User Profile: briten821

Member Since: July 21, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [1] September 28, 2016 at 3:26pm

    Who said otherwise? I bet you’re a blast in real life! If your 5 year-old son catches a ball do you run up to him and say “You’re no Calvin Johnson!” If a kid scores a goal in pond hockey, do you yell “NHL players are better than you!” He did something very few people have ever done. Give him credit. Who cares if a AA hitter is better than he is. He’s not playing AA ball!

  • [4] September 28, 2016 at 3:21pm

    Why can’t you just say “good for him?” Why crap on it? Seriously, how many players hit a home run on their first career pitch? Have you? Nobody is saying he’s the next Babe Ruth, or that he’s even going to become a MLB player. But why discount something that is undeniably a great accomplishment?

  • [5] September 13, 2016 at 1:16pm

    You’re right. But it was far more balanced. Hundreds of papers, all with their own bias. And if the bias was contrary to the thinking of the community, they couldn’t sell their papers and they went out of business. Now we have mega companies that present their bias to the entire world and, protected by their size and reach, they aren’t answerable to the other side. And that bias leans left BY FAR more than right.

  • [5] September 13, 2016 at 1:04pm

    “They” is the media. The right has one network and talk radio. The left has the rest of television, including all major networks, most cable networks, even the entertainment programming and Hollywood, Facebook, Twitter and everything else. It’s hardly the same on both sides.

  • [1] September 13, 2016 at 1:01pm

    My apologies, it was he who made the straw-man argument. I don’t think anyone was suggesting that, just because Hillary lies, trump doesn’t. At least not in this story.

    Trump is a like a compulsive liar who lies about all sorts of little crap that he doesn’t have to lie about. (Now he says he’s never gotten the flu, ever.) Hillary is a strategic liar that has to pile one lie on top of another lie to cover up a huge web of lies that got out of control. (It’s nothing, now allergies, now dry throat, now the heat, now it’s pneumonia.) I’m not a fan of either type.

  • [2] September 13, 2016 at 12:37pm

    That’s not true. She was one of the moderates on FOX. But even if it were, it proves my point. Fox may lean right, but everything else on television leans left. So pointing out bias on the right’s ONE network hardly shows that all things are equal.

  • [2] September 13, 2016 at 12:33pm

    What are you talking about? The topic is how the MEDIA doesn’t question both sides. Where did someone say Trump should be taken at his word every time? That’s a straw man argument.

  • [1] September 13, 2016 at 12:13pm

    Yes, Trump is a liar. No secret there. And if they were questioning both sides even close to equally, there wouldn’t be a problem. But that’s not the case by a long shot.

    Responses (5) +
  • [14] September 13, 2016 at 12:12pm

    The point is that she, and her network, gobble up every talking point that comes out of the Clinton campaign without question. It never even crosses their minds to ask for evidence from the left. But the right is always doubted, always assumed to be lying, always guilty until proven innocent. Really, this shouldn’t be hard to grasp for you, it’s been going on a loooooong time….

    Responses (4) +
  • [9] September 13, 2016 at 12:07pm

    Whether you agree with him or not, the headline is misleading. It makes it seem as if he was saying “patriots” need to make OTHERS bleed. He was saying the “patriots” will be the one bleeding. There’s a BIG difference between the two statements. Let’s see which version the main-stream media runs with…

  • [8] September 9, 2016 at 9:09am

    I agree with most of your comment, but not that it is a sign of weakness. I would suggest that there is nothing in this world more difficult to do than end your own life, except maybe continuing to live when life has become that miserable for you.

  • [17] September 9, 2016 at 9:07am

    A point blank shot in the heart will do the job. Head shots are worse for the family, and if you screw that up you are going to be half-vegetable for the rest of your life.

  • September 6, 2016 at 2:48pm

    It’s on Youtube? Well then, it MUST be true…

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] September 6, 2016 at 2:43pm

    When you record your boss saying “I think you and I should have had a sexual relationship a long time ago, and then you’d be good and better and I’d be good and better,”- that is the very definition of sexual harassment. This wasn’t said over dinner or socially. It was during what was supposed to be professional discussions at work. He was clearly implying that a sexual relationship would have fast tracked her career.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] September 6, 2016 at 2:40pm

    Shame on you for taking sides without learning the facts that are out there already. She recorded several incidents using her cell phone. He implied that her advancement in the job depended on them sleeping together. That’s the very definition of sexual harassment. All of this has been reported right here on the Blaze…

    Responses (1) +
  • September 1, 2016 at 10:55am

    INTERESTINGLY- Yesterday on the radio, after another full day of saying how horrible Trump would be for the country, Beck said they have been letting him advertise to their audience. “We are glad to take his money.” he said. So, as long as he pays, they will let someone they have called a dangerous dictator in the making spread his propaganda to their audience?

    Anybody else still have any doubts about Beck being in this entirely for his wallet?

    Responses (1) +
  • August 20, 2016 at 7:31pm

    WOW. You are really think you know a lot more about this subject than you actually do. You are making false comparison after false comparison. The way pornography affects the brain is not comparable to chocolate, or even alcohol. Unless you are willing to spend some time actually learning about the subject before shooting your mouth off like an expert (and don’t say you already have, because your comments clearly show you have not), there is nothing more we can do for each other. Have a nice evening.

  • [24] August 20, 2016 at 6:58pm

    There’s a difference. Like drugs and alcohol, pornography alters the brain chemistry. Study after study has shown that it warps a person’t sense of sexual morality. Guns do not in themselves change the way a person thinks.

  • [1] August 20, 2016 at 11:26am

    “Far more than 200 years?” So you think slavery ended BEFORE the Revolutionary War? Your grasp of history is as stunning as your bigotry.

    I don’t think it’s “anal” to point out that African Americans have not had 200 years to “pull themselves up”. In fact, they were still slaves 150 years ago. And for the first 50 years after emancipation they were treated as little more than slaves throughout most of the country, having few of the rights and almost none of the opportunities afforded to the rest of the population. And for the 50 years after that they were heavily persecuted in the Jim Crow south. Even in the north they faced tremendous racism. I come from a working class white family in Michigan, and I cringe at the stories I hear about the way blacks were treated all the way up here in the first half of the 20th century. So, rather than 200 years, they have had a little more than half a century of mostly equal civil rights. But, what’s the difference between 200 years and 50, right?

  • [1] August 20, 2016 at 9:04am

    Iamnotu- You keep shouting “200 years!”… You do know that the war of 1812 wasn’t the one that freed the slaves, right?

123 To page: Go