After the beating obviously. How do you think they get those nightsticks nice and black?
 July 29, 2016 at 3:15pm
Indeed Lothmar…got a vessel named after a heterosexual sexual predator..why not a homosexual one? And both democrats no less….
 July 29, 2016 at 2:42pm
money mutual will pay his bail….from the outrageous interest rates they charge the suckers he sells money mutual to…
 July 29, 2016 at 2:36pm
That’s funny isn’t it HairyPorthole? You were so quick to tell me (and if one peruses your posts..everyone else it seems) that I don’t know what I’m talking about. You monitor homosexual themed boards on the blaze with pathological zeal. You showed up almost instantly on a two day old board….and when I asked you to prove me wrong here….you evaporated.
July 29, 2016 at 2:23pm
Where are those details HairyPorthole?
 July 29, 2016 at 2:22pm
I’m still waiting HairyPorthole….
July 29, 2016 at 2:03pm
I want detail on how you seem to show up exclusively on homosexual themed boards at the blaze HairyPorthole….
 July 29, 2016 at 1:57pm
Actually HairyPorthole…the CDC recommends that homosexual males in monogamous relationships continue to use condoms when they have sex. The use of condoms is clearly not to prevent pregnancy I hasten to add.
By all means HairyPorthole…prove me wrong.
 July 29, 2016 at 11:31am
There you go blankboy and crappayole’…..I just quoted from a sympathetic biographer of Milk’s from his 1982 book.
 July 29, 2016 at 11:26am
Randy Shilts, a homosexual San Francisco Chronicle reporter, wrote a favorable and sordid biography of Milk in “The Mayor of Castro Street.” The 1982 book detailed Milk’s sexual relationships with a 16-year-old, a 19-year-old and other young men:
“…sixteen-year-old McKinley was looking for some kind of father figure…At 33, Milk was launching a new life, though he could hardly have imagined the unlikely direction toward which his new lover would pull him.” (pages 30-31)
“It would be to boyish-looking men in their late teens and early 20′s that Milk would be attracted for the rest of his life.” (page 24)
“Harvey always had a penchant for young waifs with substance abuse problems.” (page 180)
“Harvey confided one night that at twenty-four, Doug was the oldest man Harvey had ever started an affair with.” (page 237)
I don’t see “squelchingly (sic) hot weeks” driving trucks into crowds of people, strapping explosive vests on, gunning down nightclub goers, beheading, raping….etc…etc. Margie. When hot weeks start doing that I’ll take “climate change” more seriously as a threat to my life.
And John Perkins of Jeffersonville, Indiana, insisted that America will “deal with the terrorism issue” and “handle it well.”….was calling it a JV team,part of that handling it well John?
July 29, 2016 at 10:42am
that’s pretty much your routine isn’t it HairyPorthole? “You clearly don’t have any idea/knowledge of (insert subject here)”. You did exactly the same routine on my thread above this one and even a cursory perusal of your posts demonstrates that it’s a line you use over and over and over.
People post figures, links, sources for their assertions at which point you attempt to deflect. You have a routine it seems.
 July 29, 2016 at 10:39am
And HairyPorthole….if there’s truly nothing dangerous about being a homosexual male then you can throw away your condoms and daily PreP medication right champ?
 July 29, 2016 at 10:37am
It looks like HairyPorthole the propagandist removed my post that posters Prov1, Vendingdude and IamOctober were referring to in this thread.
I’ll post the gist of it again….
I don’t care how HIV is spread HairyPorthole. But when homosexuals travelling to these hotels use preparatory enemas to reduce the fecal matter involved in the sex they practice and knowing that fecal matter, tears in the bowel, openings in the urinary tract..etc all are part of the process of spreading HIV, Syphilis and Gonorrhea- of which homosexual males represent 72% and 83% respectively of the infection rates in the US- then lying in a bed where this level of unsanitary activity and disease took place is a very loathsome and gross notion. You on the other hand seem to be feel very comfortable in it…that’s your prerogative.
WND is complete garbage.
Would you care to provide a reputable source instead?
WND is your source and you believe it? Come on. Find this info from credible sources and then maybe your concerns would be relevant.
Ignore the heathens, AvengerK...Milk's own biography states...
'When Jack Galen McKinley first began his relationship with Milk in late 1964, he was 16 years old...and Milk was 34 years old'
The pederast (Milk) belonged in prison, just like Sandusky.
Seriously you've been punked. You've been made the fool. Just shows how people will accept any kind nonsense on the internet provided it supports their beliefs. Like that National Enquirer article that Ted Cruz's father was involved with a conspiracy to kill Kennedy. Even AvengerK has bought into this story just as he did with the idea that Ted Cruz's dad conspired to kill John F. Kennedy.
Thankfully I'm here to help. No, you don't have to thank me. I considerate a privilege to have the opportunity to correct the misinformation and set readers on a truer path, one based on knowledge and critical thinking. In that capacity I offer the following advice:
1) Don't believe everything you read on the internet, even if it conforms to your deeply held views about everything hate.
2) Don't believe the US is going to name a ship after Harvey Milk. That's just stupid. You've been punked again.
Lets start with this guy and then move on through Congress and oust all those Congressmen who have sex with boys in the bathrooms because everyone knows there are more than have already been caught.
"Thankfully I’m here to help. No, you don’t have to thank me. I considerate a privilege to have the opportunity to correct the misinformation and set readers on a truer path, one based on knowledge and critical thinking."
That's great. We are lucky, in a way, I guess, but you forgot to actually correct the misinformation. Were you going to get around to that or are you only as credible as you claim K's source is?
termyt, sorry dude. Here’s what I was getting around to:
1) Don’t believe everything you read on the internet, even if it conforms to your deeply held views about everything you hate.
2) Don’t believe the US is going to name a ship after Harvey Milk. That’s just stupid. You’ve been punked again.
Punked? I guess this means the navy is lying?
Yeah, you're stupid.
hey blinky and cafe, everyone knows that ALL gays are pedophiles. Its the only way to guarantee a good crop of gays from the next generation. Gotta sow your gay seed if you want to reap a gay harvest and you gotta sow it very early in a persons life.
I don't know about the drugs. That's very possible, considering the time period. But all the Biographical information about Harvey Milk from LGBT friendly resources clearly state that he had a thing for teenage boys. Considering that this guy is one ugly looking dude, it isn't a stretch of the imagination that he might have been using some kind of "incentive" to attract young men (drugs, money, whatever).
Either way, he was definitely a sexual predator. Whether or not he used drugs in his predatory actions is up for debate, but his attraction to children/teenagers is not. When his lovers grew older, and started having mature bodies, he would discard them and seek out younger looking targets. He spent a lot of time developing sexual relationships with boys who were looking for father figures, and then he used that father figure status as a kind of grooming method.
This is not news to anybody. It's been well established throughout the years by his own friends and lovers.
Randy Shilts, a homosexual San Francisco Chronicle reporter, wrote a favorable and sordid biography of Milk in "The Mayor of Castro Street." The 1982 book detailed Milk's sexual relationships with a 16-year-old, a 19-year-old and other young men:
"...sixteen-year-old McKinley was looking for some kind of father figure...At 33, Milk was launching a new life, though he could hardly have imagined the unlikely direction toward which his new lover would pull him." (pages 30-31)
"It would be to boyish-looking men in their late teens and early 20's that Milk would be attracted for the rest of his life." (page 24)
"Harvey always had a penchant for young waifs with substance abuse problems." (page 180)
"Harvey confided one night that at twenty-four, Doug was the oldest man Harvey had ever started an affair with." (page 237)
There you go blankboy and crappayole'.....I just quoted from a sympathetic biographer of Milk's from his 1982 book.
@ avengerk - I mean there's already a vessel named after Clinton right?
Indeed Lothmar...got a vessel named after a heterosexual sexual predator..why not a homosexual one? And both democrats no less....
July 28, 2016 at 7:03pm
LOL…so now that brainlez’s attempt to portray Obamacare as a constitutional right went no where…he’s switched to calling it a civil right. You stink of stupidity and desperation brainlez.
How many civil rights can I pay a fine on and opt of buying brainlez?
 July 28, 2016 at 6:21pm
Oh and brainlez? Reconciliation is used for budget legislation (not constitutional rights as you’re under the belief has taken place). When Scott Brown became senator he took away the democrat super-majority in the Senate and deprived them of the 60 vote ability to close off debate. Reconciliation bills essentially cannot be filibustered which is why the democrats chose that route.
So in brainlez’s world…a budget procedure of the Senate used to pass a piece of legislation has now morphed into an enumerated right to heathcare of the American people as explicitly expressed in he constitution. Ohhhhkay.
I’m not going to lie to you brainlez…I thoroughly enjoy humiliating you. Your smugness and liberal-elitist posturing throughout the process makes humiliating you that much more entertaining. You were so sure of yourself earlier….and now you’re reduced to spinning a piece of legislation eventually passed using budgetary tricks as a constitutional right of the American people. I’d feel sorry for you…but I’d be lying.
July 28, 2016 at 5:47pm
brainlez…Obamacare is a piece of legislation champ. It was passed using reconciliation. It is not an amendment nor a right. Your mealy mouthed and desperate attempts to call Obamacare a constitutional right make you look quite weak and foolish.
In fact….it infringed on the commerce laws it attempted to overstep and the individual mandate had to be changed into a tax and not a penalty in order to make it comply with the constitution. So before that..it was unconstitutional.
But I’ll call your bluff you flaccid little prog….show me where the government provision of healthcare to the American people is stated as a right in the constitution.