User Profile: Benjamin Linus

Benjamin Linus

Member Since: September 14, 2010

Comments

123
  • [5] April 25, 2016 at 11:06pm

    Sigh…. I hope this woman reaches the point where she can become honest with herself about a whole lot of things. I honestly feel bad for her and people like her. To see citizens so completely deceived pains my heart. My sincere hope and prayer is that the scales fall from their eyes and they see the truth with perfect clarity.

  • [11] March 4, 2016 at 2:14am

    Not sure if serious.How can voting for someone else be a vote for Hillary? That is not possible. Are you insane? I am positive that if I vote for someone else it a vote for that person, not a vote for Hillary. Or are you claiming that somehow when I vote for someone else I will accidentally check the box next to Hillary’s name and not realize it? I assure you, I will be explicitly careful to write in the name I am voting for and NOT check the box for Hillary. So don’t worry.

  • [8] February 28, 2016 at 7:50pm

    Let me help you. The tea party stands for the constitution. As Palin and Sessions move from the constitution to progressive or socialist candidates they move away from the tea party. The tea party does not move with them.

  • [24] February 14, 2016 at 7:18pm

    Up until now I thought if Rubio won the nomination I would hold my nose and vote for him. After this last debate I have had it with him and I will never vote for him. I was watching closely when Rubio joined the gang of eight and tried to pass comprehensive immigration reform that included amnesty. I cheered Cruz as he and a few other senators fought and killed it at great cost and effort. Now to see Rubio frame Cruz for it is to much to bear.

    If Rubio just admitted to what he did I would probably vote for him. But to lie and twist it into framing Cruz (who fought against it) shows a level of slimy politician on Rubio’s part that speaks of deep character flaws that I cannot vote for.

  • [3] January 24, 2016 at 10:40am

    I am kind of frustrated with Beck over that as well. And Beck talking about repointing the cornerstone or whatever is just so… Blah. Most people are going to fall asleep when Beck starts talking like that and you are certainly not going to win people who are on the fence. I know Beck wants to sound all intellectual but Cruz’s campaign has that already my the truck load. Compare that with a snappy and memorable slogan like, “Make America great again.” It is sad but Cruz will benefit most right now from simple slogans that make people feel good or empowered.

    Beck needs to very quickly learn how to more effectively help Cruz and not hurt him.

  • [1] January 24, 2016 at 10:27am

    @jeffersen – McCain worse than Obama in the sense that a certain simple minded or intellectually lazy percentage of McCain voters would follow him, or fall asleep, as he takes the nation in to the same place Obama has taken the nation, down into the pit of progressivism. This is what the two have in common, big government progressivism.

  • [1] January 19, 2016 at 10:52pm

    Don’t forget Michele Bachman and her love affair with spying on American citizens.

  • [128] January 7, 2016 at 10:25pm

    For the thousandth time, IT DOES NOT MATTER IF OUTLAWING GUNS REDUCES MURDERS! It is not worth the loss of Liberty. I know that is hard for some people to hear but that is because they do not properly comprehend the the value of Liberty and take it for granted. Hear me when I tell you that Liberty IS that valuable. What fools we will think ourselves for letting it slip away when it is all gone.

    Responses (2) +
  • [8] January 7, 2016 at 1:07am

    Sorry. I am not ready to trust Rubio. He claims he has learned his lesson but that doesn’t mean he deserves my trust. After he sold us out on amnesty and securing the border and joining up with those progressive rinos I can’t gain back my trust this quickly. Also, his record on supporting the NSA spying and supporting shredding the constitution to do it is appalling. And no Marco, being privy to the scary secret intelligence information is no justification for taking our liberty in exchange for safety. Live free or die you pathetic coward.

  • January 4, 2016 at 11:21pm

    I would call stopping over 90,000 people from using trusts and corporations to register NFA items pretty bad news. By the way, the vast majority of that 90,000 are people registering, paying $200, and waiting six months for a sound suppressor (which is primarily a hearing safety device).

  • [3] January 4, 2016 at 11:11pm

    It probably won’t curb gun violence. Even if it did would it be worth the loss of liberty? I say no.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] January 1, 2016 at 3:14pm

    It might be time to strip the executive branch of all powers given it by the people except, perhaps, the power to coordinate the national defense. Far to many citizens are already starting to think of the president as some sort of king and his wife some sort of queen. With each new president we see more and more power taken from the other branches of government. With each new president we see more and more of the constitution ignored. We need a major reset and we need it soon.

    Responses (2) +
  • [10] January 1, 2016 at 12:38pm

    Will congress exert its powers as the legislative branch and put the president in his place for overreaching his powers as executive? Sadly, congress has shown itself to be a bunch of cowards that will stand by while the constitution is torn apart by the hands of tyranny of scocialism.

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] December 22, 2015 at 9:34am

    You are right. NASA has has several tremendous achievements recently as well. I only meant to emphasize the reaction of the crowd to the SpaceX achievement and how it reminded me of that feeling that at its core America is good and with the government out of the way anything is possible.

  • [5] December 22, 2015 at 1:42am

    Great, another debate I won’t watch because it will AGAIN be full of gotcha questions with a progressive slant and “he said something bad about you so go fight while we watch” questions. I have no hope of a debate on the issues that are important to liberty, limited government, restoring the republic.

  • [11] December 22, 2015 at 1:32am

    I have not seen that level of joy and excitement over the United States accomplishments in a very very long time. I almost had forgotten that feeling. And it took a private company to make it happen! What SpaceX accomplished today was considered impossible just a few years ago. When will those in this nation who pine for the control of scocialism admit that over and over capitalism continues to make the impossible possible while socialism is a system that protects and promotes failure and crushes individual thought and ambition? As our nation races down to the ant heap of scocialism, today was a bright reminder of what we are so close to forever losing. Oh how we will regret our foolishness if that day comes.

    Responses (2) +
  • [14] October 29, 2015 at 1:15am

    Ted Cruz unexpectedly goes off? Unexpectedly? I have been waiting since debate number one for a candidate to really call BS on the media. Good for Cruz for having the guts to be the first.

  • [2] September 12, 2015 at 7:54pm

    Does Todd realize how pathetic it sounds to say, “‘We’ve been told who our real friends are, Glenn.”? So Todd and Sarah let other people tell them who their friends are. How disappointing. That is a real blow to the respect that I have for the Palins.

    And who is this person that is going around driving wedges between conservatives? It is time for Beck to name names or they will keep getting away with it. No Glenn, it is not “fine” that this happened and it is not ok to let whoever is driving wedges between you and other conservative leaders get away with it.

  • [2] March 9, 2015 at 2:08pm

    Hold on! TheBlaze has made a huge mistake in this article, or at least were not clear in such a way that many people will be misled. The ATF is still planning on banning M855 ammo. For proof read the ATF’s own proposals here (page 14&15):

    http://www.atf.gov/sites/default/files/assets/Library/Notices/atf_framework_for_determining_whether_certain_projectiles_are_primarily_intended_for_sporting_purposes.pdf

    It was recently noticed that in a recent ATF publication that M855 was omitted from being exempt. The ATF admitted the mistake in their publication. This admissions does not mean that the ATF a is stepping away from going forward with a ban in M855. Again, read the proposal linked above where it specifically calls out M855/SS109 for a ban.

  • [69] March 2, 2015 at 7:05pm

    This is the height of ridiculous. All AR15 ammunition can defeat the soft body armor commonly worn by police officers. If the ban on M855 is allowed to proceed then the door is open for them to “regulate” all AR15 ammunition out of existence.

    Also, requiring a “sporting purpose” for ammunition is a direct violation of 2nd Amendment rights. The 2nd Amendment has little to nothing to do with “sporting” and everything to do with defending liberty from tyranny.

    Responses (2) +
123
Restoring Love