User Profile: AvengerK


Member Since: July 25, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [6] July 25, 2014 at 4:24pm

    I was watching O’Reilly a few nights ago he said that the Supreme Court will kill Obamacare once it gets a second crack at it. I tend to accept his prediction on this. It’s clear that the intention was to coerce states into setting up exchanges and now Obama’s surrogates are backpeddling on it. The problem is Gruber is on video clearly stating this was the intention of the provision. Once the subsidies are excised then Obamacare collapses under it’s own weight. With a GOP majority in both houses of congress come 2015 the law gets repealed and Obama is forced to either sign off on the repeal or make people buy the insurance without the subsidies they were promised.
    Now..gauging from Obama’s antics right now..he doesn’t give a d@mn about anyone but himself (and his world view) and he will not sign off on any repeal and attempt to portray any financial hardships of no subsidies as the GOP’s doing. The problem arises for Barry when one recalls that the law is still very unpopular and euphemistically carries his name as it’s title…”Obamacare”. Try as he might he simply won’t be able to sell it as a republican law or a republican altering of it. He owns it and every democrat that voted for it along with him owns it.
    One is tempted to recall Kurt Russell from Tombstone…”you tell Obama I’m coming..and hell’s coming with me ya hear? Hell’s coming with me”.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 25, 2014 at 3:39pm

    By the way Bernie..that “writing styles” thing you attempted? Check out your post as Jamescur at 12:33 and the Lucretinous identity’s post at 2:38. LOL.

    You make this WAY too easy buddy.

  • [2] July 25, 2014 at 3:32pm

    LOL…weak arguments Bernie?
    You asked for evidence as to an agenda among homosexuals to normalize sex with children. I provided those examples for you. Are they going to openly state it for us? Not while they’re using fools like you to portray them as normal they won’t, it would be counter productive for them right now. No..for now they’re using euphemisms like “intergenerational sex” to insinuate that aspect of their sexuality into the public psyche. It’s not being “mainstreamed” just yet because it’s bad business.
    You were “defeated” many posts ago champ. All these paltry little lists and entreaties to “writing styles” of yours are just more of your deflections and baiting.
    You make this too easy sport.

  • [1] July 25, 2014 at 2:58pm

    wow Benie…such a long post to tell me you have no intention of telling me why NAMBLA was part of the homosexual movement until the publicity for a “legit” homosexual agenda got too bad to keep them included their numbers?

    So let me recap first you wouldn’t answer for NAMBLA because you believe it’s too long ago to warrant answering. But now you won’t account for NAMBLA’s presence because homosexuals of “the late 1970′s” are somehow different to homosexuals today. LOL….this stuff’s great..comedy gold Bernie.

  • July 25, 2014 at 2:46pm

    LOL…how hysterical is that? Bernie the troll with the mulitude of screennames he hides behind and stalks and baits others is demanding to be respected and addressed as an adult.

    You’re a piece of work man.

  • July 25, 2014 at 2:38pm

    LOL..yeah you’ve tried that “sickle cell” line with me when you post as Harry Potter Bernie. You need to keep your identities more distinct from each other. That’s just you deflecting again anyway.

    I can list the heatlh and psychological issues plaguing your beloved lesbians Bernie but all it will do is provide corridors for you to scurry into to deflect and distract again. I’m not up to smoking you out’s tedious.

    LOL…yeah and being a herion addict is normal to being a heroin addict but it doesn’t make it safe or normal for the human species though does it champ? Is ths draining in yet Bernie? You’re asking society to treat homosexuals as normal because the only way you can further the homosexual agenda is by making it appear as normal as you can make it. This is why you and your other screennames won’t address the presence of groups like NAMBLA in the homosexual conversation and why my bringing up GLSEN’s desire to teach schoolage kids how to f#st one another was met with silence from you and your other log in name here.

    Which segues beautifully into your phony denials about “teaching sexual encounters” and “proper education” Bernie. LOL.

  • [1] July 25, 2014 at 1:44pm

    Was I too subtle when I used the word “performance” Bernie? LOL.

  • July 25, 2014 at 1:39pm

    Jamescur..why don’t you log in as Lucretinous and give it a shot, since age is an issue for you? LOL.

  • [2] July 25, 2014 at 1:37pm

    Indyguy…I already suspected that. My suspicion is it’s Bernie the dysfunctional aka: B.Antoninus, Monicne, Kregneva, Newtowns-Third-Law.

  • [3] July 25, 2014 at 1:33pm

    yes Lucretinous you are asking for homosexual sex practices to be portrayed as normal and safe by virture of your perpetuation of the rote and canards you progs dredge up time and again in the selling of the homosexual agenda… “love each other”…”just like black people and civil rights” nauseum. Your prog strategty is to portray homosexuality as “normal just different” when in’s far from anything resembling normal by virtue of the health and psychological issues intrinsic to it.
    For instance…part of the homosexual agenda is to tell school age children to “experiment” sexually. Implication? Go ahead and try homosexual encounters see if they suit you boys and girls. Is this normal and safe to you Lucretinous?

  • [2] July 25, 2014 at 1:23pm

    Gosh Jamescur..I don’t recall asking you to answer anything on “dissent” among the GOP Party.
    You expressed a reluctance to answer for NAMBLA’s presence in homosexual pride parades and U.N. delegations for “LGBT” matters based on the number of years ago it was present in the homosexual groups so I offered you a more contemporary issue to answer regarding GLSEN’s plans for teaching abberent sex practices to school age kids.

    Would you explain your reluctance to answer the question I gave you that didn’t have your “30 year answer by” date imposed on it? Please delineate your criteria for questions posed to you and I’ll try to make this as accomodating as I can seeing that you have some kind of reluctance which makes you instantly attempt to deflect from it, self-inflate yourself and malign the questioner.

  • [1] July 25, 2014 at 1:14pm

    Oh that’s right I forgot…Jamescur won’t answer a question that pertains to events more than a year old. At that point all you get is self-approving, self-inflating deflections from him and attempts to malign you so as to distract from his awkward postition of having to answer for the troubling behavior of his homosexual allies.

  • [1] July 25, 2014 at 1:01pm

    Oh look how unexpected..more piety, self-approval and attempts to malign me from Jamescur rather than answer a question posed to him.

    You and Lucretinous are like stepford wives. LOL.

  • [2] July 25, 2014 at 12:58pm

    LOL…..more deflections Lucretinous?

    I asked you to explain why you believe homosexual sex should be portrayed as “normal and safe” and you parsed and minced words like the duplicitous prog troll you are.

    Your performance went something like this..”yes homosexual sex practices are not safe it’s impossible to deny it when you corner me on it AvengerK..quick now..heterosexuals..what about heterosexuals..look over there quickly Look at them..over there..not here..over there..d@mn I need a deflection again..lesbians…lesbians”.

    You make this far too easy champ.

  • [4] July 25, 2014 at 12:50pm

    But since you have a “use by” date on offering answers Jamescur..I’ll ask you an easier one.
    Why does GLSEN want to teach school age children sex practices like “f#sting”? GLSEN is the homosexual advocacy group started by former Obama “Czar of safe schools” Kevin Jennings to affect the homosexual agenda in the education system. While under Obama’s wing Jennings distanced himself from GLSEN’s desire to teach kids how to f#st each other. What a coincidence huh? NAMBLA gets “disappeared” when Gay Inc wants to appear “legit” and Jennings disavows his own group’s plans while he’s “legit” with Obama. Seeing a pattern at all?

  • [1] July 25, 2014 at 12:44pm

    LOL….more deflections Jamescur? Wow…for someone so pious and self-approvng you seem at a loss to answer a simple question. Why was NAMBLA part of gay pride parades and an “LGBT” U.N. delegation? In both instances..NAMBLA’s removal from those entities only took place because light was shed on their presence in those groups.

    You stink of desperation champ.

  • [2] July 25, 2014 at 12:25pm

    So endeth the lesson….

  • [1] July 25, 2014 at 12:22pm

    More deflections and attempts to malign me Jamescur?
    I”ll ask you again champ since you keep evading the question…Why was NAMBLA part of pride parades and an “LGBT” U.N. delegation AT ALL?
    I don’t want your piety, I don’t want your deflections I want an answer. Are you capable of answering?

  • [4] July 25, 2014 at 12:18pm

    How cute…Lucretinous is trying to ignore the facts I gave him.

    Why don’t you help out your buddy Jamescur and tell us why NAMBLA found a home in pride parades and in an “LGBT” U.N. delegation Lucretinous. Well..they had a home until the publicity got too bad to cover up for Gay Inc.

  • July 25, 2014 at 12:12pm

    Have you come up with why homosexuals dominate the HIV, gonhorrea and syphillis numbers in the U.S. yet Jamescur? Or will you be subjecting us to more of your piety?

123 To page: Go