User Profile: beekeeper

beekeeper

Member Since: September 04, 2010

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • January 20, 2014 at 6:26pm

    Blue Cross is the company offering the Obamacare coverage – if this were a ‘regular’ blue cross/blue shield policy, it would have been trivial to cancel coverage…

    Every Obamacare policy is offered by a private insurance company, the government only offers Medicare and subsidies..

  • January 2, 2014 at 11:56am

    The law of Unintended consequences tells us they will have a disproportionate number of minorities in jail for non-violent crimes AND an increase in the number of shootings as the criminals realize their targets are now unarmed…

    But they’ll insist that disarming otherwise law-abiding citizens is for their safety… And the ‘they’ that will be doing the insisting will be writing their letters of support for this measure from their homes in the Chicago suburbs.

    Responses (1) +
  • December 25, 2013 at 8:17pm

    “Former ‘Saturday Night Live’ star? Uhm, no. He has been a guest host of SNL, never a cast member.

    And to boil his career down to gest host appearances on SNL is an insult (IMHO). He’s written, directed, and acted in many movies, released grammy-winning albums, and was a comedic force in the ’70s and ’80s, and plays a mean banjo… And yes, he’s been on SNL.

  • December 25, 2013 at 8:12pm

    The Omni Hotel in Dallas, TX just put up 500 homeless people in the hotel for Christmas, feeding them, running movies for them, and other activities for them.

    http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2013/12/24/omni-hotels-opening-its-doors-to-homeless/

  • November 18, 2013 at 5:28pm

    What money? PayPal cancelled the transaction.

    No sale, no sales contract, no terms of agreement…

  • November 18, 2013 at 5:27pm

    If PayPal cancelled the transaction, then there was no sales contract, therefore the terms of the sales contract do not apply to the attempted customer, right? Or are non-customers still bound to the terms actual customers agree to?

    Seems like a simple counter-argument…

  • November 12, 2013 at 1:36pm

    The purpose of the Christian Rescue Mission it to help feed the hungry, not to create a coalition of diverse beliefs so that all can participate in the Rescue Mission’s charity work.

    The decision of the Rescue Mission to exclude members of the atheist group from the food delivery program doesn’t prevent the atheist group from performing charitable work – maybe the Atheists should view this as a chance to perform their own charity work, maybe organize their own food drives, etc…

    The story is that 500 hungry souls are being fed, not that Atheists want to help feed them.

    Responses (2) +
  • October 23, 2013 at 10:56pm

    And when asked to point to an example f “the other side” displaying the same level of heated rhetoric, she stormed out the interview, just as Jay Carney did when asked about the healthcare.gov website.

  • October 22, 2013 at 6:24pm

    Ask the Girl Scouts about their policy of lesbian leaders and scouts… Ask them what they do when they catch/observe an under-age girl engaged in lesbian act on cam pouts/outings…

    They’ve been ‘liberal’ for years.

  • October 17, 2013 at 10:00pm

    Has she thought through the disproportionate ‘impact’ this will have on lower-income families?

  • October 16, 2013 at 11:34am

    Those calling this ‘fat shaming’ are ignoring the true message of the picture – it’s a woman’s duty to give her husband healthy male children. It’s an attack on infertile women! /sarcasm

    It’s a Rorschach test.

  • October 14, 2013 at 9:30pm

    To quote our a President:

    “Elections have consequences”

  • September 21, 2013 at 9:36pm

    “Some are actually willing to plunge America into default if they can’t FUND the Affordable Care Act,” Obama said.

    There, I fixed it for you…

    Dems are the ones willing to shutdown government if they can’t FUND Obamacare.

  • September 21, 2013 at 11:20am

    “That’s all they think about is getting into my pooch,” Behar added.

    Uhm, no – that is the safest “pooch” in the world, trust me.

    BTW, I’ve never heard it called a “pooch” – where’d that come from? (Aren’t feline references more common?)

  • August 15, 2013 at 9:33pm

    OMG – Al Sharpton is a two-faced liar!

    Who knew?

    (Though I must say I find it interesting that Sharpton went to O’Reilly for money…)

    Responses (78) +
  • August 13, 2013 at 11:55pm

    If you don’t check IDs at the polls, how can we establish if there is or is not any voter fraud?

  • August 13, 2013 at 8:02am

    If I’m reading this right, a woman can order a paternity test to establish who the father is, then can go after him for child support, BUT a man that is part of a child’s life currently can not take a paternity test and argue for visitation rights?

    Oh wait, it’s California – of course that is what they are arguing for…

  • August 11, 2013 at 2:52pm

    What, exactly, are atheist soldiers being denied?

    They have equal, un recorded/unfettered access to chaplains the same as any other oldies. There are chaplains of numerous denominations, yet typically only one chaplain per unit – they are trained and serve ALL denominations, including atheists equally – they do not check your dog tags before consulting with you to make sure you have a compatible chaplain available.

    Chaplains perform a religious service, what service would an atheist chaplain provide/offer that a religious chaplain could not?

    Responses (1) +
  • July 29, 2013 at 2:04pm

    All this accomplishes is that 40 markets around the country will open up to new radio stations that want to carry Rush & Sean in the future.

    The company dropping the two shows has a record of preferring their own in-house talent over outside talent, and this is just part of the business.

    Will the 40 stations that “lose” Rush & Sean grow or contract after the change? Who knows, their audience may shrink, but their revenues may grow – one thing is certain, there are 40 radio stations set to grow when they pick up these two shows.

  • July 26, 2013 at 11:43am

    They only had about 10,000 $100 bills in their trunk – trace amount x 10,000 bills easily equals attention from a drug sniffing dog…

    I bet the real problem was the dryer sheets – I bet you the dog is trained to detect that scent as well, since it may be a common trick to mask the scent on money (same with coffee grounds).

    I think there’s a good chance the dog simply detected the dryer sheets.

    If, as claimed, the money was earned in strip clubs and stored as cash, it probably has more body odor than anything else – in my youth I’ve seen countless bills shoved into many sweaty areas on a stripper’s body.

    Eeewww…

123 To page: Go