TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying Beulah's 10 most recent comments.

• Why Did The NFL Make YouTube Take Down Chrysler’s Clint Eastwood Super Bowl Ad?

  February 6, 2012 at 4:27pm

  In reply to SquidVetOhio.

  What really struck me as odd, being from the minority-heavy Chicago, is the discernible lack of minorities in this commercial, which is supposed to feature the Motor City; Detroit, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, is roughly 83% black, yet there only had been a mere three readily-visible blacks in all the faces shown for the city, and even those few were clearly working middle class men. Detroit’s downfall is the result of ultra-liberal black Democrats holding sway there for decades, which is why the general population is so very poor (more than a third are listed below poverty level, and the median income is a whopping $20K less than the Michigan average). This is not to suggest that blacks are responsible for their own demises, other than they have bought into, wholesale, the promises of their ultra-liberal black leaders; they have lowered their guard at the color line, and become prey of that trust. It is not for no reason that Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson blames black leaders (WHO LEAD) for steering their own people off a cliff, because the black people herein have FOLLOWED, not white leaders, but their OWN leaders, yet they fail to see the causal connection. It is the same in Chicago, which has been in serious decline for decades, and in any minority-laded metropolitan area which has bought into the disastrous liberal policies of their own leaders. Check out Beck’s interview of Peterson, a leader whom blacks SHOULD follow:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqV3QimDeVA

• Justice Ginsburg on Egypt TV: ‘I Would Not Look to the U.S. Constitution’ to Craft Modern Law Document

  February 6, 2012 at 4:03pm

  I cannot fathom why a Jewish person such as ol’ Ruth would risk going to a hotbed of violent, deadly anti-Semitism; does she have a death wish, or does she think her position as one of Oblahblah’s ultra-liberal cronies affords her invincibility? How sad to think how disparate she is from her namesake, the Ruth of scripture who would not forsake Naomi, as THIS Ruth seems willing to forsake her nation…

• Shock Article: Bioethicists Suggest Killing Someone With ‘No Autonomy Left’ Is Not Morally Wrong

  January 30, 2012 at 6:33pm

  In reply to Beulah.

  Essentially, historical reports from the late 1940′s assert that […] with the advent of socialist regimes, health care facilities were confiscated, professional organizations were dissolved, and health care was placed under a centralized system of financial and operational organization controlled by the communist state.”
  Since the 1940s? That is well before Obama is said to have been born (we still haven’t seen an official birth certificate, thus it cannot be said for certain), thus the pattern had been well established and available for study prior to the adoption of Obamacare. That information involves the ideology which precipitates the methods adopted; what are the results to which our politicians should have heeded? The same study reveals the depressing and infuriating consequences of socialized medicine under the regulatory auspices of centralized governmental authority: “Health services in transition were invariably traumatic and stressful in all countries. Health statistics and demographics can provide an insight into the overwhelming aspect of the transitions in regards to health […] (in) the Russian Federation life expectancy at birth bottomed during the transition at the level expected for an underdeveloped country of Central Asia, 57 years of age for men […] mortality rates from cardiovascular diseases, intoxication, and suicides tended to increase in all countries. (CONT.)

• Shock Article: Bioethicists Suggest Killing Someone With ‘No Autonomy Left’ Is Not Morally Wrong

  January 30, 2012 at 6:26pm

  In reply to Beulah.

  The following quotes are taken from Antonio Maria de Gordon’s, “Cuba’s Health in Transition and the Central and Eastern European Countries Experience” (http://www.finlay-online.com/finlayinstitute/healthintransition.htm)

  “All countries that adopted the ideology and social systems associated with Marxism-Leninism had a socialist type of health service. The original model for this type of health administration was organized in the former Soviet Union. Since then, it has been known in public health circles as the Semashko type of health system. The features of the Semashko health systems were essentially based on two premises: the ideology of Marxism-Leninism, and the socio-economic realities of the countries where it was adopted. The Semashko type of health system provided through the socialist health services: universal coverage, centralized planning and decision-making […] the social and economic order through which, theoretically, all types of workers and social organisms functioned and operated in the context of an egalitarian communist society. The development of the socialist type of health services in the Central and Eastern European countries of the former soviet-block began and developed in a remarkably similar manner in all countries. Essentially, historical reports from the late 1940′s assert that […] (CONT.)

• Shock Article: Bioethicists Suggest Killing Someone With ‘No Autonomy Left’ Is Not Morally Wrong

  January 30, 2012 at 6:23pm

  Objections to Obamacare have nothing to do with race, and that they stem chiefly from an awareness of the cradle-to-grave control over life-and-death by petty and incompetent bureaucrats; Obamacare doesn’t seek to fund health care in this nation, it seeks to control it, and Vladimir Lenin and Fidel Castro both had recognized that socialized medicine is fundamental to Communism; either liberals are blissfully unaware of this information, or they are for it as is their Marxist hero, Obama. (Lenin called those who unwittingly advocate their own demise “useful idiots”.)

  In 1917, the Bolsheviks had inherited two medicinal constructs, one concentrated in the more peasant-like, rural areas for farmers (Zemstvo), and an alternate system based on urban centers, which had centered around industrial workers and their middle class families (Semashko); the two systems colloquially had been referred to as the “Worker’s Medicine Program” and the “Folk’s Medicine Program” (as in country folks). In 1920, the Communists merged the two systems into the “Soviet Medicine Program,” in which the Semashko model had been adopted, to the objection of the Zemstvo physicians, as it ended the Zemstvo autonomy. (CONT.)

• Shock Article: Bioethicists Suggest Killing Someone With ‘No Autonomy Left’ Is Not Morally Wrong

  January 30, 2012 at 6:18pm

  NOTE TO BECK’S SITE: I notice that the site has altered the word N-e-g-r-o which I had types by substituting it with all asterisks—and this is unnecessary and overly politically-correct censorship, because the word,as originally spelled, simply denotes “black,” and it remains the word, in fact, for the color black in the Romance languages which derive from Latin (Spanish, French, Italian, etc.). Please, do not “sanitize” what does not need to be cleaned up, because the term is DESCRIPTIVE, and not DERAGATORY. Political correctness is a strategic invention (along with critical theory, which Oblahblah’s mother had studied) of the atheist Communists, who deny we have souls, and who insist we are simply bodies to be used. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjaBpVzOohs

• Shock Article: Bioethicists Suggest Killing Someone With ‘No Autonomy Left’ Is Not Morally Wrong

  January 30, 2012 at 6:11pm

  …more economically prudent to shoot him and sell his body to the glue factory, and thereby make a profit off his carcass and avoid paying for his medical care. This is what Dr. Ezekiel Emmanuel’s “Complete Lives Plan” entails, when it comes to farming organs from incapacitated patients who are costly to maintain and whose organs can be culled for profit in a rationed care system.

• ‘A Slave Holder Named Thomas Jefferson’: Is Smithsonian’s New ‘Race’ Exhibit Fair to Founding Father?

  August 16, 2011 at 1:22am

  In reply to Ari Ben TZion.

  Excellent point. And, on top of that, the Egyptians, being native Africans, were black, and scripture describes them as being cruelly oppressive “harsh taskmasters” over the Israelites…

• Noam Chomsky Says Christian Right Supports Israel Because They Are Anti-Semitic and Want the Jewish Population to Be Exterminated by Armageddon

  August 11, 2011 at 4:00pm

  Chomsky and others of his ilk (Soros) are Kenites; they are those who hate our brother Judah, of whom Jesus Christ had said in Revelation (message to the Asiatic churches of Smyrna and Philadelphia) that they are those who say they are Jews and are not, but whom are really of the synagogue of Satan. They are the enemy of God’s chosen people, who had appended themselves to the tribe of Judah (1 Chronicles 2:55), assuming Jewish identity, but belonging to a distinctly separate race which despises God’s chosen race (Chosen to fulfill His purposes, not because they are in any way superior; in fact, God chooses the weak and small to confound the strong and mighty, according to scripture.)

• Atheists ‘Hijack’ The Blaze’s Adam and Eve Creation Poll — But Why?

  August 11, 2011 at 3:52pm

  The reason the atheists had to hijack and corrupt the results is the same reason they have to do so for the evolutionary argument; they know they can’t win unless they fabricate information…