You really shouldn’t have set yourself up by asking fo names of people with accreditation who believe in God………You want names? here ya’ go:
Stephen C. Meyer…….Phd. Cambridge
Sir Fred Hoyle
Allan Sandage (pupil of Edward Hubble)
Antony Flew(converted FROM atheist TO Creationist)
Your “commentary” on Ravi Zecharias is either quoted in ignorance or stupidity (forgive my crassness). That type of statement ONLY comes from the mouth of a person feeling threatened by the insulted individuals presented content and not by anything you have personally observed. Ravi is a VERY well respected individual in the order of CS Lewis among his peers. I will refer you to the “No true Scottsman” idea by the above mentioned Antony Flew.
You may be a genuine atheist but please, drop the absurd notion that being a Christian excludes someone from being a “true scientist”. Again, I refer you to the “No true scottsman” fallacy.
And the Fore Fathers and the Founding Fathers. The men who invented accreditation. Also, there are a bunch of Ph.D's in the, Northwest of all places, who I have heard personal testimony of their involvement with their local Evangelical Church and are open about their love for Christ. It is a sleep giant that will demolish the contemporary post-modern bankrupt pedi-philosophies that are being indoctrinated in America's youth. Preach it Bolo2811
Thank you for your post... NJBARFLY is a stuck CD with his published junk, Atheists love to"lift up" THEMSELVES by putting down believers , quite stupid for someone so intellegent.
God does not send anyone away empty, except those who are full of themselves.
Sorry, but I never mentioned anywhere in my post that there are no scientists that believe in god. As a matter of fact, the majority of scientists, including physicists and biologists, are believers in god. Instead of making things up, you should really read what I wrote. What I can and will say, is that none of them are young Earth creationists. There are no young Earth creationist "theories" published in any peer reviewed scientific journal.
Ravi Zecharias is not a scientist. As I stated, he is just another young Earth creationist. I didn't say anything else about the man, nor do I believe I disparaged him in any devastating way. The man I did disparage was Hugh Ross, who NOBODY takes seriously, be it scientist or creationist.
Yes, when someone claims to be a great scientist, I ask for some sort of evidence. I look at their theories and request a peer viewed journal article or two to back their theories up. This is a normal request for any legitimate scientific theory. This is how science works. I'm sorry if asking for a shred of evidence of these supposed scientific theories, which you obviously can't produce, makes me sound like a broken CD.
I made no attempt to produce it, nor am I. Your attempt is disingenuious, and you should know why. Further I am not playing the game by "your" rules.
NJBARFLY> http://www.answersingenesis.org/ ... Check it out. These guys are the best at proving and affirming the youth earth Truth. Hopefully you'll find something that will challenge you. Blessings.
June 11, 2012 at 12:59pm
As i’ve said many times before, liberals are a contradiction unto themselves. Nothing will EVER make them touch base with reality. They’ve been chasing a socialist utopia for centuries and it is STILL yet to be found, just like their “missing link” and “homoexuals are born that way”…ad nauseum…..Liberalism is a mental disorder fueled by anger and disdain for the very way of life that has ALLOWED them the freedom to be mentally disabled. You will always hear the myth that “science has proven homosexuals are born that way”…..oh really? maybe in the Liberal of Oz but not in reality. You do NOT need to be an educated rocket scientist or a genetic/molecular biologist to KNOW that the ACT (for thats what it is) of homosexuality is neither “natural” nor “normal” and there is ZERO evidence to suggest otherwise.
June 8, 2012 at 5:25pm
It would be nice if your liberal cronies were simply “shadows and ghosts” but here in the REAL WORLD government overreach is becoming a serious problem. Liberals are a contradiction unto themselves. Oh how I wish that billionaire lunatic liberals were only “shadows and ghosts” but Agenda 21 is a VERY real and VERY rapidly materializing form of tyranny. Truly, I say to you….Don’t Tread on me”………Sweet Home ALABAMA…Roll Tide.
I agree with you but for one thing that you said. It's should be Waarrrrr Eagleeee!!!. :)
June 6, 2012 at 6:15am
The Four headed Leopard anyone? The national “symbol” for Germany is the Leopard. The Four heads are the 1st, 2nd, THIRD, and soon to be FOURTH Reich. Only this Reich will have power that Hiltler tried to aquire by force…..namely DEBT.
AMEN BROTHER! This is the real opening stanza for the One World Government as predicted in the Bible. Soon, America with the loads of debt we have accrued will fall into place and submit to a One World Authority. The end times are rushing at the world at a blistering pace.
Keep your eyes on Germany. The power it receives through this economic collapse with be the catalyst of world changing events such as this world has never seen before!
May 10, 2012 at 3:08pm
HEY! ATHEISTS………I’VE GOT A 5 FT CROSS IN MY FRONT YARD!……….
I bid you…….try and make me take it down……..MAKE MY DAY……..PLEASE DO…..
Why would any atheists use the courts to get you to take it down? Your cross is on private property. You are comparing apples to oranges here: private property versus public property.
No atheist is going to ask you to take down your cross. It is your land and your right to put whatever message you want on it.
The problem is this is a government endorsement of religion.
@BOLO2811 Couldn't agree more!!!! I AM SO HEARTILY SICK OF HAVING TO be worried about what atheists, liberals, etc might do to me and mine!!!!
ROCKETSMOM -- let me put your mind at ease. We don't care about what you, as a private citizen, do in regards to your faith. No one is stopping you from practicing your faith as you see fit and no one wants to.
May 9, 2012 at 3:15pm
Umm, hate to break it to you but carbon dating is a KNOWN failure. Radio Carbon dating is bogus.
Some “scientists” thought they would have a little fun and test rocks that they KNEW before hand how old they were because they were newly fromed rock taken from the after math of Mt St Helens. You wanto to guess what their carbon dating data showed? It told them that the rocks were THOUSANDS of years old when the knew they were not, but i’m sure that info didn’t find it’s way into text books; Nor do Poly strait fossils that stick straight up through SEVERAL layers of the “geological collumn”. So yeah, carbon dating is ONLY used when it’s wildly inaccurate time frames are consistent with the testers world-view.
NOTHING will EVER make a heard hearted person believe EVEN if they saw Christ standing in front of them. Have you ever wondered WHY the actual soldiers that will be fighting in the Valley of Jezreel (armageddon) will willingly CHOOSE to fight against Christ? It’s because they NEVER believed nor can they at that point. Their entire lives have been lived in direct opposition to The Absolute Truths of the Bible and Christ especially. They disregarded those Truths that have been Self Evident since the Fall in the Garden up until that future point of Human contention against God Himself. In short, If you hate His word, you will inevitably hate Him who spoke it. Thats what Jesus was getting at when he told the parable of the Rich man who abused the beggar lazarus at his gate. Both of them died, the Rich man went to hell and the beggar Lazarus went to paradise; it was in hell that the rich man lifted up his eyes and saw Abraham from across the Great Gulf that separated the two. He begged Abraham to send someone back from the dead to warn his five brothers and it was AT THIS POINT that abraham explained to this rich man that if they wouldn’t believe the Law and the prophets (old testament) then neither would they believe EVEN IF someone were to rise from the dead. It is PRECISELY this mentality we see today; ALL the evidence in the world will NEVER make a person believe if they are predisposed to hatred toward God. End of discussion.
animouse you are as ignorant as a bucket of sand. The fool has said in his heart there is no God.
"...ALL the evidence in the world will NEVER make a person believe if they are predisposed to hatred toward God. End of discussion."
From a philosophical understanding of the word "predisposed", it negates freewill. Hatred of God is learned through a lifetime, after one obtains the age of reason (i.e. advent of conscience; knowing right from wrong), of not choosing to seek and do the "good".
May 8, 2012 at 12:00pm
How ironic. One of the BIGGEST BUMS in the history of man had the the gall to make mention of something he had NO CLUE about……..a WORK day! This bum was supported by his OWN father for almost all of his life and came up with the “Communist Manifesto” to justify his own feelings of being a BUM. Typical Liberal/Socialist: too lazy to work, so bring EVERYONE else down to their level so they won’t feel bad about being a bum. What a BUM.
Oh, did I say Marx was a BUM?…………….yep,…….guy was a BUM.
May 7, 2012 at 4:34pm
The problem has a VERY simple solution: TELL THEM THE TRUTH. You DO NOT become like the “world” to attract the world. What attracts people in the desert to the oasis? It is the LIFE GIVING WATER that they CANNOT get anywhere else. People in the “sciences” who are looking for a “theory of everything” don’t realize that they already have it…IN PRINT! The Holy Bible is the BOOK of EVERYTHING (which includes EVERY facet of our three dimensional world). The BIble made mention of the Laws of the Universe in the Book of Job LOONG before people ever knew that there were Laws of the Universe. The book of Job also mentions in detail the process that leads to rain; moisture from the seas and lakes that evaporate up into the atmosphere and then falls back to the Earh as “rain”. NO OTHER ancient Text comes close to the accuracy and intimate DETAILS laid out in the Bible of events that the people of the respective time period had NO WAY of knowing.
May 3, 2012 at 11:52am
Atheists be warned. Youy sow the wind, you WILL reap the whirl wind. THE United States of America was founded in the Judeo-Christian faith with the FIRST continental Congress opening with PRAYER to the One who was crucified upon that CROSS you hate. You are ENEMIES of the Cross of Christ and by default are ENEMIES of the United States of America. You are a scourge to humanity and are on notice. There are FAR more of US than there are of YOU.
May 1, 2012 at 6:36pm
According to the Bass Ackward US courts, an Embryo isn’t a person UNLESS that mother is murdered or killed in an auto accident AND THEN it becomes a person to enable the courts to squeeze more time and money out of the offender. You CAN’T have it both ways. This is why America IS dying and WILL be COMPLETELY DEAD in a matter of a few years. A nation CANNOT murder it’s children and expect to receive ANYTHING from GOD but JUDGEMENT. It was NO coincidence that the ONLY thing left after 9/11 was two cross beams in the shape of a CROSS. It was NO coincidence when the Stock Market “crashed” in 2008-it dropped by 777 points. It was NO coincidence when the August 2011 earthquake in Virginia happened, the ONLY damage was to the Washington Monument AND The National Cathedral; Three of the Spires were broken off and thrown to the ground. Warnings! Either heed them or be ahniahlated by your own deeds. THAT IS THE ONLY SOLUTION TO GET AMERICA OFF IT’S DEATH BED. Got news for everyone, there is not a SINGLE politician in the world who could get America “back” to being America of old. It will take repentance and a return to the ROOTS that nourished America from the beginning; Judeo-Christian faith.
you missed the windstorm that blew down the designated white house Christmas tree in spring 2011...sept 2011...was 10 years after 2/3 of the world begged God for his protection...like God was saying Christmas 2011...will be the first Christmas without my grace (end of the age of grace) you know...when we did that abomination and had a ceremony at ground zero..desolate of God.
May 1, 2012 at 3:25pm
I have to be totally honest and crass here for a moment; If a suitcase nuke went off in Chicago I would NOT shed a single tear for that cesspool. It seems that EVERY enemy of America and the US Constitution seems to conglomerate in the city of Chicago. Thats where Bill Ayers originated. Thats where that apostate Oprah originated from. That’s where the two most evil men in America originated from: Louis Farakkhan and Barak Hussein obama. Chicago HAS to be the most evil city in the world considering the LONG list of radical, evil people it has produced. The violence in that city is UN-BELIEVEABLE.
May 1, 2012 at 12:04pm
The REAL problem today is that human beings have sought to justify their SIN by bluring the lines between THE ACT itself and the PERSON who commits the ACT. In 2012, homosexuality is no longer an immoral “act”, they erroneously believe that the SIN and the person who commits the SIN are “one”. In other words, it makes them “feel good” to believe that they were “born that way” and don’t have any say in the matter. That is only half true; Once the individual acts upon that lust and entertains that homosexual desire, it becomes a trap of which there is NO escape from excpet by a repentant heart and by crying out to Christ to deliver them FROM that SIN nature that has taken them captive. Becoming angry at God and bashing his children for telling them the truth only COMPOUNDS the problem. In the words of The Apostle Paul : “Have I become your enemy because I tell you the truth?”. I say this not ONLY because it is an absolute Biblical Truth but because I KNOW from experience. Not experience with the Sin of Homosexuality but with Sins of another nature that lead to the same location……Spiritual DEATH that inevitably leads to premature physical DEATH. If a man pulls the pin on a grenade and lays it at his feet but then turns his back and pretends that it isn’t there, is that going to lessen the pain or make it “go away”? NO! Convincing yourself that something isn’t true when it is, will NEVER alleviate the consequences of violating that truth.
April 27, 2012 at 1:08pm
GREAT! Now their giving out scholarships for being IGNORANT of History. There is MORE evidence of the Life, Death, and ressurection of Jesus The Christ than there is of Ceasar crossing the Rubicon. I bet you won’t see ANY atheist even DARE to wear a Ceasar costume for “fictional character” day. Not even atheist professors are willing to look THAT stupid by even attempting to say that Jesus of Nazareth never existed. HE DID. They found a stone with an inscription belonging to Pontius Pilate. EVERY single person mentioned in the Bible existed AND the locations mentioned in the Bible Existed. Every single arguments atheists try to use against Christianity come from their conjecture, NOT hard evidence. As is typical of their defense for dying theories like evolution, they always say: “just wait, that empirical evidence will materialize one day, and THEN i’ll disprove it”…….yeah, satan is stringin them out on the “one day” mantra until he gets you in the ground pushing up daisies and by then you’ll KNOW it’s too late.
Sorry, but that is not true, The letter from Pilate has been proven an obvious fake. There is NO historical evidence of Christ other than the Bible, (which of course a person of faith will believe) and letters written decades to over a hundred years after the events of the gospels. There is a LOT of evidence of Ceasar existing, (Besides coins minted when he was in power.) We also know what he looked like due to busts made of him in his lifetime. No such evidence of Christ has ever been found. I am not saying Christ did not exist. I'm just pointing out the fallacy of your argument. Oh and as for the argument that every place in the Bible existed archeologists have never found Nazareth.
Evolution is not “just a theory,” let alone a dying one. This is a common misconception. Scientists still talk about “Darwin’s theory of evolution,” because there are now alternate theories of how evolution occurs, but there is no such thing as a scientist who does not believe that evolution occurs. Evolution is a fact, and calling it a theory is like saying that gravity is just a theory because physicists now believe that Newton’s theory of gravity is not the last word on the subject.
April 24, 2012 at 12:45pm
All I will say is that had I even “witnessed” this happening outside my home there would have to be a coroner on hand because There WOULD have been another “trayvon”……….or two. The others would have fled for their lives after the first couple of shots. I did in fact have a “mob” fight take place a few house down from where I live and it DIDN’T LAST LONG. Every single neighbor in my “hood” knows that this family is packing some serious HEAT and it’s not just for show. I ALWAYS prefer to use a chemical alternative FIRST like OC-17 and if that don’t work, PLAN B.
April 23, 2012 at 11:55am
Colonel Alan West is an AMERICAN PATRIOT. You liberal/socialist pencil necks have NO RIGHTS whatsoever to question this mans blood, sweat and tears he painted into the fabric of America. This man sees his enemy and kick THEIR A*S. The problem with academia is that they live in an ENTIRELY delusional world in which “peace, love and harmony” ONLY exist in their class rooms. THAT IS NOT REALITY. You are either ignorant OR STUPID; Ignorance can be cured, STUPIDITY IS PERMANENT. The very name “Islam” MEANS SUBMISSION. Islam is the ENEMY of the world. Islam has raped the African continent as well as countless women and children. Islam has brought NOTHING but hate and evil into the world. The prophet mohummad when he had his “encounter” with his supposed ‘angel’ believed HIMSELF that it was a demon. It was his WIFE that convinced him it was from god. How ironic is that? seeing that women have NO rights what-so-ever and their testamony is worthless. The ENTIRE religion of Islam hinges on the testamony of a woman, contradicting itself at every turn. Contradiction is a glaring warning that it isn’t TRUE.
April 23, 2012 at 11:36am
Most people are correct in fearing for the worst out of this president as his re-election draws near. I would only add that there are “some” things that this closet-tyrant would try FIRST before he tried to OUTRIGHT assert himself as permanent leader. He would almost CERTAINLY try to use “false-flag” terrorist events, perhaps another Oklahoma City bombingm blaming it on “conservative” TEA-Party types to chum up support for his re-election. If the American people don’t buy that, THEN he will blatantly try to take power via exec. order. It’s unfortunate, the government has taken SO many of our freedoms that the ONLY way they can be returned is by revolution.
April 21, 2012 at 7:33pm
History is on MY SIDE. So who’s brainwashed?…………….You wanna start with post WW1 balfour declaration? in reference to the mythical “palestinians”, you want to address the historical FACT of “palestinians” being in REALITY Jordanians? Where do you want to start? But of course i’m sure you MUST be privy to some unknown source of information that no one else seems to know. Please, make my day. Oh, and PLEASE…just FACTS….Not your anti-semitic conjecture.
So Its just rhetoric and we should burry our heads in the sand. Pay no attention to all those rockets their just figments of your imagination. Theirs no buggy man everything is fine. Wrong!
These people do not know how to live in harmony with neighbors. It’s not in their thinking.
They only know killing & hate. This song is about their culture.
“That’s Not Right” http://www.reverbnation.com/play_now/song_10789999
FYI, here is Ron Paul on the issue of radical Islamists.
War and the Constitution | Ron Paul
"The Arab nations are united like they've never been united before. ... So the Islamic fundamentalists have exactly what they've been looking for maybe for a thousand years. ... And if there's ever any understanding of the Arab thought process, I mean we are doing everything conceivable to support the enemy on what we're doing."
israel firsters like you are sickening, the israeli government announced a 12 million dollar plan to pay american jjews to post pro israel comments and defend israel in the court of american public opinion, they are instructed to use " non jjewish sounding names" deceitful trash these people are.
"Israel’s deputy prime minister acknowledged this week that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has never actually said Israel must be “wiped off the map.”
So all those UN translators, over all these years, mis-translated him? If that's true, how can we trust anything the UN translators.... translate? This sounds so... Hilary Clintonish.....
News the MSM isn't showing.
Paul Supporters Sweep Oklahoma District 4
@A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
Here's what Ron Paul says about Iran getting a nuclear weapon:
WALLACE: As for Iran's nuclear ambitions, you wrote this: "One can understand why they might want to become nuclear capable, if only to defend themselves and to be treated more respectfully."
Is that your policy towards Iran?
PAUL: Well, even our own CIA gives me this information, that they have no evidence that they're working on a weapon. Just think of what we went through in the Cold War. When I was in the Air Force, after I was drafted in the Air Force, all through the '60s, we were -- we were standing up against the Soviets. They had like 30,000 nuclear weapons with intercontinental missiles.
Just think of the agitation and the worrying of a country that might get a nuclear weapon some day. And just think of how many nuclear weapons surround Iran. The Chinese are there. The Indians are there. The Pakistanis are there. The Israelis are there. The United States is there. All these countries -- China has nuclear weapons.
Why wouldn't it be natural that they might want a weapon? There'd be -- internationally, they'd be given more respect. Why should we write people off? There was -- you know, in the '50s, we at least talked to them. At least our leaders and Reagan talked to the Soviets.
What's so terribly bad about this?
So, Ron Paul's position is "what's so bad" about Iran getting a nuclear weapon?
Gee, Dr. Paul. What's so bad about that? Oh...I'm sure nothing at all.
Then you'd think there'd be a link to that somewhere. Perhaps someone caught a screenshot of the proof?
Or is that just an unsubstantiated assertion from another anti-Semetic?
Does anyone remember the unicorn Obama road down the rainbow and into the whitehouse? Ron Paul rides its mate.
"Washed from the pages of time" or "Cancerous tumor that must be removed" is clearly a threat. If your neighbor says that you would take it seriously too. Maybe they, and by they I mean Hezbollah, Hamas, Iran, now Egypt and Turkey have had leaders say similar things, only mean these statements as provocative rhetoric. But to dismiss it summarily as rhetoric would be really, really, really, colossally stupid on Israels part. Luckily for them, they don't.
"Here’s what Ron Paul says about Iran getting a nuclear weapon: ..."
Our Founders had the same foreign policy as Ron Paul: Ignore other nations' wars, and be willing to trade with all countries, whether they were in a war with someone else, or not.
National sovereignty is exactly that. Unless they're attacking us, we don't have a right to tell them what to build.
Further, OUR CIA started hostilities toward the Iranians in 1953 with the coup against their democratically elected PM - and we did it for a British oil company.
And now, our sanctions against Iran is hurting their citizens, economically. In this case, WE are the aggressor.
The Progressives have historically been the interventionists, not the Republicans. The Progressives are responsible for WWI, WWII - they tricked us into war.
We have been played by Progressives for a LONG time.
@A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
So, to be clear - Ron Paul says he's good with Iran having nuclear weapons.
To counter that point, you make excuses for why Iran might want to attack America? So, blame America first. Is that another Ron Paul platform plank?
The Progressives have historically been the interventionists, not the Republicans. The Progressives are responsible for WWI, WWII – they tricked us into war.
We have been played by Progressives for a LONG time.
You are somewhat correct. What do you consider interventionism? Sanctions are "interventionist"? No, they aren't. They don't even work as a deterant. Then what's your point? It's hurting the people? No, it simply isn't helping them.
It's not our job to see to it that the Iranian economy makes Iranians happy. That's the problem of the Iranian people and their government. Theirs is totalitarian, in case you didn't know. There's nothing wrong with us funding anti-government movements, so long as they aren't also Islamist.
There's nothing wrong with supporting Israel when they want to deal with their own neighbors.
"These people do not know how to live in harmony with neighbors. It’s not in their thinking.
They only know killing & hate."
The ignorance of that is astounding. How many Muslims do you know? How many times have you been to the middle east? I'm guessing zero on both. Christianity is filled with more call to violence than any other religion. To claim otherwise is absurd.
"What do you consider interventionism? Sanctions are “interventionist”? No, they aren’t. They don’t even work as a deterant. Then what’s your point? It’s hurting the people? No, it simply isn’t helping them.
"It’s not our job to see to it that the Iranian economy makes Iranians happy. That’s the problem of the Iranian people and their government. Theirs is totalitarian, in case you didn’t know. There’s nothing wrong with us funding anti-government movements, so long as they aren’t also Islamist."
You readily accept the idea of a global government, and don't even realize it.
Sanctions disrupt the international division of labor, and, as our experience with the Smoot-Hawley Tariff during the Great Depression, in effect, showed, cutting our own citizens off from the international division of labor is shooting ourselves in the foot. Therefore, the only economically viable means to economically cripple another country is to collude with other countries in an international governmental alliance.
If you like sanctions, then you like global government. You favor this approach at your own peril.
Yes, technically, individuals have a right to refuse to trade with Iran (our government doesn't have a right to tell us not to); But the effects of your approach are like what our Smoot Hawley did to us.
It hurts the citizens who now must resist the sanctions to survive.
This is what Thomas Jefferson said should be how we deal with "belligerent nations" at war with others, but not at war with us.
Third Annual Message to Congress by Thomas Jefferson
"We have seen with sincere concern the flames of war lighted up again in Europe, and nations with which we have the most friendly and useful relations engaged in mutual destruction. While we regret the miseries in which we see others involved let us bow with gratitude to that kind Providence which, inspiring with wisdom and moderation our late legislative councils while placed under the urgency of the greatest wrongs, guarded us from hastily entering into the sanguinary contest, and left us only to look on and to pity its ravages." ...
... "These will be heaviest on those immediately engaged. Yet the nations pursuing peace will not be exempt from all evil. In the course of this conflict, let it be our endeavor, as it is our interest and desire, to cultivate the friendship of the belligerent nations by every act of justice and of incessant kindness; to receive their armed vessels with hospitality from the distresses of the sea, but to administer the means of annoyance to none; to establish in our harbors such a police as may maintain law and order; to restrain our citizens from embarking individually in a war in which their country takes no part; to punish severely those persons, citizen or alien, who shall usurp the cover of our flag for vessels not entitled to it, infecting thereby with suspicion those of real Americans, and committing us into controversies for the redress of wrongs not our own;"
Ron Paul has seen the effects of sanctions time and again, and they usually lead to war because of the economic destruction they cause.
Starve the Iranians? No!
"Before the House of Representatives: Statement Opposing the Iran Refined Petroleum Sanctions Act, December 15, 2009 ..."
"As we have learned with US sanctions on Iraq, and indeed with US sanctions on Cuba and elsewhere, it is citizens rather than governments who suffer most. The purpose of these sanctions is to change the regime in Iran, but past practice has demonstrated time and again that sanctions only strengthen regimes they target and marginalize any opposition. As would be the case were we in the US targeted for regime change by a foreign government, people in Iran will tend to put aside political and other differences to oppose that threatening external force. Thus this legislation will likely serve to strengthen the popularity of the current Iranian government. Any opposition continuing to function in Iran would be seen as operating in concert with the foreign entity seeking to overthrow the regime."
I wish you would consider these.
Ron Paul's 2002 Predictions All Come True - Incredible Video!
Armed Chinese Troops in Texas!
Ron Paul on "Letters of Marque and Reprisal"
How Ron Paul Would Defend America
"The ignorance of that is astounding. How many Muslims do you know? How many times have you been to the middle east? I’m guessing zero on both. Christianity is filled with more call to violence than any other religion. To claim otherwise is absurd."
It doesn't help that the Marxists in our government will use blowback to incite America into war with a people whose religion promotes the conquest of non-Muslim people.
There are good people who claim to be Muslims. But Islam is a hateful religion, and a lie.
The only reason there are peaceful Muslims is because they are either not following Islam, or because they are engaged in Taqiyya.
The Christians in America don't despise Arab nations because they have a different faith, but because they know Islam demands their destruction.
My only fear about Ron Paul is that his reliance on Robert Pape's work, in support of his position that our occupations are a major source of hostilities toward the US (which is true), seems to reveal an ignorance of the fact that CAIR is a Muslim Brotherhood front group whose purpose is to use Taqqiya to subjugate America to Sharia law.
But even if Ron Paul is ignorant about CAIR's motives, our Founders devised a remedy for such a thing, if we just got back to the Constitution. The solution to Taqqiya is state sovereignty, and Senators appointed by state legislatures.
This is how our Founders intended the Constitution to provide for defense against Taqqiya-like tactics.
Federalist Papers #10
"The influence of factious leaders may kindle a flame within their particular States, but will be unable to spread a general conflagration through the other States. A religious sect may degenerate into a political faction in a part of the Confederacy; but the variety of sects dispersed over the entire face of it must secure the national councils against any danger from that source. A rage for paper money, for an abolition of debts, for an equal division of property, or for any other improper or wicked project, will be less apt to pervade the whole body of the Union than a particular member of it; in the same proportion as such a malady is more likely to taint a particular county or district, than an entire State."
And here is a good article on why we don't have the State sovereignty that would protect us from the tactics of Taqqiya.
Repeal the Seventeenth Amendment
Many good things would come from Ron Paul restraining the Executive Branch to its Constitutionally enumerated duties, including a defense against the tactics of Taqqiya by way of a general empowering of the several states.
Ron Paul 2012!
Sad that this topic (Israel) brings out the worst in people on both sides of the debate. Has anyone noticed? the mention of the "Zionist regime" I.E. government that runs Israel is the target of Iranian hate and NOT the People of Israel? Perhaps you know the history and facts of people like Herzl, Marx,Hess et al.? While we are at it, who are the people mentioned by Ramses the II? The sea people who they called Palete, residing in the reigon of the levant?
When were Israel and Jerusalem destroyed and by whom? What does the Scripture say about Israel being destroyed never to rise again? What do some Jews think about modern State of Israel? http://www.jewsagainstzionism.com/about/visitorcomments/topic_titles.cfm?topic=Questions from Christians Does this make them or me an Anti-Semite? What is Zionism? Does this mean I side with Iran? I doubt that anyone will actually take the time to read or learn anything regarding this subject. The truth might disturb your reality.
"the historical FACT of “palestinians” being in REALITY Jordanians?"
FACT? Yes please explain your version of history.
Once you have enlightened us with the "FACTS" explain how this has any meaning in the modern conflict between the israeli Government and the Palestinian people.
@@A Doctors Labor Is Not My Right
How many of the so called Conservative Talk show hosts and Presidential Candidates repeated this lie? And now that Israel’s deputy prime minister acknowledged this week that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has never actually said Israel must be “wiped off the map.” Which Ron Paul and others have noted on more then one occasion. Then some how the sheepel on “ezalB ehT” can try attempt to twist it into Ron Paul’s fault?? Just think how hard it must be for these poor souls to live and follow mentors that knowingly miss lead you.
"How many of the so called Conservative Talk show hosts and Presidential Candidates repeated this lie? And now that Israel’s deputy prime minister acknowledged this week that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has never actually said Israel must be “wiped off the map.”"
I'm not convinced there's a meaningful difference between "wiped off the map" and "regime change". Islam demands the eradication of Israel.
Not that their wars are any of our business. In fact, it should trouble the Christian that the land of Israel was returned to the Jews via international agreement.
Indeed, had the US not involved itself in WWI, there likely would not have been a Hitler to commit the Holocaust in WWII, and who knows whether there could have been a more peaceful way for the Jews to reclaim their rightful land.
We could have avoided the creation of a UN, the goal of Progressives' wars.
What I would do, to try to convince Christians not to support our involvement in a war with Iran - other than the fact that it's not our war - is show them that their Mossad Chief doesn't think a nuclear Iran is an existential threat to Israel.
HUGE: ANOTHER Mossad Chief Agrees With Ron Paul: Nuclear Armed Iran NOT Inevitably A Threat to Israel
History is definately on your side. The day after Israel achieved its 1948 nationhood, it was attacked by 5 Muslim nations. Each attacking nation was a minimum of 650% larger than the sliver that is Israel. Yet Israel, although it did not have more than a single day to get on its feet militarily, economically, defeated all five attacking nations. This is the not the mere equivalence of one solitary man defeating 3,250 men... the odds were even greater... because all but one nation refused to sell weapons to a desperate and pleading Israel... it was not the U.S... only Czechoslovakia aided Israel.
So whereas the 5 attacking Muslim nations had every, numerous and the greatest of weapons, Israel began its defense with far from enough weapons to arm their men... not yet trained soldiers... so they were simply desperate, determined men. There were additional attacks on Israel since 1948 such as the 6-Day war of 1967 in which Israel defeated Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. How can this be possible? How can such a tiny, unprepared nation win against such odds? There can be only one reasonable explanation. And yet we are to believe that Islam is not united in their objective to wipe Israel off the map?
April 21, 2012 at 4:26pm
Silly semantics. What’s the difference between saying “Israel must be wiped off the map” and saying “Israel is a ‘cancerous tumor’ that has to be removed? THEY ARE THE SAME SENTIMENT! This type of semantic demagouging is what liberal/socilists are well known for. If my enemy says to me: “You will be killed”, does that make it “ok” as long as he/she DOESN’T say “I’LL kill you”? NO! it’s the SAME THING. Well, as long as your not named “Israel” then it seems to be ‘ok’. Palestinians are a fraud and the globalists who push their bogus agenda do so out of an evil hatred that knows no borders.
The globalists? The globalists ARE Israel. They want a country full of white Jews but refuse to let Christians have a white country in America. You're so brain washed that it's not even funny.
ringadindindong Israelis Globalist are kiding or just nuts what is it you want the united states with out any Jews Why? Your hatered for the Jewish people is showing and it aint pretty. I think you would be happier in Iraq You want a country with out the jews that is for white Christians? If that is wnat you trully feel then how can you call yourself Christian
Only white Jews? Have you been to Israel? You know what, it doesn't matter because even if you haven't that's no excuse for ignorance. Ever hear of Ethiopian Jews? Guess what: they're black. There are also numerous Jews of Persian, Moroccan, Egyptian, etc. descent that are NOT WHITE. Or at least not white as you were probably defining it.
Oh and one more thing, not everyone in Israel is Jewish. There are even political parties whose memberships are entirely non-Jewish.
April 19, 2012 at 1:39pm
The lives of CS Lewis and Freud are VERY telling without either having to say a single word. Lewis fearlessly entered into the great beyond with JOY and gratitude and a genuine LOVE for others. Freud on the other hand racked with fear and under the burden of a hardened unrepentant heart took his own life in one last final defiant act of bravado. Lewis left a legacy of incredible literature for the building up of faith toward his Lord Jesus Christ. As Christ stated in Revelation, we are to “overcome the World, The flesh and the Evil One BY the Blood of the Lamb and BY THE WORD OF OUR TESTAMONY”. Atheists can always manufacture a million excuses as to why they don’t want to believe but the ONE thing they can’t argue with is OUR (the redeemed) testamony of deliverance from vanity. The sick healed, the blind see, the Lame walk, the drug addict cleansed, the prostitute, faithful, the thief, restitution, on and on and on. THAT, NO ONE CAN DENY.