User Profile: Blest


Member Since: January 11, 2013


123 To page: Go
  • [5] October 20, 2016 at 1:57pm

    She’s fine with killing people with guns. But guns are only for her and her cronies and secret service bodyguards. Everybody ELSE, you know, the plebs and the ignorant commoners, THEY are the ones who can’t have guns.

  • [6] October 20, 2016 at 10:38am

    Even 3rd world countries make you dip your finger in permanent ink so you can’t vote twice…

  • October 20, 2016 at 10:33am

    I don’t know where you’re from, but if you’re paying $100 per bullet, you need to find a better supplier.

  • [1] October 20, 2016 at 10:32am

    I don’t think that is the correct way of looking at things. You see, the same people who want to give terminal cancer patients an “end of life pill” are the same people who refuse to allow the same treatment to convicted murderers, rapists, and so on.

    Executing a serial killer?
    Executing a desperate cancer patient who is scared and vulnerable?

    The world has gone insane. And it has nothing to do with money.

  • [1] October 20, 2016 at 10:22am

    People suspected that Google was covering for Hillary several months ago. Even traditionally left-wing people were kind of freaked out that Google was manipulating searches in favor of her.

    Very insightful stuff, and these e-mails confirm it. Google was working to help Clinton.

  • [1] October 20, 2016 at 10:07am

    That is exactly what I thought as well. We’re seeing increasing evidence that the elections are not only having massive amounts of voter fraud involved, but they also seem to have Google manipulating search results and so on.

    Strange games are afoot. Be vigilant.

  • October 20, 2016 at 9:35am

    Bwa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
    Oh… ouch… my side hurts from laughing so hard.

    I’m sorry, this is just so funny. Only Germany would be dumb enough to pay people to leave. Do they not realize that just encourages more people to come to their nation just for the free “Get out of our country money”?

  • October 19, 2016 at 10:37am

    Well, drug-addicts tend to run away from the people who can help them, and run towards self-destruction and death. Not surprising that a druggy might run away from The Monk.

  • [4] October 19, 2016 at 10:35am

    You should travel outside of the US and see the rest of the world. Even the most pathetic Americans are better people than the average European.

  • [9] October 19, 2016 at 10:32am

    What really amazes me is the enormous blatant hypocrisy from the Left when it comes to things like this. Take the issue of kids having sex, for example. Their stance is that making rules against having sex is pointless, because kids are going to have sex anyway. They are 100% in favor of sexuality education, and the idea of abstinence-only sex education or regulations is just horrifying to them.

    But then you get on the topic of guns, and they think that firearm education is evil, and that the only solution is to ban guns.

    Think about that for a moment. They think that CHILDREN will have sex no matter what you do, so you might as well make sure they are educated and safe, but they think that CRIMINALS will simply stop using guns if you have abstinence-only gun education and regulations.

    This kind of logical incoherence is baffling to me, on both sides. You should teach kids about the correct purpose and context of using of a gun and how to do it safely. And you should teach young people about the correct purpose and context of sex as well. Being afraid of guns, or of teen pregnancy, or anything like that, will only cause you to educate from ignorance.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] October 19, 2016 at 10:19am

    Always remember, whatever Liberals call us, that is actually what they are themselves. If they call us racists, that’s what they are. If they call us homophobic, that’s what they are. If they call us violent, that’s what they are. They feel guilt about what they do, and then justify it by claiming that Republicans do the same things they do, only worse.

  • [-1] October 19, 2016 at 10:12am

    How does this “Bradley Effect” thing go for Trump? I thought it was about RACISM. Wouldn’t that naturally correlate to the whole Sexism issue going on right now? People don’t want to say they’re voting for Trump because they will be seen as Sexist, because they’re voting against the woman, and they’re voting for the guy who is called “Sexist” in the media.

    The Bradley Effect only makes sense if it’s people voting for Trump, but lying to people and claiming that they are voting for Hillary. Because that is what everybody seems to be saying, that if you don’t vote for Hillary, you hate women, you are a sexist, and so on.

    A few major polling groups and survey groups have just stopped doing polls on the General Election, because they are not reliable and there is no way to get accurate poll information. For the majority of the 2012 election, the polls showed Romney beating Obama, and it only changed right at the very end, about a week before the election, the polls showed that Obama had a slight lead.

    So either people are as fickle as can be and change their voting based on which direction the wind blows that day, OR, the polls are just not working the way they should, and there is some kind of systemic problem with either bias or people just lying to polls and surveyors in large numbers.

  • October 18, 2016 at 9:53am

    Sorry, I don’t have a Facebook account.

  • [13] October 18, 2016 at 9:36am

    It’s not just that. They don’t understand what Socialism is either, or what Communism is. They don’t understand what any of these things are. They literally think that socialism is “roads” and “fire departments”. They have no idea what they are getting into, and what they are sacrificing in order to get there.

  • [6] October 17, 2016 at 11:11am

    Where are all the people crying out about the “rhetoric” being used by the media and left-wing political figures? I mean, that phrase “Nazi Republicans” came directly from the liberals and the media.

    I remember back when that one Democrat lady was shot by a crazy guy back several years ago, the entire media tried to paint it as “violent rhetoric” by right-wing groups. Well, this was clearly violence inspired by left-wing rhetoric. Where is the news media in all of this? Huh?

  • [10] October 17, 2016 at 11:08am

    I like the “Deplorable” hat idea. Maybe a hat like Zorro’s, or the Three Musketeers, or Robin Hood’s.

    Speaking of Robin Hood, it’s amazing how many people think that Robin Hood is about supporting socialism. All this “Steal from the rich and give to the poor” stuff people say about Robin Hood, but nobody has ever actually paid attention to the story. He stole from the Tax Collectors, the Government, the Sheriff, not the rich. His love interest, Maid Marian, is a noblewoman who is rich and privileged, yet Robin never steals from her. Why? Because he doesn’t steal from the rich. He steals from the government.

  • [15] October 17, 2016 at 11:01am

    Precisely what all of my Native friends and acquaintances have told me as well. They actually PREFER the term “Indian”. Except one guy, and he prefers “Navajo Indian”.

    Responses (1) +
  • October 17, 2016 at 10:59am

    Who are “they”?

  • [2] October 17, 2016 at 10:58am

    This is why Voter ID laws are so terrifying to Democrats. The idea that you have to have a photo ID in order to vote threatens to throw a wrench into their plans of having illegals and dead people voting Democrat.

    On a funnier note, I do remember seeing something online one time that was a picture of a happy guy smiling, saying “I voted Republican my entire life, but now that I’m dead, I’ve had a change of heart, and I’ll be voting Democrat from now on.”

  • [9] October 17, 2016 at 10:52am

    From what I can tell, it is a multi-layer code designed to throw people off. Immediately, it is clear that this is a base-16 string of numbers, more commonly referred to as a Hex code. When you put the number into a converter to translate it, you get strange sequences of ASCII characters.

    The first tweet contained the number 4bb96075acadc3d80b5ac872874c3037a386f4f595fe99e687439aabd0219809

    That translates to: K¹`u¬­ÃØ ZÈr‡L07£†ôõ•þ™æ‡Cš«Ð!˜

    There are a lot of computer nerds who type messages like this in code, they call it encrypted Leet Speek. And it is unique to each individual, so it’s impossible to unscramble without really knowing the mind of the person who wrote it. Sort of like Tolkien inventing an entire language for his elves in the Lord of the Rings books, it’s unique to him, because he made it up.

    Responses (2) +
123 To page: Go