TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying Bronco Guy's 10 most recent comments.

• Robert Gates: I Would Have Made the Same Decisions During Benghazi Attack

  May 12, 2013 at 6:58pm

  Oh, so the real-time video of the event wasn’t enough? The fact that a team could be scrambled in 2 to 3 hours and WANTED TO GO, but were specifically told to stand down isn’t enough to convince him otherwise? I guess when you say, “all I really know about this is what I’ve been watching on TV”, you kind of set yourself up NOT to be an authority–irrespective of your previous position. Anyone who has not been briefed by internal sources and only knows what CNN or MSNBC knows, well…knows very little.

  Oh, and HOW IRONIC, he just happen to appear on a Sunday Morning News show in the midst of the biggest breaking scandal for this administration yet. Just thought you’d stop by for a chat, Mr. Gates? How convenient!!

  Give me a break!!! But once again, I’m sure the ignorant and the mindless left will lap it up like poison and just beg for more lunacy.

  This world is so obviously upside down–unfortunately those already with their heads buried in the sand can only see that things look perfectly okay from their perspective.

• Bible Publisher Scores Big Contraceptive Mandate Victory — But Battle With Obama Admin Isn’t Over

  May 7, 2013 at 9:32am

  In reply to onetoomany.

  @moderationisbest: Irrespective of God’s omnipotence that allows him to know of your rejection of him, he still created you because he loves you and died for you. He loves you enough to give you free will. It wouldn’t be love, otherwise. His knowing of your entire future however, does not DETERMINE your future. You have absolute control and autonomy of your life. You are equally free to repent and start to love God and get to know him as you are to stay in perpetual rejection of him. The choice is always yours. Even you don’t know your own future. Your heart is against God now, but who knows what the future will bring. You’re not born Christian. Christianity is replete with stories of hard-core atheists and anti-Christs who ultimately had an encounter with God that changed their way of thinking and subsequently changed their entire lives.

  You have obviously based your rejection of God on a number of presuppositions that line up with your worldview. The mind justifies what the heart has already chosen. And all of us, before we know Christ, love darkness instead of light. That’s simply where you are right now, but you don’t have to remain. I would encourage you to examine your presuppositions and your worldview and investigate if your worldview actually lines up with how life really is. Truth is out there. It’s not going to change. You just have to be willing to even look for it. If not, all you’ll ever know is darkness, and for you, it will seem like light enough.

• L.A. Politicians Move to Block Sale of Newspaper to Koch Brothers — Say it Would Be the ‘End of Journalism’

  May 3, 2013 at 2:25am

  What a complete and total joke!! So, civic trust is only achieved in print if the print follows a clear, left leaning, socialist agenda? There is no such thing as unbiased in our news anymore. To report the facts would be to show pictures and simply print dialogue that was said during any given incident. Editorializing, something I was taught when managing editor of my school newspaper, is the most common occurrence on television and in print. Every worldview has a bias and a set of pre-suppositions. That’s true for MSNBC as much as it is for FOX. And that’s okay. You simply have to know the worldview and pre-suppositions your news agency operates under and then compare them to your own worldview. You will never escape bias. That said, this country is in intellectual systemic failure due to the endless and mindless diatribes of the left. Having a major news organization like the Los Angeles time receive some balanced thinking from the right would be a welcome. The right has their agenda as well–but most often, the agenda is always an attempt to uncover and get to the truth. Whereas the left is so far steeped in the lies and deception–more like delusion–of their own agenda, that anything “newsworthy” from that side of the aisle is suspect at minimum and laughable at maximum…

• L.A. Politicians Move to Block Sale of Newspaper to Koch Brothers — Say it Would Be the ‘End of Journalism’

  May 2, 2013 at 6:45pm

  What a complete and total joke!! So, civic trust is only achieved in print if the print follows a clear, left leaning, socialist agenda? There is no such thing as unbiased in our news anymore. To report the facts would be to show pictures and simply print dialogue that was said during any given incident. Editorializing, something I was taught when managing editor of my school newspaper, is the most common occurrence on television and in print. Every worldview has a bias and a set of pre-suppositions. That’s true for MSNBC as much as it is for FOX. And that’s okay. You simply have to know the worldview and pre-suppositions your news agency operates under and then compare them to your own worldview. You will never escape bias. That said, this country is in intellectual systemic failure due to the endless and mindless diatribes of the left. Having a major news organization like the Los Angeles time receive some balanced thinking from the right would be a welcome. The right has their agenda as well–but most often, the agenda is always an attempt to uncover and get to the truth. Whereas the left is so far steeped in the lies and deception–more like delusion–of their own agenda, that anything “newsworthy” from that side of the aisle is suspect at minimum and laughable at maximum.

• Explosive Report Contradicts the Obama Administration’s Benghazi Story in a Big Way

  April 29, 2013 at 11:56pm

  In reply to Snowleopard {gallery of cat folks}.

  @PHROGDRIVER, thank you for your service to our country!!! And thank you for delivering the absolute smack down on JEFFS63, and every other liberal who hasn’t lifted a finger in combat for our nation but thinks he can puff his chest out and look down his nose at those who have and actually question THEIR legitimacy. “Conspiracy theory” has gotten a bad rap as a term. One or two nut jobs employ the term and suddenly the term itself loses its meaning. But Nixon was ipso facto involved in a conspiracy, and equally so are Hillary and Obama. Gee Jeff, I guess since you label something a “conspiracy theory”, you suddenly shot down everyone’s arguments? How easy and convenient for you. Certainly easier than listening to and looking at THE FACTS. And as far as “anonymous sources” go, you are even more ignorant if you don’t really believe people who would speak about this would be in very real danger. This man would get crucified if he showed himself. Thank goodness he’s being brave enough to even get the information out there–just like the brave congressmen and women and other government officials who are “anonymously” leaking facts about the Saudi National cover-up. This is how things work, Jeff. This is why things get leaked in the first place–because there’s a cover up!!!! NO COVER UP–NO NEED FOR SECRETIVE ANONYMOUS SOURCES!! See how this works Jeff? In the real world. Not the world you live in, mind you–but the actual REAL world? Understand now, Jeff?

• German Homeschooling Family Facing Deportation Speaks Out on TheBlaze TV: ‘This Is Home for Me Now’

  April 18, 2013 at 11:41pm

  In reply to Leviticus2510.

  You could not have said that better!!! I completely and wholeheartedly agree!!! The problem seems so large and so out of our control, I think most people don’t know what to speak or how to act to stop the growing machine that has become our federal government. I truly believe it’s not that people don’t care or look the other way; I think they don’t know to whom to express their concern and which way to look for help.

  Very frustrating….

• Meet the Teacher Who’s Bringing God Back Into Public Schools — But Who Says He’s a Big ‘Threat’ to Religious Conservatives

  April 15, 2013 at 12:34pm

  I think Don LaPointe and Teachhead have said it best. First, you have to have credentials. The events of antiquity actually have to be studied and dissected before you can reasonably teach others. As a personal belief, though that research is valuable and profitable, it’s not necessary in order to produce faith. But to stand in a classroom and think you can truly dissect any religion and talk about “facts” without having any credible degree is not reasonable. Is he reading C.S. Lewis, N.T. Wright, the Gospels? I doubt it.

  Secondly, to Teachhead’s point: I would put the historicity and facts of Christianity up against any philosophy and any other religion. The “dissection” doesn’t scare me one bit. Truth never has to be frightened of investigation. Truth always withstands the greatest interrogations.

  As to his plethora of un-unique birth and resurrection stories, isn’t it interesting he doesn’t mention a single one–simply states that they exist. And even if there are numerous birth and resurrection myths, how many of those “mythical beings” are at the center of a worshipping body in the hundreds of millions? Perhaps what makes Christ’s resurrection story “unique” is that it’s the only one that actually happened, the only one that could fan into flame a faith and a following individually and corporately that has outlasted all others and still growing today. If Apollo or Zeus were truly sitting on the throne of Heaven, I imagine we’d still be worshi

• Which 80 Prominent Republicans Just Signed a Legal Brief Proclaiming Gay Marriage Is a Constitutional Right?

  February 27, 2013 at 11:32am

  There have been a number of comments about constitutionally defined marriage and biblical marriage. This is a smoke and mirrors/splitting hairs comparison. It’s like completely disavowing american pizza’s origins in Italy. Irrespective of what we as a nation think we mean by “marriage”, it’s origins are biblical. Period. God instituted marriage between a man and a woman, and the concept wouldn’t even exist without Him. You cannot legislate against people sinning. We all have the freedom in this country to live how we choose. But by the same token, you cannot legislate in order to make sin acceptable. You can drink all you want, but you’ll be arrested if you drive intoxicated. You can burn with murderous thoughts in your soul, but you’ll spend life in prison if you kill someone. You can covet all you want, but you’ll be convicted if you steal. People may think they have evolved on this issue, but it’s really been a devolution, a caving into pressure as this minority screams its loudest. Was this an issue even 100 years ago? Of course not. Weren’t there homosexuals 100 year ago? Of course! But the demarkation that separates wrong from right was absolutely clear. That line has been allowed to be blurred, and now we think we’re dealing with a “difficult issue.” It’s not difficult at all. It’s based on truth and is just as clear as it was 100 years ago. “We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God.” 2Cor 10:5

• Gallup: Here Are the Most ‘Conservative’ & ‘Liberal’ States

  February 2, 2013 at 12:05am

  So wait….how did Romney lose the election? All the conservative numbers are higher than the states with liberal numbers. Oh, right….remember that one district in Ohio where Romney didn’t get a SINGLE VOTE??? Anyone ever look into that?? Not really convinced he got into the White House legally….

• MSNBC Host: ‘I Thank God and Country…Abortion Was There to Save Me’

  January 26, 2013 at 1:19am

  Horrific!!!!! Talk about scales on the eyes of the lost!!! It is inconceivable that his thought is even conceived as rationale!!!