Wow, mocking a person mocking you. Difference is that your’s is simply a personal attack that doesn’t have any logic to it or point to it. You couldn’t do a better job of showing people how much of a moron you are if you tried.
 February 24, 2015 at 9:27am
They will get even lower. After all, it is the logical conclusion if one is to believe in evolution. The question to them then isn’t why, but why not.
Yes, it will get much worse.
February 20, 2015 at 8:25am
Geez, Kron, why not just think for yourself? Use your brains instead of your feelings.
 February 19, 2015 at 8:47am
And yet, meat, Trump is still so much more successful than you can ever dream to be.
Even with that, you still have the ignorance to try to vilify. It’s no fun looking into the mirror, is it?
 February 19, 2015 at 8:31am
You seem to totally ignore the obvious. Of course, you chastise one side, but not the other. The question is why don’t you see other human beings as equals? Do you speak out equally against the “black” message?
We are all equal and should be treated equally and we should have the same reaction regardless of who is behaving badly. Otherwise, we don’t truly believe what we say we believe.
 February 17, 2015 at 2:54pm
It’s like talking to a fence post, isn’t it desert?
February 17, 2015 at 9:03am
Where to begin. I’ll just pick one.
“What effect do you think the death penalty really has on them then? Certainly NOT as a deterrent – right?”
Zap has no ability to come to any rational thought as proven by this comment. Totally ignores the fact that it keeps that particular offender from ever committing another crime. But past that, offers no rational thought on why it couldn’t possibly be a deterrent, just declares that it can’t.
Your concern for the innocent is commendable, but your position only guarantees that the guilty are not only not punished, but are available to commit future crimes. So you throw rational thought down the drain to prop up your feelings which are on full display from your last comment on how you really don’t want a discussion on the death penalty. People who are on shaky footing rarely want their delusions exposed. They even tend to get angry.
And to even address your first question, Yes, laws only affect the law abiding “IF” the law isn’t enforced. That’s the rub, isn’t it. You claim to want the law, but then piss your pants when they are enforced and you find an overwhelming number of your precious preferred people incarcerated. You talk out of both sides of your mouth.
[-4] February 16, 2015 at 4:43pm
Good luck with that. If you could keep the commandments, Christ wouldn’t have had to be crucified.
 February 16, 2015 at 4:22pm
Just read it Prof, and you’ll answer your own question.
 February 13, 2015 at 7:53am
The entire post is evidence of one who does not use thinking to arrive at the truth. You reference thinking as any idea necessary to hold to an ideology. It might make you feel good, but in the end, you’re just wrong.
 February 4, 2015 at 8:54am
Good grief, Mil. Get over your Ventura man crush.
I don’t know the truth about him and Kyle, but he’s outing himself with his own mouth and you seem bent on doing the same thing.
January 20, 2015 at 8:45am
Penal Code. I see what they did there.
 January 8, 2015 at 8:24am
Great. Now this guy needs to ask himself why he couldn’t understand this before. It’s not rocket science.
The guy was a professional victim. For the first time in his life he had to take off the victim hat when he took the roll of LE. I'm not surprised this took place in Sheriff Joe's department. Common sense wins!!
WILLFUL IGNORANCE !
I believe he suffered from Armchair Quaterback Syndrome. A common affliction in this country.
No, its not rocket science. A person really must REFUSE to understand something so fundamental and instead embrace the narrative that best suits his agenda. I think I detected a somewhat 'sheepish' smile on his face toward the end as he was explaining his new appreciation for how quickly decisions have to be made.
Simple -- like most liberals, he was blinded by hate.
No, it's not rocket science, but unless you've been in that type of situation or gone through that type of training you don't truly understand the police side of it. It's a whole lot different looking in from outside than it is being in that situation.
 January 1, 2015 at 3:44pm
Only problem, Tired, is you seem to desire to follow and know some parts of scripture, but totally ignore the vast majority of it. His love and mercy cannot violate His justice. He’s Holy.
The Bible is either true or it isn’t. Do we just ignore the parts that are uncomfortable?
 December 27, 2014 at 10:35pm
Obviously, we had the same father.
And, yes, Blessed is the word.
 December 27, 2014 at 5:25pm
Yep. “Do not participate in the evil deeds of darkness, instead even expose them.” Eph 5:11
 December 27, 2014 at 11:06am
Uh, no and no.
You really are blind.
 December 25, 2014 at 8:05pm
“You shouldn’t say that because not everyone celebrates Christmas”
Then wear a sign so everyone knows you are a jerk.
Personally, I don’t care if you celebrate Christmas……I celebrate Christ and will say so.
She should've told him, "I Hope you find your joy anyway. Somewhere!"
Seems like he should've wore his 'rainy cloud over his head' hat so everyone would know he was Scrooge-ing. And you've got two options. 1) steer clear of him or 2) pester the hell out of him, make him earn that 'rainy cloud' hat.
LOL! Excellent! Here's your sign!
Absolutely, Brutel. We celebrate Christ and will say so. If they don't like it, tough.
 December 23, 2014 at 11:15am
Yes, the Soviets used to use this line of intimidation to push their agenda.
Unfortunately, you’ve had many, many years of the things you say are good, but we’ve seen education levels decline. You simply refuse to see the correlation and revert to the old Soviet tactics. You’re a good Comrade.
 December 23, 2014 at 11:00am
Sorry, Sambo, but I think you are wrong.
You gloss over the “arrest” part to jump to rationalize the “resisting” part. Start by accepting “don’t commit crimes” and then accept “do not resist arrest” or else nothing else matters.
If you were a Marine, as you claim, please tell me what would happen if as a boot, you figured your better to decide which lawful orders to follow and which not to follow?
This was a matter of a person who was more interested in doing as he pleased on a repeating pattern than caring about what was right or wrong and the natural laws of decisions have consequences finally caught up with him. Trying to argue otherwise only makes the arguer look foolish.
If you want to hold that the officers maneuver was wrong, fine. But try to keep the two things separate and deal with each separate.