User Profile: Balthazor

Balthazor

Member Since: March 04, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • July 29, 2016 at 1:41pm

    Well you’re not entirely wrong about that. I, for one, hate what idiot liberals have done to my country and I’m damn angry about it.

    But this “Putin Puppet” thing is just blatantly and laughably moronic. Yet I’m sure you and your fellow drones will continue to regurgitate it ad nauseam until such time as the DNC issues you the next talking point update.

  • July 29, 2016 at 1:31pm

    If they did, they could support that position by pointing out that, despite the fact that Democrats have been treating black people like they’re incompetent idiots for decades now, black people keep voting for Democrats.

  • [4] July 29, 2016 at 1:26pm

    Good point. Somehow in crazy liberal-thought land, requiring an ID to vote is unconstitutional, but requiring an ID, background check, paperwork, fees, permits, and all kinds of bureaucratic nonsense to possess a firearm is not unconstitutional.

    Responses (2) +
  • [5] July 29, 2016 at 1:19pm

    This a thousand times over. These clowns have been promising revolution for how many decades now? Let’s get on with it already.

  • July 29, 2016 at 12:58pm

    “Wait until the debates, given his track record Trump is bound to say something incredibly stupid and lose whatever small number of independents he might have.”

    Except that every time Trump says something “stupid” his numbers go up.

  • [1] July 29, 2016 at 12:51pm

    That’s apparently going to be the liberal talking point for as long as they can milk it, that Trump is Putin’s puppet. At least until they can come up with some other stupid thing to say.

    “certainly, his populist, divisive rhetoric echoes Hitler and Mussolini”

    Are you talking about Obama now? Sure sounds like it.

    Responses (2) +
  • [15] July 28, 2016 at 1:37pm

    I agree, but it would be nice if that worked both ways. If they don’t want people freaking out over a picture of two men in bed, then they shouldn’t freak out when, for example, Paul Ryan posts a picture of interns that are all white. But it never seems to work out that way.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] July 27, 2016 at 5:15pm

    Is there some kind of mind control ray that tells you people what to think? Do you even know what “treason” means?

  • [3] July 27, 2016 at 2:33pm

    And today’s liberal talking point surfaces yet again. If the Russians already have the emails, which is what the FBI seems to think, then Trump isn’t encouraging anyone to do anything.

    Like I’ve said the last half dozen times this exact same nonsense was posted, if someone steals your property and you ask for it back, are you encouraging them to steal your property?

    Good grief people, use your brains. At least try.

  • [1] July 27, 2016 at 2:27pm

    I can answer that: it’s because we prefer to judge people based on their results and not just on their intentions.

    For example, liberals always want to be judged on their intentions. It doesn’t matter that liberal anti-poverty programs have failed utterly and, if anything, have caused more poverty. We’re not supposed to judge the results, we’re supposed to pat them on the back for simply wanting to end poverty. Or for that matter, there’s Hillary’s email. It doesn’t matter how many laws she broke, she didn’t intend to break them, so she’s good to go. We’d prefer to see her judged on the results rather than on the intentions.

    The same philosophy applies to attempted murder vs. murder, judge people based on their results rather than just on their intentions.

    Responses (1) +
  • [8] July 27, 2016 at 2:06pm

    And today’s liberal talking point surfaces yet again. If the Russians already have the emails, which is what the FBI seems to think, then Trump isn’t encouraging anyone to do anything.

    Like I’ve said the last half dozen times this exact same nonsense was posted, if someone steals your property and you ask for it back, are you encouraging them to steal your property?

    Good grief people, use your brains. At least try.

  • [16] July 27, 2016 at 2:03pm

    Oh please. The media is there to ask questions, not state opinions. If they’re injecting their opinions into the matter they should be told to be quiet.

  • [13] July 27, 2016 at 2:00pm

    Guess criminality runs in the family. I wonder if the Vicks had a father present.

    Responses (1) +
  • [7] July 27, 2016 at 1:55pm

    I guess this is going to be the liberal talking point.

    The Russians already stole the emails, which Hillary is likely responsible for. Asking the Russians to release the emails back to the US is not treason. Not unless you’re an idiot. If someone steals from you, and you ask for the stolen item back, does that make you a party to the theft? Clearly not.

    If anyone’s guilty of treason here it’s Hillary.

  • [31] July 27, 2016 at 1:51pm

    Let’s just skip the foreplay and jump right into the race war. It’s what they seem to want, so let’s get on with it already.

    Responses (3) +
  • [4] July 27, 2016 at 12:43pm

    jack_renollds, you’re either being deliberately obtuse, or you’re just an idiot.
    Suppose your neighbor steals your lawnmower. You ask for it back. Does that make you a criminal, asking that the thief returns your mower? It’s really not that complicated.

  • [21] July 26, 2016 at 7:28pm

    I agree. You never know with Trump, but in my experience “I’ll think about it” usually is a euphemism for “not gonna happen.”

    Responses (4) +
  • [8] July 26, 2016 at 3:24pm

    I’m sure glad the Blaze is here to cover these important stories.

    Responses (2) +
  • [13] July 25, 2016 at 6:55pm

    You’re conflating two different issues. One can be outraged (or not) at the criminal practices of these hackers, and yet also be outraged (or not) at the content of what was revealed by the hackers.

    Moreover, the inconsistency to which you refer goes both ways. The Democrats sure seem to be a whole lot more outraged over this particular leak than they were over the Bush leak.

  • [-2] July 22, 2016 at 4:54pm

    @Warhawk76 – no, I’m just speaking to reality. There’s zero chance of a 3rd party or write-in candidate winning this year. Just none. Not gonna happen. You can suck on that pipe much as you want, but the dream will never become reality. That being the case, I’d rather hold my nose and vote for a guy I don’t much like than to hand the presidency over to the most corrupt, dishonest, and criminal candidate who has ever run for that office. And to allow this criminal to achieve the presidency over the vanity of satisfying one’s conscience, well it just seems obnoxious to me. Yeah, who cares if a blatantly corrupt criminal ascends to the presidency, at least I’ll feel good about myself!

    Seriously, I think Hillary could blow someone’s head off and some people would say “meh, I’m still writing in Cruz.”

123 To page: Go