I hope you’re being sarcastic
edit: Nah, I'm pretty sure you're not serious.
But yes, if you have firearms in the house, you must teach your kids about them, just like you teach your kids not to touch the stove or play with the lawnmower or eat/drink random objects.
AK 47s go under their pillow.
Teach your damn kids that guns aren't toys, these kids were probably never exposed to a firearm in their life.
May 5, 2016 at 10:46am
@ cammojunkie. Yes I can give my answer without considering the divinity of Jesus. Man changed the tenets to his own accord. Some changes were made by men who really believed their interpretation of the KJB was better than the Catholics, others made the change to justify their behavior , and other man changed it from greed and lust for power. People rather take the religion by their geography,parents and culture.
 May 5, 2016 at 9:11am
well which branch of the church did you pick? This once again shows the weakened church as it continues to splinters and divide causing the social influence to drain from it like a crucified man’s blood. Atheist could never hope to harm the Christian church as much as its own members have.
I belong to no denomination or cult claiming to be Christian. Denominations are mans doing not Gods.
I am a non denomination futurist fundamentalist Christian
 May 5, 2016 at 8:54am
The Jews did not accept any of the people claiming to be a messiahs and Christians have rejected many of them also. Maybe Jesus came and was rejected and went home. I should start my own church on that premise.
May 5, 2016 at 8:28am
This just helps my point that the division in the church is what weakens it. This poll is WITHIN the Protestant so it does not consider Catholics or Orthodox churches.
Seems like God's word would be plain and simple since most of us human beings are plain and simple.
 May 5, 2016 at 7:32am
some should make a movie about a Muslim vampire. In stead of a cross hanging around there necks they could have bacon.
 May 4, 2016 at 5:58pm
The Christian churches are shattered! Just the fact that they have to list a bunch of different denominations should explain that fact. Catholics say this, Protestants sat that, Baptist say the other. this is where the power of the church has been lost. Not atheist attacking or devil worshipers undermining the church, but a division between the churches. Being gay is okay in one, no it is not in the other. If Christians want to regain some social power they better unite back into
Common sense dictates that only one can be right. Particularly , Jesus said that He was going to build one church,His church, not many churches, Matthew 16:18 "And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church". So how do we find that church? Hmm? Wouldn't that church be 2000 years old? Yes, because Jesus founded it 2000 years ago. And wouldn't that church know that it's own history being 2000 years old ? Yes the catholic church has that history. For example the book Faith of the Early Fathers: by William A. Jurgens studies the historical fact of that early church.
Thus the true church is not scatter.
 May 4, 2016 at 4:18pm
The hard part was inventing the crock-a-gram.
 May 4, 2016 at 3:36pm
Ca ching!! ca Ching!! That is what the victim class hears when they FEEL mistreated. Sue… Sue… Sue. It for the principal not the money. Right? Then sue for a dollar. , if I owned the place, would say I add pork to my coffee.. Then I would hang a wild boar’s head on the wall. If I owned a bakery I would say I give a dollar from every item to a anti gay organization. Get smart people. Use they laws against them the way they will use them against you. Fight fire with fire.
Mine is any president gets to pick. The SCOTUS is the most enduring piece of the office. We get law makers on the bench..oh and screwed over..
 May 4, 2016 at 1:58pm
Why ask just liberals? seems to me that both sides share the same views. This huge Gov did not just spring up over night. Bush started the spree with two wars and Obama continued them. No I am not Blaming Bush, I blame all of them since Reagan. Too many people try to blame one side while both are the cause.
you think the economy is more important than innocent babies being shred in their mothers wombs, brutally murdered and thrown in the garbage or sold for parts? those lives must be answered for…judgement is coming
I get your point, but at the same time, one wouldn't want to say "who cares that Hitler is tossing Jews into ovens, at least he's saving the country." From the pro-life point of view, the execution of millions of people isn't something that can just be brushed aside.
Or, one who can coax you out of that basement.
eda, the worse the economy is, the more abortions there will be. Life is complex.
Bathrazor, the Jews who were tortured and murdered were alive, walking, talking, thinking, feeling people who wanted to stay alive. An embryo is none of those things.
Maggie is an evil sociopath.
"Bathrazor, the Jews who were tortured and murdered were alive, walking, talking, thinking, feeling people who wanted to stay alive. An embryo is none of those things."
Your injecting your own opinions in that. The nazis would have contended that Jews weren't people. Moreover, by every definition an unborn child is alive. It consumes nutrients, uses the energy to function and grow, and gives off waste.
Besides, by your argument, a coma patient is no more a person than a fetus. They don't walk, talk, think, feel, and are only kept alive by others. Yet to abort a coma patient is murder.
Life if complex, if given the chance. Unfortunately the aborted never live to find out, or the possibility of making a difference for others.
Maggs, abortion is a means to an end.
 May 4, 2016 at 12:56pm
Why not an atheist? We have had plenty of Christian hypocrites. Jimmy Carter (one of the worst presidents ever) was the only prez who at least tried to be a Christian.
Microcosm. If the bus was filled predominantly with blacks wouldn't that make them, in that instant, the majority?
No, the definition of racism has nothing to do with majorities and minorities. It is the presumption that one race is superior to another.
However, Liberals claim that only white people can be racist, which I feel is a racist comment in and of its own.
That's just a definition the liberal ivy-league intellectuals concocted so as to be able to claim that black people can't ever be racist. Anyone who buys into that nonsense if a fool. Ever hear of apartheid?
And like Exrepublicsheep points out, "majority" and "minority" are subjective terms. A white kid in an all black school would be the minority, even if nationally whites are a majority. So even if you buy into the twisted logic of the liberal elites, their theory, like most liberal theories, breaks down the instant it hits reality.
1. A belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human racial groups determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to dominate others or that a particular racial group is inferior to the others.
2. Hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.
Where in all of this is there any mention of majorities? These women clearly, as demonstrated by their actions, hate whites and attempted to hurt them based solely upon the basis of race. They are the very definition of racist. Took me all of 30 seconds to look up the definition. You should try it sometime.
thatsa legalistic definition defined by racist progressives, not a scientific term. racism isnt dependent on any such limitations, thats just to make phony law suits easier to prosecute by the progressive cretans that invented the laws.