User Profile: Ballot_Box_Revolution

Ballot_Box_Revolution

Member Since: August 21, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [22] August 27, 2014 at 8:25pm

    wow a 40 year career inside a woman’s room…Wonder if she ever got tired of him?

    Responses (3) +
  • August 26, 2014 at 8:09am

    OK so lets say it is unconstitutional to ban Gay marriage….I can agree with that. However it is also unconstitutional for “the state” to punish churches for not accommodating gay marriage…

    Alll we did by letting “the state” …”protect the sanctity of marriage” was destroy the sanctity all together. State approved marriage has nothing to do with God anyways. In my opinion by going through the process of being “allowed” to marry in the form of licences, and the final approval by documents signed, is putting “the State” above God, and therefore all State approved marriages are not being married under God but under the state…

    God is nothing more than a Figure Head…..”the state” should have nothing to do with marriage No taxing or subsidizing of it. All it does is create this environment that we are in. This is why marriages do not last…it is nothing more than politics, and finances…

    Responses (6) +
  • August 24, 2014 at 12:53pm

    I don’t believe any of what comes out of either side either, but lets just say for instance that we had a plane in their airspace, I think they have every right to intercept, the same as if they had planes in our airspace…we would expect it…

    The problem is, I can’t trust any side, so I will not jump on a war band wagon….To me that seems to be the case here. They need the backing of war by its people….The best thing the people can do is disregard, our governments stupid actions…grieve the loss, but understand it is because government is dumb…

  • [1] August 22, 2014 at 1:14pm

    OK so lets say it is unconstitutional to ban Gay marriage….I can agree with that. However it is also unconstitutional for “the state” to punish churches for not accommodating gay marriage…

    Alll we did by letting “the state” …”protect the sanctity of marriage” was destroy the sanctity all together. State approved marriage has nothing to do with God anyways. In my opinion by going through the process of being “allowed” to marry in the form of licences, and the final approval by documents signed, is putting “the State” above God, and therefore all State approved marriages are not being married under God but under the state…

    God is nothing more than a Figure Head…..”the state” should have nothing to do with marriage No taxing or subsidizing of it. All it does is create this environment that we are in. This is why marriages do not last…it is nothing more than politics, and finances…

  • [10] August 22, 2014 at 12:08am

    “they are tremendously well funded.”

    by us

    Responses (1) +
  • [66] August 21, 2014 at 9:48pm

    Yeah all mike did was Punch him in the face hard enough to make his face swell up….What the heck? That cop had no reason, to think he might do anything else….

    /sarcasm

    I still think it should have ended in the store….by letting the cops handle it, it did nothing but cause a media frenzy…

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] August 20, 2014 at 6:14am

    I wasn’t aware of why people were doing this, I just thought it was people trying to get internet attention….My awareness came when I read the Headline on the blaze…

  • [25] August 19, 2014 at 8:00am

    If this had happened to me, I could hear my Grandfather saying….Boy I am going to miss you, and I do love you, but you should have known better than to go into someone’s store and steal their stuff…

    Lessons not taught these days…

  • [56] August 19, 2014 at 7:57am

    I have no dog in this fight (or race if we are being PC) The store owner should have shot him (Mike) when he was being pushed around inside his own store and his property being stolen as if Mike was owed some kind of respect.

    I find it funny when those protesters were singing those hymns, and sad songs as if someone of importance lost their life for no good reason. It should have ended inside the store…that is where I stand on all this….

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] August 18, 2014 at 7:02pm

    Here’s an idea….Dont jump on any party band wagon…All of them are corrupt in their own ways…Political parties are a collectivist idea…Around the age of 20 I was a Democrat…Dont ask me why it was the cool thing to be I guess….I started listening to Rush because i wanted to hear it live, him being a racist and all the stuff I heard about him…I failed to ever find him being racist and i found that he made a lot of sense….I became, and registered as a Republican…I was die hard republican for a long time, until a few years ago…I found out they are no better…..I started to become Libertarian, and this did not last long…..I agree with almost all of the Libertarian views, however I found out you would be shunned by most of them if you did not fit into their little box…So I gave up on all parties…everything organized becomes corrupt…this is a sad fact….Lets just be people…collectivism destroys everything….

  • [2] August 18, 2014 at 6:50pm

    “Don’t ever doubt him”….Now… you see, that is why we are where we are. I don’t care how much I agree with anyone….I will always doubt, and find out..>We need to stop putting so much trust in figure heads….I cant think of anyone, that I trust so much…I would say I trust Glenn Beck s pretty good deal…although I dont agree with him as often as I would like…I believe that he believes what he is saying…

  • [1] August 17, 2014 at 8:24pm

    oh yeah…my user name is from years ago when i made this account, and it goes against what i just said, but i have become wiser since then…

  • [1] August 17, 2014 at 8:22pm

    I am not an Anarchist, but very close…My idea would be that there is a document…Very similar to our Constitution that lays out the rules…I believe the first ten amendments would do fine, the ones that define Liberty anyways…however there does have to be a body that enforces these rules that protect Liberty, from those foreign and domestic.

    The problem i have with Anarchy is we would become very clanish, and those who have the bigger clans would prevail and take control. So these rules that protect our liberties have to have a body to enforce some clan from infringing on the Liberty of another clan…..This body would not have any power over the people, or use force unless this is happening….For example if some clan is going around in tanks, (because yes i say they should be allowed to have tanks) trying to control others then this body steps in…This body is not there to make rules, and it is not a body that, will be allowed to give itself any more power…..something like that anyways….needs some ironing out….lol

  • [1] August 17, 2014 at 11:59am

    I guess what i am trying to say is…or at least a part of what i am trying to say is…They were hoping things would get way out of control when there was no police intervention, so they could deliver that message…

  • [4] August 17, 2014 at 11:53am

    The reasoning is, they want people to fear liberty. A lot like that movie The Purge…The message being this is what Liberty looks like. And what better way to have this message delivered? By a group of people (and no i dont mean blacks) who do not understand the concept of Liberty…They were probably hoping things would be a lot worse than they were…

    Responses (1) +
  • [7] August 10, 2014 at 8:20pm

    I imagine Stewart was trying to “rooster tail” some dirt at him or something along those lines, and it failed…This is just what I imagine…I could see it happening with people I know….I don’t think it was intentional hit, and I dont think that there is anything wrong with trying to throw dirt at him, but know that you could hurt someone if you mess up…and if you do mess up you need to take responsibility for it.

    On the other hand it was just as dumb a decision to get out of the car and run into the middle of the track…They both made poor choices, but dont punish everyone for the mistakes of a few….

  • August 9, 2014 at 9:34am

    yes symbolically there was a message….But I don’t think it effected those that don’t care, or those that have already chosen a side.

    I’m not saying it was a bad thing. I am just saying i don’t think it changed anyone’s minds..

  • [-3] August 8, 2014 at 8:19pm

    I believe the right side got the upper hand here….but in all honesty nothing productive was said by either side…

    Responses (5) +
  • June 19, 2014 at 10:02am

    Obviously we are not able to pass any new bills, or resolutions going forward. When things like this happen, isn’t it obvious that no one is voting based on anything other than what lobbyists, or party leaders tell them to? And if you are going to vote out of boredom, and ignorance, vote nay…..

    How difficult would it be (on the federal level) to stop all future passage of laws, seeing that none of them for the past who knows how many years are not legit stances by the people who voted on them? What should be done before we go any further is, take the bills that have been passed over the last 50 years or so, review them, and re-vote on them. We would have to ban lobbying first though…or else that is 50 years of lobbying repeating itself….congress would love that…We would also need to get people in there that understand what our government is supposed to do, and not supposed to do.

  • July 21, 2013 at 5:57pm

    You disgust me JOHN….Thinking about that ballot i did in your name makes me want to cut off my hands or something…..gah…

    Abandon your party wagons people!!!

123 To page: Go