“She’s not going anywhere.” She’ll be going somewhere alright, voting for abortion or supporting it will put you in hell.
 July 30, 2015 at 5:04pm
Words from a psychopath the heights of which so one will ever be able to figure out.
 July 30, 2015 at 4:58pm
anyone with half a brain knows things run by a government is always in the red.In other words anyone that is a person.
 July 30, 2015 at 4:54pm
I believe that anyone that thinks like you must not be a person. A monster like Hitler yes.
 July 30, 2015 at 4:39pm
Why do you get to decide when a fetus is a person?
 July 29, 2015 at 9:45pm
 July 29, 2015 at 9:43pm
That’s nice . A big “However” what is his position on abortion! On gay marriage? If we don’t become a God fearing country we will not stand!
 July 29, 2015 at 9:39pm
” You really want to go all the way back to that debate” This quote demonic in nature in that is what the devil wold want one to believe in other words ignore the evil that abortion is.
July 29, 2015 at 7:30pm
Mark 10:6 6But from the beginning of the creation, God made them male and female. 7For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother; and shall cleave to his wife. Notice it says male and female not male and male or female and female. Further the bible says man shall leave father and mother not same sex couples.
Homosexuality is mock sexuality.
And “gay marriage” is mock marriage.
So what about people who don't believe in the bible? Not everyone believes what you do. Using the bible to make a point is not very effective.
If the best support you have for your case is the Christian bible, then it really is no wonder America's secular court system struck down the ban on same-sex marriage ..
You seem unaware that that was His response to the Pharisees as to whether or not DIVORCE was permitted. Clearly, His answer was a firm "No!". But still we have it.
Now, if America were a theocracy, what the Bible says might be relevant to the secular, civil law.
 July 29, 2015 at 7:20pm
Defending a Higher Law
animal cognition is purely sensorial, limited to
sounds, odors, touch, tastes and images. Thus, they do not have
the precision and clarity of human intellectual perception. Therefore, it is not infrequent that animals confuse one sensation
for another or one object with another.
Instincts move an animal toward a purpose in accordance
with its nature. Sarah Hartwell explains that tomcats kill their kittens as a
result of receiving mixed signals from their instincts:
Most female cats can switch between “play mode”
and “hunt mode” in order not to harm their offspring.
In tomcats this switching off of “hunt mode” may be
incomplete and, when they become highly aroused
through play, the “hunting” instinct comes into force
and they may kill the kittensA typical example of this phenomenon can be seen with
bonobos. These mammals from the chimpanzee family engage
in seemingly sexual behavior. These sexual attitudes are their
way of expressing dominance,
 July 29, 2015 at 5:59pm
planecrashlaw ” There is no such thing as god.”
Just because you don’t believe in God does not mean that He does not exist. Also just because you don’t believe in hell is no proof that there is no place as hell.
 July 29, 2015 at 5:55pm
if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another? By abortion, the mother does not learn to love, but kills even her own child to solve her problems.
Mother Teresa: continued
And, by abortion, the father is told that he does not have to take any responsibility at all for the child he has brought into the world. That father is likely to put other women into the same trouble. So abortion just leads to more abortion.
Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want. This is why the greatest destroyer of love and peace is abortion.
They were big time part of it as snooop post’ explained.
The original KJV Bible actually had 73 books but Protestants removed 7 of the books to come up with the 66 you have now. Those 7 books were in,
1. The Septuagint (the Bible that Jesus and the Apostles quoted from)
2. The Codex Sinaiticus (the oldest Bible known to
3. The Vetus Latina (the Bible that St Jerome translated into the Latin Vulgate)
4.. The Latin Vulgate (translated by the Bible scholar St Jerome)
5. The original Guttenberg Bible (printed in Latin in 1455)
6. Martin Luther’s German Bible (printed in 1534)
7. The original 1560 Geneva Bible (the Bible used by the Protestant Pilgrims who landed at Plymouth Rock)
8. The ORIGINAL (1611) King James Bible
9. Every SINGLE Protestant Bible printed prior to 1666
Again, it’s a very simple question. If the Bible is in fact the word of God then why did men remove 7 books from the word of God when the word of God did not tell them to do so?
[-2] July 28, 2015 at 5:15pm
wedrawstuff Bible also tell us 2 Peter 3:16 “As also in all his Epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they doe also the other Scriptures, onto their owned destruction” Who do you think that Peter was talking to? Peter was talking to the first Christians who thought they had the best interpretation of the day telling them that some things in Paul’s writings are difficult to understand and to misinterpret it could lead to their own destruction. Even if we knew all scripture and had all sorts of PHD degrees in theology, etc. We will still have all sorts of opinions on what this or what that scripture means. We will not always agree on all things. Where’s the unity Jesus prayed to the Father for us in John 17:21? He prayed that we would be one as He and the Father are one .Not so good when you think there are over 25,000 and growing Protestant religions each claiming to have the right and sometimes contradictory interpretations. Thus we need God’s authorized church leaders with God given infallible authority.
Roman Catholics' are not considered Christians... The first christian church was an Antioch.
Paul - might want to check out some less biased history books. How about reading some of the Church fathers and look to all the ones that said that the Bishop of Rome was the ultimate authority? Here is a primer of excerpts from some of the writers to give you a starting point...
Catholics did not exist until after 300 years A.D.
The first churches were just called Christians...
The seven churches are located in:
Ephesus (Metropolis of Ephesus)
Smyrna (Metropolis of Smyrna)
Pergamon (Metropolis of Pergamon)
Sardis (See of Sardis)
Philadelphia (Metropolis of Philadelphia)
and Laodicea, near Denizli (see Laodicean Church)
True and historic Christianity and Catholicism are synonymous. The word Catholic describes the fullness of faith taught everywhere, and already in the first century served as a differentiating term from false versions of Christianity that had cropped up and that continue to crop up even today.
Remember many heretics were claiming to be Christian - followers of Arius, Gnostics...
But there was one place where the truth of the Apostles was handed down, where the Sacrifice of the Mass was, where the Real Presence was, and still is - then as it always will be until the end of the age: The Catholic Church.
Don't believe me, see what the early Church fathers said.
"...as these teachers [heretics] who are destitute of truly divine wisdom maintain; while the Catholic Church possesses one and the same faith throughout the whole world, as we have already said." Irenaeus, Against Heresies, 1:10,3 (A.D. 180).
"Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist, which is [administered] either by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. .... Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church." Ignatius of Antioch, Epistle to the Smyrneans, 8:2 (c. A.D. 110).
July 28, 2015 at 4:15pm
First century? Bible was change??? There was no NT part of the bible in the first century even the second until Rome called a council in 380 AD
[-1] July 28, 2015 at 3:58pm
Are you infallible? If not, then that means that you could be wrong meaning you must admit that I could be right.