User Profile: Balthazor

Balthazor

Member Since: March 04, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [2] September 26, 2016 at 1:29pm

    “…dopey Mark Cuban…”

    Trump definitely has an amusing way with words.

  • September 22, 2016 at 11:23am

    I see you’re still clinging to that stupid “Putin’s Puppet” meme. It’s starting to sound more than a bit worn out and desperate now.

    Also, it’s worth pointing out that you too are a Blaze poster.

  • [47] September 22, 2016 at 10:33am

    I can’t wait until the next time the cops shoot a white guy so I can go loot a Walmart and get free stuff!

    Responses (8) +
  • [34] September 22, 2016 at 2:29am

    Obama sure has done wonders for race relations in this country.

    Responses (1) +
  • [98] September 22, 2016 at 12:43am

    How ironic for her to be complaining about someone making a fabricated story. BLM lives on fabricated stories.

  • [13] September 20, 2016 at 1:48pm

    @zapparules – one more thing, I noticed you said the “health” of the mother, rather than the life of the mother. That’s a nifty little rhetorical device that the pro-abortion left started using a while back, just like when they changed “global warming” to “climate change.” Every pregnancy threatens the “health” of the mother. Morning sickness, for example. It’s hard to see yourself as healthy when you’re tossing cookies every morning. I’m not saying this is the case with you, but people saying “health” of the mother is another way to pretend to only support certain abortions when in fact they actually support them all.

  • [35] September 20, 2016 at 1:43pm

    Just a few decades ago Klinger put on a dress to get out of the army. These days he’d put on a dress to get a promotion.

  • [7] September 20, 2016 at 1:38pm

    @zapparules – but now I’ll ask you a question: do you support state-enforced child support? See, there’s a double-standard in society wherein if a woman gets pregnant and decides she isn’t ready for a child or can’t afford a child or simply doesn’t want a child, she has the “right to choose” to abort the child. She gets a parental mulligan, a get out of parenthood free card. Yet if a man fathers a child and he decides he’s not ready for a child or can’t afford a child or simply doesn’t want a child, the state says “tough luck bub” and it’s either pay up, or go to prison.

    So men are expected to take responsibility for the children they create, enforced by the state on threat of imprisonment. But women, hell we can’t expect them to take responsibility, and we’re told it’s none of the state’s business. What BS. So long as abortion is legal, state-enforced child support should not be. My wallet, my choice.

    Or, if the state can force men to take responsibility for the children they create and toss them in prison if they don’t, then the same should apply to women. Equality, after all.

  • [12] September 20, 2016 at 1:32pm

    @zapparules – first of all, this comparison to the death penalty is silly and everybody knows it. I don’t call myself “pro-life” because I think it’s a silly term, one which opens the door to stupid comparisons, such as to the death penalty. I prefer to call myself anti-abortion. Much more accurate, I think. But more to the point, if I supported the death penalty I would do so openly and proudly. I wouldn’t hide behind some equivocation to pretend like I don’t support something when I actually do.

    Now as far as abortion, I’m not opposed to ALL abortion. I think abortion is the taking of a human life, and there are circumstances in which taking a human life is ok. Self-defense, for example. If someone is going to kill you, you have every right to take them out. As such, if there’s ample reason to believe that a pregnancy is going to threaten the mother’s life, then I’m ok with an abortion in that circumstance, because it looks like self-defense to me. I wouldn’t begrudge any woman getting an abortion to save her own life.

    Rape and incest seem like weak excuses to me, since the child isn’t responsible for the circumstances of their conception, but at the same time since rape and incest account for all of about 1% or 2% of abortions, it’s a strawman argument anyhow. The millions of abortions aren’t rape victims, they’re selfish evil ghouls who refuse to accept responsibility for their actions. And they should be sent to prison.

  • [1] September 20, 2016 at 1:12pm

    I am Jack’s complete lack of surprise.

  • [11] September 20, 2016 at 1:06pm

    I guess it’s a sign of the times that silly Twitter battles are considered news.

    Responses (2) +
  • [16] September 20, 2016 at 11:07am

    “There IS a difference between beimg.pro-abortion and supporting a rigjt to choose”

    No, not really. You’re just splitting hairs to make yourself feel better. If you support a right to choose, then you support legalized abortion. It’s just that simple. What you’re saying would be akin to saying “I don’t condone slavery, but I support people’s right to have slaves.” It’s nonsense. It’s a way to support something that you know is awful while exempting yourself from any moral responsibility for supporting something awful.

  • [2] September 20, 2016 at 10:58am

    Liberals really don’t understand how analogy works, do they?

    They’re just trying to turn this into Trump’s “basket of deplorables” moment. Too bad for them it’s not going to work.

  • [75] September 16, 2016 at 7:58pm

    Liberals: fighting for the right of men to have babies, fighting for the right of women to not have babies.

    Responses (1) +
  • [8] September 16, 2016 at 7:23pm

    Ah, the good old “I’m rubber you’re glue” retort. What brilliance do you have in store for us next, the “my dad can beat up your dad” rebuttal?

  • [23] September 16, 2016 at 7:11pm

    What charity, the Clinton Foundation?

    Responses (1) +
  • [21] September 16, 2016 at 7:10pm

    Worst haiku ever.

    Responses (1) +
  • [153] September 16, 2016 at 6:56pm

    I’ll defer to Monty Python on this one:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFBOQzSk14c

    Francis: Why are you always on about women, Stan?
    Stan: I want to be one.
    Reg: What?
    Stan: I want to be a woman. From now on I want you all to call me Loretta.
    Reg: What!?
    Stan: It’s my right as a man.
    Judith: Why do you want to be Loretta, Stan?
    Stan: I want to have babies.
    Reg: You want to have babies?!?!?!
    Stan: It’s every man’s right to have babies if he wants them.
    Reg: But you can’t have babies.
    Stan: Don’t you oppress me.
    Reg: I’m not oppressing you, Stan — you haven’t got a womb. Where’s the fetus going to gestate? You going to keep it in a box?
    Judith: Here! I’ve got an idea. Suppose you agree that he can’t actually have babies, not having a womb, which is nobody’s fault, not even the Romans’, but that he can have the *right* to have babies.
    Francis: Good idea, Judith. We shall fight the oppressors for your right to have babies, brother. Sister, sorry.
    Reg: What’s the point?
    Francis: What?
    Reg: What’s the point of fighting for his right to have babies, when he can’t have babies?
    Francis: It is symbolic of our struggle against oppression.
    Reg: It’s symbolic of his struggle against reality.

    Responses (7) +
  • [13] September 16, 2016 at 6:51pm

    To be taken seriously by liberals is easy: just loudly proclaim the most idiotic, nonsensical thing that enters your mind. Luckily, being taken seriously by liberals can be found nowhere on my to-do list.

    Responses (3) +
  • [26] September 16, 2016 at 4:34pm

    “and I read a lot of dumb things”

    You write a lot of dumb things too.

123 To page: Go