we are in the minority now so we should just capitulate our morals and deeply held beliefs. This would only serve to make it easier for them to destroy us from within. Don't fall for their lies! There are still way more of us than of them.
The BSA has "duty to God" first in the Scout Oath for a reason. Faith in God has always been a part of the program since it's foundation. It's the main reason the left wants to subvert it, like they do to all organizations that foster faith and morality. The BSA will either live up to this Oath to do their Duty to God or they will break it and, as a result, sully over 100 yeas of good they have done. I highly doubt the LDS troops will stay in BSA if they capitulate to this pressure. I don't speak for the LDS church but I know they will not knowingly allow openly gay Scout leaders. Period. To do so would violate our beliefs.
 May 21, 2015 at 1:29pm
ricckky…homosexual adult males in isolation with and in close proxmity to adolescent males they’re sexually attracted to and whileaway from parental oversight…what could possibly go wrong?
So you think all gay men are attracted to adolescent males then, correct? That is what you just stated.
Are all straight men attracted to adolescent females? Are all straight females attracted to adolescent males?
Your logic is so flawed I find it hard that your brain can tell your lungs to take in air so you can continue to live.
Considering that most cases of child abuse are committed by their own parents or family members, I would say you are doing the children a favor.
 May 21, 2015 at 1:25pm
They’re progs who’s “intellectual” and ideological roots are in Marxism (whether they’re conscious of it or honest about it or not)…any means justifies the end. “It’s for the people man”.
 May 21, 2015 at 1:22pm
That’s right Suzie Milligan…keep ‘em dumb and keep ‘em voting democrat. “Ready For Hillary”.