User Profile: 00100111


Member Since: August 10, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • July 25, 2013 at 3:51pm

    I don’t know why Glenn thinks she’s a conservative, she’s just as much a big govt statist as Obama is. The fact she is on the “right” makes no difference. Big govt is big govt regardless of ideology. If a boot is crushing your throat, does it matter if it is a right boot or left boot?

  • July 25, 2013 at 3:45pm

    Chucky and Jean, you wanna know why they couldn’t prove it? Hint: You can’t prove something that didn’t happen.

  • July 25, 2013 at 3:43pm

    That’s a lot of derp for such a small girl.

  • July 25, 2013 at 2:10pm

    Considering the idea of the left is to turn all citizens into slaves, eventually even print will be gone. We’ll just be required to “make our mark”. No reading, no writing, just believe what the govt tells you something says, and just make your mark.

  • July 25, 2013 at 11:05am

    I guarantee you they’ve already had their lives threatened by Obama and his ilk.

  • July 25, 2013 at 11:03am

    Translation: “Obama has already threatened their lives.”

  • July 25, 2013 at 11:02am

    Oops, libs. Funny when your own laws bite you in the butt.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 25, 2013 at 10:58am

    Reply from Texas: “We will not be complying, Eric. Come do something about it. We dare you.”

  • July 24, 2013 at 12:49pm

    Is it a mandatory liberal socialist uniform standard they all have to wear those totally gay thick rimmed glasses? There’s a reason they’re called Birth Control Glasses.

    Underneath he’s got his skinny jeans, his skinny fitted shirt, birkenstocks on his feet, and he’s waiting to put his wool cap back on after he leaves the studio.

    This is why there’s no such thing as liberal men. Males, perhaps (questionable), but no men. None at all.

  • July 24, 2013 at 12:46pm

    Nope, still won’t get my service.

    Responses (8) +
  • July 24, 2013 at 9:34am

    Translated: “They’ve already received death threats accusing them of staging the accident.”

  • [2] July 24, 2013 at 9:30am

    Snow, won’t happen. Many other states have even more permissive carry laws. We have precedence, he doesn’t.

  • July 24, 2013 at 9:28am

    This isn’t “guns in bars”. That’s a media frenzy term. This means I can carry in Chili’s, Outback Steakhouse, Red Lobster, etc. North Carolina does not have “bars”, per say. To be a “bar” you have to be a private club, and those could allow carry. Here, legally, even what would be a bar anywhere else is still a restaurant here. There is no legal distinction, therefor that is why they couldn’t differentiate between carrying in Ruth’s Chris vs a bar. Either way, doesn’t matter. Owners and operators can still post against carry in their establishment.

  • July 24, 2013 at 9:23am

    ROT, no permit required by sheriff means NICS check at point of sale.

  • July 24, 2013 at 9:20am

    The Blaze needs to do more research. “The final bill dropped a controversial provision that would have repealed the long-standing law requiring a background check and permit issued by county sheriffs for handgun purchases.” The Pistol Purchase Permit is a Jim Crow law designed to keep blacks from buying guns, and liberal democrat sheriffs still use it for that largely today. It needs to be repealed. We will repeal it eventually. The provision to repeal it would not have undone background checks, merely take away the “asking permission from the sheriff”. There would have been a NICS check at the time of purchase which was more accurate, as before people could have a permit, commit a felony and still use a permit that had already been issued. At least they strengthened a bit though. They didn’t repeal it, but they required sheriffs to revoke permits from those who commit crimes, before they’d not do so. Also, the PPP is now shall issue instead of may issue. Many sheriffs were denying applicants for reasons that were not state or federally disqualifying. Things like “voting for the other guy” would get people denied in liberal democrat havens like Mecklenburg and Durham. Now if they deny you, they have to cite the exact law showing why. Along with it, sheriffs can no longer limit the number of permits you get in a year.

    The rest of the law is great though. Covers much more than listed here in the article.

  • July 23, 2013 at 2:08pm

    Yup, liberals are very hateful and vitriolic. It is good to not see their ilk around. :)

  • July 23, 2013 at 1:35pm

    The 1st amendment is protected by the 2nd amendment.

  • July 23, 2013 at 1:34pm

    So, Mod, you admit you can’t read?

  • July 23, 2013 at 1:33pm

    I see you typed something, but the only thing that posted was “derp derp derp derp derp derp derp derp derp” Please try again.

  • July 23, 2013 at 1:32pm

    But it doesn’t stop there. Their end goal is to destroy religion, to destroy the institution of marriage by forcing churches to go against their beliefs and perform, recognize and accept gay marriage. It isn’t just “live and let live” with liberals. If it were, we’d be done with this conversation. They want to destroy and shut down any church that won’t do it. They’re on record as saying they want the institution of marriage to be completely gone. Do not deny this, we see right through it.

123 To page: Go