I bet deep inside, he was wanting to shove a K-Bar knife in Maher's throat to rid the world of another liberal POS.
The answer is in the article: Flynn is trying to sell his book, and TV appearances help push book sales. I'm a capitalist; I approve of him advertising to sell his book. Even if it means talking to Bill Maher.
 July 23, 2016 at 12:13pm
Hey Debbie, Donald Trump can’t hold a candle to Bill Clinton for being a sexist pig. Bill would bed you down if he had the opportunity.
bank: I catch your drift. There was a guy in Fort Lauderdale that got his head caught between closing the door and a floor. His head came off and rolled down the hall but his body was delivered to the next stop. That made for more than small talk at the water cooler about Oprah's new book, "Harpo Speaks."
 July 19, 2016 at 5:13pm
Who cares? At least Melania meant what she said when she said she loves America. Remember when Michelle was ashamed of America. No doubt, she still is.
If you look around a little bit they are slowly turning "the real world" into their world. Pretty soon employers will be apologizing to employees for not giving them the pats on the back they want and then letting them decide what their wage should be.
 July 19, 2016 at 11:45am
Chris, she was the perfect person to speak to point out what a liar and crook Hillary Rodham Clinton was, is and will always be.
 July 19, 2016 at 11:43am
This racist dude needs to change his name to Manure $hithead.
 July 19, 2016 at 11:42am
So what? At least Malenia meant what she said when she said she loves America. Michelle, not so much.
So she meant what she said about honesty, integrity and hard work, by stealing said words from someone else?
There's no downplaying this. So far, we have her saying she wrote the speech herself, then Trump's campaign saying she worked with a team of writers, then the campaign denying that it was plagiarized, to then saying only a small portion was used/copied, to then the RNC saying the speech writer concerned should be fired. I mean, which is it? She either wrote it or she did not. If she did not, why did she say she wrote it herself? If she did write it, why is his campaign saying that she did not? If she did not plagiarize as his campaign first advised, why then immediately change and say she only copied a small portion of her speech? If she wrote it herself, why is the RNC Chairman saying that the speech writer involved in this debacle should be fired?
It's like the lie, upon the lie, upon the lie.
Then of course comes the fact that she just advised that she shares the same ideals as the wife of the man, Trump has virtually declared is the great satan..
You can't even call it ironic. Moronic maybe, yes, but even that doesn't do what this shamble of her speech is, justice. They should have acknowledged who said those words, gave credit in the speech itself and moved on. No one would have said anything then and her husband's campaign would not now be throwing her under a bus by saying she didn't write her own speech as she claimed she did.
I don't think anyone is questioning her love for America, but if that love is so genuine, you would think she would have prepared a speech that was at least authentic.
Fact of the matter is, whoever her speech writers were, knew this language and this speech had already been rave reviewed.
Plagiarism at this level? Not only is it dumb, it makes her look fake. Like I've been saying, it's Trump's biggest problem....authenticity.