User Profile: bertr

bertr

Member Since: September 08, 2010

CommentsDisplaying bertr's 10 most recent comments.

  • I wonder if due to some unknown condition, it could have been living in a womb for 6 years or so still feeding from an umbilical cord?
    Pretty far out, but it could explain how it apparently lived for so long in such a deformed state.

  • I think this news stories is suppose to make you feel good. I feel better and more confident about myself and decision making skills after reading about this guys plight.

  • It sounds like this guy and his money were destined to part ways sooner or later

  • Well no more mincing words at least. The infanticide argument has become an acceptable public debate at this point.
    Serves as a chilling example of what stage we’re at in society and one of the final if not the actual last call.

  • @carolina
    I didn’t mean to blast you, i apologize as i know you arent gleeful about sanford either. But I can’t convince myself that it isnt important, and that we didnt have other choices who could have won.

  • @carolina infidel
    Some of the other primarary contenders such as Grooms and Turner ran many many many ads just during the primary phase. I know I head around an average of 3 a day on the radio just communiting back and forth to work during march(more ads just on that primary race were being run by both of those primary contenders alone, then both sanford and busch are running combined currently for the general). What is it that makes you think they would have stopped thier campaigns during the general after they recieved the contributions typical of a party nominee?

  • He seems to have a habit perpetually lie to his own family in degrees that cannot be resolved internally(requires the law, breaking up the family itself, etc…) which he still has not conquered. And before you call me judgemental, remember that it is Him who has volenteered to ask for the public’s judgement on him to represent them.

    Amazingly, that isn’t even biggest problem we can take away from this article and the post below it.

    It’s the percentage of the population who still argue that we should send this guy, who can’t even manage his own family to DC to represent us and manage our country. That mentality that supports politicans and leaders such as Nixon and Clinton(not as flawed human beings as we all are in need of help) but as examples to celebrate our flaws and as continuing leaders that is partially responsible for how this country met its the end of its meritable phase in history.

    Many here in the Charleston area, took time out of there busy day to go vote against many of the other people who managed there families seemingly well in the primary, not once but twice in order to have Sanford represent the conservatives living in the Charleston area.

    In times like these, we arent held individually responsible for what our country does, but it does make me wonder how many of the primary voters around here weigh the eternal consequences of the decisions they make, both upon themselves and the legacy of thier community.

  • Assuming she’s sincere, this woman would appear to either have extrodinarily poor discretion on pretty much everything or she may just be a unknowning puppet of evil.
    It may be helpful, when it comes to less obvious decisions, to see what this woman thinks about the matter and consider if that the opposite decision may be the right one.

  • First of all I do NOT believe this is an inside job at all, but to be fair, I can see why the people who do, feel unfairly impugned about the family guy clip. The article makes it seem like a dishonest hoax, which doesnt seem to be necessarily true. this explains the truth in full…
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7WQeqE943Uo

    A bizarre coincidence, but only that i think

    Also i think in a few years from now, looking back at how the government uses this event to take away our freedoms, it will be easy to convince people it might have been all set up

  • I don’t buy into the fallen angels procreating theology(i personally go with the theory that the sons of God mentioned were the priesthood), however I do find those text fascinating as they existed so long ago and I’m not sure you’re objection to it would apply to his theory.
    the ancient text(dead sea scrolls book of giants and the book of enoch) wouldnt limit or necesarily suggest typical copulation. They suggest more along the lines of creating the offspring, presumably through genetic manipulation of the zygot.
    How else would one micegenate men and animals as it speaks of at least? At least that was my best guess in trying to figure out what was being said in those text when i read them awhile ago.