TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying binge_thinker's 10 most recent comments.

• Report: Supreme Court ’80% Likely’ to Strike Defense of Marriage Act

  March 27, 2013 at 11:39pm

  In reply to huey6367.

  The gay agenda seeks to impose itself onto our societal, natural and religious structure because of some jealous toddler to 3rd grade battle cry that ‘it’s not fair’. Honestly, fairness is an illusion. Life is not fair. Everybody has a right to be married but there are some situations that don’t work for the preservation of mankind. You can’t marry objects, animals and if you’re the same sex, you’re one short and just as incompetent of marriage as if one of you is underage.

• Report: Supreme Court ’80% Likely’ to Strike Defense of Marriage Act

  March 27, 2013 at 11:30pm

  In reply to mcsledge.

  Both sides of the debate were out in force, with Christian opponents easily outnumbering advocates for gay marriage.

  Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2299671/PUNCHES-fly-gay-marriage-advocates-opponents-clash-outside-Supreme-Court-landmark-case-heard-inside.html#ixzz2OnlZJPQp
  Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

• Report: Supreme Court ’80% Likely’ to Strike Defense of Marriage Act

  March 27, 2013 at 11:24pm

  In reply to Inkmage.

  If victorious, the homosexual agenda will lead to the persecution of those who object on moral or religious grounds
  If homosexual marriage becomes the law of the land, then children in public schools will be taught that homosexuality is a normative lifestyle, and that gay households are just another “variant” style of family. Those who object may find themselves on the wrong side of the law. Unbelievable? This Orwellian situation has occurred in Massachusetts , which legalized homosexual marriage in 2004. In April 2005, David Parker, the parent of a six-year-old boy, protested to the Lexington elementary school after his son was taught about homosexual “families” in his kindergarten class.

  At a scheduled meeting at the school, when Parker refused to back down from his request that the school honor the Massachusetts parental notification statute, he was arrested for “trespassing,” handcuffed, and put in jail overnight. The next morning Parker was led handcuffed into court for his arraignment, and over the next several months endured two subsequent court appearances before the school district backed down and decided to drop all charges against him. In 2007, Parker’s lawsuit against the Lexington school officials was dismissed by a federal judge who refused to uphold his civil rights and to enforce the Massachusetts parental notification statute. Parker’s shocking story will become commonplace in a society that forces the acceptance of homosexual marriage

• Report: Supreme Court ’80% Likely’ to Strike Defense of Marriage Act

  March 27, 2013 at 11:18pm

  In reply to .

  Homosexual activists have a devious political agenda: to radically redefine the institution of marriage.
  Marriage corruption supporters admit that their goal is not simply to make the definition of marriage more “inclusive,” but to remake it in their own hedonistic image. Paula Ettelbrick, former legal director of the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, states, “Being queer means pushing the parameters of sex, sexuality, and family, and … transforming the very fabric of society.” Homosexual writer and activist Michelangelo Signorile rejects monogamy in favor of “a relationship in which the partners have sex on the outside often … and discuss their outside sex with each other, or share sex partners.”

• Creationist Offers $10,000 to Any Evolutionist Who Can Scientifically Disprove Genesis in Court

  March 27, 2013 at 11:09pm

  Christians do not have an issue with or are threatened by operational science. It’s the “goo to you” scientism we have a problem with. Even atheists/materialists admit to the religious nature of that kind of PC science.

• Creationist Offers $10,000 to Any Evolutionist Who Can Scientifically Disprove Genesis in Court

  March 27, 2013 at 11:03pm

  In reply to Lloyd Drako.

  And MILITANT atheists keep saying that which is funny since most of them aren’t scientists but read a book by Dawkins or Hitchens. Actually science uses scientific methodology primarily to disprove hypothesis. The more an hypothesis resists refutation the more it is accepted as a viable theory. When it can’t it uses the hypothetico-deductive method which is really speculation and extrapolation from the evidence.

  Besides DRAKO, show me the scientific (materialistic) proof that materialistic “science” is dispositive of everything.

• Creationist Offers $10,000 to Any Evolutionist Who Can Scientifically Disprove Genesis in Court

  March 27, 2013 at 10:59pm

  In reply to lgccac.

  True. http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=the+bible+and+archaeology&tag=googhydr-20&index=aps&hvadid=4031416301&hvpos=1o1&hvexid=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=146246038584928399&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=b&ref=pd_sl_9gt49c36e_b

• Creationist Offers $10,000 to Any Evolutionist Who Can Scientifically Disprove Genesis in Court

  March 27, 2013 at 10:52pm

  In reply to woodyee.

  Me and a whole slew of Christians have been waiting a long time for this supposed knock down drag out “proof”. I guess once the evolutionists stop arguing amongst themselves we should see something. Or once those pesky new discoveries stop splintering darwinian evolution even further.
  Philosophically I was expecting a good show by UK skeptics and atheists, you know stepping up to William Lane Craig’s challenge to debate. Dawkins and that lady ran away with their tail between their legs and he pretty much demolished others who were brave enough . Even van Til decimated atheist challenges, but I guess you wouldn’t know about that?

  I’ve read many atheists and their logical conclusions given atheism/materialism. Not pretty and yet atheists act is if they’ve found the promised land.

• Creationist Offers $10,000 to Any Evolutionist Who Can Scientifically Disprove Genesis in Court

  March 27, 2013 at 10:49pm

  In reply to ocrick.

  There are many philosophical and logical arguments for God which atheists have yet to counter sufficiently. I’ve presented some of those on this site and all I’ve got back is the same old deflection. Dawkins skulked away from William Lane Craig, arguably one of the best Christian Philosophers around today. He schooled Hitchens in a public debate that had atheists clamoring for reasons, settling on “well he’s just a good debater”. Surely Dawkins and Hitchens as well as Dennet and the rest could easily dismantle a fantasy? And why is it Dawkins himself automatically reverts to “design” in some of his arguments.

  Here’s an example of fantasy…

  Research on the origin of life seems to be unique in that the conclusion has already been authoritatively accepted . . . . What remains to be done is to find the scenarios which describe the detailed mechanisms and processes by which this happened. One must conclude that, contrary to the established and current wisdom, a scenario describing the genesis of life on earth by chance and natural causes which can be accepted on the basis of fact and not faith has not yet been written.

  Yockey, H.P., A calculation of the probability of spontaneous biogenesis by information theory, Journal of Theoretical Biology 67:377–398,

• Creationist Offers $10,000 to Any Evolutionist Who Can Scientifically Disprove Genesis in Court

  March 27, 2013 at 10:45pm

  In reply to athiest-infedel.

  Trying to figure out why you believe abiogenesis or the addition of genetic information without actual scientific proof must be exhausting.