User Profile: blinknight

blinknight

Member Since: January 17, 2013

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

123 To page: Go
  • April 18, 2014 at 6:00am

    “I have read His Book; in the end God wins. God is not evolving; He is the same yesterday, today and forever!”

    So the god of the Old Testament that approved of slavery, rape, genocide, and torture is the same as the one in the New Testament? It’s good to finally see a Christian admit to that.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 18, 2014 at 5:58am

    Yes, read the Bible, nothing will make you stop believing in the monster contained there in faster.

  • April 18, 2014 at 5:57am

    @mike79

    You would if people kept shoving Harry Potter in your face and demanding that you believe in him to.

  • April 18, 2014 at 5:55am

    @utopia

    As has been pointed out to you. Emotionalism is associated with theism, not atheism. I realize that you looked up a word you found somewhere, saw it fit what you wanted to think, and have clung to it ever since but let’s examine the word for ourselves. As I said, you found a new word somewhere, looked it up on google, and decided without merit or reason that it applied to your false conception of atheists.

    It was the theists who got angry and destructive, unable apparently to control themselves when they attempted to destroy a sign. It is the theists who fly in to crying fits when they don’t get their way. Theists the world over, Christians and Muslims, immediately fall to crying fits about ‘oppression’ or ‘bigotry’ as a means of getting their way. It is the theists who don’t base their arguments on anything logically consistent that can actually be proven or demonstrated, but instead employ emotional blackmail against people with threats of torture and misery.

    The wiki entry where you got your stupid idea from even mentions Hitler, and as I already stated, you can deny his religious beliefs all you want, but the fact is he used that character trait to control a very theistic German populace who found him quite appealing.

  • April 17, 2014 at 5:57pm

    Heh. If this had been a Christian sign you lot would be bawling your eyes out about ‘hate’ and ‘oppression’, but hey, the atheists got what they deserved of course.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 17, 2014 at 5:56pm

    @Cavallo

    I know I’ve explained this to you a few times already but you are the broken record that screams marxist, marxist, marxist, so really…

    Your religion has been brutally oppressing, subjugating and killing people for a thousand years just as you just freely admitted and even if it were true that atheism had a single solitary thing to do with the reasons behind more recent atrocities that doesn’t make all the murder, slavery, rape, and torture done in the name of your god any better.

    The only thing that prevented Christians from having a higher body count than they do is that they didn’t have modern methods and large populations to do it with and cry all you want about the religious beliefs of Hitler, but the vast majority of Nazi Germany were firmly in your court. After you’re done sputtering excuses about ‘well those weren’t REAL Christians…’ I would like to point out, once again, that everything ‘good’ in your religion was what society forced you to adopt because Christians were just as savage as the modern jihadist right up until society forced the change.

    The horrors you keep prattling on about as if they excuse all the evils done in the name of your religion were done in the name of Agricultural Collectivism. Nobody has ever run around murdering thousands of people because they didn’t believe in something but rather because they believed IN something to such a fanatical degree that genocide became justified in their minds.

    This inclu

  • April 17, 2014 at 5:45pm

    Same reason crying babies are so annoying.

    Responses (2) +
  • April 17, 2014 at 8:10am

    No, I assure you, 3/4 of the country absolutely do not believe in Young Earth Creationism. We may be bad off as a country, but we’re not THAT bad off.

  • April 17, 2014 at 8:09am

    @Majorly

    Yes, because one guy making a bad internet video in which he demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of his subject matter every few seconds really proves hundreds of thousands of scientists who live and breath this stuff every day… To be wrong.

  • April 17, 2014 at 8:07am

    As I already said. You think god made all this? I see no problem with that.

    You think the earth is only a few thousand years old? Then you’re wrong. That’s not ‘disrespecting a religious belief’, that’s us telling you that whatever source you got that from is wrong, no matter what it is, no matter what sort of insight it claims to have. The earth is billions of years old and we can prove that.

    Whether or not your kids understand evolution better than you is something I can’t quantify, I don’t know how much they know and you haven’t told me what you know.

  • April 17, 2014 at 8:04am

    http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html#CC

    There’s a primer for you. Feel free to research further.

  • April 17, 2014 at 5:28am

    Explain chalk cliffs using young earth creationism ideas without violating any known natural laws.

    You’re going to be at that one awhile.

  • April 17, 2014 at 5:26am

    @germont

    Except for the part about ‘biological Darwinism’, by which I assume you mean evolution, a theory that has developed dramatically since first proposed by Darwin over 150 years ago… None of the rest of that is science.

  • April 17, 2014 at 3:04am

    And how do you think the case I talked about started? Out of thin air?

    Once the child gets started, all you need is stringing along a little.

  • April 17, 2014 at 3:02am

    The child psychology experts that managed to convince a bunch of children they had been sexually abused didn’t realize what they were doing. Personal correspondence that was examined after the fact indicated that they were obsessively overzealous, but they legitimately thought they were doing a very good thing. They echoed the common theme ‘children do not make these things up’ and ‘the details are too exact to be fake’. It turns out neither of those things were true. This is why modern methods dealing with children are different.

    @Paul

    I am not the one trying to use the testimony of a four year old according to his parents to “prove” something.

    @pepper

    Where did I say that I think life is only about making money? I work in a lab. There is an outside chance of winning the “lotto” if we discover something considered a major breakthrough, but that’s about it.

  • April 16, 2014 at 6:06pm

    Well of course he did, and they didn’t fuel it at all. I mean what would they have to gain from that, beyond book and movie deals. Children pick up on things better than you realize they do.

    Responses (3) +
  • April 16, 2014 at 5:30pm

    Uh, not a single word of what I said was opinion or a story. It’s an actual documented study. It produced exactly the results I talked about and was conducted for precisely the reason I mentioned: To figure out how upwards of 10-15 children could all collectively be telling the same story of sexual abuse that never happened with wildly different details.

  • April 16, 2014 at 5:25pm

    Given what I’ve seen from creationists?

    “Is a christian or creationist unable to do biology or chemistry, or math?”

    Not as straight forward a question as you seem to think as I have seen creationists attempt to use all three of those things and fail completely miserably at it every single solitary time.

    And the reason that they fail usually has something to do with having foregone conclusions that can never be wrong no matter what.

    Then again I have also seen creationists who actually know and understand the scientific method and seem perfectly capable of getting things right.

  • April 16, 2014 at 5:20pm

    He’d still be an idiot.

  • April 16, 2014 at 5:19pm

    Kent Hovind is a convicted fraud who spend time in prison. He and his son are both nothing but con artists. It would not even take you 5 minutes of research to figure out that Kent Hovind is about as well versed in science as the man in the moon. He is a complete fraud.

123 To page: Go