@getoffmylawncommies – I agree that Walker would be so, so much better than what we have now or could have in Hillary, BUT I absolutely disagree that Cruz and Paul push people away from the GOP.
One could make a good argument that either of them have actually drawn ALOT of people either to or back to the Republican party.
The only people I see calling Rand Paul “crazy” are establishment GOP’ers who fear loosing power and rank and file republicans who have not taken the time to actually see what he has said or believes.
Now, having said that, I will happily vote for Cruz or Paul or Walker and will ignore the crowd who are gonna cry that “their candidate is the ONLY true patriot” running.
 April 19, 2015 at 9:32am
Except that Israel has never, even once attempted to do so. On the other hand they have had to survive and fight off numerous missile attacks from Syria and Hamas and deal with an Iran that has said many times that they wish to remove Israel from the map.
Your argument is a straw man argument … deal with the facts.
 April 19, 2015 at 9:17am
James 1:27: Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.
Sooo.. the CHRISTIANS wanna live(?) in ISALMO/FASCSISTVILLE...it'sa THEIR LAWS in THEIR COUNTRY. Donna like it---MOOVE!! OFCOURSE, They donna have E.WITHOLDER so's they INFORCE all their own laws!!
 April 17, 2015 at 7:48pm
I’ve got 3 children and have never asked or even suggested that anyone get them anything for their birthday.
Teach you children to give gifts on their birthday and for Christmas. You will be glad when they are grown and are kind and giving human beings rather than self-centered jerks who want everyone to do for them.
 April 17, 2015 at 7:36pm
And when an uninformed electorate elects communist thugs?????
 April 17, 2015 at 7:34pm
This is how the “Death Panels” get started …
This story is sad on so many levels.
 April 10, 2015 at 1:48pm
Still though, this is just wrong … “you were sent the notice by mistake … you can keep the flag in place as long as you wish” …
You see what just happened, THEY ended up giving HIM permission to continue to fly his flag.
In other words, “The letter was just our way of letting you know that you can fly your flag as long as we give you permission”.
HOA’s are the absolute worst!
 April 7, 2015 at 10:42am
@Since.I.Gave.Up.Hope.I.Feel.A.Lot.Better – These guys use the same tactics that the left and the Saul Alinsky types use.
“There is going to be a worldwide economic crash by Friday if we don’t act now”
“Man-made global warming is going to completely destroy the earth in 20 years” (Ted Danson circa 1990-ish)
It is the same fear mongering that Al Gore uses to push his agenda.
Cruz would be a mighty fine President, but IMO Paul makes a better one.
 April 7, 2015 at 10:36am
I like Cruz and would be happy to vote for him, but I really like Rand Paul and would be ecstatic to vote for him (at least at the moment).
Please don’t pay to much attention to the folks who are saying things like:
“My favorite candidate is the ONLY candidate that can bring this nation back …”
“My favorite candidate is a TRUE patriot…”
“Your candidate panders to the left …. ”
The truth is that there are several really good conservatives running this year. Be excited about your candidate, but in the end lets make sure that one of the conservative candidates gets the nomination over the RINO’s.
In comparison to Obama or Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton
Cruz = Awesome
Paul = Awesome
Walker = Awesome
even Rubio would be far better than what the GOP elites are gonna offer up.
Please don't pay too much attention to the folks who tell you who not to pay attention to!
Rand is that rino. You speak of.
Rand is for illegals
Rand is for NO ID went voting . So leftys can vote many times.
Rand panders to the blacks
 April 2, 2015 at 6:21pm
@JRook – She is 20 years old and has 6 professional wins including a Major championship.
Doesn’t make it right but she is a very good golfer.
 April 2, 2015 at 3:33pm
@mcsledge – You are very correct. Nowhere do the Scriptures forbid a Christian from making a cake for ANYONE. The problem arises when a baker is forced to decorate it in a fashion that violates their faith or to cater an event that violates their beliefs.
I don’t think (I could be wrong) anyone is say that they want to exclude ANYONE who is gay from entering their store.
 April 2, 2015 at 3:30pm
@viirix – Again, your ignorance is on display for all the world to see. Your extremely biased view of the Scriptures and Christians in general make you come across as a bigot and hater.
 April 2, 2015 at 3:26pm
@viirix – All of the things you mentioned are either Civil or Ceremonial laws and not Moral laws. The Civil and Ceremonial laws were “nailed to the cross” with the “handwriting of ordinances”. (Colossians 2)
While it is apparent that you have knowledge of part of the Scriptures (I’m guessing parts that someone told you) it is also obvious that you are completely ignorant of the Scriptures as a whole and what all the ceremonial laws represented and were a foreshadow of.
It is true that many “christians” do “cherry pick” which portions of the Scriptures they want to obey, but not in this instance.
Your ignorance is forgiven as I am sure you were just repeating what someone else told you.
 April 2, 2015 at 3:17pm
@FiiineTapestry – I will be happy to bake you a cake, your adopted child a cake, your “partner” a cake. It will be my pleasure to serve you. However, I can not make you a “wedding” cake because that would cause me to violate my conscious go against my religious beliefs.
 April 2, 2015 at 3:09pm
@nolefan2 – It is a slippery slope isn’t it … Having been pastor of several small Baptist churches for the last twenty years I am very selective of the weddings that I will perform. Church members only and then only church members who are faithful and have gone through a series of counseling sessions.
Rough waters lay ahead for those whose policy to marry anyone.
 April 1, 2015 at 8:43am
Racist cops …
 March 31, 2015 at 2:02pm
Business’ discriminate against people who do not have money to pay for the service.
Business’ discriminate against people are rude and disturb the peace.
Male clothing stores discriminate against women by not selling ladies clothes.
Victoria’s Secret discriminates against men by not selling mens underwear.
on and on we could go …
We are not talking about companies having the right to discriminate against people but rather do they still have the right to exercise their faith.
We have messed around and raised a generation of cry babies who cry for a lawyer every time someone doesn’t cater to their every whim.
Anybody can walk into any store and buy whatever they are selling. (Buy not steal.) Tha's what it means to not discriminate. Now, if you go to your local Victoria's Secret and want to pick up a nice little lavender thong, it is illegal for them to refuse you service because you are a man who just happens to like the feel of a little btt floss. And the exercise of rights, religious or not, ends when it impinges on the rights of others. You have the right to shoot a gun, but you don't have the right to shoot it in my front yard.
Most ridiculous post of the week - so far.
So a company that makes only jock straps
is discriminating against women.
And Maidenform and Playtex discriminate against men.
Ya know, I really try hard, with the name calling accusations
but, but - MORON!
The last time I checked a woman CAN purchase men's clothing... and men CAN purchase women's lingerie. It's not discriminatory to NOT carry items for sale. You cannot FORCE someone to sell something they do not normally carry... but you CANNOT refuse to sell anything you normally do to anyone who wishes to purchase.
tmarends, yet you are proposing exactly that: that business sell things they normally do not sell.
If a baker sells heterosexual cake toppers but not gay cake toppers, are you not requesting that they be mandated to sell gay ones also? Yet a meat shop that sells beef roasts is okay for not selling pork roasts, in your opinion.
Of if someone does Christian art, will they be required to do homo-erotic art as well?
Where does the line become clear?
I have money to pay for your services
I will not be rude or disturb the peace
I ony want the same cake you prepared for the couple in front of me and the couple behind me …I don’t want to know about your Victoria Secret panty fetish
So why do you still stubbornly refuse to serve me?
Is it because you think I’m unworthy of equal treatment, all because of my( none of your business,) choice of a lover?
I don’t care who you chose, why should you care about mine?
 March 31, 2015 at 1:52pm
Speaking out against the war is one thing, but trying to undermine the effort by insulting our soldiers and lying about military actions and even fabricating stories that enhance your agenda is another thing.
Speaking out against “raping the environment” is one thing, but using totally fabricated “evidence” and then forcing others to adhere to ridiculous laws based on said fabricated evidence is criminal.
Speaking out against “discrimination against gays” is one thing, but taking the freedom away of people to practice their religion and force them to support things against their conscious is another.
Speaking out against “illegal banking practices that tank the global economy” is one thing, staling from person ‘A’ and giving it to person ‘B’ in the name of “redistribution” is something else.
 March 31, 2015 at 1:39pm
What do you bet that the new “rules” will prohibit “hate” speech in lessons and sermons … things like:
- Marriage should be between a man and a woman
- Jesus is the only way of salvation
- Adultry, fornication, drunkeness, gluttony etc … are sin