User Profile: bcanddc

Member Since: November 16, 2011


  • [-1] September 17, 2014 at 9:47pm

    OK so us REGULAR folks can’t do anything but drive but cops can do the following; talk on the phone, text on the phone, type on a laptop and talk on the radio along with operating the lights and sirens all while speeding!

    I’m sick to death of all this control the government in getting into.

    I drive all day long from appointment to appointment. Most of my communication with customers is by email or text. If I pulled over every time I had to respond, I would not make it more than 5 mile per day. I text, talk and type on my laptop while driving……just like the police do. They are NOT super humans….in fact many of them have motor and driving skills that are not as good as mine!

    If I’m texting with my phone up in the line of sight of the road am I really more of a threat than Ma and Pa Kettle ricocheting off parked cars going down Main St. on any given day? Answer: NO but we leave them alone.

    I’m sick of the laws being drawn up to the lowest common denominator. There should be some discretion involved. Not everybody is created equal folks.

    Responses (2) +
  • January 21, 2014 at 9:55pm

    Deshawn……..hmmmmm, you get one guess as to his ethnicity.

  • January 21, 2014 at 9:34pm


    If I admit that Bush was wrong for using drones and killing children in the process, will you agree that Obama has done the same and should be held accountable as well?

  • January 13, 2014 at 8:36pm

    First of all, that’s a dumb story.

    Secondly, the first reaction should be to help your fellow man, not dig in your pocket, get your cell phone, open the camera app, change to video mode and film the guy, then connect to the wifi on the plane, log in to Facebook and post the video of the poor guy who is likely over worked and just trying to survive in this hideous economy.

    We are pathetic!

  • October 21, 2013 at 5:40pm

    Something like that ever happens to me and I guarantee you there will be more than a few dead “children” laying about. I would have not gotten out but I would have floored it and flattened any of them in my way……too damn bad!

  • September 3, 2013 at 1:13pm

    OK, nobody risked their lives here. The car was NEVER going to blow up. That never happens in real life, just in the movies folks.

    Not trying to take anything away from the people that helped. I’m glad they did, it’s simply what any person should do if they find themselves in this situation. Help your fellow man….PERIOD.

    Responses (3) +
  • March 10, 2013 at 2:06pm

    Worse yet, it’s the armpit of the ******* of the internet.

  • March 9, 2013 at 12:10pm

    In 2011, there were 356 people killed in the US by so called “assault rifles”. The US has 311,000,000 people living in it. That means that your odds of being killed by an “assault rifle” is .00000114. That number is so minuscule that I don’t even know how to pronounce it. It might be one millionth of a percent…..maybe less even, not sure.

    Why then are we even having this debate?

    Responses (2) +
  • March 9, 2013 at 11:42am

    What happened to Colorado? It’s as if they are trying to out-California, California!!!

    Responses (2) +
  • March 9, 2013 at 11:37am

    If you are a criminal, there are only two things you fear while committing your crime: getting caught by the police or getting killed by your victim.

    So pretend for just a minute you’re a criminal. What one thing could society do to make your chosen profession safer? Create gun free zones of course. In one fell swoop you eliminate the single greatest fear any criminal has. They must sit around and just laugh at this kind of lunacy.

  • March 9, 2013 at 11:34am

    If only she had known that she could have gone to a “safe zone”. If she was not able to physically get to a pre-ordained “safe zone” then she could have simply declared her bedroom a “safe zone” and of course all hostilities would have ceased. I mean after all, it’s a “safe zone” and all violent rapists respect the power of the “safe zone”. It’s like a cross to a vampire, kryptonite to superman, it’s all powerful of course.

    Why is it that liberals are completely incapable of logical thought?

  • March 1, 2013 at 9:37am

    We need to take a couple pages from the liberal playbook and use it against them.

    1. Massive civil disobedience as in simply do not comply with the law. Nobody should comply with an unconstitutional law anyway.

    2. Demand that any laws restricting firearms for the public should have NO EXEMPTIONS for police or security personnel. After all, if these laws work so well then there is no reason they need them to counter them in the hands of a bad guy right?

    3. Start teaching kids about guns and their safe use and handling. People fear what they don’t understand. The libs start indoctrinating children from kindergarten, we need to do the same. Get to them early.

    4. If you have a friend or work associate who opposes guns, offer to take them shooting. As I said before, people fear what they don’t understand. I have converted quite a few “anti-gun” people over the years by taking them out for a few hours of target practice.

    5. Don’t be quiet! When you hear anti-gun talk at work or in public, POLITELY engage and educate the people. No yelling or cussing, just politely educate them.

    We can win this because this country is in a different place now than it was in 1994. We have had many natural disasters where the people have come to the conclusion that the government CAN NOT protect you. We also have a majority of Americans feeling this country is going in the wrong direction and they wish not to lay down their last resort to turning it around.


  • February 24, 2013 at 4:05pm

    Good for him for what he said and not backing down or apologizing.

    It pisses me off to no end when these libs, having turned their home state into a mess, move to another state to escape what they created. Once there, they work feverishly to turn the new state into the same hell hole they just left! It makes no sense at all. Just stay where you were and reap the rewards of the seeds you sowed.

  • February 23, 2013 at 3:39pm

    This country is completely divided with no hope at all of finding common ground. How can two groups of people going in completely opposite directions ever agree on anything? Answer, they can’t.

    The “Progressives” have strayed so far from the founding principles of this country that there is no going back for them at this point.

    The only solution anymore is to divide the nation either peaceably or by force. That’s it. If you game this out in your head, what other conclusion can you come to? The only question now is how soon?

    Responses (1) +
  • February 20, 2013 at 11:23pm

    I understand what ArmaLite is trying to do. They don’t want to deprive individual officers from purchasing their rifles for themselves. I understand they are law enforcement officers themselves and I get it.

    Here’s the problem though. If they cut off all sales, even private sales to officers in New York, the laws will change even faster!!! What do you think Cuomo will do when he is getting flooded by calls from officers to ditch the law?

    Grow a sack ArmaLite and cut it off entirely! You have to understand if you are a firearms manufacturer or seller that as soon as they eliminate the civilian market, you all go out of business. You can’t survive on just law enforcement sales and that goes for Glock, Ruger, Colt’s, Winchester and all the rest of the big boys.

  • February 20, 2013 at 12:38pm

    I’m a big fan of shotguns for self defense but they have a few important limitations, recoil not being one of them. After all in a home invasion situation, my wife would rather have a sore shoulder for a few days than an acute case of permanent rigor mortis!

    Problem is the length of most shotguns unless you go with a shortened barrel model like a Mossberg 500 or the like. Secondly, if you use 00 buck shot in a home, NINE .38 caliber pellets come flying out the end each time. Those can do a tremendous amount of unintended damage. You simply can’t safely use that in a home where there may be loved ones anywhere near a perpetrator. A handgun or rifle makes more sense there.

    Solution, have a rifle a shotgun and a handgun…….right tool for the right job.

  • February 15, 2013 at 8:51pm

    You need to get into the heads of the liberals to understand what they are trying to do here.

    Let me tell you how this will play out. They are going after assault weapons first for three reasons. They are owned by far fewer people, they are scaring looking and they stand the best chance of getting that through congress. As soon as that is done, this is what you will hear from some left wing lawmaker: “We just passed sweeping legislation to ban assault weapons, we are all safer now. Now, did you know handguns kill 7 times more people than assault weapons? How can we not do something about those terrible handguns. After all if we can save just one life, isn’t it worth it?”

    This is a calculated move on their part I can guarantee you that much. We can not give them a single inch because this is their action plan.

    Responses (5) +
  • February 15, 2013 at 5:26pm

    I have thrice in my life used a firearm to defend myself. Twice there was not a shot fired and no police report filed as the ner-do-wells both fled immediately. I’m just one person, now imagine how many times this happens every single day in this country!! One other time while hiking my group was being shot at by some lunatic who was hidden and was taking pot shots at us. Who knows if he was a bad shot and was trying to hit us but missed five times or if he was intentionally missing. One thing for certain though is he didn’t count on my having a Ruger Mini 14 with me with a loaded 30 round magazine with which I promptly returned fire and that was the end of that situation! He must have scattered as he stopped shooting. That time we called the police, filed a report and of course he was never found. I believe that my having one of those god aweful assault rifles with me that day may have saved a life or two and you know, “if we can just save one life…..”.

    I will NEVER, EVER, EVER register my guns or give them up, NEVER!

    Furthermore, if the presence of a firearm does nothing to deter crime, why do the police carry them? After all according to the California police chief, they are not for defense, only offense.

    These liberals are getting so balled up in their inconsistencies that it’s hilarious to watch. Logic and common sense will always prevail. The problem for them now is there is just too much evidence out there to combat their lies.

    Responses (4) +
  • February 8, 2013 at 4:20pm

    I’m a native Californian but if this passes, not only will I not register a single thing, I will pack up and leave. This state is going to hell in a hand basket and I don’t care to be here when it blows up.

    I’m looking at Texas for the most part. Arizona is nice too but the lib insanity is creeping in there too.

  • February 3, 2013 at 3:23pm

    That’s a fiberglass mock up. You can see it in the pictures if you look close. You can also see an edge of the fiberglass where the inside of the cockpit meets the outside. Also, the canopy is just formed plexiglass and they didn’t even have the sense to wipe it down with a soft cloth and plexiglass cleaner so it’s all scratched up.

    This is a total joke!