User Profile: BikerMickAG


Member Since: April 05, 2011


  • [6] July 7, 2016 at 4:04pm

    There seems to be this grossly mistaken belief that something has to be admitted to in order for it to be held against a Democrat! No wonder Democrats never admit to anything under any circumstances!

  • [3] July 7, 2016 at 3:53pm

    What I want to know, in order to prove how irrational & illogical all of this is: How many/what percentage of black officers were involved in shooting black suspects, white suspects, and how many/what percentage of white officers were involved in shooting black suspects, white suspects? All we’re getting are the sensationalized, over exposure of white officers shooting black suspects. The focus is intentionally skewed & then exploited by the lamestream media.

  • [3] July 1, 2016 at 11:50am

    I’m sorry, lost my focus there for a second, what else did this *****, lightweight, pansy have to say? Anything worthwhile at all? What a worthless pile of pigeon droppings, as Monty Python would say.

  • [3] December 21, 2015 at 3:23pm

    What isn’t being said and considered is that the DNC debate had evidently such a laxative effect that Shrillary looked to be about ten pounds lighter when she sashayed back across that debate stage. Under those circumstances who would want to have shared a restroom with her?!

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] December 17, 2015 at 12:24pm

    Not having read all of the comments here, this smells less like an “admission” than it does a progressive prelude to increased governmental control in order to mandate employers to keep their employees in a full time status. This is akin to all of the other statements & measures that any one of these Marxists from President Obama, Hillary, the current administration, etc., wherein they all seem to believe that employers throughout the private sector can just absorb whatever mandates, restrictions, regulations, taxes, fees, charges, etc. that are imposed by these overbearing governmental bodies & not make any changes to the way that business is conducted based on the market &/or their customers.

  • [1] October 27, 2015 at 4:46pm

    My primary position is that neither the SCOTUS or Congress have any jurisdiction over the religious construct of marriage. Slick Willie’s slight of hand (pun intended), using DOMA to give our government jurisdiction is built on the left’s idea that precedent rules the day, so to speak. The ignorant can always be fooled in this way. Inasmuch as God’s law always comes first, even before the decisions of the SCOTUS & the laws of Congress, whatever either bestows upon homosexuals is moot since, whether they are aware of it or not, believing that they have jurisdiction doesn’t in fact give them jurisdiction. The left uses the rhetoric, “it’s the law of the land”, to infer that it is carved in stone, so to speak, & cannot be changed by either individual states or the federal Constitution, when that is not the case. For instance, if this same logic is applied to The 2nd Amendment, then why are there so many laws in a few states that would seem to undermine, ignore, &/or disallow citizens being able to “keep & bear arms”? After all, The 2nd Amendment, it’s the law of the land!

    Responses (2) +
  • [4] June 15, 2015 at 12:47pm

    I don’t think their models can hold a candle to the Victoria’s Secret models, hands down!

  • [7] June 15, 2015 at 12:46pm

    Have any of these “scientists” ever noticed that not one of these global climate model predictions/projections has ever come to fruition?! NOT ONE! Here’s my question: What level of mental illness has to be interfering with your thinking in order for you to ignore & deny the obvious?!

  • [8] June 15, 2015 at 12:36pm

    I can imagine the conversation now: “Are these the best failed climate models you’ve got? Yes sir, these are THE BEST failed climate models that we could come up with…Oh, but the data that we pulled out of our collective asses is even better!”

  • [3] May 28, 2015 at 2:42pm

    I’m still not certain what to make of them, but CARSON & FIORINA & now PATAKI are also in the mix now. FIORINA is doing some nice work on Shrillary & although I don’t know too much about PATAKI, just the mere fact that he’s from a nearly socialist state (a la CHRISTIE) leads me to believe that he will never be a strong constitutional conservative.

  • May 28, 2015 at 2:37pm

    I don’t know, SIGUHIFALB, it seems to me that the Republican establishment hates Cruz’ guts about as much as they have disdain for Paul.

  • [1] May 28, 2015 at 2:33pm

    How about a CRUZ/WEST ticket? Might that also be a reasonable possibility?

  • [2] May 26, 2015 at 1:02pm

    When you believe that you must lie in order to further your agenda, ideology, orthodoxy, then they are all as useless & worthless as the lie is to begin with.

  • [4] April 16, 2015 at 12:09pm

    Criminals typically & obviously don’t have much, if any, reservation about breaking the law. The Obama administration has little regard for the law & even less regard for the U.S. Constitution.

    Responses (1) +
  • March 31, 2015 at 12:54pm

    Conversion/Reparative psychotherapy is no less valid than any other form/type of psychotherapy & your one account, irregardless of it’s origin & veracity, is no definitive indication that the whole of Conversion/Reparative psychotherapy is harmful to the patients who willingly & voluntarily seek it out or that it should be made unavailable to them by banning &/or outlawing it’s practice.

  • [17] December 26, 2014 at 4:34pm

    Way to go Hayley! This Davis dunce & many others just like him also seem to have no clue that most people see right through their posturing and right to their ignorance.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] October 21, 2014 at 2:00pm

    Alright TheBlaze! My cable carrier is Blue Ridge Cable in northeastern PA & we’ve got it in HD!

  • [10] October 6, 2014 at 12:23pm

    ALL lives matter as long as they don’t intentionally violate the law, then all bets are off! If the “protest” was about blacks being killed by blacks in startling numbers, then it was worthwhile. If the “protest” was insinuating that police exceeded their authority in defending themselves against thugs like Michael Brown, then it was shortsighted & misguided, to say the least.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] September 29, 2014 at 2:02pm

    These major league A-holes are too ignorant for words! Ignore the ignorant fools, maybe they will realize their stupidity as some fanatical, radical, muslim, jihadist, terrorist is hacking at their infidel neck.

  • [2] September 8, 2014 at 5:29pm

    President Obama is going to make a statement: “If I had a brother, he would probably hit just like Ray Rice. Heck, Michelle hits harder than that! I can’t tell you how many times she’s whooped my a$$!”