User Profile: Bill Wallace

Bill Wallace

Member Since: September 08, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [1] February 10, 2016 at 1:50pm


  • February 10, 2016 at 1:31pm

    The part not explained…

    She is a call girl. Dude was walking the wild side. She did the hump and dump on the chump.

  • [2] February 10, 2016 at 1:16pm

    First, yes, Americans ARE stupid. After all, how many voted for the guy who came up with the idea that “you must pass the bill to find out what is IN the bill”? We fall to divide and conquer tactics creating boogeyman’s for women’s rights, racial rights, etc.

    Second, the primaries are NOT the place to put out new ideas. If you do, you just gave your playbook to the other side for when the race really counts. You give media more time to lie and deny your policies. NYT comes out with ad nauseum articles how evil you are and how bad the idea is. Cuban should know that…except for #1.

  • [5] February 10, 2016 at 12:59pm

    Where is the cop-cam showing their side?
    Or even the audio of the cop during the stop?

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] February 10, 2016 at 12:56pm

    That poor girl.

    She inherited the worst parts of her dad and her mom. An mashing together of traits that has left her very…unappealing.

  • [22] February 10, 2016 at 12:55pm

    Feds took the parts so they can still gun-run and not have the weapons traced back to the US Government.

  • [12] February 10, 2016 at 12:54pm

    If there is another attack, Democrats lose. Period.
    Obama will be seen as a failure. Outrage will flow to his party.

    Even moreso…if they find out the person came across the southern border, Trump wins easily. The fence will be demanded.

    Responses (3) +
  • [2] February 9, 2016 at 2:36pm

    What is with all the negative comments?

    I don’t agree with her view, but she is hot. I would invite her to join my caucus any day.

    Responses (1) +
  • [8] February 9, 2016 at 2:29pm

    Leading by example.

    Love it.

  • [12] February 8, 2016 at 6:34pm

    She is hot…and that is where it ends.

    Her comments about Trump saying he could shoot people, and her pondering if he was referring to her, identifies her as a liberal crony.

    First, Trump said “people”. Since when is Megan Kelly a multiple person? That is enough to make you question her psychological well being.

    Second, that she brings that comment up, in that context, is a leftist tactic. So out of context it is absurd. That is trigger 1 for being a liberal crony.

    Third, she is making this an item about women safety and gender inequality. Perfect playbook from Hillary Clinton.

    3 strikes the charm.

  • [16] February 5, 2016 at 12:03pm

    Define “unAmerican”.

    If you base it on traditional America values, of certain freedoms, then absolutely, Islam is unAmerican. Their view on women, on male superiority, on slavery. These are things practiced by muslims.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] February 4, 2016 at 7:24pm

    So, if I wear these glasses, do they come loaded with a 9 and cop killer bullets?
    Do they come in colors, red or blue cause of blood?

    Do I suddenly find myself the father of 19 kids from 24 different baby mamas?

    Ooohh…can Google get involved and put in a voice translator so I can go about my day speaking ebonics?

    Will they give me rhythm and soul?

  • [3] February 4, 2016 at 6:59pm

    And thus it begins….

    The President of the US is known as the “leader” of the free world. Key in on the term “leader”.

    I simply refuse to abide by any laws when the “leader” refuses to follow them himself/herself.

    If Hillary can flout laws and put secrets at risk, and not face the criminal justice system because she is running for President or a Clinton, then we have abandoned the system that was created in seeking Independence and are, instead, back into a royalty situation where the king can do no wrong.

    She would lead by example, and that example means I no longer have to abide by the laws.

    If Obama wants to lead in the same manner, and instead of standing up for the law as he is required, and decided he won’t do it, he endorses lawlessness.

    Why should ANY AMERICAN follow the law when those who we elect refuse to do so?
    The answer is simple. We should not.

  • [3] February 4, 2016 at 6:43pm

    Isn’t this why back alleys exist?

    I could wipe the smugness off his face with 4 of 5 knuckles.

  • [6] February 3, 2016 at 7:49pm

    A very simple counter…

    IF muslims agree with beheading a person for defamation of Mohammad (and most do),
    then WHY is it muslims will NOT join together, en masse, and remove these islamic terrorists who are (supposedly) defaming Allah?

    Allah is so much greater than Mohammad. The sin by muslims defaming Allah and Islam should be immediate execution.

    And yet…where is all the muslims who are gathering together to destroy ISIS?
    To destroy Boko Haram?
    Or Al Qaeda?

    The truth of the matter is, Obama is lying to us, the muslims are lying to us, and we are just too damn stupid to figure it out.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] February 3, 2016 at 7:43pm


    Guy is still sore for the epic implosion of his presidential campaign.

  • February 3, 2016 at 12:30pm

    This was long overdue. The whole argument with equal rights is to remove stereotypes and cultural misconceptions. Yet SCOTUS used those stereotypes to justify inequality, ignoring the purpose of the law, the objective of government, and all the other nations who utilize women as an effective fighting force.

  • [2] February 2, 2016 at 2:51pm

    Taking away my freedom of speech to force me to be sensitive to people? That is inclusive?

    Where does that include my view or opinion?

  • [2] February 2, 2016 at 2:49pm

    I had the same conversation at my law firm. Criticism of Citizens United and the hatred of the Kochs, but when you bring in silencing Soros or unions, and suddenly they are the heralds of freedom and the lower class. Have to protect them.

    Point out that Citizens United, while not perfect, is the only avenue that the poor can pool resources to combat billionaires, and they still don’t like it.

    It isn’t about freedom of speech. It is about silencing your opponent.

  • February 2, 2016 at 2:43pm

    My answer? So what?

    Rape is horrible. Atrocious. I think it is worthy of capital punishment.
    But what did the baby do? It is completely innocent.

    It is sad, and terrible, but I am not one for punishing a purely innocent party due to circumstance alone. And there are times when a person alleges rape when it wasn’t.

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love