User Profile: BrandiRae

BrandiRae

Member Since: October 16, 2012

Comments

  • November 19, 2012 at 11:40am

    So all the talk about a “two-state solution” is pure baloney.

    They COULD HAVE declared themselves an independent state during all those centuries WHEN THEY OCCUPIED Israel’s former territory and DIDN’T.

    They were even OFFERED statehood by the League of Nations and REFUSED.

    The Bible is clear about their future:

    When Israel is forced to flee into the wilderness during the 3½ year reign of Antichrist, Palestinians will THINK they’ll have its territories, including Jerusalem, all to themselves, but their gladness will be short-lived.

    Jesus will return 42 months later and STRAIGHTEN THINGS OUT IN  the Middle East — ONCE AND FOR ALL.

    According to Joel 3:1-8, when Jesus restores Judah and Jerusalem, He will judge the nations round about: He will judge Lebanon and, ESPECIALLY, the “Palestinians”.

    He will judge them for selling the people of Judah and Jerusalem who try to escape, EVEN CHILDREN, to the Greeks who, led by the risen antichrist, will once again become Israel’s enemies.

    Antichrist and his armies will be INSTANTLY defeated by the returning Christ. Jesus will re-gather all Israel, from all over the world into their land, which He gave them AS ETERNAL POSSESSION (Genesis 15:18-21; 17:8), and will relocate so-called Palestinians to Saudi Arabia, where they will be assimilated into its population.

    There won’t be any “Palestinians” during the Millennium. They’ll be called “Saudis”, or by their true name “Arabs”.

  • November 19, 2012 at 11:31am

    So-called “Palestinians” are simply Arabs from neighboring countries, who OCCUPIED the territory of ancient Israel after Israel was dispersed and ceased from being a nation.

    Their former leader and founder of the PLO Yasser Arafat was an Egyptian, for Pete’s sake!!!

    Palestinians take their name from the ancient Philistines, who were widely regarded as Israel’s worst enemies.

    Following the Bar Kokhba revolt by the Jews in 135 A.D. and through 390 A.D., Roman Emperor Hadrian named THE ENTIRE PROVINCE of Judea, INCLUDING SYRIA AND LEBANON, ”Syria-Palestina”.

    He did this in order to further annoy and humiliate the Jews who, from that time, were FORBIDDEN to enter or even VISIT Jerusalem, except on their anniversary of their both their temples’ destructions (Tisha B’Av).

    So-called “Palestinians” COULD HAVE declared their independence, or “statehood” AT ANY TIME prior to 1947 and DIDN’T.

    They CHOSE NOT TO.

    The were happy to live as WHAT THEY REALLY ARE, Arabs,  SUBJECT TO the Ottoman Empire.

    When Britain defeated the Ottoman Turks in 1917 under the command of General Edmund Allenby, THESE ARABS (that we now call “Palestinians”) WERE ALLOWED TO REMAIN there.

    And when the League of Nations (presently known as the “United Nations”) offered statehood to Israel in 1947, statehood was also offered to the so-called “Palestinians”. While Israel promptly accepted, THEY DECLINED…

  • November 19, 2012 at 9:06am

    And when the League of Nations (presently known as the “United Nations”) offered statehood to Israel in 1947, statehood was also offered to the so-called “Palestinians”. While Israel promptly accepted, THEY DECLINED.

    So all the talk about a “two-state solution” is pure baloney.

    They COULD HAVE declared themselves an independent state during all those centuries WHEN THEY OCCUPIED Israel’s former territory and DIDN’T.

    They were even OFFERED statehood by the League of Nations and REFUSED.

    The Bible is clear about their future:

    When Israel is forced to flee into the wilderness during the 3½ year reign of Antichrist, Palestinians will THINK they’ll have its territories, including Jerusalem, all to themselves, but their gladness will be short-lived.

    Jesus will return 42 months later and STRAIGHTEN THINGS OUT IN  the Middle East — ONCE AND FOR ALL.

  • November 19, 2012 at 8:58am

    There’s never been a country or state named Palestine, and there never will be.

    So-called “Palestinians” are simply Arabs from neighboring countries, who OCCUPIED the territory of ancient Israel after Israel was dispersed and ceased from being a nation.

    Their former leader and founder of the PLO Yasser Arafat was an Egyptian, for Pete’s sake!!!

    Palestinians take their name from the ancient Philistines, who were widely regarded as Israel’s worst enemies.

    Following the Bar Kokhba revolt by the Jews in 135 A.D. and through 390 A.D., Roman Emperor Hadrian named THE ENTIRE PROVINCE of Judea, INCLUDING SYRIA AND LEBANON, ”Syria-Palestina”.

    He did this in order to further annoy and humiliate the Jews who, from that time, were FORBIDDEN to enter or even VISIT Jerusalem, except on their anniversary of their both their temples’ destructions (Tisha B’Av).

    So-called “Palestinians” COULD HAVE declared their independence, or “statehood” AT ANY TIME prior to 1947 and DIDN’T.

    They CHOSE NOT TO.

    The were happy to live as WHAT THEY REALLY ARE, Arabs,  SUBJECT TO the Ottoman Empire.

    When Britain defeated the Ottoman Turks in 1917 under the command of General Edmund Allenby, THESE ARABS (that we now call “Palestinians”) WERE ALLOWED TO REMAIN there.

    And when the League of Nations (presently known as the “United Nations”) offered statehood to Israel in 1947, statehood was also offered to the so-called “Palestinians”. While Israel promptly a

    Responses (1) +
  • November 9, 2012 at 11:10am

    Coal country is also whispering…..in KY, WV and VA. We will have to relocate if it really happens. My husbands company is taking a cut from their profits to keep employees ($5 per ton). Then after their order is complete, their job positions aren’t secure. It’s a scary time….

  • November 7, 2012 at 5:42pm

    Draconian? Is that the best you have? I have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ…..whether or not you believe, doesn’t impact my belief. Your opinion does not matter to me. I don’t attend church and I believe once you ask Jesus into your heart, it’s forever. You can’t lose salvation…..I’m less draconian than most “Christians”. I’m also an existentialist……

    Label me however you want, so long as it makes you happy. It doesn’t impact my life, thoughts, or beliefs.

    GOD IS GOD. HE SETS THE RULES. HE’S NOT TAKING POLLS TO SEE HOW PEOPLE FEEL ABOUT HIS PLAN OF SALVATION. OUR PERSONAL OPINIONS ARE IRRELEVANT, WHERE SALVATION IS CONCERNED.

    MAN CAN INVENT AS MANY FALSE RELIGIONS AS HE WANTS, TO SUIT HIS WHIMS AND WARPED IMAGINATION, BUT THEY WON’T LEAD YOU TO GOD.

    PEOPLE MUST COME TO GOD, HIS WAY. HIS WAY IS THRU JESUS CHRIST…

    JESUS IS THE ONLY WAY TO GOD.

    IT’S HIS WAY, OR “NO WAY”!

    Jesus said to him, I am THE way, and THE truth, and THE life: NO MAN COMES UNTO THE FATHER, BUT BY ME” [John 14:6].

    “Neither is there salvation IN ANY OTHER: for there is NO OTHER NAME. . . whereby we must be saved” [Acts 4:12].

  • November 7, 2012 at 5:16pm

    I’m still laughing at your response…..Calle names and resort to insults. That’s all you have?! Too funny. Be skeptical of my posts. I don’t add or subtract from Gods Word. I didn’t write or inspire the Bible….take it up with Him.

  • November 7, 2012 at 3:55pm

    Btw…..it’s Roe v. Wade. In case you didn’t realize the mistake.

  • November 7, 2012 at 2:43pm

    He also used Cyrus, another pagan, and even called him ”His anointed”!!! (Isaiah 45:1).

    Unfortunately, I don’t see TOO MANY PEOPLE who’ve lived in those hellholes, fall on their faces before God, cry out to Him, seek His Face, repent of their sins, and beg for mercy.

    I DON’T SEE THEM TRYING TO MEND THEIR WAYS and seek His will with ALL their hearts.  

    EVEN SADDER, I DON’T SEE IT HAPPENING IN “CHRISTIAN” America.

    So, perhaps President Obama was right when he said that America “is NOT a Christian nation”.

    Perhaps THAT’S THE REASON he just got RE-ELECTED.

  • November 7, 2012 at 2:41pm

    I know, I know, those who’ve witnessed or experienced the horrors of ungodly regimes, the oppression and injustices committed during the Roman Empire, the atrocities of the Holocaust, or the ruthlessness of Stalin’s purges… those who’ve lived under the draconian dictatorships of Saddam Hussein, Muammar Ghadaffi, or Hafez Assad, or even those closer to home who’ve lived in Castro’s Cuba or Chavez’s Venezuela, have every right, humanly speaking, to question how a loving, merciful God could allow SUCH EVIL.
    He often allows it because WE allow it.
    Those regimes are often A REFLECTION OF the collective consciousness of a nation.
    We are quick to blame God but we forget that we live in a sin-infested, fallen world, filled with corrupt men with corrupt minds.
    The only reason Antichrist gets to rule this world is BECAUSE that’s what mankind WILL WANT and deserve (Revelation 9:20, 21; 13:4; 16:11).
    It’s ultimately OUR SIN, and the evil desires in men’s hearts, that have brought about such tyrannies.

    Has God allowed it? Absolutely.

    Did God give man FREE WILL? Yes and Yes.

    Has man, throughout his tortured history, ABUSED that free will to his own misfortune?

    Let me count the ways…

    When people turn to God WITH ALL THEIR HEARTS He has used even PAGAN kings, who believed in and worshipped “other gods”, as His instruments: like Nebuchadnezzar, whom He called “His servant” (Jeremiah 27:6; 28:14).

    He also used Cyrus, another pagan, and even calle

    Responses (1) +
  • November 7, 2012 at 2:39pm

    If you believe in God, keep this in mind:

    If we truly believe in the One true God, if we truly have Jesus living in our hearts, WE DO NOT GET TO PICK AND CHOOSE where His Word is concerned.

    We DO NOT use the Bible “selectively”.

    We DO NOT focus only on the portions we “like” and DISREGARD those we DON’T LIKE.

    That would make us religious hypocrites.

    Every godless “Christian” cult that exists was born out of such selective misuse and UTTER DISREGARD FOR the INERRANCY and ABSOLUTE TRUTH contained in God’s Word.

    Either we believe ALL OF IT, or NONE OF IT (Matthew 4:4).

    The fact is that God  IS Almighty.

    The fact is that God “changes the times and the seasons: He removes kings, and sets up kings” (Daniel 2:21).

    The fact is that He “rules in the kingdom of men, and GIVES IT to WHOMEVER He will” (Daniel 4:17).

    We may NOT LIKE whom He gives that “kingdom” to, we may not always like the rulers He sets up, we may not fully understand with our limited vision and intellect WHY He allows some wicked person to rule certain countries, but He’s God, He knows everything and, ultimately, He ALLOWS IT…..

  • November 7, 2012 at 1:06pm

    @ramonpreston

    I want to clarify hat I’m not implying that you are the idiot that I referred to. The idiot I referred to is the person on YouTube who started the lie that interprets this scripture to fit his theory……

  • November 7, 2012 at 1:01pm

    While the word barak in Hebrew does mean “lightning”, the word bamah DOES NOT MEAN “heaven” or “sky”.

    The word “bamah” means “high place” [Ezekiel 20:29].

    ANY “high place” here on earth would be a bamah, including the altars where sacrifices to idols were made.

    The Hebrew word for “sky” or “heaven” is shamayim.

    Furthermore, shamayim is also the Hebrew word used in Isaiah 14:12,13, when it says “how are you fallen from heaven, O Lucifer”, which is the second scripture they give as “evidence” for their ludicrous theory.

    Therefore the CORRECT translation of Luke 10:18 into Hebrew is:

    “I was beholding satan, as barak from the shamayim having fallen”.

    NOWHERE does it say in that passage that Jesus saw satan as Barack Obama.

  • November 7, 2012 at 12:55pm

    FYI:

    Luke 10:18 reads:

    “And He said to them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven”.

    The genius in question claims that the word “lightning” in Hebrew is barak, and that the word for “heaven” is bamah.

    Therefore, this scripture in Hebrew would read “I beheld satan as Barack Obama”.

    He even relates it to Isaiah 14:12 which reads:
    How are you fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How are you cut down to the ground, which did weaken the nations! 

    That is a blatant, outrageous LIE.

    Even IF his translation were correct (it ISN’T, but even IF it were], it WOULDN’T SAY “I beheld satan as Barack Obama”.

    It would say “I beheld satan AS barak FALL FROM bamah”.

    However, that’s NOT what it says.  The Greek VERB for “fall” is in aorist active participle, which indicates the action HAD ALREADY TAKEN PLACE, so the LITERAL translation into English would be:
    “I was beholding satan, as barak from the bamah having fallen”.

    The use of the word barak means NOTHING, and PROVES NOTHING: barak is a very common Semitic name and surname. Two well known examples are Israel’s former Prime Minister Ehud Barak, and Egypt’s former President Hosni Mubarak. There’s even a famous entertainer named Shakira Mebarak.

    While the word barak in

  • November 6, 2012 at 10:29am

    For me, this is about the economy, healthcare and his war on coal. The war on coal has directly impacted my family (negatively) and his EPA regulations aren’t easing up. He is the idiot-in-chief…..I can’t wait to cast my vote (in an hour). Obama said to vote out of revenge, well I am taking his advice and voting his **** out! Good riddance.

  • November 5, 2012 at 5:27pm

    @4xeverything

    Bible prophecy teaches, quite clearly, that Antichrist will appear on earth just prior to the last 3-1/2 years of tribulation, and that he will be permitted to rule the earth for only 3½ years, or 42 months. Nowhere does it state he will rule for 7 years. That’s utterly false [Revelation 12:6, 14; 13:5].

  • November 5, 2012 at 5:24pm

    The Antichrist will NOT be a Muslim.

    Daniel 11:37 states “neither shall he regard the gods of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard ANY god”.

    That would have to include Allah.

    According to Revelation 17:8, the Antichrist must have already lived prior to the first century A.D. There were no Muslims at the time. The Islamic religion did not even exist until the 7th century A.D. Period. Case closed.

    NO WAY CAN HE BE MUSLIM.

    Obama can’t be the Antichrist because he was born in 1961.

    According to Revelation 17:8 the Antichrist “was” [he lived prior to the first century A.D.], IS NOT, and WILL ASCEND [COME UP] FROM THE BOTTOMLESS PIT”.

    The Antichrist, according to Daniel 7:8, 24 must come from the territories of the former Roman Empire [Daniel 7:8,24]. Obama was born in Hawaii. That automatically disqualifies him.

    Even if we use his father’s ancestry from Kenya. Kenya was never, repeat, NEVER part of the Roman Empire.

    The Antichrist will be a military man [Revelation 13:4]. Obama hasn’t even served in the armed forces… ever. He’s a rookie, folks! He’s untried and untested.

    NO WAY CAN HE BE OBAMA….

  • October 22, 2012 at 2:59pm

    @dora

    I guess that includes yourself, right? Just wanted to clarify that.

  • October 21, 2012 at 10:42am

    I am sorry if I offended you….but I have witnessed MH do more good than harm. I am published for my research on the brain. How interesting. Anyway, you have your view, I have mine. And I do believe it also has to do with personal responsibility, coping skills, etc. But, it also has to do with genetics, not just environment. And in some cases, injuries, sicknesses, etc.

  • October 21, 2012 at 10:31am

    @bodybag

    Lithium is an older drug used for people with severe bipolar and other disorders. Usually people who can not function in society (institutionalized). It’s a very effective pill, but dangerous to the overall health of the user. There are newer drugs that are prescribed and tried before lithium Is used. It is a last resort drug, when all other drugs have failed. And you’d be shocked at how many “MH patients” are in society…..doctors, teachers, lawyers, congressmen, McDonald’s workers, etc. They shouldn’t be labeled the same. MH is a serious issue, one I advocate for and have for many many years.