User Profile: AvengerK


Member Since: July 25, 2011

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

123 To page: Go
  • April 23, 2014 at 3:17pm

    Really have a new name these days..Verycobbledviolin

    Kevin DuJan…former Clinton backer and current homosexual commentator:

    “Christians are depicted as the greatest villains of all time to gays, with the Gaystapo high command of “community leaders” declaring that Christian institutions must be destroyed as much as possible. Some lesbian went on tee-vee over the weekend saying that she wants “gay marriage” to pass because it both weakens the Church and traditional families…and I think there are a lot of subversives who do things like complain about Christmas trees or nativity displays in the War Against Christian Holidays in order to further undermine and weaken the Church. Gays love having an enemy, and the gay community leaders know that unless gays are focused on an enemy they will just go off into a million different directions (because dealing with gays is like herding cats if you don’t have a colorful and epic enemy to focus on).”
    “Gays bash Christians because they know they can get away with it…and they steer clear of ever criticizing Islam for anything because they are too scared that a Muslim will bomb, behead, brutalize, or do other horrible things to them…as “The Religion of Peace” consistently does all around the world. As a member of the community, I can tell you that gay people are very stupid when it comes to Islam. ‘

    DuJan’s words Verycobbledviolin…make you, quite frankly, an ignorant nut job.

  • April 23, 2014 at 11:29am

    and Hillary and Chelsea are left wing rags.

  • April 23, 2014 at 11:28am

    You mean like prog trolls who get their Charles116 screenname banned on the blaze and feel they must return to post more so they come up with Verycobalviolet as a new name to post with? That kind of sucker?

  • April 23, 2014 at 11:20am

    LOL….the continued slide of American students? You mean as a result of liberals dominating the education field for decades now? What do you recommend for the child to read JCrooked? “My two daddies”? Go peddle you idiocy at huffpo where the rest of your prog chimpanzees screech in approval for you.

  • April 23, 2014 at 11:16am

    I don’t care if the child is attempting to read Hawkings’- “A Brief History of Time”. Let the child read. He’ll ask about what he doesn’t understand..that’s called developing learnng skills.
    Just a realistic perspective.

  • April 23, 2014 at 11:08am

    tcha…like totally..for sure.

  • April 23, 2014 at 11:07am

    Bing AJAY…the standad reply from schools caught red-handed…”we take this seriousy, we’re looking into it” Then the offending party (teacher) comes out of the “we’re looking into it” ether and apologises claiming “it was part of the cirriculum” or “I was concerned for other students” then promises never to do it again.
    These statists in your schools are using the “you can’t unsay it” rule. They make their statement, they do their act knowing that likely no credible repurcussions will come there way. The make a flaccid apology for appearances sake (if they’re forced to) and go off smiling to themselves knowing the damage has been done anyway because they can’t “unsay” what they said or did. The idea has already been insinuated.
    That’s vulgar and slimy the American left really is..and make no mistake..they are desperate to turn Texas blue.

  • April 23, 2014 at 10:59am

    “Well, Matt, obviously it’s an extensive, expansive topic—“ Psaki began before getting cut off.

    “Well Jen, let me condense that extensive and expansive topic to just one element in particular and perhaps that will help you to organize your thoughts better? Where did those 6 billion unaccounted for dollars go for the state department under Secretary Clinton’s watch?”.

    “Well, Matt, obviously it’s an extensive, expansive topic—“

    “Not even one receipt in her defense Jen?”

    “Well, Matt, obviously it’s an extensive, expansive topic—“

    “Not even one invoice for even 5 dollars of that 6 billion Jen?”

    “Well, Matt, obviously it’s an extensive, expansive topic—“

    “Well Jen, let’s try something easier…where was Secretary Clinton while our mission in Benghazi was being attacked?”.

    “Well, Matt, obviously it’s an extensive, expansive topic—“

    “Was she in bed?”

    “Well, Matt, obviously it’s an extensive, expansive topic—“

    “watching Letterman?”

    “Well, Matt, obviously….

    “Well Jen, let me ask on a specific detail then…Why did Secretary Clinton make a commercial for Pakistani audiences where she’s apologizing to them for a you tube film when it’s become clear at this point that almost immediately into the attack we knew the attack on the mission was a terror attack that had nothing to do with a you tube film?”.
    Can we include the cost of that commerical as part of that unac

  • April 23, 2014 at 10:43am

    I don’t believe I’ve ever heard this Psaki clownshoes give a straight answer to anything she was asked.

  • April 22, 2014 at 3:49pm

    No question Gonzo…the American left is terrified at the prospect of Obamacare being repealed and their attempt at government intervention in peoples’ health being seen as a failure. Their agenda would be set back many years. That’s why “mend it, don’t end it” is their desperate and cynical attempt in keeping the dysfunctional law on life support until they can insinuate socialized medicine into the public discourse. “Mend it, don’t end it” is not just to save democrats from being culled from the senate this year and so preserve the balance of power in Washington…it’s also to keep the hope of moving to socialized medicine feasible in the near future. A repealed Obamacare is a huge blow to leftist aspirations of government control.

  • April 22, 2014 at 3:07pm

    Does Media Matters still have tax exempt status?

    Responses (1) +
  • April 22, 2014 at 2:59pm

    Slayer…the only “positive” scenario the democrats have with Obamacare is if it’s around long enough to get enough Americans dependent on it (hence..”don’t end it, mend it”). They’re gambling that after the employer mandate forces millions of Americans into the exchanges..and insurance companies have become “boutique” services for higher earners because they were regulated and priced into a smaller market (as Zeke Emanuel -Obamacare writer- is already braying about) – then Americans will be acclimated to government oversight of healthcare and when the insolvency of Obamacare is proclaimed they will demand the government simply institute socialized medicine.
    Again..the writers of Obamacare were working towards this. The law is meant to fail. There’s no other explanation as to why it’s writers would want to see insurers fail, herd millions and millions of Americans into the exchanges by harming their private and employer coverage, play three card monty with revenue, offer phantom spending cuts, predict unrealistically rosier than rosy budgets, force Americans to buy more coverage than they need, force physician owned practices into decline..the list goes on.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 22, 2014 at 2:45pm

    I think the website was a demonstration of just how incompetent Obama and Sebelius are. They both knew well in advance that it was no where near ready to implement on the day it was scheduled to go up but because Obamacare was still unpopular and it’s critics so effective in their portrayal of Obamacare as a disaster waiting to happen that Obama chose to go ahead with the site (possibly on Sebelius’ assurances) and gamble that it wouldn’t be as bad as it later turned out. I think it was another example of Obama believing that the power of his personality was enough to cover for a site he believed wouldnt’ be nearly as bad as it turned out to be. Obama truly believes he’s the smartest guy in the room and his cabinet choices are the most adept minds in the country (when not chosen strictly for political purposes like Eric Holder)
    The website was symbolic of the cynicism, political covering and utter incompetence of Barack Obama and Kathleen Sebelius.
    Obamacare on the other hand is tailored to overload the system and herd the nation to single payer socialised medicine. It’s writers are already proclaiming the end of health insurance companies (Zeke Emanuel) who unless they become beholden to the government will go under. It’s “paid for” by phantom cuts, three card monty budgeting and rosier than rosy economic predictions. It’s met none of it’s needed threshholds and as evidenced by the fuzzy “7.5 million” number with no back up numbers to explain it.

  • April 22, 2014 at 2:28pm

    Bankruptcy will end Obamacare Gonzo because Obamacare isn’t the endgame. Single payer, socialized medicine is the end game. Obamacare is designed to whittle away at the private insurance industry and supplant it with government overseen healthcare. Obamacare is the canary in the coal mine. It’s to begin to test just how much the American people are willing to give up to the government in regards to their healthcare. If it dies and the population is relieved about it then the democrats have a real problem on their hands. But if it dies and the American people have become dependent on it, then the next step is “we tried it the free market way and it failed..the capitalists failed, the conservatives failed…it’s time to try our ideas, government knows best..we care about you.. don’t be afraid..the governemt is taking over your will have all the healthcare you need for your entire life..the best and most ‘effective’ care as deemed by unelected government beaurocrats….at little or no expense to you”.
    Only the most truest of true believers among democrats actually believes Obamacare can afford itself Gonzo. The ones that designed it know it will go it’s meant to do. The whole law is a ponzi scheme and three card monty based on fuzzy math, phantom cuts and rosier than rosy expectations.

  • April 22, 2014 at 2:18pm

    Slayer…democrats like Reid and Schumer have openly stated that the end goal is “single payer coverage”…socialized medicine in the style of the Europeans (along with all it’s rationing, means testing. poor quality and eugenics). Obamacare is meant to be the “democrats always cared about you” waiver when Obamacare becomes insolvent. It is certain to become insolvent as more people are demanding the subsidies and “free” coverage than are actually paying for the subsidies and “free” coverage. This is the stuff of Bernie Madoff only Americans don’t have a choice like investors did with him..they’re being forced into the Obamacare ponzi scheme whether they like it or not. When it goes bankrupt the democrats will say “we tried it the free market way..we tried it the republican doesn’t’s time to try it our way because we’ve shown we’re willing to do it their way and we care more about you..just trust us”.
    This law is one of the most cynical and cruelest tricks played on the American people in this nation’s history.
    You’re right…the mutants on medicaid don’t give a damn whether it can be paid for or not. The irony of course is that they’ll be the first to cry foul when it all falls apart.
    It’s classic Clowerd-Piven Slayer…overload the system to collapse it, then supplant it with the preferred socialist agenda. Obama taught Clowerd-Piven to his footsoldiers as a community organizer.

  • April 22, 2014 at 2:02pm

    I think it’s safe to say at this point that Obama’s critics were right after the “7.5 million enrolled” number was heralded across the land. Up until that time Obama and Sebelius were reluctant to give specifics then all of a sudden..a nice, tidy and attractive “7.5 million enrolled” gets trumpeted right at the end of the fuzzy enrollment expiry date. The critics said it was important to look at the numbers behind the “7.5 million” being heralded by Obama. Sure enough..Obama’s braying 35% youth enrollment (because it’s close to the 40% new youth enrollees he needed to attempt to keep Obamacare above water) when in fact…only 28% youth have enrolled and the balance of his 35% are under 18 years old and not paying at all.
    Knowing all this…it’s safe to say that it will become clear that in the 7.5 million number many haven’t paid the first premium (or can continue to pay afterwards), many already qualified for Medicaid and too many are getting subsidies thus making Obamacare certain to face insolvency.
    What Obama and the democrats want to do is make Americans dependent on Obamacare before it’s declared bankrupt. To do this they must keep it on life support (with lies, fudged numbers and media help) long enough for more people to enter into it. This shoe will drop when the employer mandate comes into effect and millions get thrown off their employer coverage and herded into the exchanges. At that stage people will be afraid to repeal alway

    Responses (4) +
  • April 22, 2014 at 1:42pm

    The important thing is that Americans now pay for more coverage than they want or need because they were thrown off the plans they wanted or needed. This is so that people who already qualified for Medicaid could apply for Medicaid and for people who aren’t paying into the system to continue not paying into the system. These people vary in number from 45 million to 30 million depending on what day you asked Barack Obama.

    Responses (4) +
  • April 22, 2014 at 1:26pm

    I stand corrected Gonzo. You are correct, female liberals are a protected class, female conservatives are to be scorned, mocked and vilified.

  • April 22, 2014 at 1:16pm

    In the American Left’s order of rank, being black is higher than being female. Hence..Barack Hussein Obama II is of higher priority than Hillary Rodham Clinton I.

    Responses (6) +
  • April 22, 2014 at 1:14pm

    Mr Fallon…thehigh priests of the American left are in the process of preparing and annointing Hillary Clinton for her ascension to the throne after Barack Hussein Obama II abdicates (curse that constitution) and ascends to his place at the right hand of Gaia. Part of this preparation is to make Hillary appear credible. Also…the “war on women” will be prosecuted again. She is to become sacrosanct and beyond ridicule and criticsm (in the same way Barack Hussein Obama II was) as a means to protect her from the barbarians on the right and to make the low information people believe she is more than she is. Mr Fallon…Hillary Clinton from this point forth is not to be mocked or ridiculed until such time as she safely sits on the throne of power.

    So let it be let it be done.

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go