User Profile: BookMDanno


Member Since: December 14, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [2] November 24, 2015 at 8:43pm

    Why does Rahm throw fuel on the fire talking about protests? Do whites protest (riot) in the streets after killings by black thugs? Are there civil uprisings over that pastor’s wife being gunned down? Here, the grieving will see a perp brought up on charges. The rest of us wait a long time for justice, too. In Missouri, an acccomplice to a horiffic double murder who’s been on death row for 20+ yrs just got another stay (Reginald Clemmons)….possibly another trial. You want to try a case with 23yr old evidence/witnesses?

  • [2] November 24, 2015 at 5:54pm

    American Jews have done it for decades, unbelievably.

  • [3] November 24, 2015 at 5:48pm

    ….”indian reservation”…? How about ‘inner city’…? ‘Democratic states’ (going bankrupt)…? ‘Sanctuary cities’…?

  • [2] November 17, 2015 at 10:42pm

    Mika’s views probably get seen more here than on cable!

  • [3] November 17, 2015 at 10:37pm

    Sure! The same gov’t that vetted the Tsarnaevs, Maj. Hassan, Bowe Bergdahl (before releasing 5 al qaeda senior officers), Iraqi police who shoot us in the back, Libyan gov’t security officers at Benghazi, Morsi, WMDs in Syria,…with that resume of intel success, sleep well, Mika.

  • [4] November 16, 2015 at 9:46pm

    Closing our borders and refusing to take imbedded terrorists sounds pretty measured to me, and a darn sight better than what some some others would do. I think Shep has jumped the shark.

  • [1] November 13, 2015 at 7:51pm

    Often felt like we conservatives need to band together in a loose association so we are identifiable to one another. Imagine walking into a retail store and the owner recognizing that you must be a fellow conservative….you have a book of local service providers proud to declare an affiliation with liberty, patriotism, service, ethics, America, the Constitution, maybe through a trademarked logo in the corner of their ad, like a MasterCard or Visa logo now. This isn’t to EXCLUDE liberals, it’s to show that we are significant in number, organized, unashamed, active, open to all who share our values…all this is positive rather than the ‘negative’ of boycotts, but let the ‘Hollywoods’ and Marxists profit from their own kind rather than use OUR money to advance their destructive cause.

  • [6] November 4, 2015 at 10:18pm

    My point, too! If they’re so hateful, feel so disadvantaged, so outraged over being taken from the Motherland, returning could be easily arranged.Other minorities–some barely able to speak English–are coming here and leap-frogging over the whiners and perpetual “victims.” We’re paying for this underclass, aren’t we? What are we getting in return?

  • November 4, 2015 at 10:12pm

    He’s right, to an extent. Freed blacks were simply turned out to fend for themselves, wound up with Jim Crow and institutional racism. BUT, let’s look at the trillions spent on Great Society programs, quotas, preferential hiring practices, etc. etc, and money spent on their behalf, too, for instrastructure, schools, Head Start, hot school lunches…aftet 50 years we’ve got, what, more poverty, more on welfare, more entitlements, more tax incentives, more hostility & anger, violence, cities on fire. How much is enough When–if ever–will the slate be wiped clean? Much of the poverty is based on bad choices: unwed mothers, mothers as students, prolific baby daddies who provide no support/ have no jobs, little interest in education, assimilation in to a society with more successful values….maybe time to leave well enough alone. Not everyone can handle freedom. Not everyone can seize opportunity. I learned sometimes you just can’t help people bent on self-destruction, and it’s best to walk away.

    Responses (2) +
  • November 4, 2015 at 8:26pm

    Not sure you can box the liberal media into journalistic integrity. It’s no longer in their DNA. Can the journalism schools be proud of these axe-grinders?

  • [5] November 4, 2015 at 5:29pm

    At every turn, you can expose the hypocrisy of the Left. They are NOT concerned with life, as the Left’s response to Kate’s Law, Fast & Furious, and Benghazi prove (not to mention unrestrained abortion). When it suits their agenda, their response is, “What difference does it make?” Even aggressive pursuit of criminals offends them. They are fakers, interested only in anarchy. But first, you have to take down all those with principles, concern for their fellow man, the apparatus the Framers established, traditions, Judeo-Christian beliefs….a tall order, isn’t it?

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] November 3, 2015 at 8:12pm

    Amalga; But when we talk of restricting welfare, we’re branded racists. Can’t have it both ways.

  • October 29, 2015 at 10:28pm

    I have quit listening to several radio hosts…and another regularly gets ‘time out’…for comments about physical appearance (all conservative hosts, btw). Seems to be a new low when you use a public forum to denigrate someone’s looks. This is not the first attack on Fiorina. Have we lost civility? Do adults still need their parents to rein them in?

  • [1] October 29, 2015 at 7:07pm

    Can’t add more to the 10,000 posts other than point out the woman is clearly wrong: in both the Prof. Gates incident and hers, contact was not initiated on whim from the cops. That’s a big distinction, lost on those playing the race card or wanting to make a case for victimization.

  • [17] October 28, 2015 at 10:16pm

    Jeb walks, talks, acts like a desperate guy. His big donor pals are going to need to call in a lot of IOUs to get Jeb in the White House.

    Responses (1) +
  • [14] October 28, 2015 at 10:08pm

    Question for Quintilla: What did Dems give up on that budget? Anything?

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] October 27, 2015 at 10:57pm

    Why stop & frisk rich suburban kids–violating their Constitutional rights–who aren’t committing crimes? I dare say that a lot of highly paid celebrities, entertainers, sports figures seem to get booked…and they’re not targeted. How do you square that with your ‘loser/victim’ narrative?

  • October 27, 2015 at 10:51pm

    Been my experience that you can’t save people from themselves. You’re buying into the victimization narrative, which shows it works. What you really mean to say is that some people can’t handle freedom, must be protected (read: coerced) from bad choices, must make others pay for their mistakes. I vote for freedom. You, apparently, vote for coercion. Be careful what you wish for. Ever wonder why vacant lots are strewn with trash, mattresses, broken bottles? Think white Americans put trash there? Ever read the sports pages, where national celebrities making more in a year than we do in a lifetime can’t stay off the crime pages? I don’t think rich white people create criminals. And a cursory look at sports pages shows that even riches don’t change the nature of the permanent underclass.

  • [1] October 27, 2015 at 10:39pm

    No, Fuhrman didn’t get OJ off but his use of the ‘n’ word in private played into the charge of racism. I’d say a series of errors by Marcia Clark got OJ off, along with Christopher Darden’s push to have OJ–an actor—try on a dried blood-drenched glove. Johnny Cochran played the race card to a T. Didn’t help that the trial was moved from the upscale Brentwood, to the inner city where the jury pool was composed of, well, inner city residents. Fuhrman is a good detective…solved a 20+ yr old cold case later, and apparently worked on his own time to free a wrongly charged black person BEFORE the OJ case–but that never saw the light of day.

  • October 23, 2015 at 1:46am

    I’ve seen the video twice but don’t know if it was growling or just sniffing. The dog may have been greeting him; that’s not what I call “attacked.” ButtHurt, you’re either a troll or one of those people who can’t separate fact from your assumptions….not enough evidence there to conclude he was attacked and needed to use lethal force.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love