User Profile: brovet


Member Since: May 04, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [6] May 2, 2016 at 1:38pm

    He defamed this poor guy and I hope the guy (and his attorney) puts 50 out of his mansion and into a trailer. What a complete jerk!

  • [4] May 1, 2016 at 10:49am

    The Russians show a lot more national pride than folks do in our country. That Russian soldier had courage and displayed honor!

    Responses (2) +
  • [-1] April 24, 2016 at 5:23pm

    Michael Brown was a strong-armed robber who, attacked a police officer and attempted to take the officer’s weapon. The riot was based upon a lie pushed forward by libs and the media. A riot that was based upon the fact that a thug was killed while advancing on a police officer but we never heard an apology from any lib or media representative.

  • April 23, 2016 at 7:25am

    This is why cops are forced to sometimes use various degrees of force on suspects because they do not obey the officer’s commands. If this officer had been forced to shoot this suspect, there would be riots but the cop in this instance, who was injured, will be forgotten. Time folks to look at how these regretful use of force incidents begin!

  • [4] April 22, 2016 at 8:41am

    This guy is correct. All anyone has to do is place the word, “white” in place of “black” or “colored” and imagine the reaction of the media. “White Caucus” in Congress? They would be run out of town. “National Association for the Advancement of White People”? The would be investigated. “White College Fund”? They would loose their IRS non-profit status. Of course any group that advances one race over another is racists. It is not even arguable.
    Anyone who does not agree would be a “denier”! Kind of like the rationale the left uses in Global Warming.

  • [2] April 13, 2016 at 9:35am

    This guy was not shot for leading police on a dangerous police chase, he was not shot for pulling over after the dangerous police chase, he was shot for struggling with the officer over the officer’s firearm. Now, if this suspect had been able to turn the pistol and shoot the cop, we would never have heard of this case but because the suspect is black and the officer is white, we have the media jumping on this case. In almost every case where we have a black perp shot and the case is publicized, the suspect does something illegal to start the ball rolling and then other, more aggressive actions follow that leads to a shooting.

    All these folks have to do is comply with the orders of the police and nothing would happen.

  • [8] April 12, 2016 at 12:20pm

    This is another uninformed lib. Gun purchases through an on-line dealer require the same background check as a walk-in store would require. There is no difference. If this dumb lib does not want to own a gun, then she does not have to but she needs to get informed about the subject prior to making absurd statements!

  • April 12, 2016 at 7:32am

    Kinda sounds like when Whoppi Goldberg’s boyfriend thought the black-face would be funny. That did not work out either…

  • [10] April 11, 2016 at 7:27am

    Wait a minute; shouldn’t the Black Lives Matter group be making hay about this crime? Sorry, I forgot, they don’t care about black on black crime because they are racists.

  • [1] April 11, 2016 at 7:24am

    Talk about a “racist”! White folks built this country and have every right to be here in all their whiteness! White folks have made mistakes that were the norm during the time the mistakes were made but a lot of white blood was shed in bringing rights to non-whites.

  • [1] April 9, 2016 at 3:36pm

    Another proposed “control’ thing. Folks who do not vote, do not deserve to vote and they should not complain about election results but for Obama to even suggest mandatory voting shows he is totalitarian!

  • April 9, 2016 at 11:55am

    Could have been two assailants. Often, the media confuses, “innocent” with ,”insufficient evidence”. The bite marks are compelling but that alone is insufficient to convict a person. However, this person may have participated in the crime.

  • April 9, 2016 at 7:50am

    Thing is, libs do not care if an officer is injured by an armed citizen as long as the officer does not shoot early enough to avoid injury. That is the fact of police shootings. Folks have to start analyzing the actions of the person shot by the cops before demonizing the police. If a person is approaching the officer with an edged weapon, then the point of no return for the officer is 21 feet. When the suspect gets within the 21 foot circle, while advancing on an officer, the officer will likely be cut.

  • [4] April 7, 2016 at 7:32am

    More lib totalitarianism!

  • [3] April 7, 2016 at 7:29am

    If the woman who did the recording does not live in a “single party consent state”, then she just committed a serious felony.

    Responses (1) +
  • [8] April 6, 2016 at 10:58am

    Gotta love the libs who think with their hearts and not their heads! This boy will never be over the nightmare he has been through and why? Because libs do not care about the rights of the citizens in their countries, but do care about advocating for relocation of criminals and terrorists in their countries (including BO bringing them here).

    Responses (1) +
  • April 6, 2016 at 8:24am

    This Administration and the Libs in general have gone to great lengths to take away the property rights of the individual. They are forcing property owners to rent to folks who have demonstrated that they are criminals and cannot be trusted. They have trampled on the religious rights of Christians. They are fascists who believe the end justifies the means!

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] April 5, 2016 at 9:57am

    What she just stated was a “terrorist threat”, which is a crime in just about every state. Further, if anyone takes action on the recommended threat, then the rapper is criminally and civilly liable. I think Palin should sue and bankrupt this idiot!

    Responses (1) +
  • [7] April 4, 2016 at 1:53pm

    This bill will be great for the robot business. Say, “Good-bye!” to all those minimum wage jobs.

  • [11] April 3, 2016 at 11:11am

    If the government wants to deprive the farmer of his land then they should have to pay the farmer for his losses. The government cannot take someone’s property without reimbursement.

    Responses (3) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love