He does. I would not like to stand too close to any of these progressives on judgment day. There abe shrapnel
May 11, 2015 at 5:50pm
They won’t stop there.
 May 11, 2015 at 5:50pm
It’s all about the money.
Did you know the average cost of adopting a child within the United States is $40,000?
Perhaps more gays adopt because they can afford to.
 May 11, 2015 at 5:48pm
Are you daft?!
It cost us almost $40,000 to adopt our child here in the United States!
We could have done it for hundreds if we were willing to go outside the country.
THAT is what is wrong with the adoption process in America. The exhorbitant cost!
[-2] May 6, 2015 at 5:07pm
A man believing he is a woman doesn’t make it real either. It’s just sad, you know?
[-1] May 6, 2015 at 5:05pm
To God, actions speak louder than words. Getting someone who is mentally deluded the treatment they need to deal with their delusion, THAT act is worth a thousand words.
 May 6, 2015 at 5:01pm
Neither one of them said Bruce himself was a mistake. They said what he is doing to himself is a mistake.
 May 6, 2015 at 4:14pm
Can we please just call this “transgenderism” what it truly is?
Just two years ago, the Gaystapo forced this specific form of schizophrenia to be re-classified as “normal”, but for all intents and purposes, they are still and forever will be schizophrenics who need a lifetime of treatment rather than enabling.
Transgenderism has never been symptomatic of Schizophrenia
They make a distinction between transsexualism and schizophrenia because both may claim they were born in the wrong body but schizophrenics receiving the surgery have very poor outcomes. This was known over 30 years ago. Schizophrenia can be treated with drugs that control the chemical balance in the brain. These drugs don't work with transexuals.
Please learn something about these subjects before posting such a falsehood.
May 6, 2015 at 4:07pm
That’s not true at all. Blaming God for bad things that happen to them leads them to believe He doesn’t exist at all, after all, why would God allow bad things to happen?
 May 4, 2015 at 12:34pm
niki – You’re not factoring in the cost of living in any of those places. Sure, they may be at the national poverty rate, but locally, they are more likely living as middle class because the cost of living is a lot lower than it is in Leftist states.
 April 30, 2015 at 2:55pm
tmarends – He didn’t eat with them at a brothel or at an event which was promoting thievery.
That’s the elementary difference.
Jesus would absolutely not have gone into a brothel. It would have destroyed any credibility He had as a rabbi.
 April 30, 2015 at 2:52pm
I disagree. After all, if it were just as simple as baking a cake, pretty much anyone could do that on their own.
No, this is about cake DECORATIONS which is an art form. If a Christian is asked to use their skills to support a private event which goes against their conscience, it’s no different than asking a t-shirt printer to print a t-shirt with messages he finds against his conscience. They are both artists and provide a service that is unique and not one that everyone needs.
 April 30, 2015 at 2:44pm
That’s a funny question coming from someone with the name “Destroyer of Civilizations”.
Marriage for all eternity was designed as an institution for maintaining the nuclear family unit for the purpose of procreation and propagation of civil society and for the purpose of protecting the rights of women and children.
Anyone who wants to destroy this millennia-old institution also wants to destroy civil society and end the protection of rights for women and children.
April 30, 2015 at 2:37pm
Mizurax is correct. Serving on an individual level is one thing, but serving for a private event is an entirely different matter. Since private events can be used to promote all sorts of political ideologies, no one should be forced to provide services for those events.
It would be the same as forcing a gay artist to paint a sign that says being gay is wrong. If he does it willingly, that’s one thing, but to use the force of government, that’s unconstitutional and a clear violation of the First Amendment.
April 30, 2015 at 1:39pm
What privileges exist that come from being white? As Matt has pointed out in other blog posts, the true privilege in America belongs to the minorities. They have it made. They can literally get away with completely destroying their own cities. If that isn’t privilege, I’m not sure what is.
[-1] April 30, 2015 at 1:35pm
I believe you mean self-imposed racism and segregation. They choose to have their own culture, language, and community with their own black-only groups. This is the choice they made themselves. It was not institutionalized.
April 29, 2015 at 2:41pm
It should be returned to the traditional definition which referred strictly to anal sex, and then it should be outlawed. Anal sex spreads deadly diseases and always has, hence the reason it was outlawed by every civil society known to man.
 April 29, 2015 at 2:31pm
Because such thing already exists in all 50 states. Two people can already enter into a legal contract that gives them a dual partnership.
That’s not what this is about. It’s about literally destroying the traditional definition of marriage as it has existed for millennia and destroying religious liberty in the process.
No, it's about allowing for more loving consensual couples to be included in the institution of marriage. Something we should all celebrate
You are spot on correct.
April 29, 2015 at 2:20pm
Following your logic, all criteria to apply for any government benefits must be abolished since showing favor over one group (such as the poor or members of the Military) is not treating every American equally under the 14th Amendment.
 April 29, 2015 at 2:18pm
Isn’t it ironic that they wanted the same “benefits” yet discovered there weren’t any.